Conformational investigation of the asymmetric periplasmic domains of E. coli LptB2FGC using SDSL CW EPR spectroscopy.

The majority of pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria benefit from intrinsic antibiotic resistance, attributed primarily to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) coating of the bacterial envelope. To effectively coat the bacterial cell envelope, LPS is transported from the inner membrane by the LPS transport (Lpt) system, which comprises seven distinct Lpt proteins, LptA-G, that form a stable protein bridge spanning the periplasm to connect the inner and outer membranes. The driving force of this process, LptB2FG, is an asymmetric ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter with a novel architecture and function that ejects LPS from the inner membrane and facilitates transfer to the periplasmic bridge. Here, we utilize site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to probe conformational differences between the periplasmic domains of LptF and LptG. We show that LptC solely interacts with the edge ß-strand of LptF and does not directly interact with LptG. We also quantify the interaction of periplasmic LptC with LptF. Additionally, we show that LPS cannot enter the protein complex externally, supporting the unidirectional LPS transport model. Furthermore, we present our findings that the presence of LPS within the LptB2FGC binding cavity and the membrane reconstitution environment affect the structural orientation of the periplasmic domains of LptF and LptG, but overall are relatively fixed with respect to one another. This study will provide insight into the structural asymmetry associated with the newly defined type VI ABC transporter class.

A non-GPCR-binding partner interacts with a novel surface on ß-arrestin1 to mediate GPCR signaling.

The multifaceted adaptor protein ß-arr1 (ß-arrestin1) promotes activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) by the chemokine receptor CXCR4, facilitating chemotaxis. This function of ß-arr1 requires the assistance of the adaptor protein STAM1 (signal-transducing adaptor molecule 1) because disruption of the interaction between STAM1 and ß-arr1 reduces CXCR4-mediated activation of FAK and chemotaxis. To begin to understand the mechanism by which ß-arr1 together with STAM1 activates FAK, we used site-directed spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy-based studies coupled with bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based cellular studies to show that STAM1 is recruited to activated ß-arr1 by binding to a novel surface on ß-arr1 at the base of the finger loop, at a site that is distinct from the receptor-binding site. Expression of a STAM1-deficient binding ß-arr1 mutant that is still able to bind to CXCR4 significantly reduced CXCL12-induced activation of FAK but had no impact on ERK-1/2 activation. We provide evidence of a novel surface at the base of the finger loop that dictates non-GPCR interactions specifying ß-arrestin-dependent signaling by a GPCR. This surface might represent a previously unidentified switch region that engages with effector molecules to drive ß-arrestin signaling.

High-pressure EPR spectroscopy studies of the E. coli lipopolysaccharide transport proteins LptA and LptC.

The use of pressure is an advantageous approach to the study of protein structure and dynamics because it can shift the equilibrium populations of protein conformations toward higher energy states that are not of sufficient population to be observable at atmospheric pressure. Recently, the Hubbell group at the University of California, Los Angeles, reintroduced the application of high pressure to the study of proteins by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. This methodology is possible using X-band EPR spectroscopy due to advances in pressure intensifiers, sample cells, and resonators. In addition to the commercial availability of the pressure generation and sample cells by Pressure Biosciences Inc., a five-loop-four-gap resonator required for the initial high pressure EPR spectroscopy experiments by the Hubbell group, and those reported here, was designed by James S. Hyde and built and modified at the National Biomedical EPR Center. With these technological advances, we determined the effect of pressure on the essential periplasmic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) transport protein from Escherichia coli, LptA, and one of its binding partners, LptC. LptA unfolds from the N-terminus to the C-terminus, binding of LPS does not appreciably stabilize the protein under pressure, and monomeric LptA unfolds somewhat more readily than oligomeric LptA upon pressurization to 2 kbar. LptC exhibits a fold and relative lack of stability upon LPS binding similar to LptA, yet adopts an altered, likely monomeric, folded conformation under pressure with only its C-terminus unraveling. The pressure-induced changes likely correlate with functional changes associated with binding and transport of LPS.

Full engagement of liganded maltose-binding protein stabilizes a semi-open ATP-binding cassette dimer in the maltose transporter.

