Stereotactic biopsy with contrast-enhanced mammography: the initial Australian experience.

INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and MRI detect 'contrast-only' lesions (COLs) occult on standard breast imaging (ultrasound and conventional mammography). Until recently, MRI was the only reliable method of biopsy. This study presents the first Australian experience with CEM-guided biopsy (CEMBx) and the lessons learnt. METHODS: A prospective audit of the first 15 consecutive patients who underwent CEMBx for COLs was performed. Indications for contrast imaging, patient and lesion characteristics, procedural details, radiation dose and pathology data were collected. RESULTS: The 15 women were aged 37-81 years (mean 59 years). Indications for contrast imaging were problem solving (n = 3), moderate risk screening (n = 2), cancer staging (n = 9) and symptoms (n = 1). The COLs were non-mass (n = 14), mass (n = 1) and an enhancing asymmetry (n = 1). For one patient, two lesions were sampled during the same event. All lesions enhanced and were successfully sampled followed by marker clip insertion. Most biopsies (87.5%) were performed with the breast in cranio-caudal compression using a horizontal approach. Procedural duration ranged from 13 to 33 min (mean 22 min). Radiation dose was similar to standard stereotactic biopsy. Post-biopsy hematomas occurred in three patients, none required intervention. Clip displacement occurred in three cases. Core biopsy histopathology results were benign (n = 8), malignant (n = 7) and a borderline breast lesion (BBL) (n = 1). Patient satisfaction rates were high. Imaging follow-up is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: CEMBx is a quick, safe and reliable alternative to MRIBx to sample COLs.

Cinematic versus volume rendered imaging for the depiction of complex congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Planning for surgical intervention for patients with complex congenital heart disease requires a comprehensive understanding of the individual's anatomy. Cinematic rendering (CR) is a novel technique that purportedly builds on traditional volume rendering (VR) by converting CT image data into clearly defined 3D reconstructions through the stimulation and propagation of light rays. The purpose of this study was to compare CR to VR for the understanding of critical anatomy in unoperated complex congenital heart disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, CT data sets from 20 sequential scanned cases of unoperated paediatric patients with complex congenital heart disease were included. 3D images were produced at standardised and selected orientations, matched for both VR and CR. The images were then independently reviewed by two cardiologists, two radiologists and two surgeons for overall image quality, depth perception and the visualisation of surgically relevant anatomy, the coronary arteries and the pulmonary veins. RESULTS: Cinematic rendering demonstrated significantly superior image quality, depth perception and visualisation of surgically relevant anatomy than VR. CONCLUSION: Cinematic rendering is a novel 3D CT-rendering technique that may surpass the traditionally used volumetric rendering technique in the provision of actionable pre-operative anatomical detail for complex congenital heart disease.