Dalbavancin as suppressive therapy for implant-related infections: a case series with therapeutic drug monitoring and review of the literature.

Implant-related infections may need suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). We describe a SAT strategy using dalbavancin with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This is a retrospective bicentric study of patients with implant-related infection who received dalbavancin SAT between January 2021 and September 2023. Fifteen patients were included. Median number of injections was 4 (IQR: 2-7). Median time between two reinjections was 57 days (IQR 28-82). Dalbavancin plasma concentrations were above 4 mg/L for 97.9% of dosages (93/95) and above 8 mg/L for 85% (81/95). These results support the use of dalbavancin SAT for implant-related infections.

Rifabutin versus rifampicin bactericidal and antibiofilm activities against clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bone and joint infections.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococci account for approximately 60% of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Rifampicin (RMP) combination therapy is generally considered to be the treatment of choice for staphylococcal PJIs but carries an important risk of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin (RFB) shares many of the properties of rifampicin but causes fewer adverse events. OBJECTIVES: To compare the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC), and the minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBEC) of rifabutin and rifampicin for staphylococcal clinical strains isolated from PJIs. METHODS: 132 clinical strains of rifampicin-susceptible staphylococci [51 Staphylococcus aureus (SA), 48 Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) and 33 other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS)] were studied. The MBC and the MBEC were determined using the MBEC® Assay for rifabutin and rifampicin and were compared. RESULTS: When compared with the rifampicin MIC median value, the rifabutin MIC median value was significantly higher for SA (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference for SE (P = 0.25) and CoNS (P = 0.29). The rifabutin MBC median value was significantly higher than that of rifampicin for SA (P = 0.003) and was lower for SE (P = 0.003) and CoNS (P = 0.03). Rifabutin MBEC median value was statistically lower than that of rifampicin for all strains tested. CONCLUSIONS: Using the determination of MBEC values, our study suggests that rifabutin is more effective than rifampicin against clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. obtained from PJIs. Using MBECs instead of MICs seems to be of interest when considering biofilms. In vivo higher efficacy of rifabutin when compared with rifampicin needs to be confirmed.

Enterococcus-related vascular graft infection: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the frequency, management, and burden of enterococcal-related vascular graft infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2021, data regarding all episodes of vascular graft infections initially managed or secondarily referred to our referral center were prospectively collected. We described the history and management of the infection, depending on the type of prosthesis used. RESULTS: The frequency of enterococcal-related vascular graft infections was 29/249 (12 %). Most of them were early infections (22/29, 76 %). Infections were polymicrobial (26/29, 90 %), mostly associated with Enterobacterales. Among patients with positive blood cultures, 7/8 (88 %) involved enterococci. Patients with enterococcal-related vascular graft infections were mainly (22/29, 76 %) treated with an association of antibiotics. Mortality and relapse occurred in 28 % and 7 % respectively of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Enterococcal-related vascular graft infections occurred in patients with comorbidities, during the early period following surgery and were more frequent in cases of intra-cavitary prosthesis. Their potential virulence needs to be considered, especially in polymicrobial infections.

Accuracy of the GeneXpert® MRSA/SA SSTI test to diagnose methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. infection in bone fixation and fusion and management of infected non-unions.

INTRODUCTION: The GeneXpert® MRSA/SA SSTI (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/S. aureus skin and soft tissue infection) PCR test allows early detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. This test was developed for skin infections and has been evaluated for prosthetic joint infections but, to our knowledge, has not been evaluated for hardware infections outside of arthroplasties. Furthermore, we conducted a retrospective study in patients with non-prosthetic osteosynthesis hardware aiming: (1) to identify the diagnostic values of the PCR test compared to conventional cultures and the resulting rate of appropriate antibiotic therapy; (2) to identify the rate of false negative (FN) results; (3) to identify and compare the rates of failure of infectious treatment (FN versus others); (4) to search for risk factors for FN of the PCR test. HYPOTHESIS: The PCR test allowed early and appropriate targeting of antibiotic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of PCR tests and conventional cultures for osteoarticular infections of non-prosthetic hardware over four years (2012-2016) were compared to identify the diagnostic values of using the results of conventional culture as a reference and the rate of appropriate antibiotic therapies. Infectious management failures between the results of the FN group and the others were compared, and variables associated with a FN of the PCR test were identified. RESULTS: The analysis of 419 PCR tests allowed us to establish a sensitivity of 42.86%, a specificity of 96.82%, a positive predictive value of 60% and a negative predictive value of 93.83%. Using the results of the PCR test for the targeting of postoperative antibiotic therapy, it was suitable for staphylococcal coverage in 90.94% (381/419). The rates of patients for whom infectious treatment failed were not significantly different between the FN group and the other patients (20.8% versus 17.7%, respectively; Hazard Ratio=1.12 (95%CI 0.47-2.69, p=0.79)). A skin opening during the initial trauma (p=0.005) and a polymicrobial infection were significantly associated with a risk of FN from the PCR test (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The PCR test makes it possible to reduce the duration of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy during the treatment of an infection of osteosynthesis hardware but causes a lack of antibiotic coverage in 9.06% of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; diagnostic case control study.

Clinical Features and Outcome of Multidrug-Resistant Osteoarticular Tuberculosis: A 12-Year Case Series from France.

The optimal treatment for osteoarticular infection due to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis strains (MDR-OATB) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcome of MDR-OATB in France. We present a case series of MDR-OATB patients reviewed at the French National Reference Center for Mycobacteria between 2007 and 2018. Medical history and clinical, microbiological, treatment and outcome data were collected. Twenty-three MDR-OATB cases were reported, representing 3% of all concurrent MDR-TB cases in France. Overall, 17 were male, and the median age was 32 years. Six patients were previously treated for TB, including four with first-line drugs. The most frequently affected site was the spine (n = 16). Bone and joint surgery were required in 12 patients. Twenty-one patients (91%) successfully completed the treatment with a regimen containing a mean of four drugs (range, 2-6) for a mean duration of 20 months (range, 13-27). Overall, high rates of treatment success were achieved following WHO MDR-TB treatment guidelines and individualized patient management recommendations by the French National TB Consilium. However, the optimal combination of drugs, duration of treatment and role of surgery in the management of MDR-OATB remains to be determined.

Female genital mutilation: an evaluation of the knowledge of French general and specialized travel medicine practitioners.

We investigated the knowledge of female genital mutilation (FGM) among 60 general and 52 specialized travel medicine practitioners. Less than 50% of these practitioners had adequate knowledge of FGM. Only 42.9% declared having encountered FGM. FGM is likely underestimated in health facilities. Medical education and supporting information should be developed to better address and prevent FGM.