Feasibility of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection after radiofrequency ablation treatment in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-established treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) in the United States. Similarly, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely performed for early esophageal carcinoma. However, conducting ESD after RFA can be technically challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of ESD in patients with prior RFA. METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent esophageal ESD after undergoing prior RFA treatment for BE. RESULTS: Of 44 esophageal ESD cases, 7 underwent prior RFA. In those 7 cases, the en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the R0 resection rate was 86%. No acute or delayed adverse events or rehospitalizations occurred in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: ESD may be a feasible and safe option for patients with a history of RFA. It could be considered for esophageal neoplasms in patients previously treated with RFA for BE.

Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasonography with Water-Filled Balloon Method for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a commonly used tool for preoperative depth diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Probing EUS using the water-filled balloon method is a simple and safe examination. AIM: The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic performance of EUS with the water-filled balloon method for superficial ESCC compared to magnifying narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). METHODS: We retrospectively examined 403 lesions in 393 consecutive patients diagnosed with ESCC and evaluated them with ME-NBI and EUS. Clinicopathological findings were collected, and the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis was compared between ME-NBI and EUS-B. EUS examiners were not blinded to prior ME-NBI results, and EUS results may have been influenced by ME-NBI results. RESULTS: The pathological tumor depth of the EP/LPM in 152 lesions, MM/SM1 in 130 lesions, and deep submucosa (SM2/SM3) in 121 lesions was examined. The proportion of total lesions with an accurate diagnosis was significantly higher in EUS than in ME-NBI (67.7% versus 62.0%, P = 0.015). When analyzed by clinical depth diagnosis using ME-NBI, the proportion of lesions with an accurate diagnosis was significantly higher for EUS in MM/SM1 (55.7% versus 46.1%, P = 0.033). The sensitivity was significantly higher in EUS for SM2/SM3 lesions (76.0% versus 54.5%, P < 0.001). The accuracy and specificity of EUS, which differentiate MM/SM1 from EP/LPM or SM2/SM3, were significantly higher than those of ME-NBI. The median endoscopic ultrasonography procedure time was approximately 6.5 min. CONCLUSIONS: EUS with the water-filled balloon method is a safe and straightforward method that can be performed on lesions clinically diagnosed as MM/SM1 using ME-NBI. We retrospectively reviewed lesions in patients diagnosed with ESCC and evaluated them using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and endoscopic ultrasound using the water-filled balloon method (EUS-B). We conclude that EUS-B can increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical predictors of special type of esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancers with a histological type other than the two major types, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma, are referred to as "special type of esophageal cancer" (STEC). STEC is rare and difficult to diagnose preoperatively. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathological findings of STEC, including magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI). METHODS: We reviewed 1133 lesions in 936 consecutive cases who underwent endoscopic resection or surgical resection for primary esophageal cancer. Patients were classified into the SCC group and the STEC group, respectively. Factors that predict STEC endoscopically, as well as clinicopathologic features of STEC compared to SCC, were examined. RESULTS: Twenty-eight STECs were diagnosed in 28 patients: 15 with basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, 6 with adenosquamous carcinoma, 4 with mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 1 with carcinosarcoma, 1 with salivary duct-type carcinoma, and 1 with neuroendocrine cell carcinoma. There was significantly more pT1b or deeper cancer (60.7% vs. 12.8%), lymphovascular invasion (50.0% vs. 11.1%) and elevated type (53.6% vs. 16.1%) in the STEC group. The proportion of lesions with type R vessels on ME-NBI was significantly higher in the STEC group (46.4% vs. 3.9%). The STEC group had significantly lower accuracy of ME-NBI for prediction of depth (64.3% vs. 83.5%) and a greater proportion of underestimated lesions (32.1% vs. 9.3%). In the multivariate analysis, the histopathology of STEC was associated with type R vessels on ME-NBI. CONCLUSION: Type R vessels and submucosal tumor-like elevation might be the clinical predictors of STEC.

Long-term Outcome of Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia.

Background/Aims: : Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments. Methods: : We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined. Results: : No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up. Conclusions: : Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

Complete Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Cancer Leaving an Island of Normal Mucosa.

Esophageal stricture caused by complete circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of extensive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a major concern and can result in a low quality of life. Normal mucosa may remain within a complete circumferential lesion of ESCC in some cases. We herein report a case of ESCC in which a complete circumferential lesion was treated with ESD while leaving an island of normal mucosa within it. This case demonstrates that preserving areas of normal mucosa within lesions during complete circumferential ESD is not technically difficult and may be an effective measure for preventing esophageal stricture.

Safety of Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor: A Single-Center Study in the United States.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is associated with a high rate of en bloc resection and low rate of recurrence. However, in the United States, SNADETs are predominantly managed using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or surgery because the feasibility and safety of duodenal ESD have not yet been established. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of duodenal ESD for SNADETs. This single-center retrospective study reviewed the data of patients who underwent ESD for SNADETs between June 2018 and August 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, histopathology of the resected lesions, adverse events, and recurrence rates were evaluated. The primary outcome measures were en bloc resection, complications, and recurrence rate. Thirty ESD procedures were performed on 24 patients. All 30 lesions were adenomas, with no cancerous lesions. The en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rates were both 53%. There were no cases of procedure-associated perforation. Post-ESD bleeding was observed in six cases. No ESD-related mortality was observed. The recurrence rate was 14% in 1 year follow up, and 28% the during all follow-up period. ESD is a safe option for SNADET in the United States; however further comparative studies are necessary to determine the optimal procedure for North American populations.

Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Older Patients Is Safe and Feasible: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established method for treating early esophageal carcinomas. However, data on the safety and efficacy of esophageal ESD in older patients in the United States are limited. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of esophageal ESD in patients aged ≥80 years and included those who underwent esophageal ESD between June 2018 and April 2023 at a single center in the United States. Patients were divided into two age groups for comparison: ≥80 and <80 years. Treatment outcomes and complications were evaluated and compared between these groups. RESULTS: A total of 53 cases of esophageal ESD for malignant neoplasms were included, with 12 patients in the ≥80 years age group. No significant differences were observed in the patients' background and characteristics, except for a prior history of interventions (p = 0.04). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in both groups. The R0 resection rate was lower in the ≥80 years age group (75% vs. 88%). There were no complications requiring additional intervention in the ≥80 years age group, such as post-ESD bleeding, perforation, mediastinal emphysema, or pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal ESD may be a safe and feasible procedure for treating esophageal carcinomas in older patients.

Possibility of ultrathin endoscopy in radial incision and cutting for esophageal strictures.

Video 1The radial incision and cutting procedure using ultrathin endoscopy.