Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities.
Public Underst Sci
; 22(8): 941-54, 2013 Nov.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24151085
2.
An empirical examination of the management of return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks.
Genet Med
; 14(4): 444-50, 2012 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22361899
3.
Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Genet Med
; 14(4): 361-84, 2012 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22436882
4.
Key Expert Stakeholder Perceptions of the Law of Genomics: Identified Problems and Potential Solutions.
J Law Med Ethics
; 48(1): 87-104, 2020 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342788
5.
A new evaluation tool to obtain practice-based evidence of worksite health promotion programs.
Prev Chronic Dis
; 5(4): A118, 2008 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793506
6.
Empirical analysis of current approaches to incidental findings.
J Law Med Ethics
; 36(2): 249-55, 211, 2008.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18547192
7.
Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
J Law Med Ethics
; 36(2): 219-48, 211, 2008.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18547191
8.
Promoting evaluation capacity building in a complex adaptive system.
Eval Program Plann
; 69: 53-60, 2018 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29704777
9.
Examining mixing methods in an evaluation of a smoking cessation program.
Eval Program Plann
; 54: 94-101, 2016 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26520457
10.
The relationship between involvement in and use of evaluation in multi-site evaluations.
Eval Program Plann
; 48: 75-82, 2015 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25463015
11.
Introduction: The Crucial Role of Law in Supporting Successful Translation of Genomics into Clinical Care.
J Law Med Ethics
; 48(1): 7-10, 2020 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342780
12.
An empirical examination of the current state of publically available nanotechnology guidance materials.
J Law Med Ethics
; 40(4): 751-62, 2012.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23289678
13.
Expert panel reviews of research centers: the site visit process.
Eval Program Plann
; 35(3): 390-7, 2012 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22306932
14.
Recommendations for nanomedicine human subjects research oversight: an evolutionary approach for an emerging field.
J Law Med Ethics
; 40(4): 716-50, 2012.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23289677
15.
The incidentalome.
JAMA
; 296(23): 2800-1; author reply 2801-2, 2006 Dec 20.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17179453
16.
A unified approach to validation, reliability, and education study design for surgical technical skills training.
Arch Surg
; 145(2): 197-201, 2010 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20157089
17.
The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings.
Eval Program Plann
; 32(2): 91-8, 2009 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19062092