Impact of Resident and Attending Surgeon Training Level on Free Tissue Transfer Ischemia Time and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Microsurgical free tissue transfer has become an essential method for reconstruction of complex surgical defects, making the level of training an important factor to consider. There is little published regarding the impact of training level on microsurgical outcomes. This study investigates microsurgical free tissue transfer ischemia time and post-operative complications based on resident and attending surgeon experience level. METHODS: A retrospective review of all free flaps at a single institution from 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2021 was performed. Linear regression was performed analyzing ischemia time of 497 free flaps and attending surgeon experience defined by years in practice and resident level defined as post graduate year (PGY). Logistic regression model was used to analyze complications based on attending experience and resident level. RESULTS: The average resident PGY was 3.5 +/- 0.8; the average attending has been practicing 6.4 +/- 5.1 years. There was no statistically significant difference in ischemia time or complication rates based on resident PGY or attending surgeon experience level. CONCLUSION: Lower PGY residents were not found to increase ischemia time or increase complication rates. Lower attending surgeon year was not found to increase ischemia time or increase complication rates compared to surgeons who had been practicing for longer. Microsurgical free tissue transfer is considered a safe procedure in residency training and trainee involvement should be encouraged to improve resident education and enhance technical skills.

Pocket Irrigation and Technique During Reconstructive Surgery: An American Society of Plastic Surgery Survey of Current Practice.

BACKGROUND: Expander-to-implant is the most common breast reconstruction procedure in the United States. Irrigation with triple antibiotic solution (TAS), as described by Adams et al in 2006, has become standard of care to lower bacterial bioburden. However, several alternative solutions have been implemented with the literature lacking a consensus regarding use (Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:30-36). OBJECTIVE: We distributed a peer-reviewed survey among a cohort of American Society of Plastic Surgery (ASPS) members to assess pocket irrigation technique during implant-based reconstructive surgery. We then conducted a pilot in vitro study to determine antibacterial efficacy of the most preferred irrigation at preferred dwell times against select bacterial species linked to breast pocket contamination during reconstructive implant-based surgery. METHODS: The survey was distributed a total of 3 times to a random cohort of 2488 ASPS members in January 2018. During in vitro studies, pure cultures of common breast flora were exposed to TAS versus saline control at 1, 2, and 5 minutes in a simulated in vivo cavity. Viable plate counts were used to assess cell viability. RESULTS: The response rate was above the ASPS survey average at 16% (n = 407). The population reflected a cross-section of practice types and experience levels. Triple antibiotic solution without Betadine was the favored irrigation at 41%, with 73% of its users preferring dwell times of 2 minutes or less. Over 30 distinct breast pocket irrigation solutions were identified. Bacteria added to the in vivo cavity survived a 2-minute dwell time with TAS as follows: 51% Staphylococcus epidermidis, 69% Escherichia coli, 88% Enterococcus faecalis, 88% Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 98% Acinetobacter baumannii. CONCLUSION: Our survey data demonstrate significant variability in practice and lack of consensus among ASPS members regarding antimicrobial irrigation during reconstructive breast surgery. Our in vitro data underscores the importance of relating clinical practices with laboratory studies of microorganisms potentially linked to breast pocket contamination and suggests that TAS requires either dwell times greater than 5 minutes and/or the inclusion of efficacious antimicrobial agents (eg, Betadine). This finding has the potential to impact antimicrobial pocket irrigation and technique during breast reconstruction.

Antimicrobial Irrigation and Technique during Breast Augmentation: Survey of Current Practice.

Breast augmentation is among the most common procedures performed in the United States. Though bacterial contamination of breast prostheses is associated with adverse sequelae, there are no universally accepted guidelines and limited best practice recommendations for antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation. We designed a survey to identify pocket irrigation preferences and antimicrobial techniques during implant-based breast augmentation among American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) members. METHODS: In January 2018, a random cohort of 2,488 ASPS members was surveyed. Questions queried breast pocket irrigation methods and surgical techniques including implant placement, incision location, and implant soaking agents. An extensive literature review of breast pocket irrigation practices was completed and used as a basis for the survey. RESULTS: The survey response rate was above the ASPS average at 16% (n = 407). Respondents preferred an inframammary incision (90%) and submuscular implant placement (92%). Triple antibiotic solution (TAS) and TAS + Betadine ± Bacitracin were preferred by 61% and Betadine variants by 11%. Preferred dwell times stratified to 30 seconds (39%), 1 minute (18%), 2-5 minutes (21%), and >5 minutes (22%). Among those employing a TAS variant, 53% preferred a suboptimal dwell time of ≤1 minute. Prostheses were soaked in TAS (42%), TAS + Betadine ± Bacitracin (15%), a Betadine variant (12%), or other (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic bacterial contamination leads to comorbidity following breast augmentation. Our results reveal significant variability regarding breast pocket irrigation techniques among ASPS members during cosmetic breast augmentation. These data suggest the need for best practice guidelines regarding breast pocket irrigation and implant soaking agents.

