Clinical pharmacology considerations and drug-drug interactions with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine relevant to sub-Saharan Africa.

Long-acting injectable (LAI) cabotegravir and rilpivirine for HIV treatment and LAI cabotegravir for pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis are being rolled out in a multitude of countries worldwide. Due to the prolonged exposure, it can be challenging to undertake 'traditional' pharmacokinetic studies and current guidance is derived from their oral equivalents or physiologically based pharmacokinetic studies. This review aims to consider pharmacokinetic characteristics of cabotegravir and rilpivirine and describe anticipated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with frequent concomitant medications in African settings. Relevant co-medications were identified from the WHO 2021 List of Essential Medicines. All original human and physiologically based pharmacokinetic studies published in English on PubMed, discussing DDIs with LAI cabotegravir and rilpivirine prior to April 2023, were reviewed. The Liverpool HIV interaction database was also reviewed (https://www.hiv-druginteractions.org/checker). LAI cabotegravir and rilpivirine have half-lives of 6-12 and 13-28 weeks, respectively. Cabotegravir is primarily metabolized by UDP-glucuronyltransferase (UGT)-1A1 and rilpivirine by cytochrome P450 (CYP)-3A4. LAI cabotegravir and rilpivirine themselves exhibit low risk of perpetrating interactions with co-medications as they do not induce or inhibit the major drug metabolizing enzymes. However, they are victims of DDIs relating to the induction of their metabolizing enzymes by concomitantly administered medication. Noteworthy contraindicated co-medications include rifamycins, carbamazepine, phenytoin, flucloxacillin and griseofulvin, which induce CYP3A4 and/or UGT1A1, causing clinically significant reduced concentrations of rilpivirine and/or cabotegravir. In addition to virologic failure, subtherapeutic concentrations resulting from DDIs can lead to emergent drug resistance. Clinicians should be aware of potential DDIs and counsel people receiving LAI cabotegravir/rilpivirine appropriately to minimize risk.

Factors associated with uptake of contraceptives among HIV positive women on dolutegravir based anti-retroviral treatment-a cross sectional survey in urban Uganda.

BACKGROUND: In May 2018, following the preliminary results of a study in Botswana that reported congenital anomalies in babies born to HIV-positive women taking dolutegravir drug, the WHO issued a teratogenicity alert. However, there are scarce data on the impact of this guidance on contraceptive uptake among women taking dolutegravir. We assessed the uptake of contraceptives in HIV-positive women of reproductive age on dolutegravir regimens. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from April 2019 to July 2019 in five government health facilities in central Uganda, where dolutegravir-based regimens were offered as the preferred first-line antiretroviral treatment. We randomly selected 359 non-pregnant women aged 15-49 years taking dolutegravir-based regimens and interviewed them using semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. We collected data on demographics, contraceptive use, individual, social, and health system factors. We described patients' characteristics using descriptive statistics and assessed factors associated with contraceptive uptake using a modified Poisson regression model. RESULTS: A total of 359 women were included in the study. The mean age was 37 years (standard deviation = 6.8) and overall contraceptive uptake was 38.4%. The most utilized method was injectable method at 58.4% followed by condoms (15%), intrauterine device (10.7%), pills (6.4%), implants (5.4%), and sterilization (0.7%). Predictors for contraceptive uptake were parity of 3-4 children (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (APR) = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, 1.92) in reference to those with 1-2 children. There was reduced contraceptive uptake in women of the age range 40-49 years (APR = 0.45, CI: 0.21-0.94) compared to those aged 15-24 years. Unemployed women were less likely to use contraceptives (APR: 0.6, CI: 0.42- 0.94) than the formally employed. Contraceptive uptake was lower among women who did not discuss family planning with their partners (APR = 0.39, CI: 0.29-0.52) than those who discussed family planning with their partners and women who did not receive family planning counseling (APR = 0.56, CI: 0.34-0.92) than those who received family planning counselling. CONCLUSION: We observed a low-level uptake of contraceptives, with injectables as the most used method. Family planning counseling and partner discussion on family planning were associated with contraceptive uptake among the women who used dolutegravir-based regimens. There is a need for more strategies to integrate FP services and increase male involvement in HIV care programs.

