Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol ; 63(12): 466-72, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23828217

RESUMO

We aimed to systematically summarize the empirical evidence on the 4-week-, 12-month-, and lifetime prevalence of adjustment disorders, acute and posttraumatic stress disorders as well as somatoform disorders in cancer patients. We evaluated 64 English or German language original papers and systematic reviews that assessed the prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders using structured clinical interviews published between 1995 and 2010. Adjusted prevalence rates were calculated using a random-intercept model. We found the following pooled adjusted 4-week prevalence rates: For adjustment disorder 12.5% (95% CI 9.9-15.7), for posttraumatic stress disorder 2.6% (95% CI 1.7-4.0), for acute stress disorder 4.8% (95% CI 2.2-10.0) and for somatoform disorders 3.1% (95% CI 1.6-5.8). Our findings show the need for further research on representative studies that take into account the range of psychosocial stressors and supportive care needs.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Adaptação/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Transtornos Somatoformes/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Adaptação/etiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Transtornos Somatoformes/etiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia
2.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol ; 62(7): 249-58, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22585582

RESUMO

We aimed to systematically summarize the empirical evidence on the 4-week-, 12-month-, and lifetime prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders in cancer patients. We evaluated 89 English or German language original papers and systematic reviews that assessed the prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders using structured clinical interviews published between 1995 and 2010. Adjusted prevalence rates were calculated using a random-intercept model. The pooled adjusted 4-week prevalence of affective disorders was 11.1% (95% CI 8.1-15.1), and 10.8% (95% CI 6.8-16.7) based on German studies. The pooled adjusted 4-week prevalence of anxiety disorders was 10.2% (95% CI 6.9-14.8), and 13.5% (95% CI 7.1-24.3) based on German studies. The findings show the need for further research on representative studies that take into account the range of psychosocial stressors and supportive care needs in addition to the prevalence of mental disorders.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtornos do Humor/psicologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/etiologia , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Humor/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia
3.
Disabil Rehabil ; 35(2): 100-12, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22697459

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To systematically review and appraise studies examining self-report questionnaires measuring work-related aspects in cancer patients. METHOD: Literature search methodology: Searches in Embase, PsycINFO, PSYNDEXplus, PSYNDEXplus Tests and PubMed for the period 1990-2011 were completed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) the questionnaire measures work-related aspects; (ii) the questionnaire has been used in at least one study, which involved cancer patient as a relevant target group; and (iii) articles were written in English or German. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles out of 350 records were reviewed and 13 questionnaires identified. The majority of measures cover several dimensions of work-related aspects representing a variety of work-related experiences and constructs such as aspects of the work environment, demands at work and work-related interpersonal relations. Nine of the 13 questionnaires showed good internal consistency whereas subscales of four instruments had fair or poor internal consistency. For 12 out of 13 measures, validity and reliability were tested in non-cancer populations. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge about reliability and validity of self-report questionnaires measuring work-related aspects in cancer patients is scarce and more high-quality validation studies are needed. Findings further emphasize the need for the development of valid multidimensional measures that are relevant for both research and rehabilitative occupational interventions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/mortalidade , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários , Taxa de Sobrevida , Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho , Emprego , Humanos , Neoplasias/psicologia , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA