Redefining ITT cortisol thresholds on Abbott platforms to prevent misdiagnosis of adrenal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a life-threatening condition which requires long term glucocorticoid replacement. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the current gold standard test for diagnosis of secondary AI, but the widely accepted cut-off value of a peak cortisol of less than 500 nmol/L assumes that anyone who does not reach this value has AI and thus requires full replacement. The cut-off used to diagnose AI is also founded on outdated assays. Use of this cut-off in an era of more specific immunoassays therefore risks misdiagnosis, subsequent unnecessary glucocorticoid exposure and associated adverse effects with increased mortality risk. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective analysis assessed 300 ITT cortisol responses using the Abbott Architect and Alinity analyser platforms in patients with suspected AI over a period of 12 years (August 2010 to January 2022), at a tertiary centre. RESULTS: Patients were classified as having AI or not, based on a comprehensive clinical review of electronic patient records from the point of test to the present day by a panel of pituitary and adrenal specialists. Using the current institutional cut-off value of 500 nmol/L, receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a 100.0% sensitivity and 43.6% specificity (area under the curve 0.979). Using a lower cortisol threshold value of 416 nmol/L on the Abbott analyser platform maintained a sensitivity of 100.0% and improved the specificity to 86.7%. CONCLUSION: This data supports lowering the Abbott analyser ITT peak cortisol threshold to 416 nmol/L. Use of this improved cut-off avoids unnecessary glucocorticoid replacement therapy in 104 (34.7%) of individuals in this study. All patients remained well with at least 1 year longitudinal follow up of glucocorticoid replacement.

Adaptive infusion of a glucagon-like peptide-1/glucagon receptor co-agonist G3215, in adults with overweight or obesity: Results from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: To determine whether a continuous infusion of a glucagon-like peptide receptor (GLP-1R)/glucagon receptor (GCGR) co-agonist, G3215 is safe and well tolerated in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS: A phase 1 randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of G3215 in overweight or obese participants, with or without type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants were recruited and randomized with 23 completing a 14-day subcutaneous infusion of G3215 or placebo. The most common adverse events were nausea or vomiting, which were mild in most cases and mitigated by real-time adjustment of drug infusion. There were no cardiovascular concerns with G3215 infusion. The pharmacokinetic characteristics were in keeping with a continuous infusion over 14 days. A least-squares mean body weight loss of 2.39 kg was achieved with a 14-day infusion of G3215, compared with 0.84 kg with placebo infusion (p < .05). A reduction in food consumption was also observed in participants receiving G3215 and there was no deterioration in glycaemia. An improved lipid profile was seen in G3215-treated participants and consistent with GCGR activation, a broad reduction in circulating amino acids was seen during the infusion period. CONCLUSION: An adaptive continuous infusion of the GLP-1/GCGR co-agonist, G3215, is safe and well tolerated offering a unique strategy to control drug exposure. By allowing rapid, response-directed titration, this strategy may allow for mitigation of adverse effects and afford significant weight loss within shorter time horizons than is presently possible with weekly GLP-1R and multi-agonists. These results support ongoing development of G3215 for the treatment of obesity and metabolic disease.

Current Challenges and Future Directions in the Assessment of Glucocorticoid Status.

Glucocorticoid hormones (GC) are secreted in a circadian and ultradian rhythm and play a critical role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, with both excess and insufficient GC associated with adverse effects on health. Current assessment of GC status is primarily clinical, often in conjunction with serum cortisol values, which may be stimulated or suppressed depending on the GC disturbance being assessed. In the setting of extreme perturbations in cortisol levels i.e. markedly low or high levels, symptoms and signs of GC dysfunction may be overt. However, when disturbances in cortisol GC status values are less extreme, such as when assessing optimization of a GC replacement regimen, signs and symptoms can be more subtle or non-specific. Current tools for assessing GC status, are best suited to identifying profound disturbances but may lack sensitivity for confirming optimal GC status. Moreover, single cortisol values do not necessarily reflect an individual's GC status, as they are subject to inter- and intra-individual variation, do not take into account the pulsatile nature of cortisol secretion, variation in binding proteins, or local tissue concentrations as dictated by 11ßeta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD) activity, as well as GC receptor sensitivity. In the present review, we evaluate possible alternative methods for the assessment of GC status that do not solely rely on measurement of circulating cortisol levels. We discuss the potential of changes in metabolomic profiles, miRNA, gene expression, epigenetic, and other novel biomarkers such as GDF-15 and osteocalcin, that could in future aid in the objective classification of GC status.