A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium.

PURPOSE: Postoperative infectious related complications are not uncommon after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Previously, we noted that 7 days of antibiotics did not decrease sepsis rates compared to just perioperative antibiotics in a low risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy population. This study aimed to compare the same regimens in individuals at moderate to high risk for sepsis undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized in this multi-institutional study to either 2 days or 7 days of preoperative antibiotics. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had either a positive preoperative urine culture or existing indwelling urinary drainage tube. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients at 7 institutions were analyzed. There was no difference in sepsis rates between groups on univariate analysis. Similarly, there were no differences in nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. On multivariate analysis, 2 days of antibiotics increased the risk of sepsis compared to 7 days of antibiotics (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.9, p=0.031). Patients receiving antibiotics for 2 days had higher rates of staghorn calculus than the 7-day group (58% vs 32%, p=0.006) but post hoc subanalysis did not demonstrate increased sepsis in the staghorn only group. CONCLUSIONS: Giving 7 days of preoperative antibiotics vs 2 days decreases the risk of sepsis in moderate to high risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients. Future guidelines should consider infectious risk stratification for percutaneous nephrolithotomy antibiotic recommendations.

Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).

PURPOSE: The holmium-YAG (Ho:YAG) Laser system is the current gold standard for laser lithotripsy (LL). Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser (SPTF) has emerged as an effective alternative. We compared the temperature profile of both the 120 W Ho:YAG and the 60 W SPTF systems during ureteral lithotripsy. METHODS: Antegrade ureteroscopy with LL was performed in ex-vivo porcine kidneys with 3 mm Begostones. Intra-ureteral temperature was measured using one probe proximal and one distal to the site of lithotripsy. LL was performed using a 200 µm core fiber at dusting (SPTF-0.1 J, 200 Hz, SP; Ho:YAG-0.3 J, 70 Hz, LP) and fragmenting (0.8 J, 8 Hz, SP for both) settings for 5 s. Fifteen repetitions were recorded for each laser at each setting. Tissue samples of the ureter were collected for histological analysis. RESULTS: There was a rise in temperature at the site of lithotripsy using both systems at every setting evaluated. The median temperatures were greater for the SPTF on the fragmenting setting (33.3 °C vs 30.0 °C, p = 0.004). On the dusting setting, the median temperature was not statistically greater for Ho:YAG (40.6 °C vs 35.8 °C, p = 0.064), (Graphic 1). Histological analysis did not show any signs of injury or necrosis in any of the tested settings. CONCLUSION: Higher power settings used for dusting have a higher temperature rise in the ureter during lasering. Median ureteral intra-luminal temperature rise during LL was equivalent during dusting and higher in the SPTF during fragmentation, but neither reached the threshold for thermal injury based on the duration of exposure.

The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on the Development of Abnormal Postoperative Upper Tract Imaging after Ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths are commonly used during ureteroscopy to facilitate stone removal, improve visibility and maintain low intrarenal pressures. However, the use of a ureteral access sheath can cause ureteral wall ischemia and ureteral tears, potentially increasing the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture and obstruction. We studied the impact of ureteral access sheath use on postoperative imaging studies. Secondary objectives included studying the impact of other intraoperative parameters on postoperative imaging studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of cases that underwent ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis across 2 high volume institutions between January 2012 and September 2016. Patient demographics, cumulative stone size, operative time, use of ureteral access sheath, laser lithotripsy, basket extraction, preoperative ureteral stent and postoperative ureteral stent placement were extracted from the electronic medical record. Findings of followup renal ultrasound, kidney-ureter-bladder x-ray and/or computerized tomography at approximately 8 weeks after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 1,332 ureteroscopies were performed with 1,060 cases (79.6%) returning for routine upper tract imaging after ureteroscopy. Postoperative hydronephrosis was noted following 127 cases (12.0%). Factors predicting presence of hydronephrosis after ureteroscopy include lower body mass index (p=0.0016), greater cumulative stone size (p=0.0003), increased operative time (p <0.0001), preoperative ureteral stent (OR 1.49, p=0.0299) and postoperative ureteral stent placement (OR 6.43, p=0.0031). Postoperative hydronephrosis was not associated with use of ureteral access sheath, age, laser lithotripsy or basket extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ureteral access sheath did not have a significant impact on development of postoperative hydronephrosis, suggesting ureteral access sheath is safe for use during ureteroscopy. Ureteral strictures remain rare following ureteroscopy, seen in only 1.0% of our cohort. With an observed prevalence of hydronephrosis of 12.0% on followup imaging at 8 weeks, routine upper tract imaging after ureteroscopy remains a valuable prognostic tool.

Use of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission Due to Septic Shock after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have demonstrated that quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria may be more accurate than systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria to predict postoperative sepsis. In this study we evaluated the ability of these 2 criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study in 320 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a total of 8 institutions. The criteria for quick sequential organ failure assessment and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were collected 24 hours postoperatively. The study primary outcome was postoperative septic shock. Secondary outcomes included 30 and 90-day emergency department visits, and the hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: Three of the 320 patients (0.9%) met the criteria for postoperative septic shock. These 3 patients had positive criteria for quick sequential organ failure assessment and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Of the entire cohort 23 patients (7%) met quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria and 103 (32%) met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. Specificity for postoperative sepsis was significantly higher for quick sequential organ failure assessment than for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (93.3% vs 68.4%, McNemar test p <0.001). The positive predictive value was 13% for quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria and 2.9% for systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. On multivariate logistic regression systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria significantly predicted an increased probability of the patient receiving a transfusion (ß = 1.234, p <0.001). Positive quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria significantly predicted an increased probability of an emergency department visit within 30 days (ß = 1.495, p <0.05), operative complications (ß = 1.811, p <0.001) and transfusions (p <0.001). The main limitation of the study is that it was retrospective. CONCLUSIONS: Quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria were superior to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria to predict infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Medical dissolution therapy for the treatment of uric acid nephrolithiasis.

INTRODUCTION: Uric acid (UA) nephrolithiasis represents 10% of kidney stones in the US with low urine pH and high saturation of UA as the main risk factors for stone development. Dissolution therapy for UA kidney stones via urinary alkalization has been described as a treatment option. We present our experience in treating UA nephrolithiasis with medical dissolution therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of UA stone patients referred for surgery but treated with dissolution therapy between July 2007 and July 2016. Patients were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients were treated with potassium citrate alone or in combination with allopurinol. Serial imaging and urine pH were obtained at follow-up. Demographics, aggregate stone size, time to stone clearance, urine pH (office dip), and complications were recorded. RESULTS OBTAINED: Twenty-four patients (14 men and 10 women) were identified that started medical dissolution therapy for UA nephrolithiasis after initial referral for surgical management. Three patients (13%) did not tolerate the initiation of dissolution therapy and discontinued this treatment. Of the 21 patients that were maintained on dissolution therapy, 14 patients (67%) showed complete resolution of nephrolithiasis and 7 patients (33%) showed partial reduction. Patients with partial response had a mean reduction in stone burden of 68%. There were 3 recorded complications (UTI, GI upset with therapy, and throat irritation) and 4 recorded stone recurrences among these 21 patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our study population, medical dissolution therapy is a well-tolerated, non-invasive option for UA nephrolithiasis.

Supracostal access tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: minimizing complications.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Supracostal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) may be avoided due to concern for thoracic complications. The objective of the study is to report the safety and efficacy of supracostal access utilizing a tubeless (stent only) PCNL technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of perioperative outcomes of 70 patients (76 renal units) who underwent a supracostal tubeless PCNL. No nephrostomy tubes were left. All patients had a 7F ureteral stent and Foley catheter placed. The nephrostomy sheath was removed with the patient held in end-expiration, and the incision closed. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age was 62 (48.3-67) years. Median stone size was 20 × 21 mm, and 14 (18%) patients had complete staghorn stones. The upper calyx was the site of access in 52 (68.4%) cases. Access was above the 12th and 11th rib in 63 (83%) and 12 (16%) cases, respectively. Median (IQR) length of stay was 30 (28-32) hours. Fifty (68.5%) patients had no residual fragments (< 2 mm) on postoperative imaging. Eight (11%) patients underwent an ancillary procedure (7 URS and 1 ESWL), with an additional seven patients becoming stone free after this procedure (78%). Thoracic complications occurred in two (2.6%) patients: one small pneumothorax, and one pleural effusion, both managed conservatively. Other complications occurred in nine patients (11.8%): bleeding requiring transfusion (1), fever (4), urinary retention (2), and syncope (2). CONCLUSION: Compared to historical controls, our approach to upper tract PCNL utilizing a nephrostomy tube-free approach resulted in an overall low thoracic complication rate and facilitated hospital discharge.