MalFGK2 is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter that mediates the uptake of maltose/maltodextrins into Escherichia coli. A periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP) delivers maltose to the transmembrane subunits (MalFG) and stimulates the ATPase activity of the cytoplasmic nucleotide-binding subunits (MalK dimer). This MBP-stimulated ATPase activity is independent of maltose for purified transporter in detergent micelles. However, when the transporter is reconstituted in membrane bilayers, only the liganded form of MBP efficiently stimulates its activity. To investigate the mechanism of maltose stimulation, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to study the interactions between the transporter and MBP in nanodiscs and in detergent. We found that full engagement of both lobes of maltose-bound MBP unto MalFGK2 is facilitated by nucleotides and stabilizes a semi-open MalK dimer. Maltose-bound MBP promotes the transition to the semi-open state of MalK when the transporter is in the membrane, whereas such regulation does not require maltose in detergent. We suggest that stabilization of the semi-open MalK2 conformation by maltose-bound MBP is key to the coupling of maltose transport to ATP hydrolysis in vivo, because it facilitates the progression of the MalK dimer from the open to the semi-open conformation, from which it can proceed to hydrolyze ATP.

Site-directed spin labeling reveals pentameric ligand-gated ion channel gating motions.

Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) are neurotransmitter-activated receptors that mediate fast synaptic transmission. In pLGICs, binding of agonist to the extracellular domain triggers a structural rearrangement that leads to the opening of an ion-conducting pore in the transmembrane domain and, in the continued presence of neurotransmitter, the channels desensitize (close). The flexible loops in each subunit that connect the extracellular binding domain (loops 2, 7, and 9) to the transmembrane channel domain (M2-M3 loop) are essential for coupling ligand binding to channel gating. Comparing the crystal structures of two bacterial pLGIC homologues, ELIC and the proton-activated GLIC, suggests channel gating is associated with rearrangements in these loops, but whether these motions accurately predict the motions in functional lipid-embedded pLGICs is unknown. Here, using site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and functional GLIC channels reconstituted into liposomes, we examined if, and how far, the loops at the ECD/TMD gating interface move during proton-dependent gating transitions from the resting to desensitized state. Loop 9 moves ∼9 Šinward toward the channel lumen in response to proton-induced desensitization. Loop 9 motions were not observed when GLIC was in detergent micelles, suggesting detergent solubilization traps the protein in a nonactivatable state and lipids are required for functional gating transitions. Proton-induced desensitization immobilizes loop 2 with little change in position. Proton-induced motion of the M2-M3 loop was not observed, suggesting its conformation is nearly identical in closed and desensitized states. Our experimentally derived distance measurements of spin-labeled GLIC suggest ELIC is not a good model for the functional resting state of GLIC, and that the crystal structure of GLIC does not correspond to a desensitized state. These findings advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying pLGIC gating.

Identification of receptor binding-induced conformational changes in non-visual arrestins.

The non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, belong to a small family of multifunctional cytosolic proteins. Non-visual arrestins interact with hundreds of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate GPCR desensitization by binding active phosphorylated GPCRs and uncoupling them from heterotrimeric G proteins. Recently, non-visual arrestins have been shown to mediate G protein-independent signaling by serving as adaptors and scaffolds that assemble multiprotein complexes. By recruiting various partners, including trafficking and signaling proteins, directly to GPCRs, non-visual arrestins connect activated receptors to diverse signaling pathways. To investigate arrestin-mediated signaling, a structural understanding of arrestin activation and interaction with GPCRs is essential. Here we identified global and local conformational changes in the non-visual arrestins upon binding to the model GPCR rhodopsin. To detect conformational changes, pairs of spin labels were introduced into arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, and the interspin distances in the absence and presence of the receptor were measured by double electron electron resonance spectroscopy. Our data indicate that both non-visual arrestins undergo several conformational changes similar to arrestin-1, including the finger loop moving toward the predicted location of the receptor in the complex as well as the C-tail release upon receptor binding. The arrestin-2 results also suggest that there is no clam shell-like closure of the N- and C-domains and that the loop containing residue 136 (homolog of 139 in arrestin-1) has high flexibility in both free and receptor-bound states.

EPR spectroscopy of MolB2C2-a reveals mechanism of transport for a bacterial type II molybdate importer.

In bacteria, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are vital for the uptake of nutrients and cofactors. Based on differences in structure and activity, ABC importers are divided into two types. Type I transporters have been well studied and employ a tightly regulated alternating access mechanism. Less is known about Type II importers, but much of what we do know has been observed in studies of the vitamin B12 importer BtuC2D2. MolB2C2 (formally known as HI1470/71) is also a Type II importer, but its substrate, molybdate, is ∼10-fold smaller than vitamin B12. To understand mechanistic differences among Type II importers, we focused our studies on MolBC, for which alternative conformations may be required to transport its relatively small substrate. To investigate the mechanism of MolBC, we employed disulfide cross-linking and EPR spectroscopy. From these studies, we found that nucleotide binding is coupled to a conformational shift at the periplasmic gate. Unlike the larger conformational changes in BtuCD-F, this shift in MolBC-A is akin to unlocking a swinging door: allowing just enough space for molybdate to slip into the cell. The lower cytoplasmic gate, identified in BtuCD-F as "gate I," remains open throughout the MolBC-A mechanism, and cytoplasmic gate II closes in the presence of nucleotide. Combining our results, we propose a peristaltic mechanism for MolBC-A, which gives new insight in the transport of small substrates by a Type II importer.

Self-association of arrestin family members.

Mammals express four arrestin subtypes, three of which have been shown to self-associate. Cone photoreceptor-specific arrestin-4 is the only one that is a constitutive monomer. Visual arrestin-1 forms tetramers both in crystal and in solution, but the shape of its physiologically relevant solution tetramer is very different from that in the crystal. The biological role of the self-association of arrestin-1, expressed at very high levels in rod and cone photoreceptors, appears to be protective, reducing the concentration of cytotoxic monomers. The two nonvisual arrestin subtypes are highly homologous, and self-association of both is facilitated by IP6, yet they form dramatically different oligomers. Arrestin-2 apparently self-associates into "infinite" chains, very similar to those observed in IP6-soaked crystals, where IP6 connects the concave sides of the N- and C-domains of adjacent protomers. In contrast, arrestin-3 only forms dimers, in which IP6 likely connects the C-domains of two arrestin-3 molecules. Thus, each of the three self-associating arrestins does it in its own way, forming three different types of oligomers. The physiological role of the oligomerization of arrestin-1 and both nonvisual arrestins might be quite different, and in each case it remains to be definitively elucidated.

Residues within the LptC transmembrane helix are critical for Escherichia coli LptB2 FG ATPase regulation.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis in Gram-negative bacteria is completed at the outer leaflet of the inner membrane (IM). Following synthesis, seven LPS transport (Lpt) proteins facilitate the movement of LPS to the outer membrane (OM), an essential process that if disrupted at any stage has lethal effects on bacterial viability. LptB2 FG, the IM component of the Lpt bridge system, is a type VI ABC transporter that provides the driving force for LPS extraction from the IM and subsequent transport across a stable protein bridge to the outer leaflet of the OM. LptC is a periplasmic protein anchored to the IM by a single transmembrane (TM) helix intercalating within the lateral gate formed by LptF TM5 and LptG TM1. LptC facilitates the hand-off of LPS from LptB2 FG to the periplasmic protein LptA and has been shown to regulate the ATPase activity of LptB2 FG. Here, using an engineered chromosomal knockout system in Escherichia coli to assess the effects of LptC mutations in vivo, we identified six partial loss of function LptC mutations in the first unbiased alanine screen of this essential protein. To investigate the functional effects of these mutations, nanoDSF (differential scanning fluorimetry) and site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy in combination with an in vitro ATPase assay show that specific residues in the TM helix of LptC destabilize the LptB2 FGC complex and regulate the ATPase activity of LptB.

Multisite Phosphorylation Regulates GpsB Function in Cephalosporin Resistance of Enterococcus faecalis.

Enterococci are normal human commensals and major causes of hospital-acquired infections. Enterococcal infections can be difficult to treat because enterococci harbor intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance, such as resistance to cephalosporins. In Enterococcus faecalis, the transmembrane kinase IreK, a member of the bacterial PASTA kinase family, is essential for cephalosporin resistance. The activity of IreK is boosted by the cytoplasmic protein GpsB, which promotes IreK autophosphorylation and signaling to drive cephalosporin resistance. A previous phosphoproteomics study identified eight putative IreK-dependent phosphorylation sites on GpsB, but the functional importance of GpsB phosphorylation was unknown. Here we used genetic and biochemical approaches to define three sites of phosphorylation on GpsB that functionally impact IreK activity and cephalosporin resistance. Phosphorylation at two sites (S80 and T84) serves to impair the ability of GpsB to activate IreK in vivo, suggesting phosphorylation of these sites acts as a means of negative feedback for IreK. The third site of phosphorylation (T133) occurs in a segment of GpsB termed the C-terminal extension that is unique to enterococcal GpsB homologs. The C-terminal extension is highly mobile in solution, suggesting it is largely unstructured, and phosphorylation of T133 appears to enable efficient phosphorylation at S80 / T84. Overall our results are consistent with a model in which multisite phosphorylation of GpsB impairs its ability to activate IreK, thereby diminishing signal transduction through the IreK-dependent pathway and modulating phenotypic cephalosporin resistance.

Conformational changes in the activation loop of a bacterial PASTA kinase.

Many bacterial genomes encode a transmembrane protein kinase belonging to the PASTA kinase family, which controls numerous processes in diverse bacterial pathogens, including antibiotic resistance, cell division, stress resistance, toxin production, and virulence. PASTA kinases share a conserved three-part domain architecture, consisting of an extracellular PASTA domain, proposed to sense the peptidoglycan layer status, a single transmembrane helix, and an intracellular Ser/Thr kinase domain. The crystal structures of the kinase domain from two homologous PASTA kinases reveal a characteristic two-lobed structure typical of eukaryotic protein kinases with a centrally located, but unresolved, activation loop that becomes phosphorylated and regulates downstream signaling pathways. We previously identified three sites of phosphorylation on the activation loop (T163, T166, and T168) of IreK, a PASTA kinase from the pathogen Enterococcus faecalis, as well as a distal phosphorylation site (T218) that each influence IreK activity in vivo. Still, the mechanism by which loop phosphorylation regulates PASTA kinase function is yet unknown. Therefore, we utilized site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) and continuous wave (CW) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to assess the E. faecalis IreK kinase activation loop dynamics, including the effects of phosphorylation on activation loop motion, and the IreK-IreB interaction. Our results reveal that the IreK activation loop occupies a more immobile state when dephosphorylated, and that loop autophosphorylation shifts the loop to a more mobile state that can then enable interaction with IreB, a known substrate.

Binding and transport of LPS occurs through the coordinated combination of an array of sites across the entire Escherichia coli LPS transport protein LptA.

The outer leaflet of the outer membrane (OM) of bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other important pathogens is largely composed of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is essential to nearly all Gram-negative bacteria. LPS is transported to the outer leaflet of the OM through a yet unknown mechanism by seven proteins that comprise the LPS transport system. LptA, the only entirely periplasmic Lpt protein, bridges the periplasmic space between the IM LptB2 FGC and the OM LptDE complexes. LptA is postulated to protect the hydrophobic acyl chains of LPS as it crosses the hydrophilic periplasm, is essential to cell viability, and contains many conserved residues distributed across the protein. To identify which side chains are required for function of E. coli LptA in vivo, we performed a systematic, unbiased, high-throughput screen of the effect of 172 single alanine substitutions on cell viability utilizing an engineered BL21 derivative with a chromosomal knockout of the lptA gene. Remarkably, LptA is highly tolerant to amino acid substitution with alanine. Only four alanine mutants could not complement the chromosomal knockout; CD spectroscopy showed that these substitutions resulted in proteins with significantly altered secondary structure. In addition, 29 partial loss-of-function mutants were identified that led to OM permeability defects; interestingly, these sites were solely located within ß-strands of the central core of the protein and each resulted in misfolding of the protein. Therefore, no single residue within LptA is responsible for LPS binding, supporting previous EPR spectroscopy data indicating that sites across the entire protein work in concert to bind and transport LPS.

Few residues within an extensive binding interface drive receptor interaction and determine the specificity of arrestin proteins.

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated forms of G protein-coupled receptors, terminating G protein activation, orchestrating receptor trafficking, and redirecting signaling to alternative pathways. Visual arrestin-1 preferentially binds rhodopsin, whereas the two non-visual arrestins interact with hundreds of G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Here we show that an extensive surface on the concave side of both arrestin-2 domains is involved in receptor binding. We also identified a small number of residues on the receptor binding surface of the N- and C-domains that largely determine the receptor specificity of arrestins. We show that alanine substitution of these residues blocks the binding of arrestin-1 to rhodopsin in vitro and of arrestin-2 and -3 to ß2-adrenergic, M2 muscarinic cholinergic, and D2 dopamine receptors in intact cells, suggesting that these elements critically contribute to the energy of the interaction. Thus, in contrast to arrestin-1, where direct phosphate binding is crucial, the interaction of non-visual arrestins with their cognate receptors depends to a lesser extent on phosphate binding and more on the binding to non-phosphorylated receptor elements.

Probing Protein Secondary Structure using EPR: Investigating a Dynamic Region of Visual Arrestin.

One key application of site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is the determination of sequence-specific secondary structure in proteins. Regular secondary structure leads to a periodic variation in both side chain motion and solvent accessibility, two properties easily monitored by EPR techniques. Specifically, saturation recovery (SR) EPR spectroscopy has proven to be useful for making accessibility measurements for multiple protein structure populations by determining individual accessibilities and is therefore well suited to study the structure of proteins exhibiting multiple conformations in equilibrium. Here we employ both continuous wave and SR EPR spectroscopy in combination to examine the secondary structure of a short sequence showing conformational heterogeneity in visual rod arrestin. The EPR data presented here clearly distinguish between the unstructured loop and the helical structure formed in the crystallographic tetramer of visual arrestin and show that this region is unstructured in solution.

Use of Site-Directed Spin Labeling EPR Spectroscopy to Study Protein-LPS Interactions.

Site-directed spin labeling EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) spectroscopy is a technique used to identify the local conformational changes at a specific residue of interest within a purified protein in response to a ligand. Here, we describe the site-directed spin labeling EPR spectroscopy methodology to monitor changes in the side-chain motion in soluble lipopolysaccharide transport proteins upon the addition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). A comparison of the spectral overlays of the spin-labeled protein in the absence and presence of LPS provides a qualitative visualization of how LPS binding affects the motion of each spin-labeled site tested within the protein. No change in the spectral lineshapes of a spin-labeled protein in the absence and presence of LPS indicates that the site is not affected by LPS binding, while differences in the spectral lineshapes indicate that LPS does affect the mobility of the spin label side chain within the protein structure. This is a powerful readout of conformational changes at specific residues of interest that can be used to identify a specific site as a reporter of changes induced by ligand binding and to map out the effects of ligand binding through an array of reporter sites within a protein. With the use of AquaStar tubing, protein concentrations as low as 2 µM allow for up to a 100-fold excess of LPS. This methodology may also be applied to other protein-ligand or protein-protein interactions with minor adaptations.

The Two Non-Visual Arrestins Engage ERK2 Differently.

Arrestin binding to active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors terminates G protein coupling and initiates another wave of signaling. Among the effectors that bind directly to receptor-associated arrestins are extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), which promote cellular proliferation and survival. Arrestins may also engage ERK1/2 in isolation in a pre- or post-signaling complex that is likely in equilibrium with the full signal initiation complex. Molecular details of these binary complexes remain unknown. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms whereby arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 (a.k.a. ß-arrestin1 and ß-arrestin2, respectively) engage ERK1/2 in pairwise interactions. We find that purified arrestin-3 binds ERK2 more avidly than arrestin-2. A combination of biophysical techniques and peptide array analysis demonstrates that the molecular basis in this difference of binding strength is that the two non-visual arrestins bind ERK2 via different parts of the molecule. We propose a structural model of the ERK2-arrestin-3 complex in solution using size-exclusion chromatography coupled to small angle X-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS). This binary complex exhibits conformational heterogeneity. We speculate that this drives the equilibrium either toward the full signaling complex with receptor-bound arrestin at the membrane or toward full dissociation in the cytoplasm. As ERK1/2 regulates cell migration, proliferation, and survival, understanding complexes that relate to its activation could be exploited to control cell fate.

Effects of the L511P and D512G mutations on the Escherichia coli ABC transporter MsbA.

MsbA is a member of the ABC transporter superfamily and is homologous to ABC transporters linked to multidrug resistance. The nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) of these proteins include conserved motifs that are involved in ATP binding, including conserved SALD residues (D-loop) that are diagnostic in identifying ABC transporters but whose roles have not been identified. Within the D-loop, single point mutations L511P and D512G were discovered by random mutational analysis of MsbA to disrupt protein function in the cell [Polissi, A., and Georgopoulos, C. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 20, 1221-1233] but have not been further studied in MsbA or in detail in any other ABC transporter. In these studies, we show that both L511P and D512G mutants of MsbA are able to bind ATP at near-wild-type levels but are unable to maintain cell viability in an in vivo growth assay, verifying the theory that they are dysfunctional at some point after ATP binding. An ATPase assay further suggests that the L511P mutation prevents effective ATP hydrolysis, and an ATP detection assay reveals that only small amounts of ATP are hydrolyzed; D512G is able to hydrolyze ATP at a rate 3-fold faster than that of the wild type. EPR spectroscopy studies using reporter sites within the NBDs also indicate that at least some hydrolysis occurs in L511P or D512G MsbA but show fewer spectral changes than observed for the same reporters in the wild-type background. These studies indicate that L511 is necessary for efficient ATP hydrolysis and D512 is essential for conformational rearrangements required for flipping lipid A.

Characterization of the E506Q and H537A dysfunctional mutants in the E. coli ABC transporter MsbA.

MsbA is a member of the ABC transporter superfamily that is specifically found in Gram-negative bacteria and is homologous to proteins involved in both bacterial and human drug resistance. The E506Q and H537A mutations have been introduced and used for crystallization of other members of the ABC transporter protein family, including BmrA and the ATPase domains MalK, HlyB-NBD, and MJ0796, but have not been previously studied in detail or investigated in the MsbA lipid A exporter. We utilized an array of biochemical and EPR spectroscopy approaches to characterize the local and global effects of these nucleotide binding domain mutations on the E. coli MsbA homodimer. The lack of cell viability in an in vivo growth assay confirms that the presence of the E506Q or H537A mutations within MsbA creates a dysfunctional protein. To further investigate the mode of dysfunction, a fluorescent ATP binding assay was used and showed that both mutant proteins maintain their ability to bind ATP, but ATPase assays indicate hydrolysis is severely inhibited by each mutation. EPR spectroscopy data using previously identified and characterized reporter sites within the nucleotide binding domain along with ATP detection assays show that hydrolysis does occur over time in both mutants, though more readily in the H537A protein. DEER spectroscopy demonstrates that both proteins studied are purified in a closed dimer conformation, indicating that events within the cell can induce a stable, closed conformation of the MsbA homodimer that does not reopen even in the absence of nucleotide.

Both maltose-binding protein and ATP are required for nucleotide-binding domain closure in the intact maltose ABC transporter.

The maltose transporter MalFGK(2) of Escherichia coli is a member of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily. A periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP) delivers maltose to MalFGK(2) and stimulates its ATPase activity. Site-directed spin labeling EPR spectroscopy was used to study the opening and closing of the nucleotide-binding interface of MalFGK(2) during the catalytic cycle. In the intact transporter, closure of the interface coincides not just with the binding of ATP, as seen with isolated nucleotide-binding domains, but requires both MBP and ATP, implying that MBP stimulates ATPase activity by promoting the closure of the nucleotide-binding interface. After ATP hydrolysis, with MgADP and MBP bound, the nucleotide-binding interface resides in a semi-open configuration distinct from the fully open configuration seen in the absence of any ligand. We propose that P(i) release coincides with the reorientation of transmembrane helices to an inward-facing conformation and the final step of maltose translocation into the cell.

An Eight Amino Acid Segment Controls Oligomerization and Preferred Conformation of the two Non-visual Arrestins.

G protein coupled receptors signal through G proteins or arrestins. A long-standing mystery in the field is why vertebrates have two non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3. These isoforms are ~75% identical and 85% similar; each binds numerous receptors, and appear to have many redundant functions, as demonstrated by studies of knockout mice. We previously showed that arrestin-3 can be activated by inositol-hexakisphosphate (IP6). IP6 interacts with the receptor-binding surface of arrestin-3, induces arrestin-3 oligomerization, and this oligomer stabilizes the active conformation of arrestin-3. Here, we compared the impact of IP6 on oligomerization and conformational equilibrium of the highly homologous arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 and found that these two isoforms are regulated differently. In the presence of IP6, arrestin-2 forms "infinite" chains, where each promoter remains in the basal conformation. In contrast, full length and truncated arrestin-3 form trimers and higher-order oligomers in the presence of IP6; we showed previously that trimeric state induces arrestin-3 activation (Chen et al., 2017). Thus, in response to IP6, the two non-visual arrestins oligomerize in different ways in distinct conformations. We identified an insertion of eight residues that is conserved across arrestin-2 homologs, but absent in arrestin-3 that likely accounts for the differences in the IP6 effect. Because IP6 is ubiquitously present in cells, this suggests physiological consequences, including differences in arrestin-2/3 trafficking and JNK3 activation. The functional differences between two non-visual arrestins are in part determined by distinct modes of their oligomerization. The mode of oligomerization might regulate the function of other signaling proteins.