Development of a new accurate lateral flow immunoassay for diagnosis of human leptospirosis.

PURPOSE: The current diagnostic methods for leptospirosis diagnosis are technically complex and expensive, with limited applicability to specialized laboratories. Furthermore, they lack diagnostic accuracy in the acute stage of the disease, which coincides with a period when antibiotics are highly effective. New simple and accurate tests are mandatory to decentralize and improve diagnosis. Here, we introduced a new lateral flow immunoassay (Lepto-LF) for human leptospirosis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blinded assay using 104 serum samples from patients with confirmed or discarded diagnosis for leptospirosis. The diagnostic performance of Lepto-LF was estimated across different ranges of days from onset of symptoms (dpo), considering the diagnostic algorithm as reference standard. Additionally, it was compared with the screening methods enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM-ELISA) and the slide agglutination test using temperature-resistant antigen (SATR). RESULTS: Lepto-LF exhibited perfect diagnostic performance with a Youden´s index J = 1 from 6 dpo in the acute phase. IgM-ELISA gave slightly lower accuracy with J = 0.91 and 95.5% of both sensitivity and specificity; while SATR showed a markedly inferior yield (J = 0.41, sensitivity = 95.5%, specificity = 45.5%). The performances remained consistent in the convalescence phase of the disease (> 10 dpo). CONCLUSION: Lepto-LF was found to be a reliable test for simple, rapid and early diagnosis of leptospirosis, resulting a promising tool for decentralizing leptospirosis diagnosis and enabling timely treatment of patients. In addition, Lepto-LF may be employed as confirmatory test, especially in remote areas and vulnerable contexts where the standard MAT is not available.

[Evaluation of a reduced panel of leptospira strains for microagglutination]. / Evaluación de un panel reducido de cepas de leptospiras para el diagnóstico en humanos por microaglutinación (MAT).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the use of the 19 Leptospira strains panel suggested by the International Leptospirosis Society of World Health Organization for microagglutination allows confirmation of more cases that the 12 strains panel used in Argentina. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. We studied 441 serum samples corresponding to Argentinean patients with suspected leptospirosis derived during from July to December, 2009 and from January to October, 2013. RESULTS: The same number of positive samples was obtained using the MAT with the 19 or 12 strains. In six cases a serovar of the expanded collection was presumably infecting, but always coagglutinated with strains of the reduced panel. CONCLUSION: In Argentina, the diagnosis of leptospirosis by MAT could be made using the reduced 12 strains panel, obtaining the same result in case detection as using the 19 strains panel. Additional information provided by the use of all strains could be the presumably infecting serogroup.

Evaluación de un panel reducido de cepas de leptospiras para el diagnóstico en humanos por microaglutinación (MAT) / Evaluation of a reduced panel of leptospira strains for microagglutination

Objetivo. Evaluar si el uso del panel de 19 cepas de leptospiras, sugerido por la Sociedad Internacional de Leptospirosis para la microaglutinación (MAT, por sus siglas en inglés), permite mayor confirmación de casos que el de 12 cepas. Material y métodos. Estudio observacional de corte transversal. Se estudiaron 441 muestras de sueros de pacientes de Argentina, derivadas para el diagnóstico de leptospirosis en los periodos de julio de 2009 a diciembre de 2010 y enero a octubre de 2013. Resultados. Se obtuvo el mismo resultado con el panel reducido que con el ampliado. En seis casos resultó presumiblemente infectante algún serovar del panel ampliado, aunque siempre coaglutinando con cepas del reducido. Conclusión. En Argentina, el diagnóstico de leptospirosis por MAT podría continuar realizándose con el panel reducido, lo que reduciría el costo y tiempo de diagnóstico. La información adicional que aportaría el panel ampliado está relacionada con la epidemiología, mediante un mejor conocimiento del serogrupo presumiblemente infectante.

Objective. To evaluate if the use of the 19 Leptospira strains panel suggested by the International Leptospirosis Society of World Health Organization for microagglutination allows confirmation of more cases that the 12 strains panel used in Argentina. Materials and methods. Cross-sectional observational study. We studied 441 serum samples corresponding to Argentinean patients with suspected leptospirosis derived during from July to December, 2009 and from January to October, 2013. Results. The same number of positive samples was obtained using the MAT with the 19 or 12 strains. In six cases a serovar of the expanded collection was presumably infecting, but always coagglutinated with strains of the reduced panel. Conclusion. In Argentina, the diagnosis of leptospirosis by MAT could be made using the reduced 12 strains panel, obtaining the same result in case detection as using the 19 strains panel. Additional information provided by the use of all strains could be the presumably infecting serogroup.