Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Vasc Med ; 24(1): 23-31, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426857

RESUMO

The object of this study was to compare the prognostic value of different methods of ankle-brachial index (ABI) calculation. From April 1998 to September 2008, we calculated the ABI in 1223 patients before coronary artery bypass grafting. The ABI was calculated according to five different calculation modes of the numerator. The patients were classified into three groups: clinical peripheral artery disease (PAD), subclinical PAD if no clinical history but abnormal ABI (< 0.90 or > 1.40), and no PAD. The primary outcome was total mortality. During a follow-up of 7.6 years (0.1-15.9), 406 patients (33%) died. The prevalence of the subclinical PAD varied from 22% to 29% according to the different modes of ABI calculation. Areas under the ROC curve to predict mortality according to different calculation modes varied from 0.608 ± 0.020 to 0.625 ± 0.020 without significant differences. The optimal ABI threshold to predict mortality varied for every method, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. In multivariate models, ABI was significantly and independently associated with total mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15-1.85, p = 0.002); however, this association was not significantly different between the various methods (HRs varying from 1.46 to 1.67). The use of the optimal ABI threshold for each calculation mode (rather than standard 0.90) allowed a slight improvement of the model. In conclusion, the ABI prognostic value to predict mortality is independent from its method of calculation. The use of different optimal thresholds for each method enables a comparable prognosis value.


Assuntos
Índice Tornozelo-Braço/métodos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Rigidez Vascular , Idoso , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 60(3): 388-395, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30465418

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), around 25% have multisite artery disease (MSAD). Patients with CAD and MSAD are at higher risk of peri-operative and long-term cardiovascular events. Whether off-pump coronary bypass grafting (CABG) can improve their prognosis is unknown. We aimed to assess the benefits of off- vs. on-pump cardiac surgery in patients undergoing CABG, according to coexistence of extra-cardiac artery disease. METHODS: Between April 1998 and September 2008, 1221 patients undergoing CABG without any other intervention were enrolled. Overall death and major cardiovascular events were recorded at 1-month and during long-term follow-up. A propensity score (PS), derived from all relevant variables (P<0.25) associated with on-pump as compared to off-pump CABG, and representing the likelihood for each individual patient to receive off-pump CABG, was calculated. RESULTS: MSAD was observed in 279 patients (23%). Off-pump CABG was performed in 208 (17%) patients. The median follow-up was 7.6 years. The 10-year mortality was significantly lower in off- vs. on-pump CABG group (74±4% vs. 68±2%, P=0.024). In patients with MSAD, there was a trend for better survival for off- vs. on-pump CABG (63±8% vs. 50±4%, P=0.078). After adjustment for PS, we found no further difference between on- and off-pump CABG both in the whole cohort (HR=1.30, P=0.10), as well as in MSAD patients (HR=1.51, P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MSAD receiving CABG are at worst prognostic than those with isolated CAD. In these patients, we found no significant difference in the long-term mortality and cardiovascular events between on- and off-pump CABG.


Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Idoso , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
EuroIntervention ; 13(4): 397-406, 2017 Jul 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067196

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management in young patients by limiting implantation of durable intracoronary devices (using a bioresorbable stent or medical treatment alone). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients <50 years old admitted for STEMI with single-vessel disease received a two-stage management strategy. During a second coronary angiography performed between day 2 and day 7, optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guided the decision on therapeutic management, i.e., i) in the case of a stenosis greater than 70% or plaque prolapse, implantation of a BVS; or ii) in the other cases, continuation of medical management alone without stenting. All patients underwent systematic angiographic control with OFDI imaging at six months. Among the 653 patients admitted for STEMI, 124 patients were under 50 years old and 45 patients were included. Early management was performed on average at day 3.9 (day 2 - day 7). Thirty-four (34) patients received BVS implantation and 11 were treated medically. Only one major adverse cardiac event (MACE) had occurred at six months. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected younger population, the management of STEMI guided by OFDI and based on the concept of limiting implantation of durable intracoronary devices appears to be a feasible and safe therapeutic option.


Assuntos
Stents Farmacológicos , Everolimo/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Implantes Absorvíveis , Adulto , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA