Assessment of online information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery.

Online health resources are important for patients seeking perioperative information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery. The value of the resources depends on their readability, accuracy, content, quality, and suitability for patient use. We systematically assess current online health information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery. Systematic online searches were performed to identify websites discussing robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery. For each website, readability was measured by nine standardized tests, and accuracy and content were assessed by an independent panel of two robotic cardiothoracic surgeons. Quality and suitability of websites were evaluated using the DISCERN and Suitability Assessment of Materials tools, respectively. A total of 220 websites (120 cardiac, and 100 thoracic) were evaluated. Both robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery websites were very difficult to read with mean readability scores of 13.8 and 14.0 (p = 0.97), respectively, requiring at least 13 years of education to be comprehended. Both robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery websites had similar accuracy, amount of content, quality, and suitability (p > 0.05). On multivariable regression, academic websites [Exp (B)], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-3.16; P < 0.001), and websites with higher amount of content [Exp (B)],1.73; 95% CI, 1.24-2.41; P < 0.001) were associated with higher accuracy. There was no association between readability of websites and accuracy [Exp (B)], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.21; P = 0.57). Online information on robotic cardiac and thoracic surgery websites overestimate patients' understanding and require at least 13 years of education to be comprehended. As website accuracy is not associated with ease of reading, the readability of online resources can be improved without compromising accuracy.

Improvements in transcatheter aortic valve implantation outcomes in lower surgical risk patients: a glimpse into the future.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the evolution of patient selection criteria for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its impact on clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence suggests that patient selection for TAVI is shifting toward lower surgical risk patients. The extent of this shift and its impact on clinical outcomes, however, are currently unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-center study that subcategorized TAVI patients into quartiles (Q1 to Q4) defined by enrollment date. These subgroups were subsequently examined for differences in baseline characteristics and 30-day and 6-month mortality rate. The relationship between quartiles and mortality rate was examined using unadjusted and adjusted (for baseline characteristics) Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Each quartile included 105 patients (n = 420). Compared with Q4 patients, Q1 patients had higher logistic EuroSCORES (25.4 ± 16.1% vs. 17.8 ± 12.0%, p < 0.001), higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores (7.1 ± 5.5% vs. 4.8 ± 2.6%, p > 0.001), and higher median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (3,495 vs. 1,730 ng/dl, p < 0.046). From Q1 to Q4, the crude 30-day and 6-month mortality rate decreased significantly from 11.4% to 3.8% (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11 to 1.01; p = 0.053) and from 23.5% to 12.4% (unadjusted HR: 0.49; 95 CI: 0.25 to 0.95; p = 0.07), respectively. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, there were no significant differences between Q1 and Q4 in 30-day mortality rate (adjusted HR ratio: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.08; p = 0.07) and 6-month mortality rate (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.77; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate an important paradigm shift toward the selection of lower surgical risk patients for TAVI. Significantly better clinical outcomes can be expected in lower than in higher surgical risk patients undergoing TAVI.