Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Secondary Prevention of Stroke Update 2020.

The 2020 update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR) for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke includes current evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions intended for use by clinicians across a broad range of settings. They provide guidance for the prevention of ischemic stroke recurrence through the identification and management of modifiable vascular risk factors. Recommendations address triage, diagnostic testing, lifestyle behaviors, vaping, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, other cardiac conditions, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, and carotid and vertebral artery disease. This update of the previous 2017 guideline contains several new or revised recommendations. Recommendations regarding triage and initial assessment of acute transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke have been simplified, and selected aspects of the etiological stroke workup are revised. Updated treatment recommendations based on new evidence have been made for dual antiplatelet therapy for TIA and minor stroke; anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation; embolic strokes of undetermined source; low-density lipoprotein lowering; hypertriglyceridemia; diabetes treatment; and patent foramen ovale management. A new section has been added to provide practical guidance regarding temporary interruption of antithrombotic therapy for surgical procedures. Cancer-associated ischemic stroke is addressed. A section on virtual care delivery of secondary stroke prevention services in included to highlight a shifting paradigm of care delivery made more urgent by the global pandemic. In addition, where appropriate, sex differences as they pertain to treatments have been addressed. The CSBPR include supporting materials such as implementation resources to facilitate the adoption of evidence into practice and performance measures to enable monitoring of uptake and effectiveness of recommendations.

A randomized pilot study of patients with tandem carotid lesions undergoing thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal management of patients with tandem lesions (TL), or cervical internal carotid artery (c-ICA) steno-occlusive pathology and ipsilateral intracranial occlusion, who are undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains unknown. We sought to establish the feasibility of a trial designed to address this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention (EASI) study was a single-centre randomized trial comparing EVT to medical therapy for large-vessel occlusion stroke. Patients with TL receiving EVT were randomly allocated to acute c-ICA stenting or no stenting. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) at 24hours and mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: Of 301 patients included in EASI between 2013 and 2018, 24 (8.0%) with TL were randomly allocated to acute stenting (n=13) or no stenting (n=11). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Eight (61.5%; 95% CI 35.5%-82.3%) and 7 (63.6%; 95% CI 35.4%-84.9%) patients, respectively, had a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2; P=1.0). One non-stented patient had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot trial of patients with TL undergoing EVT suggests that a sufficiently powered larger TL trial comparing acute c-ICA stenting to no stenting is feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02157532.

Lack of Consensus Among Stroke Experts on the Optimal Management of Patients With Acute Tandem Occlusion.

Background and Purpose- In patients with acute stroke caused by tandem occlusion, the benefit of immediate revascularization (stenting) of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion during endovascular thrombectomy is uncertain. We sought to determine current practice patterns and whether consensus existed among physicians with stroke expertise. Methods- We distributed an online survey to stroke experts affiliated with the Canadian Stroke Consortium, the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, and international ESCAPE trial (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times) collaborators. Questions were based on clinical scenarios, and multiple choice responses across a Likert-type scale were provided. The survey was sent out in September 2017. After 2 months, data were extracted and then analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results- Responses from 162 stroke experts were analyzed; most were stroke physicians (n=65, 40.1%) and neurointerventionalists (n=74, 45.7%), from Canada (n=95, 58.6%), the United States (n=42, 25.9%), and other countries (n=25, 15.4%). Over half (n=96, 59.3%) of respondents consider acute stenting of the cervical internal carotid artery as a treatment option, whereas 40.7% (n=66) would never use it. Most respondents (n=113, 69.8%) agree that there exists uncertainty about the optimal acute management of patients with tandem occlusion. A majority (n=88, 54.3%) of physicians surveyed would include patients in a randomized trial addressing this question. Conclusions- This survey shows high variability in practice about acute management of tandem occlusion. The existence of community equipoise underscores the importance of a randomized trial evaluating the benefit of acute internal carotid artery stenting in patients with tandem occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.

Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale for EMS Redirection of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke may expedite treatment by direct transport to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) with endovascular capabilities. The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is commonly used for prehospital stroke detection. We aimed to assess whether (1) a high CPSS score can identify LVO and (2) an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) redirection protocol based on high CPSS accelerated endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: A retrospective comparison of patients transported by EMSs for suspected stroke to a high-volume CSC over a 16-month period, before and after implementation of an EMS redirection protocol based on high CPSS score (3/3). Charts were reviewed to determine the presence of LVO. Time to EVT and 3-month outcomes were compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: A prehospital CPSS 3/3 score was found in 223 (59%) patients, demonstrating positive and negative predictive values for LVO of 29% and 94%, respectively. CPSS-based EMS redirection increased the proportion of EVT performed after direct transport to CSC [before: 21 (36%), after: 45 (63%), p < 0.01] and decreased median first door-to-groin puncture time by 28 minutes [109 (interquartile range (IQR) 64-116) versus 81 (IQR 56-130), p = 0.03]. At 3 months, the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (modified Rankin score 0-2) went from 20/57 (35%) to 29/68 (43%) (p = 0.39) following implementation. CONCLUSIONS: CPSS-based EMS redirection accelerated identification of LVO strokes in the out-of-hospital setting and decreased time to EVT. Nevertheless, this protocol was also associated with high rates of non-LVO stroke. Impact on clinical outcomes should be evaluated in a larger cohort.