The burden of drug resistant tuberculosis in a predominantly nomadic population in Uganda: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Emergence of drug resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) has aggravated the tuberculosis (TB) public health burden worldwide and especially in low income settings. We present findings from a predominantly nomadic population in Karamoja, Uganda with a high-TB burden (3500 new cases annually) and sought to determine the prevalence, patterns, factors associated with DR-TB. METHODS: We used mixed methods of data collection. We enrolled 6890 participants who were treated for tuberculosis in a programmatic setting between January 2015 and April 2018. A cross sectional study and a matched case control study with conditional logistic regression and robust standard errors respectively were used to the determine prevalence and factors associated with DR-TB. The qualitative methods included focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and key informant interviews. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of DR-TB was 41/6890 (0.6%) with 4/64,197 (0.1%) among the new and 37/2693 (1.4%) among the previously treated TB patients respectively. The drug resistance patterns observed in the region were mainly rifampicin mono resistant (68.3%) and Multi Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (31.7%). Factors independently associated with DR-TB were previous TB treatment, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 13.070 (95%CI 1.552-110.135) and drug stock-outs aOR 0.027 (95%CI 0.002-0.364). The nomadic lifestyle, substance use, congested homesteads and poor health worker attitudes were a great challenge to effective treatment of TB. CONCLUSION: Despite having the highest national TB incidence, Karamoja still has a low DR-TB prevalence. Previous TB treatment and drug stock outs were associated with DR-TB. Regular supply of anti TB medications and health education may help to stem the burden of TB disease in this nomadic population.

Phase I EnACT Trial of the Safety and Tolerability of a Novel Oral Formulation of Amphotericin B.

Amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB) has substantial toxicities. A novel encochleated amphotericin B deoxycholate (cAMB) formulation has oral bioavailability, efficacy in an animal model, and minimal toxicity due to targeted drug delivery into macrophages, where intracellular fungi reside. We conducted a phase I, ascending-dose trial of cAMB administered at 1.0 g, 1.5 g, or 2.0 g per day in 4 to 6 divided doses among HIV-positive survivors of cryptococcosis (n = 9 per cohort). We assessed the tolerability of cAMB and the adverse events (AEs) associated with cAMB treatment over 3 days. A second trial (n = 9) assessed the tolerability of 1.5 g/day given for 7 days. In the single-ascending-dose study, all subjects received their full daily dose without vomiting (100% tolerability). The cohort receiving 1.0 g had 4 transient clinical AEs in 2 subjects within 48 h and 8 laboratory AEs (n = 6 grade 2, n = 2 grade 1). The cohort receiving 1.5 g had 7 clinical AEs in 1 subject attributed to acute gastroenteritis (n = 4 grade 2) and 5 laboratory AEs (n = 1 grade 2). The cohort receiving 2.0 g had 20 clinical AEs among 5 subjects within 48 h (n = 3 grade 2) and 11 laboratory AEs (n = 2 grade 2, n = 1 grade 3). From a qualitative survey, 26 of 27 subjects (96%) preferred their experience with oral cAMB over their prior experience with intravenous (i.v.) AMB. The second, multiple-dose cohort received 1.5 g/day for 1 week, with 98.4% (248/252) of the doses being taken. Overall, 5 clinical AEs (n = 5 grade 1) and 6 laboratory AEs (n = 6 grade 1) occurred without kidney toxicity. Oral cAMB was well tolerated when given in 4 to 6 divided daily doses without the toxicities commonly seen with i.v. AMB. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04031833.).

