LMA Protector™ Airway: first experience with a new second generation laryngeal mask.

BACKGROUND: The LMA Protector™ Airway (The Laryngeal Mask Company Ltd., Teleflex Incorporated, Athlone, Ireland) is a new supraglottic airway promising a better seal, an improved drainage of gastric secretions and the opportunity of a simplified fiberscopy-guided tracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to present a primary evaluation of the LMA Protector in a clinical setting. METHODS: After informed consent 50 patients, scheduled for minor/moderate surgery in supine position, were recruited. Pharyngeal seal pressures were examined in neutral position of the patients' head and in maximum passive extension of the neck. Additionally, the fiberscopic view on the glottis was graduated and the feasibility of fiberscope guided tracheal intubation through the device was evaluated. RESULTS: The median pharyngeal seal pressure of the LMA Protector in neutral position of the head was 34 cmH2O. Passive extension of the neck did not cause a reduction of the pharyngeal seal (median pharyngeal seal pressure: 34.7 cmH2O; P<0.039). The LMA Protector was applicable for fiberscopic tracheal intubation but is not reliable for blind tracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The LMA Protector provides a high pharyngeal seal. Uncommon for laryngeal masks its pharyngeal seal is not affected by the extension of the patient's neck. As a second generation supraglottic airway which is also suitable for simplified fiberscopic guided tracheal intubation, the LMA Protector could be considered as a supraglottic airway of the third generation.

Anesthesia for Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Are Patients With a Failing Hemi-Fontan- or Fontan-Physiology Different?

Background. The absolute number of patients presenting with failure of the hemi-Fontan or Fontan circulation for cardiac transplantation (cTx) will continuously rise. We aimed to analyze the intraoperative differences in patients undergoing cTx for a failing hemi-Fontan or Fontan circulation (group A) with those undergoing cTx for cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease (group B). Methods. Data of patients undergoing cTx during a 10-year period were compared between group A and group B patients. Results. cTx was performed in 83 patients (group A, n = 21; group B, n = 62). Surgical times including median incision-suture time (549 minutes vs 386 minutes, P < .05) and median organ ischemia time (305 minutes vs 233 minutes, P < .05) were longer in group A patients. After weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass a higher median modified Vasoactive Inotropic Score (16 vs 10, P < .05) was necessary in group A patients. During surgery more fresh frozen plasma (44 mL/kg vs 20 mL/kg, P < .05), platelet concentrates (20 mL/kg vs 14 mL/kg, P < .05), and coagulation factor concentrates were given in group A patients. Mortality during the first 90 days after cTx was higher in group A (23.8% vs 6.5%, P < .05). Conclusion. Patients undergoing cTx for a failing hemi-Fontan or Fontan circulation are challenging. They require an intensive vasoactive and inotropic support; furthermore, special attention should be paid to the management of bleeding complications. cTx for this group of patients is associated with higher 90 days mortality.