Utilité de l'échelle de Cincinnati pour la redirection des occlusions artérielles cérébrales proximales par les services médicaux d'urgence. Introduction : Dans un contexte pré-hospitalier, le fait de pouvoir identifier l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux peut accélérer l'amorce d'un traitement en favorisant un transfert direct vers un centre complet de prise en charge des AVC (comprehensive stroke centers) doté de moyens d'intervention endovasculaire. L'échelle de Cincinnati (Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale ou CPSS) est couramment utilisée afin de détecter les signes d'un AVC dans un contexte pré-hospitalier. Notre intention est double ici : 1) évaluer dans quelle mesure un score élevé à la CPSS peut permettre d'identifier l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux ; 2) évaluer dans quelle mesure un protocole des services médicaux d'urgence consistant à rediriger des patients en fonction d'un score élevé à la CPSS a permis d'accélérer l'offre d'un traitement endovasculaire. Méthodes : Au cours d'une période de 16 mois, soit avant et après la mise sur pied de ce protocole en fonction d'un score élevé à la CPSS (3/3), nous avons effectué une comparaison rétrospective des dossiers de patients transportés vers des centres complets de prise en charge des AVC en raison de soupçons d'AVC. Ces dossiers ont été analysés afin de pouvoir identifier les cas d'occlusion proximales. Enfin, les délais permettant d'obtenir un traitement endovasculaire et l'évolution de l'état de santé des patients au bout de 3 mois ont été comparés avant et après la mise sur pied de ce protocole. Résultats : En fonction d'un score de 3/3 à la CPSS obtenu en contexte pré-hospitalier a été observé chez 223 patients (59 %), la valeur prédictive positive et négative pour des cas d'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux étant respectivement de 29 % et de 94 %. Le fait que les services médicaux d'urgence redirigent des patients en fonction d'un certain score à la CPSS a fini par augmenter le nombre de traitements endovasculaires prodigués à la suite d'un transfert direct vers un centre complet de prise en charge des AVC (avant le protocole : 21 (36 %) ; après le protocole : 45 (63 %) ; p < 0,01) et par diminuer de 28 minutes les délais entre la prise en charge à l'arrivée et la ponction artérielle (109 [intervalle interquartile de 64-116] contre 81 [intervalle interquartile de 56-130] ; p = 0,03). Au bout de 3 mois, à la suite de la mise sur pied du protocole, la proportion de patients autonomes sur le plan fonctionnel (échelle de Rankin modifiée : 0-2) est passée de 20/57 (35 %) à 29/68 (43 %) (p = 0,39). Conclusion : Le fait de rediriger des patients en fonction d'un certain score à la CPSS a permis d'accélérer la détection de cas d'AVC survenus à la suite de l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux et donc de réduire les temps d'intervention. Cela dit, ce protocole a aussi été associé à un taux élevé de détection d'AVC non produits par l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux. L'impact de cette constatation en ce qui regarde l'évolution de l'état de santé des patients devrait être évalué dans une plus vaste cohorte.

Acute carotid stenting in patients undergoing thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of acute carotid stenting compared with no acute stenting on clinical outcomes among patients with tandem lesions (TL) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing acute carotid stenting versus no stenting among TL patients undergoing EVT with regards to 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Four reviewers screened citations for eligibility and two assessed retained studies for risk of bias and data extraction. A random effects model was used for the synthesis of aggregated data. RESULTS: 21 studies (n=1635 patients) were identified for the systematic review; 19 were cohort studies, 1 was a post-hoc analysis of an EVT trial, and 1 was a pilot randomized controlled trial. 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Acute stenting was associated with a favorable 90 day mRS score: OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.07, 1.91). No significant heterogeneity between studies was found for this outcome (I2=17.0%; χ2=18.07, p=0.26). There were no statistically significant differences for 3 month mortality (OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.50, 1.28)) or sICH (OR 1.41 (95% CI 0.91, 2.19)). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that among TL patients undergoing EVT, acute carotid stenting is associated with a greater likelihood of favorable outcome at 90 days compared with no stenting.