The Ethics of Facial Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are more than 40 cases of facial allotransplantation performed by 13 different groups in 10 countries. Although it has become a potential option to reconstruct and restore the function and appearance of severely facially disfigured individuals, the ethical concerns of facial allotransplantation remain unsolved. We conducted a systematic review to better understand the ethical concerns on facial allotransplantation and the changing trends of the ethical debate over time. METHODS: A systematic review of 3 databases was performed to identify articles related to ethical topics on facial allotransplantation. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles written since 1995 on the topics of ethics and facial allotransplantation in English, French, and Chinese languages. The ethical concerns extracted from the included articles were categorized into 4 core principles of ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The different themes under these 4 principles were extracted and subgrouped. The positions of the included articles were collected. Joinpoint regression was applied to compare the frequency of themes and positions by publication year. We presented the main topics on ethical concerns and the changing trends in ethical themes and principles of facial allotransplantation. RESULTS: There were 889 articles identified initially. After excluding 265 duplicated articles, 624 articles were included for title/abstract review process, and 148 articles were included in final data analysis. The publication year was from 2002 to 2018 with 136 articles in English, 11 in French, and 1 in Chinese. The most addressed principle was nonmaleficence (117/148, 79.1%), followed by beneficence (116/148, 78.4%), justice (103/148, 69.6%), and autonomy (86/148, 58.1%). The themes on immunosuppression/rejection, quality of life, and identity were the top 3 addressed ethical concerns. Twelve of 13 most addressed ethical themes demonstrated a decreasing trend after 2004. The themes of identity under beneficence showed a significant decrease after 2004. Ethical concerns on the cost/financial topic were the only one showing consistently increase trends from 2002 to 2018. There was a significant increase of the papers in favor of facial allotransplantation procedure comparing to those were against or neutral before and after 2008. CONCLUSIONS: More and more articles support facial allotransplantation as a feasible option to reconstruct and restore the function and appearance of severely facially disfigured individuals. The requirement of life-long immunosuppression therapy, quality of life, and identity center the ethical debates. Supported by favorable short-term results, 12 of 13 most addressed ethical concerns have trended down. The theme of cost/financial topic becomes more frequently addressed in recent years.

Management protocol for primary hyperparathyroidism in a single institution: utility of surgeon performed ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to: (I) discover preoperative diagnostic studies, intraoperative techniques, and patient factors most predictive of cure within a single hospital system; (II) establish practice guidelines for surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism to maximize outcomes based on this hospital system's performance. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all parathyroid-related procedures from 01/01/02 to 7/31/15 at the Veteran's Administration Hospital. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were eligible and charts available for analysis. Preoperative studies most predictive of cure were a combination of sestamibi parathyroid scan and surgeon performed ultrasound (S-US). When studies did not agree, S-US was most often correct. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) rapid assay was helpful in predicting cure, but added an average of 33 minutes to operating room time. Patients who had two corroborating preoperative localizing studies, one of which was S-US, that agreed with intraoperative findings, and who did not undergo intraoperative PTH confirmation enjoyed equal cure rates and shorter operating room times. Successful achievement of normal calcium was high at 95.8%. Vitamin D deficiency was prevalent in this patient population, prompting more aggressive preoperative investigation and replacement. CONCLUSIONS: A management protocol was developed based on the findings of this study: (I) obtain two preoperative localization studies, one of which is surgeon-performed ultrasound; (II) obtain preoperative vitamin D levels and supplement as indicated; and (III) in select patients who have two strongly corroborating preoperative localization studies, one of which is surgeon performed ultrasound, and intraoperative findings are consistent with the localizing studies, intraoperative PTH (IOPTH) may not be necessary.