Modified Chevron Osteotomy with Distal Soft Tissue Release for Treating Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Minimal Clinical Important Difference Values Study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether modified Chevron osteotomy together with distal soft tissue release would correct moderate to severe HV deformity and what is the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for objective and subjective evaluating parameters. METHODS: From March 2018 to January 2019, 40 hallux valgus patients (including moderate to severe) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The cohort included four males and 36 females. The average age at surgery was 50.95 (range 22-75) years. All patients underwent modified Chevron osteotomy together with distal soft tissue release and completed at least one follow-up at clinic. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle forefoot score (AOFAS, forefoot), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Foot Function Index (FFI) were all collected before and after surgery. Besides, the hallux valgus angle (HVA), 1st-2nd intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were measured both before surgery and at last follow-up. All MCID values were calculated by employing distribution-based method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) showed satisfied result at a mean 14.3-month follow-up (range 13-22 month). Two patients complained about residual pain at the bunion, and overcorrection (hallux varus) occurred in one patient. Meanwhile, no patient observed nonunion. Being female, age more than 60, residual HVA deformity (>15°), and post IMA more than 9° showed no statistical relationship with the post-operation residual pain (P > 0.05). However, high VAS score before surgery (more than 7) showed strong correlation with residual pain (P < 0.01). The subjective MCID value was 9.50 for AOFAS, 18.92 for FFI, and 1.27 for VAS, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified Chevron osteotomy together with distal soft tissue release could achieve a satisfied result for moderate to severe HV deformity at early follow-up. The residual pain was associated with severe pain before surgery (VAS more than 7).

[Clinical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation in treating Gustilo typeI and II patients with open distal humeral fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To analysis clinical effects of open reduction and internal fixation in treating Gustilo type I and II patients with open distal humeral fracture. METHODS: From 2013 May to 2017 June, 24 patient with Gustilo grade I and II open distal humeral fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation, including 20 males and 4 females, aged from 14 to 65 years old with an average of (41.3±13.1) years old. According to Gustilo classification, 16 patients were type I, 8 patients were typeII. Range of motion, complications and secondary surgery were recorded; elbow function were evaluated with VAS (visual analogue scale), MEPS (Mayo elbow performance score) and QuickDASH (quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) at 12 months after operation. RESULTS: All patients were followed up from 15 to 60 years with an average of (34.1±11.9) months. VAS score was 0(0, 2); flexion and extension ranged from 50 °to 145° with an average of (115.2±26.1)°; the range of rotation ranged from 100° to 160° with an average of (147.7±17.0)°. MEPS score was for 75 to 90 (90.0±9.1), and 14 patients got excellent result, 10 patients moderate. Quick DASH score was 4.6(0, 14.8). There were 22 patients occurred complications, such as ulnar nerve symptom and internal fixation irritation, and 10 patients accepted the second operation. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation is a safe and efficient method in treating Gustilo type I and II patients with open distal humeral fractures, which has an advantages of good range of movement and function score.

Functional Outcome of Pronation-External Rotation-Weber C Ankle Fractures with Supracollicular Medial Malleolar Fracture Treated with or without Syndesmotic Screws: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In treatment of ankle fracture, intraoperative stress tests are used to assess the syndesmotic injury and instability. However, the optimized timing of the strees test should be applied whether in pre- or post-bony fixation during operation is seldom be reported in previous studies. The different strategies on stress test timing would exhibit opposite results within a type of pronation-external rotation (PER) fractures with supracollicular medial malleolar (SMM) fractures. This study was designed to assess the 3-year functional outcomes of the special PER fractures with or without a syndesmotic transfixation based on the results of two different intraoperative stress test strategies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 61 PER injury-Weber C ankle fractures combined with SMM fractures who were treated in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between 2013 and 2014 and followed up for 3 years. Stress test was performed twice intraoperatively. A positive intraoperative stress test before bony fixation and a negative intraoperative stress test after bony fixation were found in these included patients. Twenty-nine patients (Group 1) were treated without a supplemental syndesmotic screw fixation, according to the negative intraoperative stress test after bony fixation, while 32 patients (Group 2) were treated with an additional syndesmotic screw fixation based on the positive intraoperative stress test before bony fixation. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain scores were the main measurements of outcome. The statistical index of demographic data, fracture morphologic data, time interval of follow-up, AOFAS and VAS were recorded and assessed by SPSS 21.0 software through Fisher exact tests and one-way analysis of variance. The associations between the main outcomes and influential factors were evaluated by linear regression models. RESULTS: We observed no difference in the distribution of age, sex, presence of associated posterior malleolus (PM), fracture dislocation, and fixation of associated PM between two treatment groups. With the numbers available, no statistically significant association could be detected with regard to the AOFAS (Group 1 vs. Group 2, 96.72 ± 6.20 vs. 94.63 ± 8.26, F = 1.24, P = 0.27) and VAS (Group 1 vs. Group 2, 1.47 ± 2.14 vs. 0.72 ± 1.49, F = 2.44, P = 0.12) in association with two strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates no difference to the use of the syndesmotic screw in terms of the functional outcome between syndesmosis transfixation and no-fixation patients among PER-Weber C ankle fracture patients with SMM fracture after 3-year follow-up. More attention should be paid to pre- and post-bony-fixation intraoperative stress tests and the morphology of medial malleoli fractures in ankle fractures.