Is colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection safe and effective for 15-19-mm tumors?

PURPOSE: The outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 15-19-mm tumors are unclear. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of colorectal ESD for 15-19-mm tumors and tumors exceeding that size. METHODS: From August 2018 to December 2020, 213 cases of colorectal tumors removed by colorectal ESD at a tertiary hospital were enrolled in this study. The cases were divided into two groups according to the pathologically measured size of the resected lesion: an intermediate group (15-19 mm, n = 62) and a large group (≥ 20 mm, n = 151). The en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and complications were investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the intermediate than large group (100% vs. 94%, p = 0.049), and the mean total procedure time was shorter in the intermediate than large group (29.2 [Formula: see text] 12.6 vs. 48.4 [Formula: see text] 28.8 min, p < 0.001). However, the mean procedure speed was significantly lower in the intermediate than large group (0.25 [Formula: see text] 0.10 vs. 0.28 [Formula: see text] 0.11 cm2/min, p = 0.031). The complete resection rate, post-procedural bleeding, and perforation rate were not significantly different between the two groups. In multivariate analyses, the total procedure time and mean procedure speed were significantly associated with lesion size. CONCLUSION: Colorectal ESD of 15-19-mm lesions is effective, and has a shorter procedure time and higher en bloc resection rate than the same procedure for larger lesions.

Long-term prognosis of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer according to submucosal invasion: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can provide a high en bloc resection rate and has been widely applied as curative treatment for early colorectal cancer (ECC). However, surgical treatment is occasionally required, and reports on the long-term prognosis of ESD are insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of ECC removal by ESD, including local recurrence and metastasis. METHODS: This multicenter study was conducted retrospectively on 450 consecutive patients with ECC who were treated with ESD between November 2003 and December 2013. Clinical, pathological, and endoscopic data were collected to determine tumor depth, resection margin, lymphovascular invasion, and recurrence. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 53.8 (12-138 months). The en bloc resection rate was 85.3% (384) and in intramucosal cancer being 84.1% and in superficial submucosal invasion (SM1) cancer being 89.8% (p = 0.158). The curative resection rate was 76.0% (n = 342), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (77.3% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.231). The overall recurrence free survival rate (RFS) was 98.7% (444/450). In patients with curative resection, there was no statistically significant difference in RFS according to invasion depth (intramucosal: 99.3% vs. SM1: 97.1%, p = 0.248). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with curatively resected ECC treated with ESD showed favorable long-term outcomes. Curatively resected SM1 cancer has a RFS similar to that of intramucosal cancer.

Adverse Events Associated with Routine Colonoscopy in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although colonoscopy has been widely performed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), studies on the safety of routine colonoscopy, including bowel preparation and sedation, in these patients are limited. This study aimed to investigate the safety of colonoscopy in patients with ESRD who underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 538 patients with ESRD who underwent colonoscopy between 2010 and 2020. We compared the incidence of adverse events (AEs) between the ESRD group and a propensity score-matched control group of healthy adults. Cardiovascular/pulmonary and procedure-related AEs were analyzed. We also compared the rates of AEs between patients who underwent PD or HD. RESULTS: The overall rate of AEs was 5.7% in patients with ESRD, which was significantly higher than that in healthy adults (0.6%, P < 0.001). All AEs were cardiovascular/pulmonary in nature, but no perforation or bleeding occurred. Most AEs were not severe and resolved with medical treatment. The incidence of AEs was higher in the HD group than in the PD group, but the difference was not significant (6.1% vs. 3.5%, respectively, P = 0.451). In the HD group, patients with AEs were significantly older than those without AEs (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of colonoscopy-related AEs in patients with ESRD on dialysis was higher than that in healthy adults, but most AEs were not severe. Routine colonoscopy may be safely performed in patients with ESRD regardless of the method of dialysis, but more carefully in older patients on HD.

Randomized, back-to-back trial of a new generation NBI with a high-definition white light (HQ290) for detecting colorectal polyps.

