Barriers toward organ donation in a Danish University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, organ donation-rates are below the average in the western countries. We investigated the donor potential and identified barriers toward organ donation in a Danish university hospital. METHODS: All patients who died in Aalborg University Hospital in 2012 were retrospectively identified. Patients with a CT- or MRI-proven deadly brain-lesion were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with deadly brain-lesions were included, and of these 47 patients died in the intensive care unit (ICU). Older age and diagnosis of brain-hemorrhage and infarction were associated with admission to general ward (GW). In 62.4% of the patients the potential of becoming a donor was not identified. No donations occurred from patients dying from intracerebral hemorrhage or brain-infarction although they represented 44.7% of the potential donors. DISCUSSION: This study reveals a huge, unrecognized donation potential at our hospital. About 30% was lost because they were never admitted to the ICU. After primary admission to the ICU, 15.3% of the potential donors were lost because they were transferred to the GW. In patients who died in the ICU 17.6% of the patients were not evaluated as potential donors. The relatives refused donation in 17.6% of cases. CONCLUSION: It would be possible to raise the donation rate considerably if patients with donation potential are intubated and admitted to the ICU. When active treatment is considered withdrawn, possibility of organ donation should be evaluated, and the next of kin be approached by experienced staff.

Incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan and lesions observed during subsequent colonoscopy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake can be observed during a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. For clinical and/or histological assessment of the cause, a colonoscopy is then performed. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the relationship between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and lesions observed during a subsequent colonoscopy. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science with the keywords concerning PET/CT scan and colonoscopy. The studies were selected using inclusion criteria defined a priori and were described individually to examine the correlation between incidental colorectal FDG uptake and the lesions found at colonoscopy. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 1606 studies found were included. In total, 108,578 patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT scan as part of a diagnostic work-up or cancer staging. In total, 2546 incidental colorectal FDG uptakes were described in 2121 patients (mean age 62.7 years SD ± 5.1), of which 2045 uptakes in 1635 patients were examined by colonoscopy, within a mean of 37 days (SD ± 28). The colonoscopic lesions included neoplasms (n = 1097; 322 cancers), benign lesions (n = 273), and inflammatory lesions (n = 71). Colonoscopies were normal in 604 patients. In total, 82% of lesions were located in the same location as the FDG uptakes. The positive predictive value was 70% (95% CI [68-72]). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental colorectal FDG uptake, as evaluated by subsequent colonoscopy, often reveals neoplastic lesions. Predominantly, lesions were located at the same location as FDG uptake. Further investigation is warranted before recommending that incidental colorectal FDG uptake should always result in referral to diagnostic colonoscopy.