Oxycodone or Higher Dose of Levodopa for the Treatment of Parkinsonian Central Pain: OXYDOPA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Among the different types of pain related to Parkinson's disease (PD), parkinsonian central pain (PCP) is the most disabling. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the analgesic efficacy of two therapeutic strategies (opioid with oxycodone- prolonged-release (PR) and higher dose of levodopa/benserazide) compared with placebo in patients with PCP. METHODS: OXYDOPA was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter parallel-group trial run at 15 centers within the French NS-Park network. PD patients with PCP (≥30 on the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) were randomly assigned to receive oxycodone-PR (up to 40 mg/day), levodopa/benserazide (up to 200 mg/day) or matching placebo three times a day (tid) for 8 weeks at a stable dose, in add-on to their current dopaminergic therapy. The primary endpoint was the change in average pain intensity over the previous week rated on VAS from baseline to week-10 based on modified intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: Between May 2016 and August 2020, 66 patients were randomized to oxycodone-PR (n = 23), levodopa/benserazide (n = 20) or placebo (n = 23). The mean change in pain intensity was -17 ± 18.5 on oxycodone-PR, -8.3 ± 11.1 on levodopa/benserazide, and -14.3 ± 18.9 in the placebo groups. The absolute difference versus placebo was -1.54 (97.5% confidence interval [CI], -17.0 to 13.90; P = 0.8) on oxycodone-PR and +7.79 (97.5% CI, -4.99 to 20.58; P = 0.2) on levodopa/benserazide. Similar proportions of patients in each group experienced all-cause adverse events. Those leading to study discontinuation were most frequently observed with oxycodone-PR (39%) than levodopa/benserazide (5%) or placebo (15%). CONCLUSIONS: The present trial failed to demonstrate the superiority of oxycodone-PR or a higher dose of levodopa in patients with PCP, while oxycodone-PR was poorly tolerated. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Amantadine use in the French prospective NS-Park cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess amantadine use and associated factors in the patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Immediate-release amantadine is approved for the treatment of PD and is largely used in clinical practice to treat "levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LIDs). Its use varies according to countries and PD stages. The prospective NS-Park cohort collects features of PD patients followed by 26 French PD Expert Centres. METHODS: Variables used for the analyses included demographics, motor and non-motor PD symptoms and motor complications [motor fluctuations (MFs), LIDs)], antiparkinsonian pharmacological classes and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). We evaluated: (i) prevalence of amantadine use and compared clinical features of amantadine users vs. non-users (cross-sectional analysis); (ii) factors associated with amantadine initiation (longitudinal analysis); (iii) amantadine effect on LIDs, MFs, apathy, impulse control disorders and freezing of gait (Fog) (longitudinal analysis). RESULTS: Amantadine use prevalence was 12.6% (1,585/12,542, median dose = 200 mg). Amantadine users were significantly younger, with longer and more severe PD symptoms, greater LEDD and more frequent use of device-aided/surgical treatment. Factors independently associated with amantadine initiation were younger age, longer PD duration, more frequent LIDs, MFs and FoG, higher LEDD and better cognitive function. 9 of the 658 patients on amantadine had stopped it at the following visit, after 12-18 months (1.3%). New users of amantadine presented a higher improvement in LIDs and MF compared to amantadine never users. CONCLUSIONS: About 12% of PD patients within the French NS-Park cohort used amantadine, mostly those with younger age and more severe PD. Amantadine initiation was associated with a subsequent reduction in LIDs and MFs.

Restless legs syndrome in the dominant Parkinson's side related to subthalamic deep-brain stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) has an increased estimated prevalence in patients with Parkinson's disease (PS). RLS frequently mimics symptoms intrinsic to PD, such as motor restlessness, contributing to making its diagnosis challenging in this population. We report the case of a patient with new-onset RLS following subthalamic deep-brain stimulation (DBS-STN). We assessed symptoms using suggested immobilization test (SIT) with both DBS-STN activated and switched off. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 59-year-old man with idiopathic PD developed disabling RLS following DBS-STN at age 58, with PD onset at 50 manifesting as left arm tremor. Despite improved motor symptoms during the month following surgery, the patient experienced left leg discomfort at rest, transiently alleviated by movements due to an irrepressible urge to move, and worsened at night. Symptoms had no temporal relationship with oral dopa-therapy and disappeared when DBS-STN was deactivated. A 1 h SIT assessed motor behavior with irrepressible urge to move, as well as sensory symptoms by visual analog scale. After 30 m DBS-STN was switched off followed by the appearance of tremor in the left arm while both motor and sensory symptoms of RLS disappeared in the left leg. DISCUSSION: The mechanisms of DBS-STN's impact on RLS remain controversial. We hypothesize the DBS-STN to induce in our patient a hyperdopaminergic tone. DBS-induced and DBS-ameliorated RLS represent interesting conditions to further understand the pathophysiology of RLS. Moreover, the present observation suggests that SIT can be a valuable tool to assess RLS in PD patients before and after DBS-STN in future prospective studies.