[Utility of the AGREE tool for the development and evaluation of clinical protocols: From theory to clinical practice]. / Utilidad del instrumento AGREE para la elaboración y la evaluación de protocolos clínicos: de la teoría a la práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical protocols are tools for the delivery of optimal and quality healthcare. However, there are often shortcomings in the quality of their design that invalidate their implementation. The aim of this study is to describe a systematic evaluation of clinical protocols, to analyse their quality in order to enable their implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive study that included the clinical protocols assessed by the Committee of Reviewers of Clinical Practice Recommendations and Health Technologies of a tertiary hospital during 11years of its existence between 2013 and 2023. The AGREE instrument was used to assess the quality of the protocols received, calculating standardised scores by item and domain, and categorising them into: a)excellent (90-100%), b)good (70-89%), c)improvable (50-69%), d)very improvable (30-49%), e)deficient (10-29%), and f)very deficient: 0-9%. RESULTS: Of the 59 documents received by the Commission, 32 were subsidised for AGREE evaluation. The highest scoring domain was «Scope and objective¼, with excellent scores for 29 protocols; the remaining domains had scores ranging from 58.5%-100% for «Rigour in elaboration¼ and 0-100% for «Independence¼. By items, scores ranged from 85.7-100% for «Target users of the protocol are clearly defined¼ to 0-100% for the items «Potential costs of implementing recommendations¼ and «Conflict of interest¼. Of the 32 protocols, 9 were highly recommended, 22 were recommended with modifications/conditions and one was not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The AGREE tool makes it possible to systematize both the drafting of clinical protocols by the authors and their evaluation by the Clinical Practice Recommendations and Health Technologies Review Committee. This makes it possible to have applicable and quality protocols in our hospital, which results in an improvement in the quality of healthcare.

Prognostic value of early reassessment of reduced ejection fraction in acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure (HF) is associated with a better prognosis. Identifying these subjects early after an episode of decompensation, the necessary threshold of LVEF improvement, and its predictive factors are of great interest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten patients hospitalized for HF were prospectively reassessed at an early outpatient visit (mean of 38 days). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with depressed LVEF (<50%), 50.7% presented an improvement in LVEF≥5% between the acute episode and the outpatient visit. This improvement in depressed LVEF was found to be useful for identifying patients with a good prognosis (readmission due to HF+cardiovascular mortality, p=0.022) but not in patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%). Patients with improved LVEF were significantly younger and had new-onset HF, a better global longitudinal strain (GLS), and better renal function. A multivariate logistic regression model found GLS, new-onset HF, and a lower LV mass index as predictors of LVEF improvement ≥5% (AUC 0.85).

Absence of cystatin C involvement in ventricular remodelling and heart failure.

UNLABELLED: Cystatin C (CysC) is a protease encoded by housekeeping genes. Although its prognostic value in heart failure (HF) is well known, it is debatable whether this value is due to the greater accuracy of CysC in calculating the glomerular filtration rate or to its involvement in pathological ventricular remodelling. The aim of this study was to determine whether CysC expression changes in the myocardium of foetuses of different ages and in the myocardium of adults with various cardiovascular diseases, as well as to analyse the correlation between its serum concentrations and cardiac structure and morphology in a patient group with HF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed the correlations (Pearson's r and Spearman's test) between the serum CysC levels and echocardiographic parameters of 351 patients with HF. We also performed immunohistochemical staining for CysC, metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and desmin in 9 cardiac tissue samples from autopsies of 4 foetuses of different gestational ages and 5 healthy adults or adults with cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: For the patients with HF, there was no correlation between the CysC concentrations and the cardiac parameters measured by 2D echocardiography. The immunohistochemistry showed a weak background staining for CysC in all samples, regardless of age and the presence or absence of cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CysC does not have a significant role in the pathological remodelling of the left ventricle in HF.