The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic prescription rates in out-of-hours primary care - a register-based study in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prescription rates can be affected by pandemic measures such as lockdowns, social distancing, and remote consultations in general practice. Therefore, such emergency states may negatively affect antimicrobial stewardship, specifically in out-of-hours (OOH) primary care. As contact patterns changed in the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be relevant to explore the impact on antimicrobial stewardship. AIM: To study the impact of the pandemic on antibiotic prescription rates in OOH primary care, overall and per age group. METHODS: This cross-sectional register-based study used routine data from OOH primary care in the Central Denmark Region. We included all patient contacts in two equivalent time periods: pre-pandemic and pandemic period. The main outcome measure was defined as the number of antibiotic prescriptions per contact (antibiotic prescription rate). RESULTS: The overall antibiotic prescription rate decreased during the first year of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (RR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.96-0.98). Likewise, the rate decreased for clinic consultations (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.62-0.64). However, an increase was seen for telephone consultations (RR = 1.73, 95%CI: 1.70-1.76). The decline in clinic consultations was largest for consultations involving children aged 0-10 years (RR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.51-0.56). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prescription rates in Danish OOH primary care decreased during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for young children. Prescription rates decreased in clinic consultations, whereas the rates increased in telephone consultations. Further research should explore if antibiotic prescription rates have returned to pre-pandemic levels, and if the introduction of video consultations has affected antibiotic prescription patterns in OOH primary care.

Occlusion Pressure of the Thoracic Duct in Fontan Patients With Lymphatic Failure: Does Dilatation Challenge Contractility?

BACKGROUND: The Fontan circulation challenges the lymphatic system. Increasing production of lymphatic fluid and impeding lymphatic return, increased venous pressure may cause lymphatic dilatation and decrease lymphatic contractility. In-vitro studies have reported a lymphatic diameter-tension curve, with increasing passive stretch affecting the intrinsic contractile properties of each thoracic duct segment. We aimed to describe thoracic duct occlusion pressure and asses if thoracic duct dilation impairs contractility in individuals with a Fontan circulation and lymphatic failure. METHODS: Central venous pressure and thoracic duct measurements were retrospectively collected from 31 individuals with a Fontan circulation. Thoracic duct occlusion pressure was assessed during a period of external manual compression and used as an indicator of lymphatic vessel contractility. Measurements of pressure were correlated with measurements of the thoracic duct diameter in images obtained by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography. RESULTS: The average central venous pressure and average pressure of the thoracic duct were 17 mm Hg. During manual occlusion, the thoracic duct pressure significantly increased to 32 mm Hg. The average thoracic duct diameter was 3.3 mm. Thoracic duct diameter correlated closely with the central venous pressure. The rise in pressure following manual occlusion showed an inverse correlation with the diameter of the thoracic duct. CONCLUSION: Higher central venous pressures are associated with increasing diameters of the thoracic duct. When challenged by manual occlusion, dilated thoracic ducts display a decreased ability to increase pressure. Dilatation and a resulting decreased contractility may partly explain the challenged lymphatic system in individuals with a Fontan circulation.