An observational study in an urban Ugandan clinic comparing virological outcomes of patients switched from first-line antiretroviral regimens to second-line regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation approved boosted atazanavir as a preferred second line protease inhibitor in 2010. This is as an alternative to the current boosted lopinavir. Atazanavir has a lower genetic barrier than lopinavir. We compared the virological outcomes of patients during the roll out of routine viral load monitoring, who had switched to boosted second- line regimens of either atazanavir or lopinavir. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving adult patients at the Infectious Diseases Institute Kampala, Uganda started on a standard WHO recommended second-line regimen containing either boosted atazanavir or boosted lopinavir between 1 Dec 2014 and 31 July 2015.. Mantel -Haenszel chi square was used to test for the statistical significance of the odds of being suppressed (VL < 400 copies/ml) when on boosted atazanavir compared to boosted lopinavir after stratifying by duration on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Multivariate logistic regression analysis used to determine if the type of boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) was associated with virological outcome. RESULTS: Ninety (90) % on ATV/r and 83% on LPV/r had a VL less than 1000 copies/ml. The odds of being suppressed using the same viral load cut-off while on boosted atazanavir compared to boosted lopinavir was not statistically significant after stratifying for duration on ART (p = 0.09). In a multivariate analysis the type of bPI used was not a predictor of virological outcome (p = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Patients using the WHO recommended second-line of boosted atazanavir have comparable virological suppression to those on boosted lopinavir.

High prevalence and long duration of nervous system and psychiatric adverse drug reactions in Ugandan patients taking efavirenz 600 mg daily.

Background: Efavirenz-related nervous system or psychiatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are conventionally reported to resolve soon after initiation, with incidence of dizziness at 8.5% in large clinical trials. Patients of black ethnicity are genetically at greater risk of elevated efavirenz exposure, which has been linked to nervous system toxicity. Patients and methods: The current data derive from a prospective longitudinal observational study of adult HIV-positive outpatients taking current antiretrovirals, at three diverse clinics in central Uganda. As part of an interview about medicine use, patients were asked by trained pharmacy technicians to detail current side effects and to rate their severity on a simple visual analogue scale (1-10). Details of the reported ADRs were verified by case note review. Severity and causality of ADRs were rated by the study team using validated tools. Results: A total of 300 patients taking efavirenz were analysed. Of these, 108 (36%, 95% CI 30.6%-41.7%) were affected by persisting nervous system/psychiatric ADRs (median duration 22 months). Dizziness affected 27.3% (95% CI 22.4%-32.8%) of patients taking efavirenz. Severity of the ADRs was rated by patients at ≥5/10 in 76 (58.5%) cases. In 95 (86%) cases, there was no record of the ADRs in the clinical notes. Conclusions: Strategies are needed to identify and prioritize patients urgently with persisting efavirenz neurotoxicity for a switch to newer regimens as they become available.

Dolutegravir use over 48 weeks is not associated with worsening insulin resistance and pancreatic beta cell function in a cohort of HIV-infected Ugandan adults.

Background The Uganda Ministry of Health issued restrictive guidelines on the use of dolutegravir (DTG) in persons stratified to have a heightened risk of diabetes mellitus. This followed multiple reports of persons with HIV (PWH) presenting with accelerated hyperglycemia after a few weeks to months of exposure to DTG. Having demonstrated a low incidence of diabetes mellitus and improving blood glucose trajectories in a cohort of ART naïve Ugandan PWH on DTG, we sought to determine whether the observed improvement in blood glucose did not mask background compensated insulin resistance. Methods In this analysis, 63 patients underwent serial oral glucose tolerance tests over 48 weeks. Using fasting serum insulin and glucose, we calculated insulin resistance and pancreatic beta cell function by homeostatic modelling (HOMA IR and HOMA%ß respectively). Absolute mean changes between baseline and post-baseline blood glucose, pancreatic beta cell function and insulin resistance were computed by subtracting each post-baseline value from the baseline value and compared using student t-test. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the factors associated with changes in pancreatic beta cell function and insulin resistance. Results Of the 63 participants, 37 (58%) were female. Median age was 31 (IQR: 28-37). Despite a trend towards an initial increase in both HOMA IR and HOMA%ß at 12 weeks followed by a decline through 36 weeks to 48 weeks, the HOMA IR and HOMA%ß at 48 weeks were not significantly different from baseline i.e. (difference in mean HOMA IR from baseline: 0.14, 95%CI: -0.46, 0.733, p = 0.648) and (difference in mean HOMA %ß from baseline: 6.7, 95%CI: -13.4, 26.8, p = 0.506) respectively.

