Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gene Expr ; 10(3): 101-7, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12064572

RESUMO

Differential display (DD) is a well-established analytical tool for measuring gene expression that is still popular due to its documented success and ability to identify novel genes not yet available for analysis by more powerful microarray hybridization. For a comprehensive analysis of all mRNAs in a given cell, it is statistically predicted that at least 240 different DD primer combinations are required. This prediction, however, has never been empirically tested. Using far more primer combinations than that predicted to evaluate 90% of the mRNAs in a cell, plus other modifications, we identified and confirmed the induction of five mRNAs by hydrogen peroxide in HA-1 hamster cells. However, five other known oxidant-inducible mRNAs were not identified by DD. Filter microarray hybridization did not result in the identification of any additional species modulated twofold or greater but previous two-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis identified 15 induced protein species. We conclude that the current statistical prediction for comprehensive analysis of all the mRNAs in a given cell is inaccurate, at least in our hands, and further conclude that DD is a useful but less than comprehensive method for assessing changes in mRNA levels.


Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Animais , Células CHO , Cricetinae , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/farmacologia , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Biossíntese de Proteínas , Proteínas/genética , RNA Mensageiro/análise , RNA Mensageiro/biossíntese , RNA Mensageiro/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA