Assessment of skin pigmentation-related bias in pulse oximetry readings among adults.

PURPOSE: Recent reports that pulse oximeters may overestimate oxygen saturation in individuals with darker skin pigmentation have prompted concerns from regulatory authorities regarding racial bias. We investigated the performance of TruSignal SpO2 sensors (GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) in adults with varying skin pigmentation. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using a set of pooled assessments of SpO2/SaO2 measurements from nine studies to assess bias, accuracy (Arms), and precision of TruSignal sensors in healthy adults under induced hypoxia. Subgroup analyses were performed based on oxygen saturation levels (band 1, ≥ 70 and ≤ 80%; band 2, > 80 and ≤ 90%; band 3, > 90 and ≤ 100%). RESULTS: Of the 10,800 data points from 131 individuals, 8,202 (75.9%) and 2,598 (24.1%) were assigned to the light and dark pigment groups, respectively. Bias was 0.14% overall and less than 1% across oxygenation bands. The difference in bias between dark and light pigment groups was statistically significant at the low oxygenation band with SpO2 ≥ 70 and ≤ 80% (+ 0.58% and + 0.30% respectively; p = 0.0035). Throughout the saturation range, Arms was 1.64% in the light and 1.71% in the dark pigment group, within device specifications and regulatory requirements. Oxygenation was the dominating factor in stepwise ANOVA modeling. The mixed model also showed that bias was strongly affected by the oxygenation range. CONCLUSION: TruSignal sensors demonstrated higher bias at lower oxygen saturation, with less than 0.5% difference between pigment groups. These findings raise new questions, such as ways to improve pulse oximetry measurements during challenging clinical conditions, including low perfusion.

Comparative analysis of signal accuracy of three SpO2 monitors during motion and low perfusion conditions.

To compare pulse oximetry performance during simulated conditions of motion and low perfusion in three commercially available devices: GE HealthCare CARESCAPE ONE TruSignal SpO2 Parameter, Masimo RADICAL-7 and Medtronic Nellcor PM1000N. After IRB approval, 28 healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned to the motion group (N = 14) or low perfusion (N = 14) group. Pulse oximeters were placed on the test and control hands using random assignment of digits 2-5. Each subject served as their own control through the series of repeated pair-wise measurements. Reference co-oximetry oxyhemoglobin (SaO2) measurements from the radial artery were also obtained in the motion group. SpO2 readings were compared between the test and control hands in both groups and to SaO2 measurements in the motion group. Accuracy was assessed through testing of accuracy root-mean squared (ARMS) and mean bias. In the simulated motion test group the overall Accuracy Root Mean Square (ARMS) versus SaO2 was 1.88 (GE), 1.79 (Masimo) and 2.40 (Nellcor), with overall mean bias of - 0.21 (Masimo), 0.45 (GE), and 0.78 (Nellcor). In the motion hand, ARMS versus SaO2 was 2.45 (GE), 3.19 (Masimo) and 4.15 (Nellcor), with overall mean bias of - 0.75 (Masimo), - 0.01 (GE), and 0.04 (Nellcor). In the low perfusion test group, ARMS versus the control hand SpO2 for low PI was 3.24 (GE), 3.48 (Nellcor) and 4.76 (Masimo), with overall bias measurements of - 0.53 (Nellcor), 0.96 (GE) and 1.76 (Masimo). Experimental results for all tested devices met pulse oximetry regulatory and testing standards requirements. Overall, SpO2 device performance across the three devices in this study was similar under both motion and low perfusion conditions. SpO2 measurement accuracy degraded for all three devices during motion as compared to non-motion. Accuracy also degraded during normal to low, very low, or ultra low perfusion and was more pronounced compared to the changes observed during simulated motion. While some statistically significant differences in individual measurements were found, the clinical relevance of these differences requires further study.