Pretransplant CD4 Count Influences Immune Reconstitution and Risk of Infectious Complications in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Kidney Allograft Recipients.

In current practice, human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV(+) ) candidates with CD4 >200 cells/mm(3) are eligible for kidney transplantation; however, the optimal pretransplant CD4 count above this threshold remains to be defined. We evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with baseline CD4 >350 and <350 cells/mm(3) among 38 anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-treated HIV-negative to HIV(+) kidney transplants performed at our center between 2006 and 2013. Median follow-up was 2.6 years. Rates of acute rejection and patient and graft survival were not different between groups. Occurrence of severe CD4 lymphopenia (<200 cells/mm(3) ), however, was more common among patients with a baseline CD4 count 200-349 cells/mm(3) compared with those transplanted at higher counts (75% vs. 30% at 4 weeks [p = 0.04] and 71% vs. 5% at 52 weeks [p = 0.001], respectively, after transplant). After adjusting for age, baseline CD4 count of 200-349 cells/mm(3) was an independent predictor of severe CD4 lymphopenia at 4 weeks (relative risk [RR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-5.1) and 52 weeks (RR 14.3; 95% CI 2-100.4) after transplant. Patients with CD4 <200 cells/mm(3) at 4 weeks had higher probability of serious infections during first 6 months after transplant (19% vs. 50%; log-rank p = 0.05). These findings suggest that ATG must be used with caution in HIV(+) kidney allograft recipients with a pretransplant CD4 count <350 cells/mm(3) .

Kidney allograft survival of African American and Caucasian American recipients with lupus.

BACKGROUND: African Americans with lupus who receive kidney transplants have high prevalence of predictors of allograft failure, which can explain their poor outcomes. METHODS: Of 1223 African Americans and 1029 Caucasian Americans with lupus who received kidney transplants from deceased donors between 1987 and 2006 with complete records in the UNOS program, 741 pairs were matched in 16 predictors employing a predicted probability of group membership. The primary outcome was allograft failure. Main secondary outcomes were rejection, allograft failure due to rejection, and mortality. RESULTS: Matched pairs were predominantly women (82%) with a mean age of 39 years. Twenty-four percent of recipients received kidneys from expanded criteria donors. African Americans and Caucasian Americans matched well (p ≥ 0.05): donor age, gender and race; recipient age, gender, education and insurance; dialysis prior to transplant, kidneys from expanded criteria donors, cold ischemia time, history of prior kidney transplant, panel reactive antibodies, human leukocyte antigens mismatch, blood type compatibility, transplant Era, and follow-up time. Contrary to the unmatched cohort with significantly higher allograft failure rate (events per 100 patient-years) in African Americans compared to Caucasian Americans (10.49 vs 6.18, p<0.001), matched pairs had similar allograft failure rates (8.41 vs 7.81, p=0.418). Matched pairs also had similar rates of rejections (9.82 vs 9.39, p=0.602), allograft failure due to rejection (6.19 vs 5.71, p=0.453), and mortality (2.79 vs 3.52, p=0.097). CONCLUSION: In lupus recipients of kidney transplants from deceased donors, African American and Caucasian Americans have similar allograft failure rates when predictors are matched between groups.

Advantage of rapamycin over mycophenolate mofetil when used with tacrolimus for simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants: randomized, single-center trial at 10 years.

Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the treatment of choice for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Rapamycin and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been used for maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus in SPKT; however, long-term outcomes are lacking. From September 2000 through December 2009, 170 SPKT recipients were enrolled in a randomized, prospective trial receiving Rapamycin (n = 84) or MMF (n = 86). All patients received dual induction therapy with thymoglobulin and daclizumab, and low-dose maintenance tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Compared to MMF, rates of freedom from first biopsy-proven acute kidney or pancreas rejection were superior for Rapamycin at year 1 (kidney: 100% vs. 88%; P = 0.001; pancreas: 99% vs. 92%; P = 0.04) and at year 10 (kidney: 88% vs. 71%, P = 0.01; pancreas: 99% vs. 89%, P = 0.01). The higher rates of rejection were associated with withholding MMF (vs. Rapamycin, p = 0.009), generally for gastrointestinal or bone marrow toxicity. There was no significant difference in creatinine, proteinuria, c-peptide, viral infections, lymphoproliferative disorders or posttransplant diabetes. HbA1C and lipid levels were normal in both groups, although higher in the Rapamycin arm. There were no significant differences in patient or allograft survival. In this 10-year SPKT study, Rapamycin in combination with tacrolimus was better tolerated and more effective than MMF. Overall, the patient and allograft survival were equivalent.

Predisposing factors of diminished survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation.

Since the adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, simultaneous liver/kidney transplants (SLKT) have substantially increased. Recently, unfavorable outcomes have been reported yet contributing factors remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 74 consecutive adult SLKT performed at our center from 2000 to 2010 and compared with kidney transplant alone (KTA, N = 544). In SLKT, patient and death-censored kidney graft survival rates were 64 ± 6% and 81 ± 5% at 5 years, respectively (median follow-up, 47 months). Multivariable analyses revealed three independent risk factors affecting patient survival: hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+, hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.9), panel reactive antibody (PRA) > 20% (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.2) and female donor gender (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.9). For death-censored kidney graft survival, delayed graft function was the strongest negative predictor (HR 8.3, 95% CI 2.5-27.9), followed by HCV+ and PRA > 20%. The adjusted risk of death-censored kidney graft loss in HCV+ SLKT patients was 5.8 (95% CI 1.6-21.6) compared with HCV+ KTA (p = 0.008). Recurrent HCV within 1 year after SLKT correlated with early kidney graft failure (p = 0.004). Careful donor/recipient selection and innovative approaches for HCV+ SLKT patients are critical to further improve long-term outcomes.

Kidney transplantation outcomes in African-, Hispanic- and Caucasian-Americans with lupus.

African-American recipients of kidney transplants with lupus have high allograft failure risk. We studied their risk adjusting for: (1) socio-demographic factors: donor age, gender and race-ethnicity; recipient age, gender, education and insurance; donor-recipient race-ethnicity match; (2) immunologic factors: donor type, panel reactive antibodies, HLA mismatch, ABO blood type compatibility, pre-transplant dialysis, cytomegalovirus risk and delayed graft function (DGF); (3) rejection and recurrent lupus nephritis (RLN). Two thousand four hundred and six African-, 1132 Hispanic-, and 2878 Caucasian-Americans were followed for 12 years after transplantation. African- versus Hispanic- and Caucasian-Americans received more kidneys from deceased donors (71.6%, 57.3% and 55.1%) with higher two HLA loci mismatches for HLA-A (50%, 39.6% and 32.4%), HLA-B (52%, 42.8% and 35.6%) and HLA-DR (30%, 24.5% and 21.1%). They developed more DGF (19.5%, 13.6% and 13.4%). More African- versus Hispanic- and Caucasian-Americans developed rejection (41.7%, 27.6% and 35.9%) and RLN (3.2, 1.8 and 1.8%). 852 African-, 265 Hispanic-, and 747 Caucasian-Americans had allograft failure (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for transplant era, socio-demographic-immunologic differences, rejection and RLN, the increased hazard ratio for allograft failure of African- compared with Caucasian-Americans became non-significant (1.26 [95% confidence interval 0.78-2.04]). African-Americans with lupus have high prevalence of risk factors for allograft failure that can explain poor outcomes.

Pilot Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus/Everolimus vs Tacrolimus/Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Adult, Primary Kidney Transplant Recipients at a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that the combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and everolimus (EVL) could become a viable option for use as standard maintenance immunosuppression in non-highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label, randomized pilot trial comparing two maintenance immunosuppression regimens in non-highly sensitized, adult, primary kidney transplant recipients: (TAC/EVL, Group A) vs our standard maintenance regimen of TAC plus enteric-coated mycophenolate mofetil (TAC/EC-MPS, Group B). In both treatment arms, dual induction therapy consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) and basiliximab was given. Early corticosteroid withdrawal (by 7-10 days posttransplantation) was also planned in both arms. There were 30 study participants, 15 per treatment arm. Results during the first 12 months posttransplantation are reported here. RESULTS: Between 1 month and 12 months posttransplantation, mean TAC trough levels ranged between 5 and 8 ng/mL in both arms. Mean trough EVL level in Group A ranged between 4 and 6 ng/mL, and mean EC-MPS dose in Group B ranged from 1440 mg at 1 month to 945 mg at 12 months. One patient in Group A vs three patients in Group B experienced a first biopsy-proven acute rejection during the first 12 months posttransplantation (P = .32). Four patients in each group experienced biopsy-proven chronic allograft injury (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy) (P = .99). There was a slight trend toward more favorable renal function in Group A at months 1-3 posttransplantation (P = .06, .10, and .18 for estimated glomerular filtration rate, respectively). No graft failures or deaths were observed in either group during the first 12 months posttransplantation. Four patients in each group developed an infection during the first 12 months posttransplantation. Two patients in Group A developed new-onset diabetes after transplant during the 12-month follow-up period, vs no patients in Group B (P = .13). CONCLUSION: TAC/EVL may be a viable alternative to TAC/EC-MPS for use as standard maintenance immunosuppression in non-highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients and should be given further consideration.

Effect on renal function of change from high to moderate protein intake in type I diabetic patients.

The effects on renal function of moderate restriction in protein intake were studied in 14- to 20-yr-old type I diabetic patients who had no clinical renal disease or hypertension; matched normal subjects served as controls. After assessment of protein intake and renal function, studies were conducted at the completion of each of two consecutive dietary periods of 1 wk. Diets containing 3.5 and 1.5 g X kg-1 X day-1 protein were provided during the first and second periods, respectively. Baseline protein intakes were substantial in both controls (1.86 g X kg-1 X day-1) and diabetics (2.17 g X kg-1 X day-1). Baseline creatinine clearance was increased in diabetics (P = .043). At the end of the high-protein intake period, both diabetics and controls showed similar high values of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF). GFR and RPF decreased markedly (P less than .001) and to a similar degree in both groups after normal protein intake. GFR and RPF in diabetics were not higher than in controls at this point, but filtration fraction was increased in diabetics. Albumin excretion rates were similar in both groups and not influenced by renal function changes. GFR and RPF values correlated significantly with the quantity of protein intake, as estimated from the urea nitrogen appearance rate in both groups. The results suggest that the functional response to variations in protein intake is not altered in the diabetic kidney. In addition, increased renal function in diabetics may be related partly to the excessive protein content in commonly prescribed diabetic diets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hypercalcemia due to constitutive activity of the parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide receptor: comparison with primary hyperparathyroidism.

In Jansen's disease (JD), the hypercalcemia found in about half the cases is the result of a mutant, constitutively overactive, form of the PTH/PTHrP receptor, which in these cases also causes the skeletal dysplasia. The subject of the present report was first seen in 1956 and is still under treatment at the same medical center. We report the clinical course and a detailed study of calcium and bone metabolism carried out in 1976 and compare the results with those of six typical patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism in whom exactly the same studies were carried out. In the patient with JD, the hypercalcemia was of early onset; chronic and nonprogressive; refractory to the administration of phosphate, glucocorticoid, and calcitonin; and accompanied by suppressed PTH levels as determined by two different immunoassays, an undetectable PTHrP level, increased excretion of nephrogenous cAMP (an in vivo bioassay of endogenous PTH production), decreased tubular reabsorption of phosphate, increased tubular reabsorption of calcium, increased biochemical indexes of bone turnover, and increased histological indexes of bone turnover on iliac bone histomorphometry after double tetracycline labeling. There was exaggerated loss of cortical bone and preservation of cancellous bone. All the results in JD relating to renal or skeletal effects of PTH excess were within or close to the ranges found in the hyperparathyroid patients, except that tubular reabsorption of phosphate was more depressed. Because PTH secretion was suppressed, any effects mediated by putative alternative receptors would have been diminished. We conclude that 1) the hypercalcemia due to constitutive overactivity of the PTH/PTHrP receptor is indistinguishable from that of mild primary hyperparathyroidism in clinical characteristics and renal tubular and skeletal features; and 2) the classic laboratory manifestations of primary hyperparathyroidism, with the possible exception of osteitis fibrosa cystica, can all be accounted for by overactivity of a single receptor.

Necrotizing cellulitis caused by Legionella micdadei.

Legionella micdadei is primarily considered a pathogen of the pulmonary tract of immunocompromised patients, the majority of whom have been renal transplant recipients. We report the case of a necrotizing soft tissue infection in a cadaveric renal transplant recipient resulting in amputation of the left arm. Only one other extrathoracic bacteriologically documented L. micdadei infection has been reported in the literature.

Influence of the pretransplant hematocrit level on early graft function in primary cadaveric renal transplantation.

Although use of human recombinant erythropoietin has alleviated symptoms of anemia in renal failure, effects of increased hematocrit (HCT) on early post-transplant renal function are unknown. Of 244 consecutive primary cadaveric kidney recipients transplanted over 74 months, 43% had HCT > or = 30% and 57% had HCT < 30% at transplantation. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was greater in recipients with HCT > or = 30% (61%) than in recipients with HCT < 30% (33%; P = 0.0001). Ten percent of recipients with HCT > or = 30% experienced primary nonfunction (PNF) of the allograft (P = 0.0001). No recipient with HCT < 30% had PNF. Absolute rises in HCT over the 3 months preceding transplantation were greatest in those with PNF (2.5 +/- 2.4) followed by those with DGF (2.0 +/- 3.1) and immediate graft function (IGF) (0.2 +/- 5.2; P = 0.0328). Logistic regression analysis identified HCT > or = 30% (P = 0.0014), cold storage > or = 24 hr (P = 0.0006) and rising HCT (P = 0.0090) as independent predictors of DGF with relative risks of 3.1-, 3.3-, and 2.7-fold, respectively. Recipients with rising pretransplant HCTs who underwent dialytic fluid removal within 24 hr before transplantation had DGF with greater frequency (67%) than nondialyzed recipients with rising HCTs (45%). Primary cadaveric kidney recipients with HCT > or = 30% at transplantation have significantly greater risk for DGF and PNF. Rising pretransplant HCT levels may predispose recipients to DGF; this risk may be heightened in those undergoing hemodialysis shortly before transplantation.

Complete replacement of methylprednisolone by azathioprine in cyclosporine-treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

In cyclosporine (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients complete corticosteroid withdrawal followed by CsA monotherapy has been associated with severe rejection episodes in a significant proportion of patients. We report the results of replacement of steroids by azathioprine (AZA) in 25 primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients initially treated with CsA and methylprednisolone (MP). MP taper was started 8.8 +/- 5.6 months posttransplant when the MP dose was either 10 mg/day or 20 mg every other day. MP was tapered off over a 5-month period. At the initiation of MP taper, AZA was added at 1 mg/kg/day and increased to 1.5 mg/kg/day after two months. The CsA dose was adjusted to maintain trough serum levels as measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) of 50-75 ng/ml, during and after MP withdrawal. Seventeen patients have remained continuously off MP for 14.6 +/- 5.0 months with stable renal function. Reinstitution of MP at 10 mg/day was required in 8 patients, 6 for rejection (1.8 +/- 0.7 months after MP withdrawal), 1 for AZA-induced leukopenia, and 1 for de novo glomerulopathy. Renal function returned to baseline in all 6 patients with rejection after reinstitution of MP. Two of these patients have again been successfully retapered off MP. In the patients withdrawn from MP, body weight and mean arterial blood pressure had decreased by 2.1 +/- 1.3 kg (P less than .05) and 11 +/- 7 mmHg (P less than .05), respectively, at the time of the most recent follow-up compared with values at the initiation of steroid withdrawal. The number of blood pressure medications per patient decreased by 38% (P less than .05) and 6 patients were able to discontinue all antihypertensive drugs after cessation of steroids. Discontinuation of MP also resulted in a decrease in serum cholesterol concentration from 248 +/- 50 to 217 +/- 55 mg/dl (P less than .05). We conclude that steroids can be replaced by AZA in the majority of CsA-treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients by the end of the first posttransplant year without an adverse effect on graft survival. This protocol resulted in significant reductions in serum cholesterol, mean arterial blood pressure, and body weight, and may avoid the long-term side effects of steroid therapy.

Removal of lymphocytotoxic antibodies by pretransplant immunoadsorption therapy in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients.

A high level of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) in potential renal transplant recipients is associated with a long waiting time until transplantation and correlates inversely with graft outcome. We report our experience with the employment of immunoadsorption (IA) using a column composed to sepharose-bound staphylococcal protein A (which has a relatively selective affinity for binding IgG compared with other immunoglobulins) to decrease the PRA levels and expedite transplantation in 6 highly sensitized potential renal transplant recipients (1 primary and 5 awaiting second transplants). All patients had PRA levels of greater than or equal to 70% for a duration of 1 year prior to IA. Only patients with antibody specificity localized to 1 or 2 HLA A or B antigens were accepted for the study. IA procedures were performed on alternate days until a twofold decrease in antibody titer had occurred (maximum: 6 procedures). Repeat procedures were initiated if the HLA antibody titer returned to its baseline value. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) (10 mg/kg/day every 3 weeks) and methylprednisolone (MP) (0.5 mg/kg/day) were provided as adjunctive immunosuppression until transplantation. A total of 44 immunoadsorption procedures were performed (27 primary and 17 repeat) with treatment of 2.49 +/- 0.02 plasma volumes per session. Serum IgG concentration decreased 95 +/- 3% and PRA activity decreased 75 +/- 16% after the primary treatment course. Four patients received cadaveric grafts within 3.7 +/- 1.2 months following the last IA procedure. Three grafts are functioning at 1 year, 8 months, and 8 weeks posttransplant. The remaining graft demonstrated primary nonfunction. All four patients had a past positive crossmatch using pre-IA sera with their respective donors. Patients not transplanted exhibited rapid resynthesis of IgG and a return of the PRA towards baseline levels within a few weeks after IA. We conclude that IA can effectively remove HLA antibodies and expedite graft availability in highly sensitized patients.

Histologic and immunophenotypic evaluation of pretreatment renal biopsies in OKT3-treated allograft rejections.

The histologic features immunophenotype of intragraft mononuclear populations, and HLA-Dr expression in pretreatment formalin-fixed renal allograft biopsies were correlated with outcome of OKT3 therapy in 35 steroid resistant renal transplant rejections. Therapeutic response (63% overall) was better in pure acute cellular rejections (ACR) (13/15, 87%) than ACR with interstitial fibrosis (4/12, 33%) or with vascular injury (5/8, 62%). Intragraft T lymphocytes were more numerous in vascular rejection (mean 566/mm2) compared with pure ACR (mean 265/mm2, P = .049), and macrophages were greater in pure ACR (203/mm2) compared with ACR with interstitial fibrosis (83/mm2, P = .051). Distribution of T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and macrophages among various histologic categories was otherwise statistically similar. There was no correlation between therapeutic response to OKT3 and intragraft concentrations of individual mononuclear cell subsets. Vascular and/or epithelial HLA-Dr expression was present in 17/25 (68%) cases and was not associated with histologic features or treatment response. Follow-up graft function (median 7 months) correlated significantly with therapeutic response to OKT3 (P = .0004) and histologic presence of interstitial fibrosis (P = .031), but was not related to concentration of individual mononuclear subsets or HLA-Dr expression. We conclude that intragraft concentrations of major mononuclear cell types may relate to histology, but that these do not predict treatment response or graft outcome, and thus poorly reflect intensity or possible heterogeneity of host immunologic rejection mechanisms.

Sequential use of Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin and cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation.

The use of Cyclosporine (CsA) immediately after renal transplantation may be associated with an increased incidence and duration of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and permanent primary graft nonfunction. To avoid this potential interaction we treated recipients of primary cadaveric grafts initially with azathioprine (AZA), methylprednisolone (MP), and 5 daily doses of Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin (MAG) (postoperative days 3-7). AZA was discontinued and CsA started on day 6 if the graft was functioning by then. If ATN persisted beyond day 6, AZA and MAG (maximum 12 doses) were continued and CsA withheld until graft function was established (group 1-33 patients). This protocol is compared to our previous regimen of MAG (14 doses over the first 3 weeks), AZA and MP (group 2-68 primary cadaveric graft recipients). Improved one-year graft survival (81% vs. 60%, P less than 0.05) and patient survival (93% vs. 81%, P less than 0.05) were seen in group 1. The incidence and duration of ATN did not differ in the two groups. During the first year after transplantation more patients in group 1 were completely free of rejection episodes (40% vs. 20%, P less than 0.05) and the number of rejection episodes per patient was also lower in this group (1.0 +/- 15 vs. 1.6 +/- 49, P less than 0.05). The incidence of infections was not different in the two groups. No tumors have developed in either group. We conclude that in primary cadaveric renal transplantation the initial administration of a short course of MAG followed by CsA therapy results in excellent graft and patient survival while avoiding the potential adverse effect of CsA on an allograft already subjected to preservation injury.

Effective long-term immunosuppression maintained by low cyclosporine levels in primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

Nephrotoxicity and cost are the major problems in the use of cyclosporine (CsA) in renal transplantation. Thus, maintenance of CsA levels at the lower limits of the therapeutic range is desirable. The lowest CsA level effective in preventing rejection while avoiding nephrotoxicity has not been defined. We report on 44 primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with a protocol that involved a progressive reduction in the trough CsA levels. CsA was initiated at an oral dose of 15 mg/kg, and this dose was adjusted to achieve serum trough levels, as measured by radioimmunoassay, of 150-200 ng/ml during the first month, 100-150 ng/ml during the second month, 75-100 ng/ml during the third month, and 50-75 ng/ml thereafter. Patient and graft survival at 18 months were 94% and 83.6%, respectively. The mean daily CsA doses were 6.7 +/- 3.1 mg/kg at 6 months, 5.5 +/- 3.2 mg/kg at 12 months, and 4.7 +/- 2.4 mg/kg at 18 months. Corresponding trough serum CsA levels were 94 +/- 59 ng/ml, 64 +/- 22 ng/ml, and 44 +/- 21 ng/ml at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Mean serum creatinine concentrations were 1.8 +/- 0.6 mg/dl at 6 months, 1.7 +/- 0.5 mg/dl at 12 months, and 1.6 +/- 0.5 mg/dl at 18 months. The mean serum creatinine concentration at 18 months was not significantly different from that of 18 conventionally treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients (1.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg/dl, P = .31). A total of 67% of patients did not have any rejection episodes under this protocol, while 71% of patients never developed CsA nephrotoxicity. No patient was taken off CsA for progressive nephrotoxicity. We conclude that trough serum CsA levels of 50-75 ng/ml, as measured by radioimmunoassay, are sufficient to maintain effective immunosuppression in the long-term management of primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients. These values are much lower than previously recommended, and this approach ameliorates chronic CsA nephrotoxicity.

Six-year clinical effect of donor bone marrow infusions in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: To date, several single- and multicenter clinical trials have attempted to induce specific immunological unresponsiveness using donor bone marrow cell infusions to augment solid organ transplantation, but the outcomes have not been definitive. METHODS: Between September 1994 and May 1998, 63 cadaver (CAD) renal transplant recipients of either one or two postoperative donor bone marrow cell (DBMC) infusions were prospectively compared with 219 non-infused controls given equivalent immunosuppression. There was at least a 1 HLA DR antigen match present between donors and recipients. The immunosuppressive regimen included a 10-day course of OKT3 induction, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone maintenance. A total 7.01x10(8)+/-1.9x10(8) (SD) DBMC/kg was infused into the CAD recipients on either days 4 and 11 (n=42) or one half of that dose on day 4 (n=21) postoperatively. Clinical follow-up has ranged from 2.9 to 6.3 years (mean, 4.7 years). Studies were also performed of humoral immunity and quantitative cellular chimerism. RESULTS: There is clear-cut equivalence in immunosuppressive dosaging and in the other major demographic variables in both groups. However, only 2/63 DBMC recipients had biopsy-proven chronic rejection, whereas 41/219 showed chronic rejection in the controls (P = <0.01). In both groups, mortality was not associated with rejection. The actuarial graft survival at 6.3 years in the CAD DBMC group was 84.3% compared with 72.2% in the control group (not statistically significant). However, if death with a functioning graft was excluded, graft survival was 94.1% in the DBMC group and 79.8% in the controls (P=0.039). Forty patients in the control group continue to have deteriorating renal function (increasing serum creatinine concentrations to 2 mg/dl and higher), compared with 2 patients in the DBMC group (P=0.04). In the DBMC group, chimerism in iliac crest marrow aspirates has increased 3-fold in yearly sequential measurements between 1 and 4 years postoperatively averaging 1.3+/-0.36% (SE) most recently. This has not occurred in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: There now appears to be more solid long-term evidence, in kidney transplant recipients prospectively receiving DBMC infusions, of an improvement in long-term graft survival, and of the degree of chimerism positively correlating with the absence of graft loss.

Randomized trial of thymoglobulin versus alemtuzumab (with lower dose maintenance immunosuppression) versus daclizumab in living donor renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized trial evaluating alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, in living donor (LD) kidney transplantation. METHODS: Thirty-eight LD first renal transplant recipients were randomized into three single-agent antibody induction groups: thymoglobulin (group A); alemtuzumab (group B); and daclizumab (group C). In groups A and C, target tacrolimus trough levels were 6 to 8 ng/mL, with 1 gm mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administered twice daily, and maintenance methylprednisolone. In group B, the target tacrolimus trough level was 4 to 6 ng/mL, with 500 mg MMF administered twice daily, without methylprednisolone. RESULTS: With 29/38 patients now followed beyond 36 months posttransplantation, we observed no graft failures and only one death with a functioning graft (in group B). Acute rejection episodes were low: 0/13, 1/13, and 1/12 patients in groups A, B, and C. Biopsy-proven chronic allograft injury was higher among group B (3/13) versus groups A (0/13) or C (0/12; P = .01). Poorer renal function was observed in group B; the mean calculated creatinine clearance at 3 months posttransplantation was significantly poorer: 63.3 ± 3.0 versus 85.4 ± 7.2 and 82.2 ± 8.2 in groups A and C (P = .01). No differences in the incidence of adverse events were observed.