RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to investigate a combination of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or MRE and fibrosis score 4 (FIB-4) in the detection of significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). METHODS: Between November 5, 2021, and March 4, 2022, a total of 119 consecutive patients with MASLD were included. Liver stiffness was measured using liver biopsy, MRE, VCTE, and FIB-4. Data were collected from outpatient visit charts. Significant fibrosis was defined as ≥ stage 2 fibrosis. RESULTS: All 119 MASLD patients were Caucasian, and their median age was 55 years. MRE, VCTE, and FIB-4 demonstrated significant accuracy in the detection of significant fibrosis with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.848 ± 0.036 (p < 0.001), 0.632 ± 0.052 (p = 0.012), and 0.664 ± 0.051 (p = 0.001), respectively. However, the diagnostic performance of MRE was superior compared to that of VCTE (AUC difference: 0.216 ± 0.053, p < 0.001) and FIB-4 (AUC difference: 0.184 ± 0.058, p = 0.001). With logistic regression analysis, it was determined that when compared to MRE alone, a combination of MRE and TE (p = 0.880) or MRE and FIB-4 (p = 0.455) were not superior for detecting significant fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: MRE alone is an accurate and non-invasive method for the identification of MASLD patients with significant fibrosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Magnetic resonance elastography alone accurately detects significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. KEY POINTS: ⢠In routine clinical practice, several non-invasive biochemical-based biomarkers and imaging methods are widely used to assess liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. ⢠Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is more accurate than vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or fibrosis score 4 (FIB-4) for assessing liver fibrosis and identifying significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. ⢠The combination of MRE and VCTE or MRE and FIB-4 was not superior to MRE alone.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to determine the subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial dysfunction in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, who were asymptomatic for cardiac disease. METHODS: A total of 61 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients were enrolled in the study. The 10-year probability of cardiovascular events was evaluated according to the pooled cohort equation risk score (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease). The coronary artery calcium score was measured. Conventional echocardiographic examination was followed by 2- and 3-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis had significantly higher insulin resistance (P = .018), serum alanine aminotransferase (P = .002) and aspartate aminotransferase levels (P = .021), hepatic steatosis (P = .023), and fibrosis (P = .001) than non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. The mean Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score was 7.5% ± 6.9% and 37% of the patients had medium and high cardiovascular disease risk. Cardiovascular disease (>1) was found in 30% of the patients. Interestingly, 56% had significant and extended atherosclerotic plaques. Among the patients with moderate-to-high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease scores, 63% had significant atherosclerotic plaques and 21% had extensive plaque burden. The presence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis did not significantly affect cardiovascular risk. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis was deleterious on left ventricle diastolic functions. Mean A velocity in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients was significantly increased compared to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients (87.0 ± 17.5 cm/s vs. 72.3 ± 13.6 cm/s, P = .002). Mean E/e' ratio was 8.1 ± 2.0. Submyocardial fibrosis detected had a slightly higher occurrence in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients than in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients (P = .530). CONCLUSION: The presence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis did not significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and subclinical myocardial dysfunction in asymptomatic patients for cardiac disease compared to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients.