Operative Management of Intra-abdominal Lymphatic Malformations in Children: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal lymphatic malformations (LMs) are relatively rare congenital anomalies and can be divided into intra- and retroperitoneal subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes after surgical resection of intraperitoneal LMs in children. METHODS: The records of all patients ≤16 years of age with intraperitoneal LMs managed at our tertiary center between 2007-2022 were reviewed. Patients with retroperitoneal LMs were excluded. Our preferred approach is surgical exploration for large (>5 cm), symptomatic lesions if they are potentially resectable on imaging. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (10 males) were diagnosed with intraperitoneal LMs located in the small bowel mesentery or omentum at a median age of 6.6 (range, 0.6-14.4) years. Ten (83%) patients presented with acute symptoms, including abdominal pain (n = 8; 67%) and vomiting (n = 3; 25%). Two (17%) intraperitoneal LMs were found on imaging performed for other reasons. Surgical exploration was performed in 11/12 (92%) cases. Intestinal volvulus around a mesenteric macrocyst had occurred in 4 (36%) patients. Complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 10/11 (91%) patients. Most lesions were localized to a short intestinal segment. One mixed type LM with an extensive mesenteric involvement was biopsied as the lesion was deemed to be unresectable in preoperative imaging and the diagnosis was initially unclear. There was one recurrence (8%) during postoperative follow-up on imaging (median 3.6 (range, 1.5-6.9) years) but the patient has remained asymptomatic and not undergone interventions. 6/8 (75%) of screened intraperitoneal LMs were positive for a somatic PIK3CA mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Most large, pedunculated macrocystic LMs in the small bowel mesentery or omental location were amenable to macroscopic resection. Intraperitoneal LMs tend to present with acute symptoms including a risk for intestinal volvulus based on anatomical location. Our results suggest low recurrence rates or need for further interventions over follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Ernica Clinical Consensus Statements on Total Colonic and Intestinal Aganglionosis.

BACKGROUND: Hirschsprung disease is a congenital intestinal motility disorder characterized by an absence of enteric ganglion cells. Total colonic aganglionosis and near total or total intestinal aganglionosis, defined as absence of ganglion cells in the entire colon and with variable length of small bowel involved, are life-threatening conditions which affect less than 10 % of all patients with Hirschsprung disease. The aim of this project was to develop clinical consensus statements within ERNICA, the European Reference Network for rare congenital digestive diseases, on four major topics: Surgical treatment of total colonic aganglionosis, surgical treatment of total intestinal aganglionosis, management of poor bowel function in total colonic and/or intestinal aganglionosis and long-term management in total colonic and or intestinal aganglionosis. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of representatives from ERNICA centers was invited to participate. Literature was searched, using specified search terms, in Medline (ALL), Embase and Google Scholar. Abstracts were screened and full text publications were selected. The panel was divided in four groups that extracted data from the full text publications and suggested draft statements for each of the major topics. A modified Delphi process was used to refine and agree on the statements. RESULTS: The consensus statement was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of 24 participants from 10 European countries, 45 statements reached consensus after 3 Delphi-rounds. The availability of high-quality clinical evidence was limited, and most statements were based on expert opinion. Another 25 statements did not reach consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Total colonic and total intestinal aganglionosis are rare variants of Hirschsprung disease, with very limited availability of high-quality clinical evidence. This consensus statement provides statements on the surgical treatment, management of poor bowel function and long-term management for these rare patients. The expert panel agreed that patients benefit from multidisciplinary and personalized care, preferably in an expert center. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical consensus statement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a.