Variation in Definitions of Kidney Abnormality in Patients with Spina Bifida: A Systematic Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the variability in definitions of kidney abnormality (KA) outcomes in individuals with spina bifida (SB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase™, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo®, Web of Science™ and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles from time of database inception to September 2020. No language or patient age restrictions were applied. Primary research articles involving individuals with SB where KA was assessed as an outcome were included. Means of assessing KA and defining KA severity were abstracted. RESULTS: Of 2,034 articles found, 274 were included in the review. Most articles were published after 1990 (63.5%) and included pediatric-only populations (0-18 years; 60.5%). KA outcomes were identified by imaging-based anatomical outcomes (84.7%), serum-based outcomes (44.9%), imaging-based functional outcomes (5.5%), urine-based outcomes (3.3%) and diagnoses of end-stage kidney disease (2.6%) or chronic kidney disease otherwise unspecified (1.8%). Hydronephrosis was the most commonly used specific outcome (64.6%, 177/274) with 19.8% (35/177) of articles defining hydronephrosis severity. Hydronephrosis was used more frequently in articles with pediatric-only populations. Creatinine and cystatin-C were used in 82.1% (101/123) and 17.9% (22/123) of articles reporting serum-based outcomes, respectively, with 32.7% and 50.0% of articles defining estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) severity. Serum-based outcomes were more common in articles including adults >18 years. Measured GFR was assessed in 9.9% (27/274) of articles, with 44.4% (12/27) of articles defining GFR severity. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability exists in how authors define KA with few specifically defining KA severity. Consensus and consistency in defining KA outcomes are needed.

The adverse association between stimulant use for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and semen parameters.

This study examined the relationship between stimulant medications used for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and semen parameters. We performed a retrospective cohort study at a large, academic institution between 2002 and 2020. We included men with a semen analysis without prior spermatotoxic medication use, empiric medical therapy exposure or confounding medical diagnoses (varicocele, Klinefelter's syndrome, cryptorchidism, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, cancer or cancer-related treatment, and azoospermia). Men were stratified by stimulant exposure (methylphenidate or amphetamines). A multivariable linear regression was fit to assess the association between individual semen parameters, age, stimulant exposure and non-stimulant medication use. Of 8,861 men identified, 106 men had active prescriptions for stimulants within 90 days prior to semen testing. After controlling for age and exposure to non-stimulant medications, stimulant use was associated with decreased total motile sperm count (ß: -18.00 mil/ejaculate and standard error: 8.44, p = 0.033) in the setting of decreased semen volume (ß: -0.35 ml, and standard error: 0.16, p = 0.035), but not sperm concentration, motility and morphology. These findings suggest a role for reproductive physicians and mental health providers to consider counselling men on the potential negative impact of stimulants prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on semen volume during fertility planning.

Assessing the Prevalence of Low Testosterone and Elevated Follicle Stimulating Hormone Among Men Presenting for Fertility Evaluation Without Oligospermia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of abnormal hormone parameters among men with and without oligospermia to determine the value of universal hormonal screening during initial fertility evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated men who underwent semen analysis and hormonal evaluation (morning testosterone [T] and follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]) between January 2002 and May 2021. Sperm concentration was dichotomized at 15 million/mL according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. We compared median and interquartile range (IQR) T and FSH levels according to sperm concentration using Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in prevalence of low testosterone (<300 ng/dL) and abnormal FSH (>7.6mIU/mL) were determined using chi-square test. RESULTS: 1164 men had a morning serum T. There was no difference in median T among men with normal vs abnormal sperm concentration (316 ng/dL, IQR 250-399 vs 316 ng/dL, IQR 253-419; P = .52). FSH was measured in 1261 men. Median FSH was higher among men with sperm concentration <15 million/mL (6.0IU/mL, IQR 3.9-10.7 vs 3.8IU/mL, IQR 2.7-5.7; P < .001). Among men with ≥15 million/mL concentration, 44.1% were found to have low T (P = .874) and 10.8% had an FSH ≥7.6 mIU/mL (P < .001). Among men with ≥15 million/mL sperm concentration who underwent both T and FSH evaluation, 43.6% had at least 1 hormonal abnormality. CONCLUSION: Almost half of men with normal sperm concentration had low T. As low T may have long-term implications for both fertility and overall health, providers should consider universal T screening in men presenting for fertility evaluation.

Characteristics of men who use direct-to-consumer men's health telemedicine services.

The characteristics of men who use direct-to-consumer (DTC) men's health services are not well understood. We conducted an online survey of adult men via ResearchMatch, assessing sociodemographic data, health behaviors, and concern for low testosterone and infertility. Logistic regression estimated the association between participant characteristics and familiarity with and reported use of DTC services such as Hims® and Roman®. Among 1276 men surveyed, 62.2% were concerned about low testosterone. While almost half (48.5%) were familiar with men's DTC health services, only 37 (2.9%) reported using these services. On multivariable analysis, men who used DTC men's health services were more likely to be younger (age 18-39: odds ratio [OR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-8.38, p = 0.04; age 40-59: OR 3.26, CI 1.17-9.10, p = 0.02; referent age ≥60), have annual income between $75k and $100k (OR 5.25, CI 1.39-19.87.45, p = 0.02), and be concerned about low testosterone (OR 3.81, CI 1.46-9.96, p = 0.01). In conclusion, younger men and those with mid-range incomes were more likely to use online DTC men's health services compared to older or wealthier men. Likewise, men with concerns about low testosterone were more likely to use DTC services, but other health-conscious behaviors and frequency of doctor visits did not predict use.

Reproductive urologic consultation in subfertile men: predictors of establishing care and patient perceptions after abnormal semen testing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictors of establishing care with a reproductive urologist (RU) among men with abnormal semen analyses (SAs) ordered by nonurologists and examine patient perceptions of abnormal SAs in the absence of RU consultation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Large, integrated academic healthcare system during 2002-2019. PATIENT(S): We identified adult men undergoing initial SAs with nonurologists who had abnormalities. Patients with index SAs during 2002-2018 were included for the analysis of RU consultation. Men tested in 2019 were recruited for cross-sectional survey. INTERVENTION(S): Cross-sectional survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): RU consultation and accurate perception of abnormal SAs. RESULT(S): A total of 2,283 men had abnormal SAs ordered by nonurologists, among whom 20.5% underwent RU consultation. Mixed-effect logistic regression modeling identified oligospermia as the strongest predictor of RU care (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.43-3.90) with a significant provider-level random intercept. We observed substantial provider-level heterogeneity among nonurologists with provider-specific rates of RU evaluation ranging from 3.7% to 35.8%. We contacted 310 men who did not undergo RU consultation with a 27.2% survey response rate. Of respondents, 6.7% reported receiving an RU referral. Among men with abnormal SAs not evaluated by RU, 22.7% appropriately perceived an abnormal SA. CONCLUSION(S): In men with abnormal SAs diagnosed by nonurologists, the rate of RU consultation was low and associated with substantial provider-level variation among ordering providers. Patients without RU consultation reported inaccurate perceptions of their SA. Multidisciplinary efforts are needed to ensure that subfertile men receive appropriate RU evaluation.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Use is Not Associated With Impaired Semen Parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use and semen quality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all men undergoing semen analysis (SA) for fertility evaluation from 2002-2020 at a single academic medical center. Men were excluded if they had prior exposure to spermatotoxic medications, clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, selective estrogen receptor modulators, or medical conditions known to impact male fertility. SSRI exposure was defined by an outpatient prescription within 90 days prior to any semen test. Differences between men with and without SSRI exposure were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables and chi-squared testing for proportions. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were fit to evaluate the relationship between SSRI use and individual semen parameters, controlling for age at the time of the semen analysis and non-SSRI drug use. RESULTS: A total of 8861 men were identified, of whom 153 men (1.7%) were exposed to SSRIs prior to SA. Median age was 35 years (interquartile range: 32-39) and was similar between groups (P = .999). Non-SSRI medication use was significantly higher in men taking SSRIs (78.4% vs 23.3%, < .001). On univariable and multivariable analyses, SSRI exposure was not associated with differences in semen volume, sperm concentration, motility, total motile sperm count, or normal morphology. CONCLUSION: In adult men undergoing fertility evaluation, SSRI exposure was not associated with impaired semen parameters. These data may help inform reproductive counseling and medical decision-making regarding SSRI use in men seeking paternity.

Cost-effectiveness of Early Screening Home Semen Analysis in Couples Attempting to Conceive.

OBJECTIVE: To study the cost-effectiveness of incorporating home semen analysis in screening for oligospermia and expediting time to evaluation. METHODS: A decision analytic model was built using inputs from the medical literature. The index patient is the male partner in a couple seeking fertility, and entry into the model was assumed to be at the inception of the couple's attempts to conceive via natural means. Three main strategies are described and analyzed: (1) baseline strategy of no testing, (2) utilization of a home semen testing kit, (3) universal testing via a clinic visit and gold standard lab semen analysis. The primary outcome was detection of oligospermia (defined as sperm concentration <15 million/mL). Strategies were ranked by months to evaluation by a male infertility specialist saved. Costs were considered from the patient perspective and were incorporated to determine the incremental cost per month saved to evaluation (ICMS) per 100,000 patients. RESULTS: Compared to a baseline strategy of no screening, utilizing a home test would save 89,000 months at the incremental cost of $7,418,000 for an ICMS of $45.51. Shifting to a strategy of universal gold standard clinic and lab testing saves an additional 3000 months but at an ICMS of $17,691 compared to the home testing strategy. CONCLUSION: Widespread adoption and the early usage of home semen analysis may be a cost-effective method of screening for oligospermia and facilitating further evaluation with an andrology specialist.

An Evaluation of Peer-Rated Surgical Skill and its Relationship With Detrusor Muscle Sampling in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of peer-review of TURBT videos as a means to evaluate surgeon skill and its relationship to detrusor sampling. METHODS: Urologists from an academic health system submitted TURBT videos in 2019. Ten blinded peers evaluated each surgeon's performance using a 10-item scoring instrument to quantify surgeon skill. Normalized composite skill scores for each surgeon were calculated using peer ratings. For surgeons submitting videos, we retrospectively reviewed all TURBT pathology results (2018-2019) to assess surgeon-specific detrusor sampling. A hierarchical logistic regression model was fit to evaluate the association between skill and detrusor sampling, adjusting for patient and surgeon factors. RESULTS: Surgeon skill scores and detrusor sampling rates were determined for 13 surgeons performing 245 TURBTs. Skill scores varied from -6.0 to 5.1 [mean: 0; standard deviation (SD): 2.40]. Muscle was sampled in 72% of cases, varying considerably across surgeons (mean: 64.5%; SD: 30.7%). Among 8 surgeons performing >5 TURBTs during the study period, adjusted detrusor sampling rate was associated with sending separate deep specimens (odds ratio [OR]: 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.81, P = .045) but not skill (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.57-1.17, P = .191). CONCLUSION: Surgeon skill was not associated with detrusor sampling, suggesting there may be other drivers of variability of detrusor sampling in TURBT.

Unmet financial burden of infertility care and the impact of state insurance mandates in the United States: analysis from a popular crowdfunding platform.

OBJECTIVE: To examine infertility-related fund-raising campaigns on a popular crowdfunding website and to compare campaign characteristics across states with and without legislative mandates for insurance coverage for infertility-related care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Online crowdfunding platform (GoFundMe) between 2010 and 2020. PATIENT(S): GoFundMe campaigns in the United States containing the keywords "fertility" and "infertility." INTERVENTION(S): State insurance mandates for infertility treatment coverage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes included fund-raising goals, funds raised, campaign location, and campaigns per capita. RESULT(S): Of the 3,332 infertility-related campaigns analyzed, a total goal of $52.6 million was requested, with $22.5 million (42.8%) successfully raised. The average goal was $18,639 (standard deviation [SD] $32,904), and the average amount raised was $6,759 (SD $14,270). States with insurance mandates for infertility coverage had fewer crowdfunding campaigns per capita (0.75 vs. 1.15 campaigns per 100,000 population than states without insurance mandates. CONCLUSION(S): We found a large number of campaigns requesting financial assistance for costs associated with infertility care, indicating a substantial unmet financial burden. States with insurance mandates had fewer campaigns per capita, suggesting that mandates are effective in mitigating this financial burden. These data can inform future health policy legislation on the state and federal levels to assist with the financial burden of infertility.

Perceptions of Infertility and Semen Analysis Testing Among American Men Without Children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether health-conscious men are more likely to be concerned about infertility and self-initiate semen analysis at a laboratory/clinic or through a direct-to-consumer at-home product without a health care provider recommendation. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey conducted online via ResearchMatch.org between November 2019 and January 2020. Men age 18 and older without children (n = 634) were included for analysis. Outcomes were likelihood of self-initiating a semen analysis, prevalence of infertility concern. RESULTS: Of the 634 participants, 186 expressed concern about infertility but only 29% were likely to discuss these concerns with a health care provider. More men would self-initiate a semen analysis using an at-home product than through a traditional laboratory/clinic (14.2% vs 10.4%, P = .04). Odds of self-initiating a traditional semen analysis were higher for men concerned about low testosterone (odds ratio [OR] 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-4.74, P = .023) and infertility (OR 3.91, 95% CI 2.14-7.15, P <.001). Self-initiating an at-home semen analysis was associated with concern for low testosterone and infertility as well as middle age (age 40-59: OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.16-7.88, P = .024) and fitness tracker use (OR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.12-3.39, P = .018). CONCLUSION: Many men were unlikely to discuss infertility concerns with a health care provider. Middle aged men and those who used fitness trackers were more likely to self-initiate fertility evaluation through at-home semen analysis. Concern about low serum testosterone was pervasive and strongly associated with concern for being infertile and self-initiating a semen analysis of any kind.

The resolution of the identity approximation applied to the correlation consistent composite approach.

A new implementation of the correlation consistent composite approach (ccCA), denoted RI-ccCA, utilizing both the resolution of the identity (RI) and local methods is presented. A set of 102 molecules composed of first and second row, main group atoms is employed to compare total energies, atomization energies, and enthalpies of formation between the original ccCA implementation and those of RI-ccCA. Relative CPU time and disk space requirements of RI-ccCA as compared to ccCA, demonstrate that on the average, employing the RI approximation in ccCA affords CPU time savings over 70% and disk space requirements diminished by well over 90% without introducing significant error in energetic properties.

The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine how robotic prostatectomy affects practice patterns of urologists, we examined the case volume characteristics among certifying urologists for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer. We hypothesized that the utilization of open and robotic prostatectomy as well as lymph node dissection changed dynamically over the last 10 years. METHODS: A total of 6-month case log data of certifying urologists from 2003 to 2013 were obtained for the American Board of Urology. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with a corresponding diagnosis of prostate cancer as defined by ICD-9 code 185.0. RESULTS OBTAINED: A total of 6,563 urologists submitted case logs, of which 68% (4,470/6,563) reported performing at least one radical prostatectomy (RP), totaling 46,030 RPs logged. There was a 376% increase in the performance of RALP over the study period with robotic volume increasing from 22% of all RP in 2003 to 85% in 2013. Among surgeons performing ORP, the median number performed was 2; of surgeons who performed RALP, the median number performed was 8 (P<0.001). Overall, 39% of surgeons logging ORP performed 2 or fewer RP, whereas 19% of surgeons who performed RALP performed 2 or less RP (P<0.001). The highest volume robotic surgeons (top 10% surgical volume) performed 41% of all RALP with the highest performing robotic surgeon recording 658 prostatectomies over 6 months. Oncologists represented 4.1% of all surgeons performing RP and performed 15.1% of all RP (P<0.001); general urologists performed the majority of RP (57.8%). When performed open, there was no influence of surgeon specialty on the performance of lymph node dissection (LND); if performed robotically, oncologists were significantly more likely to perform LND compared with general surgeons (47% vs. 25.9%, respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic prostatectomies are performed 5 times more commonly than open prostatectomy and represent 85% of all RP performed by board-certified urologists in 2013. Compared to RALP, ORP are significantly more likely to be performed by lower volume surgeons. Oncologists perform a higher relative percentage of RPs and are significantly more likely to perform LND if performed robotically when compared with general urologists.