Background: The benefits of narrow band imaging (NBI) for improving the detection rate of colorectal polyps remain unclear. New generation NBI using the 290 system (290-NBI) provides an at least two-fold brighter image than that of the previous version. We aimed to compare polyp miss rates between 290-NBI colonoscopy and high-definition white light endoscopy (HDWL). Methods: In total, 117 patients were randomized to undergo either 290-NBI or HDWL from June 2015 to February 2017. In the HDWL group, we performed HDWL as an initial inspection, followed by a second inspection with NBI. In the 290-NBI group, NBI was performed as the initial inspection, followed by a second inspection with HDWL. We compared polyp and adenoma detection rates and polyp miss rates (PMR) between the two groups and analyzed the factors associated with the PMR. Results: In total, 127 polyps were detected in the 117 patients. No differences in adenoma or polyp detection rates were observed between the two groups. The PMR for 290-NBI was 20.6% and that for HDWL was 33.9% (p = .068). However, the non-adenomatous PMR for 290-NBI was significantly lower than that of HDWL (11.5% vs. 52.2%, p = .002). Furthermore, the miss rates of polyps on the left side of the colon, flat-type polyps, and non-adenomatous polyps were significantly lower in the 290-NBI than HDWL. Conclusions: New generation NBI may reduce PMR, especially of flat-type and non-adenomatous polyps and those on the left side of the colon. (UMIN000025505).

Optimal Timing of Simethicone Addition for Bowel Preparation Using Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid.

BACKGROUND: Colonic bubbles obscure the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy following bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc). Simethicone is used to enhance visualization during colonoscopy. We aimed to determine the optimal timing of simethicone addition to improve bowel preparation using PEG-Asc. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study enrolled patients undergoing elective colonoscopy from April 2017 to January 2018. They were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: PEG-Asc only (control) or simethicone addition in the morning on the day of colonoscopy (PEG-S1) or in the evening of the day prior to colonoscopy (PEG-S2). The primary outcome was the quality of colon cleansing, and the secondary outcomes were the adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and diminutive (≤ 5 mm) ADR. RESULTS: In total, 240 patients were randomly allocated to the three groups; six patients were withdrawn. Of the 234 patients evaluated, 78, 79, and 77 were allocated to the control, PEG-S1, and PEG-S2 groups, respectively. The bubble scores of all colonic segments were lowest in the PEG-S2 group. There was no significant difference in ADR or PDR among the three groups. However, the diminutive ADR was significantly higher in the PEG-S2 group compared to the other two groups (control 5.1% vs. PEG-S1 8.9% vs. PEG-S2 20.8%; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Addition of simethicone to PEG-Asc at the optimal time prevents the formation of air bubbles and so improves the quality of bowel preparation, especially enhancing diminutive ADR.

Impact of patient audiovisual re-education via a smartphone on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single-blinded randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Education on preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of audiovisual (AV) re-education via a smartphone on bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy. METHODS: A prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled study was performed. Patients who underwent colonoscopy with 3 purgatives, including 4 L of polyethylene glycol (4-L PEG), 2 L of PEG with ascorbic acid (2-L PEG/Asc), and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC), were enrolled and randomized into the AV re-education via smartphone group (AV group, n = 160) and a control group (n = 160). The primary outcome was the quality of the bowel preparation according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). The secondary outcomes included instruction adherence using adherence score (AS) and patient satisfaction with education using a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: A total of 283 patients (AV group, n = 139; control group, n = 144) were analyzed per protocol. The mean BBPS (7.53 vs 6.29, P < .001) and the proportion with adequate preparation were higher in the AV group. The mean BBPS of the AV group was significantly higher than that of the control group for the 2-L PEG/Asc and SPMC preparations, but not for the 4-L PEG preparation. The mean AS and the mean VAS score were all significantly higher in the AV group. Among the 3 purgatives, the mean AS was lowest in the 4-L PEG group (P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: AV re-education via smartphone was easy and convenient, and enhanced preparation quality, patient adherence to instructions, and patient satisfaction.

Effects of administration of a proton pump inhibitor before endoscopic submucosal dissection for differentiated early gastric cancer with ulcer.

BACKGROUND: In ulcerative early gastric cancer, improvement and exacerbation of ulceration repeat as a malignant cycle. Moreover, early gastric cancer combined with ulcer is associated with a low curative resection rate and high risk of adverse events. The aim of this study was to investigate the ulcer healing rate and clinical outcomes with the administration of a proton pump inhibitor before endoscopic submucosal dissection for differentiated early gastric cancer with ulcer. METHODS: A total of 136 patients with differentiated early gastric cancer with ulcer who met the expanded indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection were reviewed between June 2005 and June 2014. Eighty-one patients were given PPI before endoscopic submucosal dissection and 55 patients were not given PPI. RESULTS: The complete ulcer healing rate was significantly different between the two groups (59.3 % vs. 23.6 %, P < 0.001). The procedure time was 38.1 ± 35.7 and 50.8 ± 50.2 min (P = 0.047). However, no significant differences were detected in the en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and adverse events including bleeding and perforation. Multivariate analysis showed that administration of PPI (OR = 10.83, P < 0.001) and mucosal invasion (OR = 24.43, P < 0.001) were independent factors that predicted complete healing of ulceration. The calculated accuracy for whether complete healing of the ulcer after PPI administration can differentiate mucosal from submucosal invasion was 75.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of PPI before ESD in differentiated EGC meeting the expanded criteria is effective to heal the ulcer lesion and reduce the mean procedure time. Complete healing of the ulcer after PPI administration suggests mucosal cancer.

Clinical outcome after enteroscopy for small bowel angioectasia bleeding: A Korean Associateion for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) multiceter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Angioectasias are the most common sources of bleeding in the small bowel. They can be treated using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE). This study aimed to identify the rebleeding rate and associated factors after BAE in patients with small bowel angioectasia bleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with bleeding due to small bowel vascular lesion in a multicenter enteroscopy database including 1108 BAEs. Finally, in rebleeding analysis, we analyzed 66 patients with angioectasia on the basis of the Yano-Yamamoto classification. Patients who had undergone endotherapy (ET) were divided into ET (n = 45) and non-ET (n = 21) groups. Rebleeding was defined as evidence of bleeding at least 30 days after BAE. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (80.4%) underwent only one-side enteroscopy. The most common ET was argon plasma coagulation (87.2%). During a mean follow-up duration of 24.5 months, ET and non-ET groups had rebleeding rates of 15.6% and 38.1% (P = 0.059), respectively. Median rebleeding time of ET and non-ET groups was 32.5 and 62 months, respectively. Liver cirrhosis (LC), low platelet count (< 105 /µL), and transfusions were the rebleeding-associated factors in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of LC (HR 4.064, 95% CI 1.098-15.045; P = 0.036) was the only independent rebleeding-associated risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: ET using BAE did not significantly affect the rebleeding rate in patients with small bowel angioectasia bleeding. An independent rebleeding risk factor was the presence of LC. Regardless of ET, careful long-term follow-up may be needed, especially in LC patients with small bowel angioectasia bleeding.

Do surveillance intervals in patients with more than five adenomas at index colonoscopy be shorter than those in patients with three to four adenomas? A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is controversy about the surveillance interval after colonoscopy when 5-10 adenomas have been found on index colonoscopy. This study aimed to investigate the risk of colorectal neoplasm (CRN) according to the number of adenomas at index colonoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at 10 university hospitals in Korea. We included 1394 patients with ≥ 3 adenomas at index colonoscopy. The risk of advanced CRN was compared according to the number of adenomas (intermediate risk group, 3-4 small adenomas or at least one ≥ 10 mm, and high risk group, ≥ 5 small adenomas or ≥ 3 at least one ≥ 10 mm). RESULTS: Overall, 164 (11.8%) developed an advanced CRN after a mean of 4.0 years from baseline colonoscopy. The 3-year and 5-year risk of advanced CRN was 2.1% (95% CI 2.09-2.11) and 14.4% (95% CI 14.36-14.44) in intermediate risk group and 3.2% (95% CI 3.19-3.21) and 23.3% (95% CI 19.15-19.25) in high risk group (P = 0.01). Having ≥ 5 adenomas (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.23, P = 0.01) detected at index colonoscopy was a significant risk factor for developing advanced CRN. CONCLUSIONS: Although risk of advanced CRN in patients with 5-10 adenomas was significantly higher than that in patients with 3-4 adenomas, the cumulative risk at 3 years was low at 3.2%. Thus, we suggest that a 3-year surveillance interval might be appropriate for the patients with 5-10 adenomas, and further prospective studies are needed to investigate whether more intensive surveillance is needed in this group.

A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A previous study reported that cold snare polypectomy (CSP) was superior to cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for the removal of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) (≤5 mm) when the techniques were assessed for completeness of resection. However, completeness is expected to be greater with CFP when strict investigation of the remnant polyp is performed. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of CFP with narrow-band imaging (NBI) evaluation of polypectomy sites for removal of DCPs, compared with CSP. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Of the 380 patients screened, 146 patients with 231 DCPs were enrolled. CFP was used to resect DCPs until no remnant polyp was visible by NBI endoscopy. The primary noninferiority endpoint was histologic eradication of polyps, with a noninferiority margin of -10%. RESULTS: A size of >3 mm was seen in 129 polyps (55.8%). The overall rates of histologic eradication were 90.5% in the CFP group and 93.0% in the CSP group (difference, 2.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.67 to 4.62). However, when confined to the polyps >3 mm, the histologic eradication rate was 86.8% and 93.4% (95% CI, -17.2 to 3.6), respectively. Polyp size, histology, location, and time taken for polypectomy did not differ between the groups. The failure rate of tissue retrieval was higher in the CSP than in the CFP group (7.8% vs 0.0%, respectively; P =.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, >90% of all DCPs were completely resected by using CFP with NBI evaluation of polypectomy sites, showing noninferiority compared with CSP. However, in polyps measuring >3 mm, CFP failed to show noninferiority versus CSP. CFP appears to be the proper method for resection of DCPs 1 to 3 mm in size if no remnant polyp is visible by NBI endoscopy, but CFP is likely to be insufficient for larger polyps. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02201147.).

Risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia after removing high-risk adenoma detected at index colonoscopy in young patients: A KASID study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Advanced adenoma (> 10 mm in diameter, villous structure, or high-grade dysplasia) in young patients may have different characteristics and prognosis compared with those in older patients. We aimed to compare the incidence of colorectal neoplasms in young patients with older patients after removing high-risk adenoma (advance adenoma or ≥ 3 adenomas). METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at 13 university hospitals in Korea. The 1479 patients who removed high-risk adenoma at index colonoscopy and followed by surveillance colonoscopy ≥ 2.5 years after were included. The cumulative incidence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms was compared according to the age groups (group 1: < 50 years, group 2: 50-70 years, and group 3: ≥ 70 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of advance adenoma detected at index colonoscopy was significantly higher in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (85.4%, 78.1%, and 77.2%, respectively; P = 0.035). The 5 years cumulative incidence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms were 61.9%, 67.9%, and 74.7% (P < 0.001), and 11.7%, 17.9%, and 27.1% (P = 0.001) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age > 70 years was a significant risk factor for developing overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.82, P = 0.004) and advanced colorectal neoplasms (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.43-4.59, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The cumulative incidence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms was significantly higher in older patients than in young patient groups. Age was a significant risk factor for developing colorectal neoplasms after removing high-risk adenoma.

