Functional outcome after laparoscopic nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: To date sacrocolpopexy is regarded as the reference standard treatment for primarily apical compartment prolapse and multicompartment prolapse. Most bladder and bowel dysfunction improves postoperatively after sacrocolpopexy; however, de novo bowel or de novo bladder dysfunction can occur. The inferior hypogastric nerve is commonly known among pelvic surgeons. However, the inferior hypogastric nerve and its fine fibers are difficult to identify; iatrogenic lesion is commonly tolerated although this can lead to bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. This study was performed to assess the functional outcome after nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2016 all women undergoing a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical or multicompartment prolapse stage >2 were included in this prospective study. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy was performed using the nerve-sparing approach. Objective outcome was assessed by preoperative and postoperative POP-Q changes. De novo bladder and de novo bowel dysfunction were subjectively and objectively evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 137 women were included. Significant objective improvement for point Aa and C (p < 0.0001) preoperatively to postoperatively was seen. The posterior compartment remained unchanged with point Ba -2. De novo overactive bladder and de novo bladder outlet obstruction with elevated postresidual volume were seen for both in 0.7% (1/137). De novo stress urinary incontinence was seen in 0.7% (5/137). De novo constipation was seen in 5%, bowel incontinence in 0% and resolution of pre-existing obstipation in 14.5%. De novo laxative use (9%) in the first 12 weeks was the most common postoperative problem. CONCLUSION: We could demonstrate that when a nerve-sparing technique is applied for sacrocolpopexy low de novo bladder (18%) and de novo bowel dysfunction can be seen.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without midurethral sling insertion: Is a two- step approach justified? A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Most data support the fact that women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with concomitant symptomatic or occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) benefit from concurrent POP and anti-incontinence procedure. However some data support a delayed or 2-step approach. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) alone with a delayed approach for SUI to prove the justification of a 2-step approach. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study from 2014 to 2016 including women with symptomatic POP ≥ stage 2 prolapse and concomitant SUI or occult SUI. Laparoscopic SCP for apical or multi-compartment POP with or without concomitant MUS insertion was performed. Primary outcome measures were asymptomatic regarding SUI after prolapse surgery alone, persisting SUI with or without subsequent anti-incontinence surgery. RESULTS: A SCP alone was performed on 62 women. Stress urinary incontinence was seen in 31% with SCP alone and a third of those women needed an additional midurethral sling for persisting SUI. Women who chose a combined surgery for POP and incontinence with SCP and a suburethral sling the postoperative success rate regarding SUI was 100% with two women needing a sling release. CONCLUSION: We showed that women with POP with concomitant stress urinary incontinence undergoing sacrocolpopexy benefitted from a two-step approach as only 11% needed an additional incontinence procedure. This study highlights the importance of pre-operative counselling. It should be tailored to the individual woman.