Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Risk assessment of child-pornography-exclusive offenders.
Law Hum Behav
; 47(4): 499-509, 2023 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37471014
2.
Risk assessment communication difficulties: An empirical examination of the effects of categorical versus probabilistic risk communication in sexually violent predator decisions.
Behav Sci Law
; 36(5): 532-553, 2018 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30294807
3.
Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case.
Behav Sci Law
; 36(3): 358-372, 2018 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29691882
4.
Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
Behav Sci Law
; 31(2): 215-29, 2013.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23613165
5.
The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
Behav Sci Law
; 29(3): 331-57, 2011.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21766326
6.
Mock jury research: where do we go from here?
Behav Sci Law
; 29(3): 467-79, 2011.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21706517
7.
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Professional Perceptions of Jury Decision-making Research Practices.
Behav Sci Law
; 34(4): 495-514, 2016 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27193481
8.
Reality check: a comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment.
Behav Sci Law
; 28(6): 730-50, 2010.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19856483
9.
Addition of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy or Brachytherapy Boost to External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
J Clin Oncol
; 38(26): 3024-3031, 2020 09 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32396488
10.
Preface to "when does sample matter in juror decision-making research? Differences between college student and representative samples of jurors".
Behav Sci Law
; 29(3): 325-7, 2011.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21766325
11.
Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
Int J Law Psychiatry
; 29(4): 289-305, 2006.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16530267
12.
The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisions.
Int J Law Psychiatry
; 47: 109-14, 2016.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27206709
13.
The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidence.
Int J Law Psychiatry
; 28(6): 589-603, 2005.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16125775
14.
Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness.
Int J Law Psychiatry
; 26(2): 113-37, 2003.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12581750
15.
Contemplating the presence of third party observers and facilitators in psychological evaluations.
Assessment
; 16(4): 362-72, 2009 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19667137
16.
Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive-experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony.
Behav Sci Law
; 25(4): 507-26, 2007.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17620274
17.
Adjusting risk of recidivism: do judicial departures worsen or improve recidivism prediction under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
Behav Sci Law
; 22(6): 731-50, 2004.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15386558
18.
The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
Behav Sci Law
; 22(6): 801-22, 2004.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15568199