Blood glucose outcomes of anti-retroviral therapy naïve Ugandan people with HIV with pre-diabetes mellitus initiated on dolutegravir for 48 weeks.

Background: The Uganda ministry of Health recommends frequent blood glucose monitoring for the first six months on dolutegravir, in people with HIV (PWH) having pre-diabetes mellitus (pre-DM). We sought to determine if indeed PWH with pre-diabetes started on dolutegravir had worse blood glucose outcomes at 48 weeks compared to those with normal blood glucose. Methods: In this matched cohort study, we compared 44 PWH with pre-DM and 88 PWH with normal blood glucose at baseline. The primary outcome was change in mean fasting blood glucose (FBG) from baseline to week 48 and 2-hour blood glucose (2hBG) from baseline to week 36 compared between the two groups. Results: There was significant increase in FBG in PWH with normal blood glucose (mean change in FBG(FBG): 3.9mg/dl, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): (2.2, 5.7), p value (p) = < 0.0001) and decrease in those with pre-DM (FBG: -6.1mg/dl, 95%CI (-9.1, -3.2), p = < 0.0001) at 48 weeks. 2hBG at 36 weeks was significantly lower than at baseline in both groups with the magnitude of reduction larger in those with pre-DM at 12 weeks (adjusted differences in mean drop in 2hBG (a2hBG): -19.69mg/dl, 95%CI (-30.19, -9.19), p = < 0.0001) and 36 weeks (a2hBG: -19.97mg/dl, 95%CI (-30.56, -9.39), p = < 0.0001). Conclusion: We demonstrated that Ugandan ART naïve PWH with pre-diabetes at enrollment have consistent improvement in both fasting blood glucose and glucose tolerance over 48 weeks on dolutegravir. Intensified blood glucose monitoring of these patients in the first six months of dolutegravir may be unnecessary.

Prevalence of overweight and obesity and associated factors among people living with HIV attending a tertiary care clinic in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity are significantly increasing among people living with HIV (PLWH), contributing to the risk of major adverse cardio-metabolic events. However, little is known on its prevalence among PLWH in sub-Saharan Africa. In this study, we report the prevalence and factors associated with overweight and obesity among PLWH in a large tertiary HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective review of electronic database of all PLWH that attended the Adult Infectious Diseases Institute clinic between November 2018 and April 2019 was conducted. Demographic, body mass index (BMI) [kg/m2] and clinical variables were extracted. Based on BMI, nutritional status was classified as undernutrition (< 18.5kg/m2), normal (≥ 18.5 < 25kg/m2), overweight (≥ 25 < 30kg/m2) and obesity (≥ 30kg/m2). Poisson regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with overweight and obesity. RESULTS: Overall, 7,818 participants were included in the analysis, 64% (n = 4,976) were female, with a median age of 44 years (interquartile range (IQR): 36-51) and a median BMI of 24.2 (IQR: 21.2-28.1). The prevalence of overweight and obesity combined was 46% (55% female versus 30% male), obesity 18.2% (24.6% female versus 7.1% male) and overweight 27.8% (30.4% female versus 22.9% male). Factors associated with overweight and obesity were: Females (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 1. 8, 95%CI:1.69-1.87), age category 25-59 years (aPR: 1.9, 95%CI: 1.63-2.24) and ≥ 60 years (aPR: 1.8, 95%CI:1.49-2.12); duration on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for 6-10 years (aPR: 1.1, 95%CI:1.08-1.18), CD4 count 200-500 (aPR:0.08, 95%CI:0.01-0.15) and > 500 (aPR:0.46, 95%CI:0.39-0.54) and having at least one noncommunicable disease (NCD) (aPR: 1.1, 95%CI:1.07-1.18). CONCLUSION: There is a high burden of overweight and obesity among PLWH in Uganda. Nutrition and weight management programs particularly targeting high risk groups such as females and persons with underlying NCDs should be integrated into HIV care.

An Interactive Voice Response Software to Improve the Quality of Life of People Living With HIV in Uganda: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Following the successful scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART), the focus is now on ensuring good quality of life (QoL) and sustained viral suppression in people living with HIV. The access to mobile technology in the most burdened countries is increasing rapidly, and therefore, mobile health (mHealth) technologies could be leveraged to improve QoL in people living with HIV. However, data on the impact of mHealth tools on the QoL in people living with HIV are limited to the evaluation of SMS text messaging; these are infeasible in high-illiteracy settings. OBJECTIVE: The primary and secondary outcomes were to determine the impact of interactive voice response (IVR) technology on Medical Outcomes Study HIV QoL scores and viral suppression at 12 months, respectively. METHODS: Within the Call for Life study, ART-experienced and ART-naïve people living with HIV commencing ART were randomized (1:1 ratio) to the control (no IVR support) or intervention arm (daily adherence and pre-appointment reminders, health information tips, and option to report symptoms). The software evaluated was Call for Life Uganda, an IVR technology that is based on the Mobile Technology for Community Health open-source software. Eligibility criteria for participation included access to a phone, fluency in local languages, and provision of consent. The differences in differences (DIDs) were computed, adjusting for baseline HIV RNA and CD4. RESULTS: Overall, 600 participants (413 female, 68.8%) were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months. In the intervention arm of 300 participants, 298 (99.3%) opted for IVR and 2 (0.7%) chose SMS text messaging as the mode of receiving reminders and health tips. At 12 months, there was no overall difference in the QoL between the intervention and control arms (DID=0.0; P=.99) or HIV RNA (DID=0.01; P=.94). At 12 months, 124 of the 256 (48.4%) active participants had picked up at least 50% of the calls. In the active intervention participants, high users (received >75% of reminders) had overall higher QoL compared to low users (received <25% of reminders) (92.2 versus 87.8, P=.02). Similarly, high users also had higher QoL scores in the mental health domain (93.1 versus 86.8, P=.008) and better appointment keeping. Similarly, participants with moderate use (51%-75%) had better viral suppression at 12 months (80/94, 85% versus 11/19, 58%, P=.006). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was high uptake and acceptability of the IVR tool. While we found no overall difference in the QoL and viral suppression between study arms, people living with HIV with higher usage of the tool showed greater improvements in QoL, viral suppression, and appointment keeping. With the declining resources available to HIV programs and the increasing number of people living with HIV accessing ART, IVR technology could be used to support patient care. The tool may be helpful in situations where physical consultations are infeasible, including the current COVID epidemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02953080; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02953080.

Erratum: Symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 escape in two patients on second-line antiretroviral therapy in Uganda.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omy132.].

The Potential Teratogenicity Alert for Women Conceiving on Dolutegravir-Based Regimens: An Assessment of Risk Communication by an Urban HIV Clinic in Uganda and Choices made by Women.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In May 2018, the World Health Organization and other regulatory authorities released a safety alert for dolutegravir related to a risk of neural tube defects among women exposed to dolutegravir at the time of conception. Models of how drug safety information can be shared effectively in the shortest time are necessary to prevent interruptions of public health programs. We sought to describe an implementation process to inform and support women already on dolutegravir-based regimens at the time of conception to make informed choices following the safety alert of a potential teratogenicity risk. We describe the choices made by women, as well as determine the factors associated with women's choices to switch off dolutegravir. METHODS: A clinic response plan was developed in the first week following the alert and clinic staff were trained on safety guidance. All women aged < 55 years taking dolutegravir were identified from the clinic database and contacted by phone for earlier appointments. Non-menopausal and non-surgically sterilized women were referred for urine pregnancy testing and evaluation of pregnancy intentions in the following 12 months and effective family planning was offered. We describe the coverage of women who received the communication as well as the fidelity to the outlined plan from 21 May to 12 September, 2018. We used modified a Poisson regression analysis to determine factors associated with switching off dolutegravir. RESULTS: Of all active patients in the clinic, 9% (690/7963) were identified as female aged < 55 years taking dolutegravir. Ninety-five percent (656/690) were reviewed by September 2018 and informed of the safety alert, implying a high level of uptake. Fidelity to standard operating procedures was also high at 72%. Twenty-two percent (146/656) of patients were menopausal or surgically sterilized. Five hundred and ten women were of reproductive potential with a median age (interquartile range) of 37 years (30-42 years). Five percent (23/510) were human chorionic gonadotrophin positive and all initial ultrasound reports revealed no deformities. Twenty-one percent (108/510) had intentions to conceive and opted to stop taking dolutegravir with 90% (97/108) switching to efavirenz. Seventy-nine percent (402/510) opted to remain taking dolutegravir. However, only 40% (160/402) chose effective contraceptive methods and 60% (242/402) opted for condoms only/no contraceptive method. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid well-coordinated response ensured prompt communication of the dolutegravir safety warning. The process developed by the clinic can act as a model for response during drug safety alerts. Women made informed decisions with most opting to remain taking dolutegravir; however, effective contraception uptake was low.

Symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 escape in two patients on second-line antiretroviral therapy in Uganda.

Two HIV-infected individuals on second-line atazanavir-based antiretroviral therapy presented with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA was higher than plasma HIV RNA and antiretroviral regimens' optimization led to prompt resolution of symptoms in one. Patients on second-line atazanavir-based antiretroviral therapy with documented previous treatment failure may be at risk of symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid escape.

Boosted lopinavir vs boosted atazanavir in patients failing a NNRTI first line regimen in an urban clinic in Kampala.

INTRODUCTION: In 2011 Uganda recommended boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) as the preferred PI for second line due to once daily dosing, replacing aluvia (LPV/r) (1, 2). The evidence was based on the BMS O45 trial, of LPV/r vs ATV/r was performed in a high-income setting, on patients with prior PI use and resistance testing (2, 3). There are no RCTs or observational studies comparing use of ATV/r with LPV/r in patients failing NNRTI first line antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa (3, 4). The Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) has a large second line cohort (>1838). This aims to compare clinical, immunologic and virologic response of LPV/r versus ATV/r at IDI. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis on routinely collected data of patients switched to second line with NRTI backbones TDF/3TC or FTC, AZT/3TC, ABC/3TC from January 2009 to December 2013. Students T-tests and Chi-square tests were used in this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1286 (73.5% female) patients were switched to LPV/r 991 (77%) and ATV/r 295 (23%) (p<0.001). NRTI backbones were 760 on TDF/3TC (66.8% LPV/r vs 33.2% on ATV/r), 504 on AZT/3TC (93.3% vs 6.7%), and 22 on ABC/3TC (59% vs 41%). Median (IQR) time on first line for LPV/r was 21 (1-44) months and for ATV/r was 41 months (22-68). Median CD4 (IQR) at switch to LPV/r was 181 cells/uL (66-424) and to ATV/r was 122 (57-238) (p≤0.001). A total of 366 patients had CD4 done at six months after switch and the mean (IQR) CD4 increase was 153 (54-241) for LPV/r versus 116 (52-171) for ATV/r (p=0.232). Additionally, 304 had a CD4 at 12 months and the means were 172 (45-272) for LPV/r vs 179 (60-271) for ATV/r (p=0.426). There was no significant difference in the mean increment by NRTI backbone or by stratifying to viral load (VL) at time of switch to VL <100,000 and ≥100,000. Median (IQR) VL at switch was 61,000 (13,000-2,030,000) LPV/r and 51,000 (14,000_151,000) ATV/r. 269 had a VL done in the first 12 months and 178/250 (71.2%) on LPV/r versus 16/19 (84.2%) on ATV/r were undetectable (p=0.228). 259 (26%) LPV/r versus 33(11%) ATV/r had ≥1 opportunistic infections on second line (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is an observational study based on our experience at IDI. Like elsewhere in Africa, there is no routine viral load testing, making it difficult to get sensitive analysis of data on ART efficacy within routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, this observational study is reassuring in terms of efficacy of both ATV/r and LPV/r for patients failing first line therapy in our setting.