Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter in radiated and non - radiated compromised urethra. Assessment with a minimum 2 year follow-up.

PURPOSE: to assess the efficacy of transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on continence for male stress urinary incontinence in cases of prior surgical treatment or/and radiation failure, and as a first option in radiation patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2007 to August 2012, 37 male patients were treated with transcorporal AUS AMS™ 800. Twelve patients had primary placement of transcorporal cuff, a surgical option due to a previous history of radiation and 25 patients had secondary procedure after failure of AUS or urinary incontinence surgery. Functional urinary outcomes were assessed by daily pad use, 24-hour Pad-test and ICIQ-SF questionnaire. Quality of life and satisfaction were assessed based on I-QoL and PGI-I questionnaires. RESULTS: After a median of 32 months, the continence rate (0 to 1 pad) was 69.7%. Median pad test was 17.5g (0-159), mean ICIQ-SF score was 7.3/21 (±5.4) and mean I-QoL score was 93.9/110. A total of 88% of the patients reported satisfaction with the AUS. The 5-year actuarial revision-free for AUS total device was 51%. Patients for primary implant for radiation were not more likely to experience revision than non-radiation patients. Preservation of erections was reported in half of the potent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transcorporal AUS cuff placement is a useful alternative procedure option for severe male UI treatment, especially in patients with a compromised urethra after prior surgery or radiation. A high continence rate was reported and implantation as first option in radiation patients should be considered.

Efficacy of Pelvisoft® Biomesh for cystocele repair: assessment of long-term results.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To our knowledge a study regarding the efficacy of Pelvisoft® Biomesh for cystocele repair has not previously been reported in the literature. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term efficacy, subjective outcomes and complications in the use of a non-synthetic porcine skin mesh graft (Pelvisoft® Biomesh) associated with transvaginal anterior colporrhaphy in the treatment of cystocele prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a single centre. Thirty-three women aged 35-77 years underwent cystocele repair using Pelvisoft® graft between December 2005 and June 2009. Twenty-nine women who underwent transvaginal cystocele repair with Pelvisoft® Biomesh for over a 2 years period were assessed. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Cystocele repair was performed via the vaginal route using Pelvisoft® Biomesh implant by inserting it in the anterior vaginal wall. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 54.0 months. The rate of recurrence was 17.3%. A total of 6.9% of patients presented early mesh exposure treated by conservative treatment. The mean PFDI-20 score was 72.2. Among sexually active women, the mean PISQ 12 was 33.9 but 56.2% had dyspareunia. After surgery, 6 patients had de novo intercourse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the use of Pelvisoft® biomaterial associated with anterior colporrhaphy for cystocele repair appears to be safe with acceptable failure and complication rates at long term. Nevertheless, an adverse impact on sexual function was reported by the majority of patients.

Removal of pelvic schwannoma using a retroperitoneoscopic and open double approach: description of an effective novel technique.

INTRODUCTION: Schwannomas are rare tumors and are exceptionally retroperitoneal. In the event of clinical signs or uncertainty in the diagnosis, their removal is justified. A risk of neoplastic transformation exists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients had a retroperitoneal schwannoma located next to or under the sacral promontory. A double approach using an initial retroperitoneoscopy and an iliac abdominal incision had been decided preoperatively. This approach has not been described previously in the medical literature. RESULTS: The double approach enabled the complete removal of tumors in all patients. The iliac incision, described within, enabled the removal of the tumors despite major attachments and difficulties in exposure, due to the tumors' distal situations. CONCLUSION: A double approach by retroperitoneoscopy and laparotomy can enable removal of difficult low-seated retroperitoneal schwannomas without increasing intraoperative risk or perioperative morbidity.