RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of anti-infliximab antibodies (anti-IFX) on 3 different points of care: response/tolerance to infliximab (IFX), tapering strategy, and in a subsequent treatment with a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). METHODS: A prospective cohort of 60 radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) patients under IFX were evaluated retrospectively regarding clinical/laboratorial data, IFX levels and anti-IFX, at baseline, after 6, 12-14, 22-24, 48-54, 96-102 weeks and before tapering or switching. RESULTS: Anti-IFX were detected in 27 (45%) patients, of whom 23 (85.1%) became positive in the first year of IFX treatment. In comparison to negative anti-IFX group, anti-IFX positive patients demonstrated the following: less use of methotrexate (MTX) as a concomitant treatment to IFX (5 [18.5%] vs. 14 [42.4%]; p=0.048); more infusion reactions at 22-24 weeks (p=0.020) and 48-54 weeks (p=0.034); more treatment failures (p=0.028) at 48-54 weeks; reduced overall IFX survival (p<0.001); and lower sustained responses (p=0.044). Of note, positive anti-IFX patients exhibited a shorter tapering survival (9.9 months [95% CI 4.0-15.8] vs 63.4 months [95% CI 27.9-98.8]; p=0.004) in comparison with negative anti-IFX patients. Conversely, for patients who failed IFX, positive anti-IFX patients had better clinical response to the second TNFi at 3 (15 [83.3%] vs. 3 [27.3%]; p=0.005) and 6 months (15 [83.3%] vs. 4 [36.4%]; p=0.017) than the negative anti-IFX patients after switching. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided novel data that anti-IFX is a parameter for reduced tapering survival, reinforcing its detection to guide clinical decision. Additionally, we confirmed in a long-term cohort the anti-IFX association with worse IFX performance and as predictor of 2nd TNFi good clinical response.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To date, the only study that has assessed the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 mRNA) vaccine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) observed a moderate response, but the sample size precluded an accurate analysis of the effect of individual drugs. Therefore, we evaluated the immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Sinovac-CoronaVac) and the influence of different medications in SLE. Safety was also assessed. METHODS: We conducted a prospective controlled study of 232 SARS-CoV-2-naive SLE patients and 58 SARS-CoV-2-naive controls who were vaccinated with 2 doses of Sinovac-CoronaVac with a 28-day interval (day 0/day 28 [D0/D28]). Immunogenicity analysis at D0/D28 and D69 included anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG seroconversion (SC) and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) positivity. The influence of individual drugs on immune response and safety was assessed. RESULTS: Patients and controls were well balanced for age (P = 0.771). At D69, SLE patients showed a moderate SC (70.2% versus 98.1%; P < 0.001) and moderate frequency of NAb positivity (61.5% versus 84.6%; P = 0.002), although both frequencies were lower than in controls. Factors associated with lower SC in univariate analysis at D69 were prednisone use (odds ratio [OR] 0.215 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.108-0.427], P < 0.001) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use (OR 0.201 [95% CI 0.107-0.378], P < 0.001), whereas hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use led to a 2.5 increase in SC (P = 0.011). SLE patients who were receiving HCQ monotherapy had similar SC to controls at D69 (100% versus 98.1%; P = 1.000). In multivariate analysis, prednisone and MMF use were independently associated with lower SC (P < 0.001) and NAb positivity (P < 0.001). Safety analysis revealed no moderate/severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sinovac-CoronaVac has a moderate immunogenicity in SARS-CoV-2-naive SLE patients with an excellent safety profile. We further demonstrate that HCQ may improve SC, whereas prednisone and MMF had a major deleterious effect in vaccine response, reinforcing the need to investigate the role of temporary MMF withdrawal or a vaccine-booster dose (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04754698).