Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs. endoscopic mucosal resection for early Barrett's neoplasia in the West: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The difference in clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia remains unclear. We compared the recurrence/residual tissue rates, resection outcomes, and adverse events after ESD and EMR for early BE neoplasia. METHODS: We included patients who underwent EMR or ESD for BE-associated high grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) at eight academic hospitals. We compared demographic, procedural, and histologic characteristics, and follow-up data. A time-to-event analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence/residual disease and a Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the groups. RESULTS: 243 patients (150 EMR; 93 ESD) were included. EMR had lower en bloc (43 % vs. 89 %; P < 0.001) and R0 (56 % vs. 73 %; P = 0.01) rates than ESD. There was no difference in the rates of perforation (0.7 % vs. 0; P > 0.99), early bleeding (0.7 % vs. 1 %; P > 0.99), delayed bleeding (3.3 % vs. 2.1 %; P = 0.71), and stricture (10 % vs. 16 %; P = 0.16) between EMR and ESD. Patients with non-curative resections who underwent further therapy were excluded from the recurrence analysis. Recurrent/residual disease was 31.4 % [44/140] for EMR and 3.5 % [3/85] for ESD during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.5 (6.75-30) and 8 (2-18) months, respectively. Recurrence-/residual disease-free survival was significantly higher in the ESD group. More patients required additional endoscopic resection procedures to treat recurrent/residual disease after EMR (EMR 24.2 % vs. ESD 3.5 %; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ESD is safe and results in more definitive treatment of early BE neoplasia, with significantly lower recurrence/residual disease rates and less need for repeat endoscopic treatments than with EMR.

Chronic Pancreatitis Patients Who Leave Against Medical Advice: Prevalence, Trend, and Predictors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaving against medical advice (LAMA) is an unfortunate occurrence in 1-2% of all hospitalized patients and is associated with worse outcomes. While this has been investigated across multiple clinical conditions, studies on patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) are lacking. We aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of this event among patients with CP. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2007-2014, was used in the study. Patients with LAMA were identified, and the temporal trend of LAMA was estimated and compared among patients with and without CP. We then extracted patients with a discharge diagnosis of CP from the recent years of HCUP-NIS (2012-2014) and described the characteristics of LAMA in these patients. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of LAMA. RESULTS: 3.39% of patients with CP discharged against medical advice. LAMA rate in CP patients was higher and increased more steeply at quadruple the rate of those without. More likely to self-discharge were patients who were young, males, non-privately insured, or engaged in alcohol and substance abuse, likewise were those with psychosis and those admitted on a weekend or non-electively. The northeast and for-profit hospitals also had higher odds of LAMA. However, patients transferred from other healthcare facilities have reduced LAMA odds. Among all patients with CP, those with LAMA had shorter length of stay (2.74 [2.62-2.85] days vs. 5.78 [5.71-5.83] days) and lower hospitalization cost $23,271 [$22,171-$24,370] versus $45,472 [$44,381-$46,562] compared to the no-LAMA group. CONCLUSION: LAMA occurs in approximately 1 in 29 patients with CP and is increasing at almost quadruple the rate of those without. Clinicians need to pay closer attention to the identified at-risk groups for ameliorative targeted interventions.

Vedolizumab Dose Escalation Improves Therapeutic Response in a Subset of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: The Gemini trial failed to detect a significant difference in response rate for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) randomized to standard (every 8 week) vedolizumab dosing vs escalated (every 4 week) dosing. Subsequent real-world data imply the Gemini trial design may have obscured a benefit of escalated dosing. AIMS: We investigated outcomes after vedolizumab dose escalation for patients with UC. We also explored potential clinical predictors of dose escalation requirement. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included patients with UC who received vedolizumab between 1/2017-1/2019. We compared rates of clinical response (decrease in partial Mayo score by ≥ 2) and remission (partial Mayo < 2) for standard vs escalated dosing. RESULTS: Among the 90 patients reviewed, 52 achieved and maintained remission on standard dosing. The average time to remission with standard dosing was 33.3 ± 6.6 weeks. After an average of 56.3 ± 7.4 weeks standard dosing, 24 patients (22 "partial responders" and 2 "non-responders") were dose-escalated. Of the 22 "partial responders" dose-escalated, 10 (45%) achieved remission, 10 (45%) achieved further improvement. Neither "non-responder" demonstrated further clinical benefit. Prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic exposure predicted dose escalation requirement (p = 0.008). Patients requiring dose escalation had more severe disease at baseline as measured by both full Mayo (p = 0.009) and partial Mayo scores (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We show dose escalation benefited patients with UC who exhibit a "partial response" to standard dosing. Early vedolizumab dose escalation should be considered in both patients with severe disease and those with prior anti-TNF experience.

Using nomogram of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system for treatment selection in patients with stage C hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The nomogram of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been used for outcome prediction. Patients with BCLC stage C HCC often undergo anti-cancer therapy against current treatment guidelines in real world practice. We aimed to use the nomogram to provide guidance on treatment selection for BCLC stage C patients. METHODS: A total of 1317 patients with stage C HCC were retrospectively analyzed and divided into four groups by nomogram points. One-to-one matched pairs between patients receiving different treatments were generated by the propensity score with matching model within these groups. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. RESULTS: Patients with higher nomogram points were more often treated with targeted or supportive therapies (p <  0.001). Patients receiving targeted or supportive therapies had a decreased survival compared to patients undergoing aggressive treatments (surgical resection, ablation, transarterial chemo-embolization or transplantation) across all four groups (p <  0.001). After matching for baseline differences in the propensity model, patients receiving different treatments had comparable age, gender, etiology of liver disease, tumor burden, severity of cirrhosis and performance status. Survival analyses were re-performed and disclosed that patients with nomogram points < 15 had better overall outcome after aggressive treatments (p <  0.05). For patients with nomogram points > 15, there was no significant difference in survival between patients receiving two different treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram of BCLC system is a feasible tool to help stage C HCC patients to select primary anti-cancer treatment in pursuance of better overall survival.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents in rheumatic diseases; A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents compared to their reference agents in immune mediated diseases. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of biosimilars of anti-TNF-α agents compared to their reference agents in patients with various immune mediated diseases. The outcomes were the rates of clinical response and adverse events among patients treated with biosimilars compared to their reference agents. Additionally, occurrence of anti-drug antibodies with the use of biosimilars was compared to the reference agents. RESULTS: Nine studies reporting outcomes in 3291 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were identified (5 infliximab, 2 adalimumab, and 2 etanercept). No RCTs in other diseases were found. Biosimilars of infliximab showed similar rates of clinical response compared to the reference agent in RA and AS. Frequency of anti-drug antibody and adverse events were similar except for a slightly, but significantly, higher risk of upper respiratory tract infections with biosimilar (RR 1.54, P = 0.047, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-2.37). Biosimilar of adalimumab showed no differences among any outcomes compared to the reference agent. Biosimilars of etanercept showed no differences for clinical response and frequency of adverse events, but showed a significantly lower rate of anti-drug antibodies at 24-30 weeks (RR 0.05, P <0.0001%, 95% CI = 0.01-0.21). CONCLUSION: In the present study, biosimilars of anti-TNF-α agents had an overall comparable efficacy and safety profile compared to their reference agents in RA and AS supporting their use for these conditions.

Campylobacter infection and the link with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: on the pathway towards a causal association.

OBJECTIVES: proving causality between an exposure and outcome can be difficult in humans. Here, we utilize the Bradford Hill (BH) criteria to summarize the causal relationship between Campylobacter infection and the development of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). METHODS: we utilized the BH criteria to assess the strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, biological gradient, plausibility, coherence, experiment, and analogy of the current evidence linking Campylobacter to IBS. Through a consensus amongst all authors, the confidence of each criterion was graded as high, moderate, low, or very low. RESULTS: a total of four criteria (strength, temporality, plausibility, and analogy) were graded as high; four criteria (consistency, biological gradient, coherence, and experiment) were graded as moderate; and one criterion (specificity) was graded as low. Large-scale epidemiological studies report a risk ratio of 2.7-5.6 for developing IBS after campylobacter. In rodent models, Campylobacter jejuni 81-176 can cause loose stool months after the infection is cleared and share common pathophysiology as IBS patients such as elevated intestinal TLR-4 and IL-8, antibodies to CdtB and vinculin, increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. CONCLUSIONS: Campylobacter infection appear to cause IBS in a subset of patients. This may hold implication in risk factor identification, public health policy, and possibly treatment.

Expanding beyond endoscopy: A review of non-invasive modalities in Barrett's esophagus screening and surveillance.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a condition that results from replacement of the damaged normal squamous esophageal mucosa to intestinal columnar mucosa and is the most significant predisposing factor for development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Current guidelines recommend endoscopic evaluation for screening and surveillance based on various risk factors which has limitations such as invasiveness, availability of a trained specialist, patient logistics and cost. Trans-nasal endoscopy is a less invasive modality but still has similar limitations such as limited availability of trained specialist and costs. Non-endoscopic modalities, in comparison, require minimal intervention, can be done in an office visit and has the potential to be a more ideal choice for mass public screening and surveillance, particularly in patents at low risk for BE. These include newer generations of esophageal capsule endoscopy which provides direct visualization of BE, and tethered capsule endomicroscopy which can obtain high-resolution images of the esophagus. Various cell collection devices coupled with biomarkers have been used for BE screening. Cytosponge, in combination with TFF3, as well as EsophaCap and EsoCheck have shown promising results in various studies when used with various biomarkers. Other modalities including circulatory microRNAs and volatile organic compounds that have demonstrated favorable outcomes. Use of these cell collection methods for BE surveillance is a potential area of future research.

Asians Have Higher Risk of Developing Pancreatic Necrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient Population: A National Inpatient Sample Database Study.

Background  The aim of this study is to evaluate race-associated risk factors of acute pancreatitis (AP) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Methods  A retrospective analysis using 2016 and 2017 National Inpatient Sample database was performed. Inclusion criteria were principal diagnosis of AP and a secondary diagnosis of IBD. Patients below 18 years of age were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality rate and secondary outcomes included pancreatic necrosis, surgical necrosectomy, total hospitalization charges, total parenteral nutrition use, and length of stay. For the primary and secondary outcomes, adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and mean difference calculation using multivariate regression were calculated. Results A total of 7,060 patients with AP in IBD were identified; of which 53.5% were female. The use of Medicaid was significantly higher in blacks (39.5%), Hispanics (32.6%), and Asian/Pacific Islanders (40%) compared to whites (19.9%). Approximately 63.2% of AP patients in IBD received care at an urban teaching hospital. Pancreatic necrosis was noted to be highest in Asians or Pacific Islanders compared to whites (aOR 12.62, 95% CI 1.00-159.3, p = 0.05). Conclusion Our study shows that racial disparities exist among AP in IBD patients with pancreatic necrosis being more common in Asians and Pacific Islanders compared to whites. Identification of potential causes of these disparities is of paramount importance to expand access to healthcare.

Ustekinumab dose escalation improves clinical responses in refractory Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians often utilize off-label dose escalation of ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with disease refractory to standard dosing. Previous studies report mixed results with dose escalation of UST. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of 143 adult patients with CD receiving UST over a 33-month time period was conducted. Patients receiving UST at standard dosage for a minimum of 16 weeks were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes collected were clinical response [Physician Global Assessment Score (PGA) by >1] and remission (PGA = 0). Changes in clinical parameters were calculated for dose-escalated patients beginning with the time of dose switch (~42 weeks) and compared with a group of patients who were classified as "failing" standard dosing at 42 weeks who were not dose escalated. RESULTS: Dose escalation improved PGA by 0.47 ± 0.19 compared with patients remaining on every 8 weeks dosing (Q8 week), who worsened by 0.23 ± 0.23 (p < 0.05). Dose escalation decreased CRP 0.33 ± 0.19 mg/L and increased serum albumin 0.23 ± 0.06 g/dL (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, disease duration and prior CD surgeries inversely correlated with the need for dose escalation. CONCLUSION: Our results support UST Q4 week dose escalation for selected CD patients who fail to achieve remission on standard Q8 week dosing. Dose escalation improves clinical outcomes, prevents worsening disease severity, and positively impacts CRP and albumin levels. Together these data indicate that clinicians should attempt Q4 week UST dosing in refractory CD patients before switching to an alternative class of biologic therapy.