RESUMO
BACKGROUND: For nurses, clinical competency is paramount in ensuring that patients receive safe, high-quality care. Multi-patient simulation (MPS) in nursing education is gaining attention, and evidence shows its suitability for real-life situations. MPS can be an effective solution for nurses' continuing clinical education. OBJECTIVES: This project compares the effectiveness of MPS (involving both a standardized patient and a high fidelity simulator) and a single high-fidelity simulation (single HFS; only involving a high fidelity simulator) for enhancing the clinical competency of nursing students. DESIGN: A stratified, permuted, block randomized controlled study design was used. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty undergraduate nursing students in years 3, 4, and 5 were selected to participate. Subgroups with each comprising three undergraduate nursing students from different years were formed. METHODS: The participants were randomized to receive either an MPS (intervention group) or single HFS (control group) for 1 day; they later received the same intervention after a 30-day washout period. One objectively measured questionnaire and two self-reported questionnaires were used to measure clinical competency: the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI), Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), and Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Questionnaire (SET-M). RESULTS: The results revealed significant between-group differences. Specifically, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in both the CCQ (linear contrast [d] = 71.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 53.407, 89.393; P < 0.001) and CCEI total scores (d = 7.17; 95 % CI = 5.837, 8.503; P < 0.001). The SET-M results indicated that 85 % of the participants (n = 51) strongly agreed that they felt more confident about performing a patient handover to the healthcare team after the simulation. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicated that both the MPS and single HFS effectively enhanced students' clinical competency. However, MPSs have superior educational outcomes relative to traditional single HFSs.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Bacharelado em Enfermagem , Simulação de Paciente , Estudantes de Enfermagem , Humanos , Competência Clínica/normas , Estudantes de Enfermagem/psicologia , Estudantes de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Bacharelado em Enfermagem/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Adulto Jovem , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Adulto , Modelos EducacionaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, with subsequent spread around the world. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region SAR (China) recorded its first confirmed cases on 23 January 2020. In this report, we describe a family cluster of 12 confirmed cases, with two additional confirmed cases from secondary transmission. METHODS: We reported the epidemiological, clinical and laboratory findings of the family cluster, as well as the public health measures instituted. RESULTS: All 12 confirmed COVID-19 cases were among the 19 attendees of a three-hour Chinese New Year family dinner consisting of hotpot and barbecue dishes. Environmental sampling of the gathering venue was negative. Two additional confirmed cases, who were co-workers of two confirmed cases, were later identified, indicating secondary transmission. Contact tracing, quarantine and environmental disinfection were instituted to contain further spread. DISCUSSION: Our findings were highly suggestive of a superspreading event during the family gathering. The source was likely one of the cases during the pre-symptomatic phase. The event attested to the high infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 through human-to-human transmission from social activities and argued for the necessity of social distancing in curtailing the disease spread.
Assuntos
COVID-19/transmissão , Surtos de Doenças , Família , Férias e Feriados , Distanciamento Físico , Comportamento Social , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/virologia , China , Busca de Comunicante , Desinfecção , Hong Kong , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Saúde Pública , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region of China, recorded its first confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case on 23 January 2020. We reviewed the case epidemiology and the various public health measures implemented from January to May 2020. METHODS: The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the cases recorded in different phases of the epidemic were described and compared, and the effectiveness of the public health measures implemented were reviewed using the changes in the daily number of confirmed cases and the interval from symptom onset to hospital admission. RESULTS: Between January and May 2020, 1084 confirmed COVID-19 cases were reported, about 70% of which had a history of travel during the incubation period. The case fatality ratio was 0.4%. The local epidemic progressed through four phases: (1) preparedness and imported infection from mainland China, (2) local transmission, (3) imported infection from overseas countries associated with local transmission, and (4) controlled imported infection with limited local transmission, with an eventual reduction of the daily case number and minimization of the onset-to-admission interval. Various public health measures, including enhanced surveillance, border control, and social distancing, were introduced in phases in response to the prevailing local and global situations. DISCUSSION: The overall containment strategy in Hong Kong led to a stabilization of the number of cases and the absence of a community-wide outbreak during the 4.5 m after the first case was reported. This strategy of containment might serve as an example for future planning of preparedness and response against novel infectious agents.