Open staged repair of splenic and extensive superior mesenteric artery aneurysms.

A 31-year-old man with a history of multiple strokes of unknown etiology presented with multiple asymptomatic visceral artery aneurysms including a 3.3-cm bilobed splenic artery aneurysm and a 3.1-cm fusiform superior mesenteric artery aneurysm. He had no family history of aneurysms, and there was no evidence of collagen disease. He underwent open splenic artery aneurysm resection without splenectomy and had an uneventful recovery. Seven months later, he had open repair of his 14.6-cm-long fusiform superior mesenteric artery aneurysm with a 15-cm-long collagen-coated polyester interposition graft with multiple visceral branch reimplantations into the graft. The postoperative course was uneventful, and computed tomography confirmed patent graft and side branches. Two years later, the patient remained free of abdominal symptoms, although he suffered another episode of a mild stroke.

Expanded Indications and Improved Outcomes for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Demand for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has increased. The authors' initial NSM guidelines included risk reduction and cancers 2 cm or smaller located more than 2 cm from the nipple. The relative contraindications included obesity, large and/or ptotic breasts, and prior radiation. This study aimed to evaluate changes over time in NSM indications, surgical approach, and early outcomes. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the study identified 354 patients scheduled for 588 NSMs, 341 (96%) of whom underwent 566 NSMs. Changes across time [early (2009-2010), mid (2011-2012), and recent (2013-6/2014)] were assessed using tests for linear trend. RESULTS: For patients undergoing reconstruction, NSMs increased from 24% (early) to 40% (recent) (p = 0.004). Among the NSM patients, average body mass index, proportion with bra cup sizes of C or larger, and prior radiation increased significantly over time. Performance of NSM for tumors 2 cm or less from the nipple increased from 5 to 18%, and after neoadjuvant therapy, from 8 to 21.5% (p = 0.02). Use of inframammary, radial, and reduction-type incisions increased over time, together with intraoperative laser angiography (both p < 0.0001). Concomitantly, the overall complication rate, complications requiring treatment, and postoperative nipple loss decreased. During a median follow-up period of 19 months, five locoregional recurrences (LRR) were observed, for an estimated 2-year LRR rate of 1.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0-3.9%]. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, the indications for NSM expanded in terms of patient characteristics, tumor stage, and prior therapy, whereas the complication rates decreased. Excellent short-term outcomes suggest that NSM is a reasonable approach for many risk-reduction and cancer patients without disease in the nipple-areolar complex. Further study is needed to assess long-term aesthetics, patient satisfaction, and oncologic safety.

Indications and Perioperative Outcomes for Pancreatectomy with Arterial Resection.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy with arterial resection (AR) is performed infrequently. As indications evolve, we evaluated indications, outcomes, and predictors of mortality, morbidity, and survival after AR. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a single-institution review of elective pancreatectomies with AR (from July1990 to July 2017). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for predictors of outcomes and survival. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients underwent pancreatectomy with AR including any hepatic (54%), any celiac (44%), any superior mesenteric (14%), or multiple ARs (14%), with revascularization in 55%. The majority of cases were planned (77%) and performed post-2010 (78%). Overall 90-day major morbidity (≥grade III) and mortality were 54% and 13%, respectively, due to post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), or ischemia in the majority of cases. There was a significant decrease in mortality post-2010 (9% vs 29%, p = 0.02), and this was protective on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 0.1, p = 0.004); PPH increased mortality (OR 6.1, p < 0.001). Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage was associated with major morbidity (OR 5.1, p = 0.005), reoperation (OR = 23.0, p = 0.004), ICU (OR 5.5, p < 0.001), and readmission (OR 2.6, p = 0.004). Other morbidity predictors were AR with graft (OR 4.0, p = 0.031) and POPF (OR 3.1, p = 0.003). Median survival was 28.5 months and improved for ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.038). There were no differences in survival based on AR type. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of indication or type, pancreatectomy with AR is associated with risks greater than standard resections. Mortality has decreased in the modern era; however, morbidity remains high from hemorrhagic, fistula, or ischemia-related complications. Mitigation measures are needed if advanced resections are considered with increasing frequency given the potential oncologic benefit of AR in selected cases after modern chemotherapy.

Outcomes of Primary Colorectal Sarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Review.

INTRODUCTION: Primary colorectal sarcomas are a rare entity with anecdotally poor outcomes. We sought to inform surgeons, oncologists, and researchers of the characteristics and outcomes of these understudied and difficult-to-manage tumors. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with pathologically confirmed primary sarcoma of the colon or rectum (1998-2012). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors were excluded. Unadjusted overall survival was reported using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were used as a comparison cohort. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three patients with primary colorectal sarcoma were identified (57.5% leiomyosarcoma subtype). Median age was 63 [inter-quartile range 52, 75] years with 23.1% between the ages of 18 and 50 and 48.7% female. Majority of sarcomas were located in the colon (70.7%). When compared to 696,902 patients with adenocarcinoma, sarcoma patients were younger, had larger tumors, were more likely node negative and rectal in location, and higher grade (all p < 0.001), while sex, race, and comorbidity score were similar (all p > 0.05). Overall survival was lower at 5 years in patients with sarcoma (43.8%) than adenocarcinoma (52.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Primary colorectal sarcomas are rare and present at a younger age and higher grade than adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Survival is significantly worse compared to adenocarcinoma patients.

Outcomes and feasibility of nipple-sparing mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: While nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is gaining acceptance for risk reduction and for treatment of early stage breast cancer, node-positive disease remains a relative contraindication. Our aim was to evaluate the use and outcomes of NSM in node-positive breast cancer patients. METHODS: We identified 240 cancers in 226 patients (14 bilateral) scheduled for NSM and operated on between 1/2009 and 6/2014. We compared outcomes for 58 node-positive vs 182 node-negative patients. RESULTS: Intraoperative conversion to skin-sparing mastectomy was similar for node-positive and node-negative patients, 10% and 7%, as was 1-year success of NSM, 84% and 90%, respectively. Five-year locoregional disease-free estimates were 82% (95% CI 68%-99%) for node-positive and 99% (95% CI 96%-100%) for node-negative patients, P = .004; however, there were no nipple-areolar recurrences among node-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: With careful consideration of biologic and anatomic risk factors for recurrence, these data suggest that NSM is a reasonable option for selected node-positive breast cancer patients.

Multiple primary melanoma in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding surveillance for multiple primary melanoma (MPM) in elderly patients or whether the incidence and risk factors are the same as for younger patients. Thus, we studied the frequency and characteristics of MPM in the elderly melanoma patients. METHODS: From our prospective melanoma registry, we studied 222 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older at their initial melanoma diagnosis. Mean follow-up was 65 ± 3 months. RESULTS: Median age was 76 years. Twenty-two patients (10%) developed a second primary melanoma and 8 (4%) of 3 or more primaries. 82% of second primaries (18 of 22) were the same or thinner than the index melanoma, yet 50% of third primary melanomas (4 out of 8) were thicker. Only prior dysplastic nevi (P <. 0001) were a significant risk factor for MPM. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest elderly melanoma patients have a significant risk of MPM that warrants careful surveillance to facilitate prompt detection and treatment. Patients with dysplastic nevi merit special scrutiny.