Effectiveness of Surgicel® (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because the invasive procedure of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) entails a extensive mucosal defect and submucosal exposure, the procedure may have a substantial risk of complications including delayed bleeding, perforation and bacteremia and/or endotoxemia. The aim of our study was to investigate whether Surgicel(®) would be effective in reducing complications after colorectal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2013, 52 consecutive patients who underwent a colorectal ESD were enrolled. After the removal of colorectal epithelial neoplasm, surgicel was sprayed onto the submucosal surface using the wet type of application (Surgicel(®) group). We evaluated tumor type, location, size, histology, procedure time, hospital stay and associated complication. For assessing inflammatory reaction, white blood cells and body temperature were monitored. In assessing the effectiveness of Surgicel(®) application, we retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes with 52 other consecutive large colorectal tumor patients who had previously received conventional ESD, as control group (non-Surgicel(®) group). RESULTS: Of the 52 patients, three patients were excluded. Forty-nine patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. During the follow-up period, rebleeding occurred in 0 (0% in Surgicel(®) group) patients and 4 (7.7% in non-Surgicel(®) group) patients; fever (>37.7) in 2 (4.1%) and 10 (19.2%) patients, respectively (p = 0.019); and leukocytosis in 9 (18.4%) and 16 (30.8%) patients, respectively (p = 0.172). C-reactive protein level was 0.35 ± 0.18 and 9.83 ± 2.44 (p < 0.001). The mean hospitalization period was 4.22 ± 0.94 and 5.13 ± 0.27 days, respectively (p < 0.001). The group (surgicel vs. non-surgicel, p = 0.005, odds ratio 11.114 (2.104-58.718)) was identified as independent predictor for complication such as fever or delayed bleeding by multivariated analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Surgicel(®) application after colorectal ESD may be an effective method to reduce some complications and mean hospitalization period. Therefore, surgicel application may be considered to be a valuable clinical method.

Risk stratification and management of non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) can contribute to local recurrence or lymphatic and distant metastasis of the tumor. We stratified the risk of local recurrence according to the histological characteristics in non-curative resection after ESD for EGC. METHODS: Among 892 EGCs treated with ESD, 152 (17.0%) were classified as non-curative resection based on the histology after ESD. The clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with local recurrence were analyzed retrospectively in non-curative resections. RESULTS: Of 152 non-curative resections, 46 (30.3%) were stratified as Group 1 (incomplete resection and met the ESD criteria), 31 (20.4%) as Group 2 (complete resection and exceeded the ESD criteria), 41 (27.0%) as Group 3 (incomplete resection and exceeded the ESD criteria), and 34 (22.4%) as Group 4 (lymphovascular invasion regardless of complete resection). Group 3 [odds ratio (OR) 3.991; p = 0.015] and Group 4 (OR 4.487; p = 0.014) had higher rates of local recurrence after non-curative resection. In those high-risk groups, endoscopic surveillance without additional treatment detected significantly more local recurrence than in those receiving additional treatment (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Risk stratification for non-curative resection is important for EGC prognosis after ESD. Moreover, additional treatment for non-curative resection influences long-term outcomes, especially in high-risk groups.

Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia According to the Number of High-Risk Findings at Index Colonoscopy: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding outcomes for patients with multiple findings for high-risk adenomas are scarce. AIM: To compare the risk for colorectal neoplasm (CRN) recurrence according to the number of high-risk findings. METHODS: This was a retrospective and multicenter study. Patients who had one or more high-risk adenomas at the index colonoscopy and underwent follow-up colonoscopy 2.5 or more years after the index colonoscopy were included. The number of high-risk findings was defined as follows: number of adenomas larger than 1 cm + number of adenomas with HGD + number of adenomas with a villous component + existence (counted as 1) or nonexistence (counted as 0) of three or more adenomas. RESULTS: A total of 1646 patients were included, and the mean duration between index and follow-up colonoscopy was approximately 4 years. The cumulative incidence rate of recurrent advanced CRN in patients with three or more high-risk findings was higher than that in patients with one or two high-risk findings (p < 0.001). However, the difference in 3-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrent advanced CRN between the two groups was not great, although it was statistically significant (4.8 vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: A 3-year surveillance interval for patients with multiple high-risk findings, regardless of the number of high-risk findings, appears reasonable.

How to predict adequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy using conventional polyethylene glycol: prospective observational study based on survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The present study investigated the conditions and predictive factors for adequate bowel preparation using 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) preparation in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective-survey-based observational study. The survey consisted of 14 questions that assessed the preparation method (group 1: split method for morning colonoscopy; group 2: full-volume method for same-day afternoon colonoscopy; group 3: full-volume method for next-day morning colonoscopy), dinner type and timing the day before colonoscopy, elapsed time after PEG consumption, and stool character and defecation frequency immediately before colonoscopy. Preparation status was compared using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS). RESULTS: Total of 465 surveys (391 for group 1, 55 for group 2, 19 for group 3) were conducted. Mean BBPS score was highest in group 1 and lowest in group 3 (P < 0.001). Fasting dinner before colonoscopy group showed a higher mean BBPS than the diet group; eating before 6 p.m. and a low-residue diet showed a higher mean BBPS (P < 0.05). Defecation frequency (>5 times) was related to adequate preparation in the left colon and elapsed time (<5 h) to that in the right colon (P < 0.05). Liquid stool without solid material immediately before colonoscopy was related to adequate preparation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In bowel preparation with 4-L PEG, elapsed time after PEG consumption (<5 h), defecation frequency (>5 times) and liquid stool without solid material immediately before colonoscopy were predictive factors for adequate bowel preparation just before colonoscopy.

Palliative self-expandable metal stents for acute malignant colorectal obstruction: clinical outcomes and risk factors for complications.

OBJECTIVE: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) have been used as palliative treatment or bridge to surgery for obstructions caused by colorectal cancer (CRC). We assessed the long-term outcomes of palliative SEMSs and evaluated the risk factors influencing complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five patients underwent SEMS placement for acute malignant colorectal obstruction. Of the 72 patients who underwent palliative treatment for primary CRC, 30 patients received chemotherapy (CT) for primary cancer (CT group) and 42 underwent best supportive treatment (BST) without CT (BST group). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in late migration between the CT group and the BST group (20.0% in CT group, 2.4% in BST group, p = 0.018). Response to CT influenced the rate of late obstruction (0% in disease control, 35.7% in disease progression, p = 0.014). However, late obstruction was not associated with stent properties, such as diameter or type (≤22 mm vs. >22 mm, 13.5% vs. 14.3%, p = 1.00; uncovered stent vs. covered stent, 15.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.675) and migration (≤22 mm vs. >22 mm, 16.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.108; uncovered stent vs. covered stent, 8.6% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.615) in palliative SEMS. CONCLUSION: The administration of CT increases the rate of stent migration, and disease control by CT can reduce the risk of obstruction by maintaining the luminal patency of palliative SEMSs.

Usefulness and safety of endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Safety and efficacy data on endoscopic treatment of duodenal neoplasm are limited. We suggest the technical feasibility of endoscopic procedures by evaluating the results of endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma with or without malignant transformation between September 2003 and March 2012 were included. Endoscopic polypectomy of duodenal polyp (DPP), duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (DEMR), and duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (DESD) were selected as endoscopic treatments for each lesion. RESULTS: Mean lesion size was 9.1 mm, and most lesions were located in the second portion of the duodenum. There were 40 adenomas and five early-stage adenocarcinomas arising from adenomas. Of the 45 duodenal neoplasms, five patients were treated with DPP, 33 with DEMR, and seven patients with a large duodenal lesion underwent DESD. Minimum of 1-year follow-up endoscopies were performed in 42 patients, excepting three patients treated after October 2011. Median follow-up was 24.8 months. Of the 45 patients, en bloc resection was performed in 43 (95.6%). A complete resection was performed in 41 patients (91.1%). No significant bleeding events occurred. Perforations occurred in three patients who underwent DESD. All perforations were noticed during the procedures and completely closed by endoscopic clipping. There was one recurrence at 6 months after DPP. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment is minimally invasive management for duodenal adenomas and superficial adenocarcinomas. It would be helpful for medical doctors in the management of duodenal neoplasms.

