Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 19(8): 2652-6, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22451231

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Extensive tumor implants secondary to sarcoma, sarcomatosis, or mesothelioma in children is rare. We conducted the first phase 1 trial of escalating doses of cisplatin during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in children with sarcomatosis. The most devastating complication of cisplatin therapy is nephrotoxicity. Here we present the anesthetic management and analysis of the impact of intraoperative fluid management on the incidence of renal failure. METHODS: Of the 10 patients under 18 years of age who underwent HIPEC in the context of our phase 1 trial, six patients were under the age of 10 years. We reviewed the anesthetic management, intraoperative fluid and blood administration, and postoperative renal function in these patients. RESULTS: The average age and weight were 6 years and 20.9 kg, respectively. To avoid renal toxicity, urine output was maintained at an average of 3 ml/kg/h. Crystalloid and colloid were transfused at an average rate of 9 ml/kg/h. Percentage increase in creatinine postoperatively varied from 33 to 500 %. Volume of fluid administered did not correlate with percentage increase in creatinine. All patients had a temporary increase in their serum creatinine, but none required dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid administration at an average rate of 9 ml/kg/h was required to maintain satisfactory urine output. This rate of intraoperative fluid administration is similar to what is provided to adult HIPEC patients. There was no significant correlation in the volume or type of fluid delivered and the increase in serum creatinine. More studies are needed to determine optimal fluid management in children undergoing HIPEC with cisplatin.


Assuntos
Anestésicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia do Câncer por Perfusão Regional/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Renal/etiologia , Insuficiência Renal/prevenção & controle , Sarcoma/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prognóstico , Adulto Jovem
2.
Case Rep Anesthesiol ; 2020: 8767195, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32566314

RESUMO

On December 16, 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States approved sugammadex (Bridion, Merck and Co), a modified gamma-cyclodextrin, to be used as a reversal agent. It is a first and unique selective nondepolarizing steroidal muscle relaxant (NDSMR) binding agent with a great affinity for rocuronium and vecuronium. However, there have been several recently published case reports of bradycardia and asystole immediately after sugammadex administration for the reversal. This report presents a case of sugammadex administration followed by rapidly progressing bradycardia leading to asystole and subsequent death. The family has provided the written consent to share this case report.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA