Prognostic Factors in Patients with an Implanted Pacemaker after 80 Years of Age in a 4-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: The controversy over electrotherapy for patients aged >80 years occurs already at the stage of qualification for this treatment type and concerns optimal device selection, the implantation strategy, and the overall benefit from pacemaker therapy. The group also has a considerable number of cardiovascular risk factors, and the data from the literature on the impact of the pacing mode on the remote prognosis of this group are ambiguous. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the risk factors for death among patients with implanted pacemakers >80 years of age in a 4-year follow-up. METHODS: The study group consisted of 140 consecutive patients (79 women) aged 84.48 ± 3.65 years with single- or dual-chamber pacemakers implanted >80 years of age because of symptomatic bradycardia. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, demographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters, pharmacotherapy, and factors related to the implanted device - i.e., indications, pacemaker type, and the implantation position of the tip of the right ventricular lead - were included. The endpoint was death for any reason in a 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: During follow-up, 68 patients (48.6%) died. Although atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular response constituted 20% of the indications for implantation, 60.8% of the patients received a single-chamber system (VVI/VVIR). In the whole group, the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed both a favourable prognostic significance of DDD pacing system implantation (HR = 0.507; 95% CI: 0.294-0.876) and coexisting hypertension (HR = 0.520; 95% CI: 0.299-0.902). The risk factors were fasting glycaemia (HR = 1.180; 95% CI: 1.038-1.342) and, potentially, female sex (HR = 1.672; 95% CI: 0.988-2.830; p = 0.056). In the female subgroup a more favourable prognosis was related to the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (HR = 0.435; 95% CI: 0.202-0.933) and DDD pacemaker implantation (HR = 0.381; 95% CI: 0.180-0.806). In the male subgroup a more favourable prognosis was related to concerned patients with coexisting hypertension (HR = 0.349; 95% CI: 0.079-0.689). CONCLUSIONS: DDD mode pacing seems to serve as a factor which decreases mortality among patients aged >80 years in long-term follow-up. The potentially poorer prognosis for the female patients in this group may result from a combination of the dominant VVI pacing mode, potential propagation of atrial fibrillation, a low proportion of antithrombotic therapy, and sex-related predispositions to thromboembolic complications.

The influence of obstructive sleep breathing disturbances on echocardiographic and pulmonary haemodynamic parameters in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: It is important to identify the clinical indicators of poor prognosis and treatable conditions that might contribute to the progression of heart failure (HF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the group of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and concomitant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). AIM: To evaluate the influence of OSA on echocardiographic and haemodynamic parameters in patients with DCM, and the outcome in long-term follow-up. METHODS: We enrolled patients with DCM and severely impaired ejection fraction (EF < 30%). Each patient underwent polygraphy, echocardiography, and right heart catheterisation. Subjects were divided into groups based on the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): > 0 and < 5 (group I), ≥ 5 and ≤ 15 (group II), > 15 and ≤ 30 (group III), and > 30 (group IV). We compared the OSA-free (AHI < 5) subjects with those with OSA (AHI ≥ 5). The evaluated clinical end-points were death and orthotropic heart transplant. RESULTS: The study population comprised 51 patients. Mean EF was 22%; 59% of patients were suffering from OSA. The increased severity of OSA correlated with worse pulmonary haemodynamics. Patients with OSA had higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance than individuals without OSA (p = 0.044, p = 0.032, respectively). The highest chamber diameters assessed in echocardiography were found in group IV (p < 0.05). A total of 10 end-points occurred during follow-up (8.9 ± 5.1 months), with significant differences observed between groups I-IV and the highest rate in group IV (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The increasing severity of OSA worsens the prognosis of DCM patients, independently of severe HF and coexistent PH. Systematic OSA screening in patients with HF might facilitate identification of individuals at high risk of progression of pulmonary haemodynamic impairment and end-point rate.