Re-revision Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction Because of Nonunion and Tendon Failure After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Extensor mechanism (EM) disruption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is devastating, especially in cases of re-rupture. A 67-year-old man with diabetes had patellar tendon rupture after revision TKA and then had migration of the bone block after Achilles tendon allograft with bone block (ATBB) augmentation with cerclage. A third reconstruction was performed with open reduction and internal fixation and high-strength braided suture augmentation. Five months postoperatively, the patient had regained full range of motion with intact EM and hardware. The risk of re-rupture is high in ATBB, and the primary issues in this case were nonunion and tendinous compromise. A construct that encompasses compression and buttressing of the bone block with tendon augmentation potentially addresses the risks of recurrent EM rupture in more complex cases. [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].

Atypical Mycobacterial Infections of the Spine: Evaluation and Management.

BACKGROUND: Atypical mycobacterial infections of the spine can be difficult to treat and represent a subset of the vertebral osteomyelitis and diskitis spectrum often requiring early and aggressive surgical intervention. The purpose of this review is to improve the understanding of and approach to disease management from the perspective of the spine surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Debridement or excision of the affected levels may be necessary to decrease mycobacterial loads and restore biomechanics. A close relationship with the patient's internal medicine and infectious disease specialists should be maintained to ensure disease eradication or remission. Long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy may be required for infection control. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Atypical mycobacterial spine infections are rare, complex, and difficult to eradicate. Our institution proposes a collaborative effort among the spine surgeon, infectious disease specialists, and internal medicine specialists to best approach the work-up, diagnosis, and treatment of these infections. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):e61-e66.].

Comparison of Adverse Outcomes Following Placement of Superion Interspinous Spacer Device Versus Laminectomy and Laminotomy.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests placement of the Superion interspinous spacer (SISS) device compared with laminectomy or laminotomy surgery offers an effective, less invasive treatment option for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Both SISS placement and laminectomy or laminotomy have risks of complications and a direct comparison of complications between the 2 procedures has not been previously studied. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term complications of the SISS with laminectomy or laminotomy and highlight device-specific long-term outcomes with SISS. METHODS: Via retrospective review, 189 patients who received lumbar level SISSs were compared with 378 matched controls who underwent primary lumbar spine laminectomy or laminotomy; data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Complications analyzed included rates of wound infection, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, urinary tract infection, sepsis, septic shock, cardiac arrest, death, and reoperation within 30 days of index surgery. Differences between groups were analyzed using the χ2test. Device-specific complication (DSC) rates included device malfunction or misplacement (DM), device explantation (DE), spinous process fracture (SPF), and subsequent spinal surgery (SSS). RESULTS: No differences in demographics or comorbidities existed between groups. There was no significant difference in rates of complications between groups. A total of 44.4% of patients in the SISS group experienced DSCs with 11.1% of patients experiencing DM, 21.1% experiencing an SPF, 20.1% requiring DE, and 24.3% requiring SSS. Having at least 1 DSC significantly increased odds of SSS, odds ratio >120, P < .0001. CONCLUSION: Rates of 30-day complications in the SISS group were not significantly different from patients undergoing laminectomy or laminotomy. Rates of 2-year DSC within SISS and cumulative risk associated with these complications should be considered further as they likely represent need for additional procedures for patients and substantial cost to the healthcare system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Having no differences in adverse events between laminectomies or laminotomies and SISS plus evidence of substantial device-specific long-term adverse outcomes and reoperation should be given consideration when deciding on surgical intervention of 1-2 level lumbar spinal stenosis.