Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Cytol ; 50(5): 499-506, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17017434

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test DNA methylation profiling in detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three bladder specimens were analyzed for the DNA p16INK4a, RASSF1, APC, GSTP, E-Cad and CyclinD2 genes to determine if there is a difference in gene methylation between benign and malignant cases. Urine samples were analyzed in a feasibility study. Finally, methylation profiles of urine samples were obtained and compared with follow-up biopsy diagnoses. RESULTS: We found methylated genes in 18% benign, 37% urothelial carcinoma in situ and 93% infiltrating urothelial carcinoma cases (p = 0.001). Methylation profiles from the 18 urine samples revealed a significantly higher prevalence of methylated genes in carcinoma cases than benign cases (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). We analyzed methylation profiles in 37 cytologically atypical urine samples with malignant or benign diagnosis on surgical follow-up andfound that only APC (55% in malignant vs. 0% in benign, p=0.025) and CyclinD2 were differentially methylated (35% in malignant vs. 0% in benign, p=0.2) while p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1, GSTP and E-Cad had similar methylation profiles. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that methylation of p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1, GSTP and E-Cad genes may not accurately identify carcinoma, but methylated APC and CyclinD2 might be useful biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma in urine.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/genética , Impressões Digitais de DNA/métodos , Metilação de DNA , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/genética , Urotélio/patologia , Idoso , Ciclossomo-Complexo Promotor de Anáfase , Caderinas/genética , Caderinas/metabolismo , Carcinoma/urina , Ciclina D2 , Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/genética , Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/metabolismo , Ciclinas/genética , Ciclinas/metabolismo , DNA/genética , DNA/urina , Impressões Digitais de DNA/tendências , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Reações Falso-Negativas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p14ARF/genética , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p14ARF/metabolismo , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/genética , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/metabolismo , Complexos Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligase/genética , Complexos Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligase/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/urina , Urotélio/metabolismo
2.
Mod Pathol ; 16(11): 1095-101, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14614048

RESUMO

Methylation of tumor suppressor genes has been implicated in breast cancer development. However, methylation profiles of different breast lesions, subtypes of carcinoma in particular, have not been examined in detail. In this study, we use methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to generate gene methylation profiles of different breast lesions and to test the clinical utility of such profiles. We examined the methylation status of three genes, RARbeta2, RASSF1A, and cyclin D2, on 102 samples of breast tissue, from benign (n = 36), to in situ carcinoma (n = 21), to invasive carcinoma (n = 45). We found that almost all cases of invasive carcinoma (96%) contained at least one methylated gene from our panel, whereas gene methylation was less common among benign lesions (42%) and in situ carcinoma (76%). Of the three genes, cyclin D2 methylation was most specific for malignancy because only 1 of 35 benign cases was methylated at this gene (1 case was not informative). The major histologic subtypes of invasive carcinoma show similar methylation profiles in the genes examined. We next performed MSP analysis on archival breast fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy samples and corresponding surgical biopsy specimens and found a high concordance between the two types of specimens. We then analyzed 17 breast FNA biopsy samples with an indeterminate diagnosis. In this setting, MSP had a high specificity (100%) and modest sensitivity (67%) for identifying malignancy.


Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/genética , Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Metilação de DNA , Biópsia por Agulha , Carcinoma/genética , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/genética , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Impressões Digitais de DNA , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA