Preventability of serious thromboembolic and bleeding events related to the use of oral anticoagulants: a prospective study.

AIMS: To determine the preventability of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and to explore contributing factors to preventable ADRs. Results were compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in the emergency departments of two teaching hospitals from July 2015 to January 2016. Patients admitted with a thrombotic or bleeding event while under DOAC or VKA were included. Four independent reviewers assessed causality, seriousness and preventability of ADRs using pilot-tested scales. For cases of serious and potentially preventable ADRs, we performed semi-structured interviews with general practitioners to identify contributing factors to ADRs. The primary outcome was the proportion of serious ADRs that were potentially preventable. RESULTS: The analysis included 46 DOAC and 43 VKA patients (median age 79 years). Gastrointestinal (n = 34) and intracranial (n = 16) bleedings were the most frequent ADRs. Results were that 53% of DOAC- and 61% of VKA-related serious ADRs were deemed potentially preventable. Prescribing issues and inadequate monitoring were frequent for DOAC and VKA respectively. We identified many causes of preventable ADRs that applied to all oral anticoagulants, such as pharmacodynamic drug interactions and lack of communication. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of serious ADRs were potentially preventable for both DOACs and VKAs. Interventions focusing on prescribing, patient education and continuity of care should help improve the use of DOACs in practice.

Rivaroxaban plasma levels in patients admitted for bleeding events: insights from a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Serious bleeding events have been frequently described in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). In secondary analyses of phase 3 trials, DOAC plasma concentrations were shown to correlate with bleeding outcomes. This study aimed to describe rivaroxaban plasma levels in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) for bleeding events. For each patient, risk factors for experiencing bleeding events were also investigated. METHODS: This analysis was part of an observational study conducted in the ED of two teaching hospitals. Plasma samples from 10 rivaroxaban-treated patients admitted for bleeding events were collected. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were determined by calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa assay. The measured rivaroxaban levels were then extrapolated at trough using a published population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model, and compared to on-therapy ranges observed in large clinical trials. For each patient, clinical, medication and ABCB1 genotype data were collected. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban measurements varied from 5 to 358 ng/ml, with a post-intake delay ranging from 9 to 38 h. At trough, estimated plasma concentrations were between 12 and 251 ng/ml (median value 94 ng/ml). Four patients had higher-than-expected rivaroxaban levels. Inadequate dose regimen, excessive alcohol consumption and lack of treatment reassessment were observed in several patients. Half of patients were taking ≥1 drug with potential pharmacokinetics interactions (e.g. amiodarone, diltiazem), while half of patients were taking ≥1 drug increasing the risk of bleeding. All 3 patients with available genotyping data and higher-than-expected rivaroxaban levels were heterozygous or homozygous mutated for the ABCB1 1236C > T, 2677G > T, 3435 C > T and rs4148738 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban patients admitted to the ED for bleeding events showed highly variable plasma concentrations. This analysis underlines the usefulness of rapid DOAC measurement and the value of PopPK models to estimate concentrations at trough in a context where the post-intake delay is unmanageable. Close patient follow-up, including renal function assessment and drug interactions review, is essential for bleeding risk minimization.

Appropriateness of prescribing dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants have been developed to address some of the drawbacks of vitamin-K antagonists. However, special attention should be given when using these drugs, especially in patients with renal insufficiency, questionable compliance, and those at high risk of bleeding. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of prescribing dabigatran etexilate (DE) and rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in real-life clinical practice. METHODS: This was a prospective study that included patients presenting to a teaching hospital from April to mid-October 2013, who were taking rivaroxaban or DE for NVAF. Appropriateness of prescribing was evaluated using 9 of the 10 criteria of the Medication Appropriateness Index. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing. Secondary outcome measures included (a) categories of inappropriateness, (b) prevalence of adverse drug events, and (c) interventions made by a clinical pharmacist to optimize prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were evaluated; 16 patients (23%) had 1 inappropriate criterion, and an additional 18 (26%) had more than 1 inappropriate criterion. The most frequent inappropriate criteria were inappropriate choice (28% of patients), wrong dosage (26%), and impractical modalities of administration (26%). An adverse event (AE) was found in 51% of patients (including 8 patients with transient ischemic attack/stroke). The clinical pharmacists performed 48 interventions, and 94% were accepted by the physician. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate use of DE and rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF is frequent and possibly leads to AEs. Reinforcing education of health care professionals and patients is needed. Collaboration with clinical pharmacists can contribute to better use.

[Why, when and how to monitor new oral anticoagulants]. / Pourquoi, quand et comment doser les nouveaux anticoagulants oraux?

Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now widely used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. Unlike vitamin K antagonists, DOACs exhibit predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. DOACs are to be administered at fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. However, in some patient populations or specific clinical circumstances, measurement of drug exposure may be useful, such as in suspected overdose, in patients with a haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during treatment with an anticoagulant, in those with acute renal failure, or in patients who require urgent surgery. This article provides practical guidance on laboratory testing of DOACs in routine practice and summarizes the influence of DOACs on commonly used coagulation assays.

Clinical risk assessment of modelled situations in a pharmaceutical decision support system: a modified e-Delphi exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical decision support systems (PDSSs) use reasoning software to match patient data to modelled situations likely to cause drug-related problems (DRPs) or adverse drug events. To aid decision-making, modelled situations must be linked to well-defined systemic clinical risks. AIM: To obtain expert consensus on the level of clinical risk for patients associated with each modelled situation that could be addressed using a PDSS. METHOD: A two-round e-Delphi survey was conducted from February to April 2022, involving 20 experts from four French-speaking countries. Participants had to rate modelled situations on two five-point Likert scales, assessing the likelihood of clinical consequences and their severity. The degree of consensus was determined as the proportion of participants providing risk scores in line with the median. The combined median scores for likelihood and severity provided the level of risk according to the Clinical Risk Situation for Patients (CRiSP) scale, formalized via validated tools. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus (≥ 75% agreement) on 48 out of 52 modelled clinical situations. Among these, 45 were categorized as high or extreme risk. The most common DRP identified was overdosing, accounting for 22% of cases. Furthermore, DRPs involving cardiovascular, psychiatric, and endocrinological drug classes were prevalent, constituting 45, 13, and 9% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Through consensus, our study identified 45 modelled clinical situations associated with high or extreme risks. This study highlights the interest of using PDSSs to prevent harm in patients and, on a large scale, document the impact of the pharmacist in preventing, intercepting and managing iatrogenic drug risk.

The Impact of Strong Inducers on Direct Oral Anticoagulant Levels.

PURPOSE: The concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and strong P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers may lead to reduced DOAC levels and therapeutic failure. This study aimed to describe DOAC concentrations in patients receiving strong P-gp and CYP3A4 inducers, in relation to individual risk factors for high or low DOAC levels. METHODS: We retrospectively identified hospitalized patients simultaneously receiving a DOAC and carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or rifampicin between 2016 and 2021. Among them, patients who underwent DOAC measurement at steady state were included. DOAC peak or trough levels were compared with on-therapy ranges observed in pivotal trials. Individual risk factors for high or low DOAC levels were identified. RESULTS: We included 17 patients (median age 75 years), mainly receiving apixaban and carbamazepine. For 5 patients (29%), DOAC trough or peak level was below the expected range. Among the remaining 12 patients, 8 had at least one measurement in the lower quartile of the range. The median number of risk factors for drug accumulation was 0 (range 0-1) in patients with ≥1 measurement below the range and 2 (range 0-3) in other patients. DOAC measurement led to treatment adjustments in 9 patients (DOAC dose increase or switch). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a significant risk of reduced DOAC levels in patients taking strong P-gp and CYP3A4 inducers, especially those without risk factors for drug accumulation. DOAC measurement could help manage this relevant drug-drug interaction.

Assessment of the analytical performances and sample stability on ST Genesia system using the STG-DrugScreen application.

BACKGROUND: Thrombin generation testing has been used to provide information on the coagulation phenotype of patients. The most used technique is the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) but it suffers from a lack of standardization, preventing its implementation in routine. The ST Genesia is a new analyzer designed to assess thrombin generation based on the same principle as the CAT. Unlike the CAT system, the ST Genesia is a benchtop, fully automated analyzer, able to perform the analyses individually and not by batch, with strict control of variables such as temperature and volumes, ensuring, theoretically, maximal reproducibility. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at assessing the performance of the STG-DrugScreen application on the ST Genesia analyzer. We also aimed at exploring stability of plasma samples after freezing and defining a reference normal range. RESULTS: Results demonstrated the excellent interexperiment precision of the ST Genesia and confirmed that the use of a reference plasma helps reducing the inter-experiments variability. Stability revealed that plasma samples are stable for at least 11 months at -70°C or lower, except for those containing low molecular weight heparins which have to be tested within 6 months. Freezing had no effect on the majority of thrombin generation parameters except on time to peak. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an easy implementation of thrombin generation with the use of ST Genesia in the routine laboratory. This will facilitate the design of multicentric studies and enable the establishment of reliable and evidence-based thresholds, which may improve the management of patients treated with anticoagulants.

Estimation of Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentrations in the Perioperative Setting in Patients With or Without Heparin Bridging.

INTRODUCTION: Estimation of residual rivaroxaban plasma concentrations may be requested before invasive procedures and some patients at high thromboembolic risk will have a bridging therapy with heparins when rivaroxaban is interrupted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the performance of the STA-Liquid Anti-Xa assay (STA LAX) and the low and normal procedures of the Biophen Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors (DiXaI) assay, in patients with and without bridging with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine blood samples were collected from 77 patients on rivaroxaban at CTROUGH or before an invasive procedure. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were estimated using Biophen DiXaI, Biophen DiXaI LOW, and STA LAX and compared to liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements. Stratifications were performed according to heparin bridging. RESULTS: The Biophen DiXaI LOW and STA LAX showed better correlation with LC-MS/MS measurements than Biophen DiXaI in patients not bridged with LMWH (R: 0.97, 0.96, and 0.91, respectively). However, the performance of Biophen DiXaI LOW and STA LAX decreased when residual LMWH activity was present (R: 0.18 and 0.19 respectively) demonstrating that these tests are not specific to rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: In patients not bridged with LMWH, we suggest to use the Biophen DiXaI LOW and STA LAX for the estimation of rivaroxaban concentrations <50 ng/mL. These results should be confirmed on a larger cohort of patients. Patients bridged with LMWH have inaccurate estimates of low levels of rivaroxaban and the 3 assays studied should not be used to estimate if it is safe to perform a procedure.

Idarucizumab for the treatment of hemorrhage and dabigatran reversal in patients requiring urgent surgery or procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Idarucizumab is a specific antagonist for dabigatran etexilate (DE). The recent market authorization of idarucizumab in Europe and the USA may reassure prescribers of DE, as it can increase the safety of the emergency management of patients taking this anticoagulant. However, idarucizumab use should be limited to specific indications to avoid unnecessary risks to patients and costs to healthcare systems. Areas covered: The authors provide an overview of idarucizumab development and its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The results of the clinical phase III trial RE-VERSE AD and a review of recent case reports of idarucizumab use in emergency contexts are also discussed. Expert opinion: Although idarucizumab has shown clear efficacy in reversing dabigatran-induced coagulopathy, its overall effects on patient outcome have not been proven. Information regarding the clinical context in which patients on DE are admitted for emergency treatment, and accurate laboratory tests of dabigatran plasma level during reversal may inform selection and help with the follow-up of patients who may benefit from idarucizumab. Idarucizumab should be integrated into protocol for the emergency management of patients on DE. Furthermore, the benefit of idarucizumab in specific indications such as acute ischemic stroke should be investigated.

An optimized dRVVT-based assay to estimate the intensity of anticoagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: The dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) has been suggested for the assessment of the intensity of anticoagulation of all direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aimed to compare the performance of an optimized liquid-stable dRVVT-based DOAC assay (DRVV-DOAC) on clinical samples before and after mixing these with normal pooled plasma (NPP). METHODS: Forty-one apixaban, 25 dabigatran, 56 rivaroxaban and 49 vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) plasma samples were included for retrospective analysis. Plasma DOAC concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass-spectrometry. INR was determined for all VKA samples. DRVV-DOAC was performed with an original ready-to-use reagent (Haematex Research™) where plasma samples were tested neat and in a 1:1 mix with NPP. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations ranged from 1 to 406ng/ml for apixaban, 0 to 386ng/ml for dabigatran and 0 to 719ng/ml for rivaroxaban. INR ranged from 2.2 to 6.1. DRVV-DOAC correlated well with plasma concentrations (r2=0.70, 0.94, 0.63 (non-mixed procedure) and 0.77, 0.97, 0.86 (mixed procedure) for apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively). DRVV-DOAC measurements in the normal range ruled out dabigatran and rivaroxaban concentrations above 30 and 50ng/ml, but performance was lower for apixaban. DRVV-DOAC was sensitive to VKA samples but poorly reflected INR values. When VKA samples were mixed with NPP, DRVV-DOAC measurements decreased to values close to baseline clotting time. CONCLUSIONS: DRVV-DOAC is a quick method which showed increased sensitivity compared with other phospholipid-rich dRVVT reagents already investigated. Mixing samples with NPP improved the specificity but reduced sensitivity, especially for apixaban.

Heparin monitoring: clinical outcome and practical approach.

Traditional anticoagulant agents such as unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, danaparoid and bivalirudine are used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. However, these agents have limitations: their constraining parenteral route of administration and the need for regular coagulation monitoring for HNF. The LMWHs, with their more predictable anticoagulant response, don't require a systematic monitoring. The usefulness of LMWHs monitoring in several clinical situations such as pregnancy, obesity and renal insufficiency is a matter of debate. Indeed, there is no agreement between French and American recommendations on this question. Others aspects are also controversial: the measure of trough anti-Xa activity during pregnancy and the optimal monitoring of LMWHs for patients with antithrombin deficiency (hepatic disease, new-borns). Different tests are available to ensure the monitoring of these drugs, we will see in this review their principle, their advantages and inconvenients. The management of heparin induced thrombocytopenia also needs parenteral anticoagulants: danaparoïd, bivalirudine or argatroban. The modalities of their monitoring are relatively unknown and are presented. Furthermore, platelet monitoring is capital. This article aims to provide guidance about laboratory testing of classic parenteral anticoagulants.

Preventive strategies against bleeding due to nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.

Dabigatran etexilate (DE), rivaroxaban, and apixaban are nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that have been compared in clinical trials with existing anticoagulants (warfarin and enoxaparin) in several indications for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic events. All NOACs presented bleeding events despite a careful selection and control of patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs had a decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, and apixaban and DE (110 mg BID) had a decreased risk of major bleeding from any site. Rivaroxaban and DE showed an increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin. Developing strategies to minimize the risk of bleeding is essential, as major bleedings are reported in clinical practice and specific antidotes are currently not available. In this paper, the following preventive approaches are reviewed: improvement of appropriate prescription, identification of modifiable bleeding risk factors, tailoring NOAC's dose, dealing with a missed dose as well as adhesion to switching, bridging and anesthetic procedures.