Rescreening colonoscopy practice after a negative index colonoscopy in a clinical setting; cross-sectional study for interval and outcomes of rescreening colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the rescreening colonoscopy practice after negative index colonoscopy (IC) in a real clinical setting. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the individual records of aged over 40 who had negative IC at a single center between 2003 and 2005. The quality of the IC including bowel preparation (using Boston bowel preparation scale, BBPS), cecal intubation, withdrawal time and the incidence and risk factors for advanced lesions during the rescreening colonoscopy were analyzed. RESULTS: On 1570 negative ICs, 32.6% (n = 512) had rescreen ing colonoscopy until August, 2011. The rescreened group showed significantly lower quality of the IC compared to the group not rescreened (mean BBPS 7.9 vs. 8.2, p = 0.032, mean withdrawal time 5.2 vs. 5.7 minutes, p = 0.003). Rescreening detected polyps in 33.4% (n = 171) and advanced lesions in 3.7% (n = 19, 73.7% male; p = 0.022) including cancers (0.4%, n = 2). Male gender (odds ratio, 2.995; 95% confidence interval, 1.199-7.481) was an independent risk factors for advanced lesions on rescreening. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced lesions were detected in 3.7% of rescreening group after negative IC and male was a risk factor. Following a low-quality IC, a rescreening colonoscopy was performed with short interval in a clinical practice.

Clinical usefulness of double balloon enteroscopy in suspected Crohn's disease: the KASID multi-center trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recently developed double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) may be useful to evaluate small bowel lesions in patients with suspected Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the findings of DBE, small bowel follow-through and abdominal CT in patients with suspected CD who could not be diagnosed with CD using conventional colonoscopy. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients (27 males, mean age 32.7±9.27 years) with suspected CD were consecutively enrolled in this study. The main symptoms were abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, weight loss, obscure bleeding, or anemia. These patients were enrolled from May 2006 to January 2007 at 10 tertiary medical centers participating in the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. RESULTS: The DBE demonstrated definite CD in 24 patients (80.0%) and suspected findings of CD in six patients. The pathology results obtained by endoscopic biopsies revealed a granuloma in six patients (23.1%). The DBE identified additional findings not detected by radiology studies in 24 patients (80%) although the small bowel followthrough and the abdominal CT revealed the abnormal findings (73.1% and 64%). CONCLUSIONS: DBE may be a promising alternative and useful technique for patients with suspected CD. DBE provides biopsy sampling and more detailed information than radiology studies.

Comparison of clinical effectiveness of the emergent colonoscopy in patients with hematochezia according to the type of bowel preparation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy (CFS) is a valuable diagnostic tool in patients with hematochezia. However, the optimal preparation method of emergent CFS for hematochezia has not been defined. We investigated the clinical effectiveness of bowel preparation of patients with hematochezia using polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution and glycerin or water enemas. METHODS: The medical records of the past 7 years were reviewed. Patients presenting with hematochezia that occurred within 24 h before admission were eligible for the study. All patients underwent CFS within 24 h after visiting the emergency room for hematochezia. Patients were classified into two groups according to the preparation method used (enema vs. PEG). RESULTS: Overall, 194 patients (125 enema vs. 69 PEG) were enrolled. The diagnostic rate of bleeding focus was lower in the enema group than in the PEG group (84% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.008). Performance of endoscopic hemostasis at the initial CFS was more frequent in the enema group than in the PEG group (40.8% vs. 10.1%, P < 0.001). The rate of repeated CFS was higher in the enema group than in the PEG group (44.0% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.001). Post-polypectomy bleeding (n = 33) was diagnosed during the initial study and was treated endoscopically. In cases of post-polypectomy bleeding, CFS (93.9%) was performed after an enema in all but two cases. CONCLUSIONS: In hematochezia patients, the PEG group showed a higher diagnostic rate and lower rate of repeated CFS. However, emergent CFS after an enema only seems to be useful in patients with severe hematochezia or if the bleeding focus can be presumed.