Dusting versus Basketing during Ureteroscopy-Which Technique is More Efficacious? A Prospective Multicenter Trial from the EDGE Research Consortium.

PURPOSE: There is scant evidence in the literature to support dusting vs active basket extraction during ureteroscopy for kidney stones. We prospectively evaluated and followed patients to determine which modality produced a higher stone-free rate with the fewest complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence research consortium prospectively enrolled patients with a renal stone burden ranging from 5 to 20 mm in this study. A holmium laser was used and all patients were stented postoperatively. Ureteral access sheaths were used in 100% of basketing cases while sheaths were optional when dusting. The primary study outcome was the stone-free rate at 6 weeks as determined by x-ray and ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 84 and 75 patients were enrolled in the basketing and dusting arms, respectively. Stones in the dusting group were significantly larger (mean ± SD stone area 96.1 ± 65.3 vs 63.3 ± 46.0 mm2, p <0.001). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the basketing group on univariate analysis (74.3% vs 58.2%, p = 0.04) but not on multivariate analysis (1.9 OR, 95% CI 0.9-4.3, p = 0.11). In patients who underwent a basketing procedure operative time was 37.7 minutes longer than in those treated with a dusting procedure (95% CI 23.8-51.7, p <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, hospital readmissions or additional procedures between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The stone-free rate was higher for active basket retrieval of fragments at short-term followup on univariate analysis but not on multivariate analysis. There was no difference in postoperative complications or procedures. The 2 techniques should be in the armamentarium of the urologist.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered to be the first line of treatment for large renal stones. Though PCNL comes with higher morbidity, its efficacy is unbeaten by other minimally invasive modalities. However, potential complications, such as bleeding, occur. Improved skills and modifications of the procedure may reduce the probability of adverse outcomes. This article discusses the current trends and standards in PCNL technique with special focus on all important steps as positioning, access, instruments, dilation, disintegration, and exit, including outcomes, complication management, and training modalities.

Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills for Validation of Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills Tasks.

PURPOSE: The BLUS (Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills) consortium sought to address the construct validity of BLUS tasks and the wider problem of accurate, scalable and affordable skill evaluation by investigating the concordance of 2 novel candidate methods with faculty panel scores, those of automated motion metrics and crowdsourcing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A faculty panel of surgeons (5) and anonymous crowdworkers blindly reviewed a randomized sequence of a representative sample of 24 videos (12 pegboard and 12 suturing) extracted from the BLUS validation study (454) using the GOALS (Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) survey tool with appended pass-fail anchors via the same web based user interface. Pre-recorded motion metrics (tool path length, jerk cost etc) were available for each video. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's R and ROC with AUC statistics were used to evaluate concordance between continuous scores, and as pass-fail criteria among the 3 groups of faculty, crowds and motion metrics. RESULTS: Crowdworkers provided 1,840 ratings in approximately 48 hours, 60 times faster than the faculty panel. The inter-rater reliability of mean expert and crowd ratings was good (α=0.826). Crowd score derived pass-fail resulted in 96.9% AUC (95% CI 90.3-100; positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 89%). Motion metrics and crowd scores provided similar or nearly identical concordance with faculty panel ratings and pass-fail decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance of crowdsourcing with faculty panels and speed of reviews is sufficiently high to merit its further investigation alongside automated motion metrics. The overall agreement among faculty, motion metrics and crowdworkers provides evidence in support of the construct validity for 2 of the 4 BLUS tasks.

Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium.

PURPOSE: Fragments 4 mm or smaller after ureteroscopy historically have been considered clinically insignificant but there is a reported 20% event rate on followup even with stones 4 mm or smaller. In this study we examine the natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of fragments after ureteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 6 centers were collected retrospectively from members of the Endourology Disease Group for Excellence in 232 patients who had residual fragments after ureteroscopy between 2006 and 2013. Patients with fragment(s) of any size on imaging within 12 months were eligible. The primary outcome measured was stone events, and secondary outcomes included stone growth, stone passage, re-intervention and complications. RESULTS: Of the 232 subjects with fragments 131 (56%) required no further intervention and remained asymptomatic, 34 (15%) experienced complications requiring no intervention and 67 (29%) required intervention, ie the primary outcome stone event rate was 44%. Fragments larger than 4 mm were more likely to grow with time (p <0.001) and were associated with more complications (p=0.039). Fragments larger than 2 mm were more likely to grow (p <0.001) but were not associated with complications or re-intervention. Re-intervention was predictable based on fragment size (p=0.017). In a multivariable logistic regression model there was no significant difference between the techniques of dusting stones or basket extraction. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that fragment size larger than 4 mm after ureteroscopy is associated with significantly higher rates of stone growth, complications and the need for re-intervention. Ensuring complete stone-free status is the most effective strategy to reduce stone events after ureteroscopy.

Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks.

PURPOSE: Standardized assessment of laparoscopic skill in urology is lacking. We investigated whether the AUA (American Urological Association) BLUS (Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills) skill tasks are valid to address this need. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board approved study included 27 medical students, 42 urology residents, 18 fellows and 37 faculty urologists across 8 sites. Using the EDGE (Electronic Data Generation and Evaluation) device (Simulab, Seattle, Washington) 454 recordings were collected on peg transfer, pattern cutting, suturing and clip applying tasks, which together comprise the expert determined BLUS tasks. We collected synchronized video and tool motion data for each trial. For each task errors, time, path length, economy of motion, peak grasp force and EDGE score were collected. An expert panel of 5 faculty members performed GOALS (Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) evaluations on a representative subset of peg transfer and suturing skill tasks performed by 24 participants (IRR = 0.95). RESULTS: Demographically derived skill levels proved unsuitable to evaluate construct validity. Separation of mean scores by grouped skill levels was strongest for the suturing task. Objective motion metrics and errors supported construct validity vis-à-vis correlation with blinded expert video ratings (motion metrics R(2) = 0.95, p <0.01). Expert scores appeared to reward errors in suturing but not in block transfer. CONCLUSIONS: BLUS skill task performance scoring can discriminate among basic laparoscopic technical skill levels. Self-reported demographics are an unreliable source of determining laparoscopic technical skill.

Multi-Institutional Validation of an OSATS for the Assessment of Cystoscopic and Ureteroscopic Skills.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the internal and construct validity of an assessment tool for cystoscopic and ureteroscopic cognitive and psychomotor skills at a multi-institutional level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects included a total of 30 urology residents at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. A single external blinded reviewer evaluated cognitive and psychomotor skills associated with cystoscopic and ureteroscopic surgery using high fidelity bench models. Exercises included navigation, basketing and relocation; holmium laser lithotripsy; and cystoscope assembly. Each resident received a total cognitive score, checklist score and global psychomotor skills score. Construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations between training year and performance scores (both cognitive and psychomotor). Internal validity was confirmed by calculating correlations between test components. RESULTS: The median total cognitive score was 91 (IQR 86.25, 97). For psychomotor performance residents had a median total checklist score of 7 (IQR 5, 8) and a median global psychomotor skills score of 21 (IQR 18, 24.5). Construct validity was supported by the positive and statistically significant correlations between training year and total cognitive score (r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.39-0.82, p = 0.01), checklist scores (r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.35-0.84, p = 0.32) and global psychomotor skills score (r = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55-0.88, p = 0.002). The internal validity of OSATS was supported since total cognitive and checklist scores correlated with the global psychomotor skills score. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional study we successfully demonstrated the construct and internal validity of an objective assessment of cystoscopic and ureteroscopic cognitive and technical skills, including laser lithotripsy.

Optimizing use of the holmium:YAG laser for surgical management of urinary lithiasis.

The holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Ho:YAG, holmium) laser is an intracorporeal lithotrite that is widely used in the surgical management of urinary lithiasis. The Ho:YAG laser is capable of fragmenting urinary stones of all compositions while maintaining a wide margin of safety. The 2140-nm wavelength of energy is transmitted from the generator to the stone using specialized silica optical fibers. The effectiveness of the laser can be impacted by the type of laser fiber used, the pulse energy and frequency settings, and the composition of the stone. This paper provides an overview of Ho:YAG laser fibers utilized for lithotripsy during ureteroscopy. We will also review current data regarding optimal energy settings and discuss our experience with different fragmentation techniques.

Postoperative events and complications of next-day stent removal following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to longer stenting.

INTRODUCTION: Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group. CONCLUSIONS: In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.

Comparing dusting and fragmenting efficiency using the new SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser versus a 120 W Holmium:YAG laser.

PURPOSE: Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy requires high amperage power and has an upper limit of frequency and a minimal fiber size. The technology utilizing thulium-doped fiber offers low pulse energy settings and high pulse frequencies up to 2,400 Hz. We compared the novel SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SOLTIVE™; Olympus) to a commercially available 120 W Ho:YAG laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bench-top testing was conducted with 125 mm3 standardized BegoStones (Bego USA). Time to ablate the stone into particles <1 mm was recorded for efficiency calculations. Finite energy was delivered, and resulting particle sizes were measured to determine fragmentation (0.5 kJ) and dusting (2 kJ) efficiencies. Remaining mass or number of fragments were measured to compare efficacy. RESULTS: SOLTIVE™ was faster at ablating stones to particles <1 mm (2.23±0.22 mg/s, 0.6 J 30 Hz short pulse) compared to Ho:YAG laser (1.78±0.44 mg/s, 0.8 J 10 Hz short pulse) (p<0.001). Following 0.5 kJ of energy in fragmentation testing, fewer particles >2 mm remained using SOLTIVE™ than Ho:YAG laser (2.10 vs. 7.20 fragments). After delivering 2 kJ, dusting (1.05±0.08 mg/s) was faster using SOLTIVE™ (0.1 J 200 Hz short pulse) than 120 W 0.46±0.09 mg/s (0.3 J 70 Hz Moses) (p=0.005). SOLTIVE™ (0.1 J 200 Hz) produced more dust particles <0.5 mm (40%) compared to 24% produced by the P120 W laser at 0.3 J 70 Hz Moses and 14% at 0.3 J 70 Hz long pulse (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SOLTIVE™ is superior to the 120 W Ho:YAG laser by producing smaller dust particles and fewer fragments. Further studies are warranted.

Improving Access and Quality of Care for Kidney Stone Patients in an Underserved Community.

There is a call to improve Medicaid patient access to health care, enhance quality and outcomes of care, and reduce overall financial burden. We sought to build a comprehensive kidney stone program to help patients navigate through the acute and preventive aspects of stone disease by increasing multidisciplinary referrals and compliance with recommendations and decreasing no-show rates at first follow-up and repeat stone encounters after initial evaluation. A collaborative multidisciplinary program was established at our single institution consisting of urology, nephrology, and dietary specialists to be piloted over a 3-year period. Medicaid-designated patients were evaluated during new patient encounters by urology specialists and then followed for outpatient follow-up, including specialty referrals to nephrology specialists and dietitians, for targeted preventive measures. Subjective compliance reports by patients following interventions and no-show rates at subsequent follow-ups were documented. We also followed patients 6 months beyond the initial encounter to assess repeat Emergency Department (ED) visits for acute stone episodes. One hundred eighty-three Medicaid-designated stone patients were evaluated from 2018 to 2021. Sixty-eight percent of patients identified as White, 18% identified as Black/African American, and 14% identified as "Other." Patients underwent specialty referrals to nephrology or a dietician in 47% and 42% of cases, respectively. Since the program's implementation, reported patient compliance and referrals to multidisciplinary specialists increased from 72.9% to 81.30% and 21.2% to 56.20%, respectively. Repeat ED visits for stone-related encounters within 6 months of initial presentation remained relatively stable (from 17.60% to 18.9%), while no-show rates at first follow-up decreased from 20.0% to 6.30% by study conclusion. There is continued supporting evidence for the importance of a comprehensive kidney stone program specifically for patients of lower socioeconomic status following a 3-year implementation at our institution. Encouraging results indicate increased access to multidisciplinary specialty referrals, with improvement in follow-up and reported compliance related to stone prevention strategies.

The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Isiris-α® is a single-use digital flexible cystoscope with an integrated grasper designed for double J (DJ) stent removal. Aim of this study was to conduct a multicentric evaluation of the costs and criticalities of stent removals performed with Isiris®-α in different hospitals and health systems, as compared to other DJ removal procedures. METHODS: After gathering 10 institutions worldwide with experience on Isiris-α®, we performed an analysis of the reported costs of DJ removal with Isiris-α®, as compared to the traditional reusable equipment used in each institution. The cost evaluation included instrument purchase, Endoscopic Room (EnR)/ Operatory Room (OR) occupancy, medical staff, instrument disposal, maintenance, repairs, decontamination or sterilization of reusable devices. RESULTS: The main factor affecting the costs of the procedure was OR/EnR occupancy. Decontamination and sterilization accounted for a less important part of total costs. Isiris-α® was more profitable in institutions where DJ removal is usually performed in the EnR/OR, allowing to transfer the procedure to outpatient clinic, with a significant cost saving and EnR/OR time saving to be allocated to other activities. In the only institution where DJ removal was already performed in outpatient clinics, there is a slight cost difference in favor of reusable instruments in high-volume institutions, given a sufficient number to guarantee the turnover. CONCLUSION: Isiris-α® leads to significant cost benefit in the institutions where DJ removal is routinely performed in EnR/OR, and brings significant improvement in organization, cost impact and turnover.

The Fate of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Results from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence Research Consortium.

Background: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and clinical course. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the natural history of RFs after PCNL. The objective of this study is to compare rates of reintervention, complications, stone growth, and passage in patients with RFs >4, ≤4, and ≤2 mm after PCNL. Methods: Sites from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) research consortium examined data of PCNL patients from 2015 to 2019 with at least 1-year follow-up. RF passage, regrowth, reintervention, and complications were recorded and RFs were stratified into >4 and ≤4 mm groups, as well as >2 and ≤2 mm groups. Potential predictors for stone-related events after PCNL were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. It was hypothesized that larger RF thresholds would result in lower passage rates, faster regrowth, and greater clinically significant events (complications and reinterventions) than smaller RF thresholds. Results: A total of 439 patients with RFs >1 mm on CT postoperative day 1 were included in this study. For RFs >4 mm, rates of reintervention were found to be significantly higher and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed significantly higher rates of stone-related events. Passage and RF regrowth were not found to be significantly different compared with RFs ≤4 mm. However, RFs ≤2 mm had significantly higher rates of passage, and significantly lower rates of fragment regrowth (>1 mm), complications, and reintervention compared with RFs >2 mm. On multivariable analysis, older age, body mass index, and RF size were found to be predictive of stone-related events. Conclusions: With the largest cohort to date, this study by the EDGE research consortium further confirms that clinically insignificant residual fragment is problematic for patients after PCNL, particularly in older more obese patients with larger RFs. Our study underscores the importance of complete stone clearance post-PCNL and challenges the use of Clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIFR).

Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Is a Better Predictor of Septic Shock After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Prospective Trials.

Introduction: Recent retrospective literature suggests that the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scoring tool is a potentially superior tool over use of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery. Here we examine use of qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock within data series collected prospectively on PCNL patients as part of a greater study of infectious complications. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter studies including PCNL patients across nine institutions. Clinical signs informing SIRS and qSOFA scores were collected no later than postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of SIRS and qSOFA (high-risk score of greater-or-equal to two points) in predicting admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for vasopressor support. Results: A total of 218 cases at 9 institutions were analyzed. One patient required vasopressor support in the ICU. The sensitivity/specificity was 100%/72.4% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for SIRS and was 100%/90.8% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for qSOFA. Conclusion: Although positive predictive value for both qSOFA and SIRS in prediction of post-PCNL septic shock is low, prospectively collected data demonstrate use of qSOFA may offer greater specificity than SIRS criteria when predicting post-PCNL septic shock.

Fellowship training in endourology: Impact on percutaneous nephrolithotomy access patterns.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the treatment of choice for kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Few studies have examined the reasons why some urologists obtain their own PCNL access while others prefer to have interventional radiology (IR) obtain access. The objective of this study was to investigate what factors influence this decision. METHODS: A survey was posted to the American Urological Association's (AUA) Young Urologist Community. Descriptive statistics and exploratory analyses were used to summarize practice trends and motivating factors. RESULTS: All 99 respondents began practicing within the past 11 years. Ninety-two currently perform PCNLs and 47% of them obtain their own access. Endourology fellowship-trained physicians were more likely to currently obtain their own access (75%) compared to urologists who completed non-endourology fellowships (75% vs. 23%, p=0.58) and non-fellowship-trained urologists (75% vs. 45%, p=0.01). Logging >50 cases during training also predicted physicians obtaining their own access and having a larger annual number of PCNL cases. The most common motivator for obtaining one's own access was preference to control their own access point (95%). CONCLUSIONS: Urologist-obtained PCNL access was associated with greater training experience (endourology fellowship) and current annual PCNL case volume. Urologist-reported factors that influenced the decision to obtain one's own access include control of access, comfort level, and both physician and patient convenience. By identifying the factors that influence practice patterns, we may better address barriers, improve education to make urologistobtained PCNL access feasible even without fellowship training, and ultimately improve outcomes and quality of care.