Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 111(2): 56-8, 1999 Jan 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10081122

RESUMO

This study was carried out to provide an overview of the frequency of various mycobacterial species isolated from AIDS patients at the University Hospital of Vienna from 1989 to 1996. Mycobacterium xenopi was found to be the second most common nontuberculous mycobacterial species (92 specimens from 30 patients) and was cultured predominantly from respiratory tract specimens. In 55% of patients, chest X-rays taken at the time of isolation demonstrated pathologic changes which could not be attributed to another cause. Therefore, according to our results, Mycobacterium xenopi should be viewed as an infectious agent rather than a contaminant in AIDS patients.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Mycobacterium xenopi , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/epidemiologia , Áustria/epidemiologia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Programas de Rastreamento , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/epidemiologia , Mycobacterium xenopi/patogenicidade , Virulência
2.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A ; 270(4): 487-91, 1989 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2496537

RESUMO

A method developed in the USA (2, 6, 8) for the culturing, identification and differentiation of mycobacteria by means of a radiometric method (Bactec) was compared with a conventional method by examining 802 specimens received. Obviously better results were obtained with the new method: The number of positive cultures was 102 (12.7%) for Bactec against 87 (10.8%) for the conventional method. When using the radiometric method, the contamination rate (5.1%) was higher than for the conventional method (3.1%). It would, however, seem that this disadvantage can be offset by an increase in the alkali concentration during pretreatment of the specimens. After elimination of all paired samples one or both specimens were found to be contaminated, 743 specimens remained for direct comparison. Of these, 101 (13.6%) were positive when the Bactec method, and 84 (11.3%), when the conventional method was used. The superiority of the new method was most obvious with sputum specimens: 14.5% were positive when Bactec, and 12.2%, when the conventional method was used. For the Bactec method, the mean period until positive results could be recognized by daily readings was 15 days against 28 days for the conventional method with weekly readings. Sensitivity testing can be completed within 8 days. Owing to the costs of the radiometric method, it is recommended to limit its use of defined situations.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiometria , Fatores de Tempo , Tuberculose/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA