Physiologic homeostasis after pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation.

Demand for kidney grafts outpaces supply, limiting kidney transplantation as a treatment for kidney failure. Xenotransplantation has the potential to make kidney transplantation available to many more patients with kidney failure, but the ability of xenografts to support human physiologic homeostasis has not been established. A brain-dead adult decedent underwent bilateral native nephrectomies followed by 10 gene-edited (four gene knockouts, six human transgenes) pig-to-human xenotransplantation. Physiologic parameters and laboratory values were measured for seven days in a critical care setting. Data collection aimed to assess homeostasis by measuring components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, parathyroid hormone signaling, glomerular filtration rate, and markers of salt and water balance. Mean arterial blood pressure was maintained above 60 mmHg throughout. Pig kidneys secreted renin (post-operative day three to seven mean and standard deviation: 47.3 ± 9 pg/mL). Aldosterone and angiotensin II levels were present (post-operative day three to seven, 57.0 ± 8 pg/mL and 5.4 ± 4.3 pg/mL, respectively) despite plasma renin activity under 0.6 ng/mL/hr. Parathyroid hormone levels followed ionized calcium. Urine output down trended from 37 L to 6 L per day with 4.5 L of electrolyte free water loss on post-operative day six. Aquaporin 2 channels were detected in the apical surface of principal cells, supporting pig kidney response to human vasopressin. Serum creatinine down trended to 0.9 mg/dL by day seven. Glomerular filtration rate ranged 90-240 mL/min by creatinine clearance and single-dose inulin clearance. Thus, in a human decedent model, xenotransplantation of 10 gene-edited pig kidneys provided physiologic balance for seven days. Hence, our in-human study paves the way for future clinical study of pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation in living persons.

Temporal trends in kidney paired donation in the United States: 2006-2021 UNOS/OPTN database analysis.

Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a major innovation that is changing the landscape of kidney transplantation in the United States. We used the 2006-2021 United Network for Organ Sharing data to examine trends over time. KPD is increasing, with 1 in 5 living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs) in 2021 facilitated by KPD. The proportion of LDKT performed via KPD was comparable for non-Whites and Whites. An increasing proportion of KPD transplants are going to non-Whites. End-chain recipients are not identified in the database. To what extent these trends reflect how end-chain kidneys are allocated, as opposed to increase in living donation among minorities, remains unclear. Half the LDKT in 2021 in sensitized (panel reactive antibody ≥ 80%) and highly sensitized (panel reactive antibody ≥ 98%) groups occurred via KPD. Yet, the proportion of KPD transplants performed in sensitized recipients has declined since 2013, likely due to changes in the deceased donor allocation policies and newer KPD strategies such as compatible KPD. In 2021, 40% of the programs reported not performing any KPD transplants. Our study highlights the need for understanding barriers to pursuing and expanding KPD at the center level and the need for more detailed and accurate data collection at the national level.

Genetically Modified Porcine Kidneys Have Sufficient Tissue Integrity for Use in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if genetically modified porcine kidneys used for xenotransplantation had sufficient tissue integrity to support long-term function in a human recipient. BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation remains the best available treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, a shortage of available donor human kidneys prevents many patients from achieving the benefits of transplantation. Xenotransplantation is a potential solution to this shortage. Recent pre-clinical human studies have demonstrated kidneys from genetically modified pig donors can be transplanted without hyperacute rejection and are capable of providing creatinine and other solute clearance. It is unknown whether the porcine kidneys would tolerate the relatively higher resting blood pressure in an adult human recipient compared with the pig donor or non-human primate (NHP) recipients used in translational studies. Furthermore, previous experience in NHPs raised concerns about the tissue integrity of the porcine ureter and post-xenotransplant growth of the porcine kidney. METHODS: Kidneys recovered from porcine donors with 10 gene edits were transplanted into decedent brain-dead recipients who were not eligible for organ donation. Decedents underwent bilateral native nephrectomy before transplant and were followed for 3 to 7 days. Standard induction and maintenance immunosuppression was used as previously reported. Vital signs, including blood pressure, were recorded frequently. Kidney xenografts were assessed daily, serially biopsied, and were measured at implantation and study completion. RESULTS: Three decedents underwent successful xenotransplantation. Subcapsular hematomas developed, requiring incision of the xenograft capsules to prevent Page kidney. Blood pressures were maintained in a physiologic range for adult humans (median arterial pressures (MAP) 108.5 mm Hg (Interquartile Range (IQR): 97-114 mm Hg), 74 mm Hg (IQR: 71-78 mm Hg), and 95 mm Hg (IQR: 88-99 mm Hg, respectively) and no bleeding complications or aneurysm formation was observed. Serial biopsies were taken from the xenografts without apparent loss of tissue integrity despite the lack of a capsule. Ureteroneocystotomies remained intact without evidence of urine leak. Xenograft growth was observed, but plateaued, in 1 decedent with increased volume of the left and right xenografts by 25% and 26%, respectively, and in the context of human growth hormone levels consistently less <0.1 ng/ml and insulin-like growth factor 1 levels ranging from 34-50 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest kidneys from 10-gene edited porcine donors have sufficient tissue integrity to tolerate xenotransplantation into a living human recipient. There was no evidence of anastomotic complications, and the xenografts tolerated needle biopsy without issue. Xenograft growth occurred but plateaued by the study end; further observation and investigation will be required to confirm this finding and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Treatment of Hypercalcemic Hyperparathyroidism After Kidney Transplantation Is Associated With Improved Allograft Survival.

BACKGROUND: Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) and malignancy are the most common causes of hypercalcemia. Among kidney transplant (KT) recipients, hypercalcemia is mostly caused by tertiary HPT. Persistent tertiary HPT after KT is associated with allograft failure. Previous studies on managing tHPT were subjected to survivor treatment selection bias; as such, the impact of tertiary HPT treatment on allograft function remained unclear. We aim to assess the association between hypercalcemic tertiary HPT treatment and kidney allograft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 280 KT recipients (2015-2019) with elevated post-KT adjusted serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH). KT recipients were characterized by treatment: cinacalcet, parathyroidectomy, or no treatment. Time-varying Cox regression with delayed entry at the time of first elevated post-KT calcium was conducted, and death-censored and all-cause allograft failure were compared by treatment groups. RESULTS: Of the 280 recipients with tHPT, 49 underwent PTx, and 98 received cinacalcet. The median time from KT to first elevated calcium was 1 month (IQR: 0-4). The median time from first elevated calcium to receiving cinacalcet and parathyroidectomy was 0(IQR: 0-3) and 13(IQR: 8-23) months, respectively. KT recipients with no treatment had shorter dialysis vintage (P = .017) and lower PTH at KT (P = .002), later onset of hypercalcemia post-KT (P < .001). Treatment with PTx (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.18, 95%CI 0.04-0.76, P = .02) or cinacalcet (aHR = 0.14, 95%CI 0.004-0.47, P = .002) was associated with lower risk of death-censored allograft failure. Moreover, receipt of PTx (aHR = 0.28, 95%CI 0.12-0.66, P < .001) or cinacalcet (aHR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.22-0.66, P < .001) was associated with lower risk of all-cause allograft failure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that treatment of hypercalcemic tertiary HPT post-KT is associated with improved allograft survival. Although these findings are not specific to hypercalcemia of malignancy, they do demonstrate the negative impact of hypercalcemic tertiary HPT on kidney function. Hypercalcemic HPT should be screened and aggressively treated post-KT.

Psychosocial evaluation of living liver donors-State of current practices in the United States.

We surveyed living donor liver transplant programs in the United States to describe practices in the psychosocial evaluation of living donors focused on (1) composition of psychosocial team; (2) domains, workflow, and tools of the psychosocial assessment; (3) absolute and relative mental health-related contraindications to donation; and (4) postdonation psychosocial follow-up. We received 52 unique responses, representing 33 of 50 (66%) of active living donor liver transplant programs. Thirty-one (93.9%) provider teams included social workers, 22 (66.7%) psychiatrists, and 14 (42.4%) psychologists. Validated tools were rarely used, but domains assessed were consistent. Respondents rated active alcohol (93.8%), cocaine (96.8%), and opioid (96.8%) use disorder, as absolute contraindications to donation. Active suicidality (97%), self-injurious behavior (90.9%), eating disorders (87.9%), psychosis (84.8%), nonadherence (71.9%), and inability to cooperate with the evaluation team (78.1%) were absolute contraindications to donation. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute psychosocial contraindications to liver donation between geographical areas or between large and small programs. Programs conduct postdonation psychosocial follow-up (57.6%) or screening (39.4%), but routine follow-up of declined donors is rarely conducted (15.8%). Psychosocial evaluation of donor candidates is a multidisciplinary process. The structure of the psychosocial evaluation of donors is not uniform among programs though the domains assessed are consistent. Psychosocial contraindications to living liver donation vary among the transplant programs. Mental health follow-up of donor candidates is not standardized.

The impact of the OPTN policy change on patients with a durable left ventricular assist device and chronic kidney disease: Analysis of the UNOS database.

BACKGROUND: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented modifications in 2018 to the adult heart transplant allocation system to better stratify the most medically urgent transplant candidates. We evaluated the impact of these changes on patients supported by a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the OPTN policy change on patients supported by durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We performed an analysis of patients from the United Network of Organ Sharing Database supported by durable LVAD listed for a heart transplant (HT) between October 17, 2016 and September 30, 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: pre- and postpolicy, depending on whether they were listed on or prior to October 17, 2018. Patients who were on dialysis prior to surgery or discharge were excluded from the analysis. Patients with simultaneous heart and kidney transplants were excluded. Patients who were listed for transplant prepolicy change but transplanted postpolicy change were excluded. This cohort was then subdivided into degrees of CKD based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which resulted in 678 patients (23.7%) in Stage 1 (GFR ≥89.499) (Prepolicy: 345, Postpolicy: 333), 1233 (43.1%) in Stage 2 (89.499 > GFR ≥ 59.499) (Prepolicy: 618, Postpolicy: 615), 613 (21.4%) in Stage 3a (59.499 > GFR ≥ 44.499) (Prepolicy: 291, Postpolicy: 322), 294 (10.3%) in Stage 3b (44.499 > GFR ≥ 29.499) (Prepolicy: 143, Postpolicy: 151), 36 (1.3%) in Stage 4 (29.499 > GFR ≥ 15) (Prepolicy: 21, Postpolicy: 15), and 9 (0.3%) in Stage 5 (15 > GFR) (Prepolicy: 4, Postpolicy: 5). The primary outcome was 1-year and 2-year post-HT survival. RESULTS: There were 2863 patients who met the study criteria (1422 prepolicy, 1441 postpolicy). Overall survival, regardless of CKD stage, was lower following the policy change (p < 0.01). There was a similar risk of primary graft failure (PGF) in the pre- and postpolicy period (1.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.26). 1-year overall survival was 93% (91, 94) and 89% (87, 91) in the pre- and postpolicy periods, respectively. 2-year overall survival was 89% (88, 91) and 85% (82, 87) in the pre- and postpolicy periods, respectively. For CKD Stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5, 1 -year survival was 93% (91, 95), 92% (90,93), 89% (86, 91), 89% (86, 93), 80% (68, 94), and 100% (100, 100), respectively. For CKD Stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5, 2-year survival was 91% (88, 93), 88% (86, 90), 84% (81, 88), 84% (80, 89), 73% (59, 90), and 100% (100, 100), respectively. Patients with CKD 1 and 2 had better survival compared to those with CKD 3 (p < 0.01) and CKD 4 and 5 (p = 0.03) in the pre- and postpolicy periods. Patients with CKD 3 did not have a survival advantage over those with CKD 4 and 5 (p = 0.25). On cox regression analysis, advancing degrees of CKD were associated with an increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LVAD support had decreased overall survival after the OPTN policy change. Patients with more advanced CKD had lower survival than patients without advanced CKD, though they were not impacted by the OPTN policy change.

Change in Body Mass Index and Attributable Risk of New-Onset Hypertension Among Obese Living Kidney Donors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether body mass index (BMI) changes modify the association between kidney donation and incident hypertension. BACKGROUND: Obesity increases hypertension risk in both general and living kidney donor (LKD) populations. Donation-attributable risk in the context of obesity, and whether weight change modifies that risk, is unknown. METHODS: Nested case-control study among 1558 adult LKDs (1976-2020) with obesity (median follow-up: 3.6 years; interquartile range: 2.0-9.4) and 3783 adults with obesity in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) studies (9.2 y; interquartile range: 5.3-15.8). Hypertension incidence was compared by donor status using conditional logistic regression, with BMI change investigated for effect modification. RESULTS: Overall, LKDs and nondonors had similar hypertension incidence [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.94-1.43, P =0.16], even after adjusting for BMI change (IRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.99-1.58, P =0.05). Although LKDs and nondonors who lost >5% BMI had comparable hypertension incidence (IRR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.46-1.34, P =0.36), there was a significant interaction between donor and >5% BMI gain (multiplicative interaction IRR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.29, P =0.006; relative excess risk due to interaction: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.24-1.56, P =0.007), such that LKDs who gained weight had higher hypertension incidence than similar nondonors (IRR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.32-2.53, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LKDs and nondonors with obesity had similar hypertension incidence. Weight stability and loss were associated with similar hypertension incidence by donor status. However, LKDs who gained >5% saw increased hypertension incidence versus similar nondonors, providing support for counseling potential LKDs with obesity on weight management postdonation.

Living donor liver transplantation: A multi-disciplinary collaboration towards growth, consensus, and a change in culture.

INTRODUCTION: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) reduces liver transplant waitlist mortality and provides excellent long-term outcomes for persons with end stage liver disease. Yet, utilization of LDLT has been limited in the United States (US). METHODS: In October 2021, the American Society of Transplantation held a consensus conference to identify important barriers to broader expansion of LDLT in the US, including data gaps, and make recommendations for impactful and feasible mitigation strategies to overcome these barriers. Domains addressed encompassed the entirety of the LDLT process. Representation from international centers and living donor kidney transplantation were included for their perspective/experience in addition to members across disciplines within the US liver transplantation community. A modified Delphi approach was employed as the consensus methodology. RESULTS: The predominant theme permeating discussion and polling results centered on culture; the beliefs and behaviors of a group of people perpetuated over time. CONCLUSIONS: Creating a culture of support for LDLT in the US is key for expansion and includes engagement and education of stakeholders across the spectrum of the process of LDLT. A shift from awareness of LDLT to acknowledgement of benefit of LDLT is the primary goal. Propagation of the maxim "LDLT is the best option" is pivotal.

Financial, policy, and ethical barriers to the expansion of living donor liver transplant: Meeting report from a living donor liver transplant consensus conference.

INTRODUCTION: In October 2021, the American Society of Transplantation (AST) hosted a virtual consensus conference aimed at identifying and addressing barriers to the broader, safe expansion of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) throughout the United States (US). METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of LDLT experts convened to address issues related to financial implications on the donor, transplant center crisis management, regulatory and oversight policies, and ethical considerations by assessing the relative significance of issues in preventing LDLT growth, with proposed strategies to overcome barriers. RESULTS: Living liver donors endure multiple obstacles including financial instability, loss of job security, and potential morbidity. These concerns, along with other center, state, and federal specific policies can be perceived as significant barriers to expanding LDLT. Donor safety is of paramount importance to the transplant community; however, regulatory and oversight policies aimed at ensuring donor safety can be viewed as ambiguous and complicated leading to time-consuming evaluations that may deter donor motivation and program expansion. CONCLUSION: Transplant programs need to establish appropriate crisis management plans to mitigate potential negative donor outcomes and ensure program viability and stability. Finally, ethical aspects, including informed consent for high-risk recipients and use of non-directed donors, can be perceived as additional barriers to expanding LDLT.

Living donor liver transplant candidate and donor selection and engagement: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference.

INTRODUCTION: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a promising option for mitigating the deceased donor organ shortage and reducing waitlist mortality. Despite excellent outcomes and data supporting expanding candidate indications for LDLT, broader uptake throughout the United States has yet to occur. METHODS: In response to this, the American Society of Transplantation hosted a virtual consensus conference (October 18-19, 2021), bringing together relevant experts with the aim of identifying barriers to broader implementation and making recommendations regarding strategies to address these barriers. In this report, we summarize the findings relevant to the selection and engagement of both the LDLT candidate and living donor. Utilizing a modified Delphi approach, barrier and strategy statements were developed, refined, and voted on for overall barrier importance and potential impact and feasibility of the strategy to address said barrier. RESULTS: Barriers identified fell into three general categories: 1) awareness, acceptance, and engagement across patients (potential candidates and donors), providers, and institutions, 2) data gaps and lack of standardization in candidate and donor selection, and 3) data gaps regarding post-living liver donation outcomes and resource needs. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to address barriers included efforts toward education and engagement across populations, rigorous and collaborative research, and institutional commitment and resources.