Implementation of a care-pathway at the emergency department for older people presenting with nonspecific complaints; a protocol for a multicenter parallel cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults frequently attend the Emergency Department (ED) with poorly defined symptoms, often called nonspecific complaints (NSC). NSC such as 'weakness' and 'not feeling well', often lead to an extensive differential diagnosis. Patients with NSC experience a prolonged length of stay at the ED and are prone to adverse outcomes. Currently, a care pathway for patients with NSC does not exist. A special structured care pathway for patients with NSC was designed to improve the efficiency and quality of care at the ED. METHOD: A multicenter parallel cohort study, organized in different hospitals in the Noord-Brabant area, the Netherlands, in which general practitioners (GP), elderly care physicians (ECP), Emergency Physicians (EP), geriatricians and internists will collaborate. Patients ≥ 70 years presenting with NSC and in need of ED admission as indicated by their own GP or ECP are eligible for inclusion. Before implementation each hospital will retrospectively include their own control-group. After implementation, patients will prospectively be included. The care-pathway exists of risk stratification by the APOP-screener, in-depth history taking, i.e. limited comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and a standard set of diagnostics, and a dedicated ED-nurse (if possible) present to ensure the care-pathway is followed. The primary outcome is length of stay at the ED (LOS-ED) and perceived quality of care. Secondary outcomes are hospital length of stay, revisits, readmissions and mortality at 30- and 90-day follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study proposes a structured care pathway for older patients presenting at the ED with NSCs and considering effectiveness and perceived quality this may improve acute care for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial register, number NL8960.

Organisation of internal medicine in acute care in the Netherlands: a detailed overview.

BACKGROUND: Organisation of the emergency department (ED) is gaining attention due to an increased demand on emergency services, leading to crowding and influencing the quality of care. It is known that the organisation of acute care influences the performance of the ED. In the Netherlands, the organisation of EDs differs between hospitals. However, detailed information about the various organisational structures is lacking. This study aims to determine the organisational structures and the different roles and responsibilities of internists and emergency physicians (EPs) in the EDs. METHODS: We performed a nationwide observational study between January 2018 and February 2019. All hospitals with an ED in the Netherlands were identified, contacted, and surveyed. Requested information was retrieved from internists and complemented with local administrative hospital data. RESULTS: 76 out of 89 EDs responded to the questionnaire (84%); 93% of EDs were operational 24/7. A registered acute internist was present at 47 locations (62%) and an EP at 60 EDs (79%). At 10 locations (13.2%), internists reported not being physically present at the ED. Supervision and working agreements between EPs and internists differed between the hospitals. Collaboration between EPs and internists was graded satisfactory (7.4/10). CONCLUSION: This is the first study providing a detailed overview of the ED organisation in the Netherlands regarding internal medicine patients. This organisation differs in terms of staffing, presence of EPs and internists, and working agreements. The influence of the various organisational structures of EDs on quality of acute care should be the subject of future research.

Correlations between peripheral blood Coxiella burnetii DNA load, interleukin-6 levels, and C-reactive protein levels in patients with acute Q fever.

From 2007 to 2010, the Netherlands experienced the largest reported Q fever outbreak, with >4,000 notified cases. We showed previously that C-reactive protein is the only traditional infection marker reflecting disease activity in acute Q fever. Interleukin-6 is the principal inducer of C-reactive protein. We questioned whether increased C-reactive protein levels in acute Q fever patients coincide with increased interleukin-6 levels and if these levels correlate with the Coxiella burnetii DNA load in serum. In addition, we studied their correlation with disease severity, expressed by hospital admission and the development of fatigue. Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels were analyzed in sera from 102 patients diagnosed with seronegative PCR-positive acute Q fever. Significant but weak negative correlations were observed between bacterial DNA loads expressed as cycle threshold values and interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels, while a significant moderate-strong positive correlation was present between interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels. Furthermore, significantly higher interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels were observed in hospitalized acute Q fever patients in comparison to those in nonhospitalized patients, while bacterial DNA loads were the same in the two groups. No marker was prognostic for the development of fatigue. In conclusion, the correlation between interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels in acute Q fever patients points to an immune activation pathway in which interleukin-6 induces the production of C-reactive protein. Significant differences in interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels between hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients despite identical bacterial DNA loads suggest an important role for host factors in disease presentation. Higher interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels seem predictive of more severe disease.