Prosthetics, Medicine, and Disability in Modern America: The Case of the A. A. Marks Artificial Limb Company.

Through the case of the A. A. Marks Artificial Limb Company, this article explores how the technology and business of prosthetics grew in America up to the First World War. In 1853, Amasa A. Marks established the artificial limb company A. A. Marks in New York. By the time of the First World War, the company had become the largest supplier of artificial limbs in the United States and had gained international recognition, exporting its products all over the world. Focusing on the company's growth before the war, this paper analyzes how American artificial limb makers positioned themselves between art and medicine and between surgeons and disabled customers at a time when their occupation had yet to be established as a specialized profession. From the mid-nineteenth century when the artificial limb business burgeoned to the First World War, American society went through various social and cultural changes that influenced the prosthetics industry and the perception of disability. During the Civil War, numerous soldiers were injured but survived because advancements in amputation techniques enabled surgeons to save more lives despite limb loss. The growing number of maimed veterans required more mechanical and public support for their rehabilitation. As a reconstruction project of the nation and a way to address the sense of damaged masculinity felt by injured war veterans, both Union and Confederate states approved support for providing them with artificial limbs at public expense. In postbellum America, as well as deformity and amputation, industrialization created a need for artificial limbs as the brutality of advanced weapons and unfortunate accidents involving machines and railroads increased the number of amputees. Thus during the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, recognition of maimed bodies in public places went through a legislative and cultural transformation. The growth of artificial limb manufacturer A. A. Marks was in tune with such technological, medical, and sociocultural changes. Along with technological innovations and patents to protect these innovations, Amasa Marks devised various marketing methods and strategies through which the company secured customers and finally expanded the prosthetics market. As its customers increased, the company accumulated quantitative and qualitative data from patients' responses and interviews, and its own observations. In the late nineteenth century, George E. Marks, Amasa Marks's son and a representative of the company, analyzed customers' experiences of disability, gathering information on patterns of disability and mortality rates. Based on the company's rich experience with a large number of patient cases, George Marks advanced criticisms of surgical methods and provided second opinions on amputation surgeries. In doing so, he attempted to promote the limb maker's position from mere artisan to specialist, redefining the relationship between medicine and prosthetics and between surgeon and prosthetist. He also conveyed patients' complaints and needs to the medical men in the process, and distributed the company's findings and knowledge to surgeons and the general public by publishing treatises, articles, and manuals. Consequently, the company influenced an important epistemological turn in which the prosthetic perspective was considered prior to amputation surgery, not just as an inevitable follow-up.

Dr. James Smith's Dream of Eradicating Smallpox and the National Vaccine Institution.

This article re-examines from a new perspective the efforts of James Smith (1771-1841), a Maryland doctor, to eradicate smallpox in the United States. As one of the few successful cowpox inoculators at the turn of the nineteenth century, Smith recognized the necessity for a public vaccine institution that could ensure the safe production and continuous preservation and circulation of vaccine matter. Thus, he devoted himself to creating statewide and national vaccine institutions funded by the state and federal governments. He established the National Vaccine Institution (NVI), but despite his efforts, the NVI existed only a short time from 1813 to 1822. Previous studies on Smith have focused on the 1813 Vaccination Act (An Act to Encourage Vaccination) and the NVI, and have evaluated them as failed projects or historically missed opportunities. However, this kind of approach does not justly place the act and institutions within Smith's larger plan and do not fully discuss the role of the NVI in his system of promoting vaccination in the United States. This article analyzes how he responded to the problems hindering cowpox vaccination, including spurious vaccine, failed vaccination, and low public acceptance of cowpox vaccine. In doing so, this study shows that Smith attempted to establish a universal and systematic vaccination system connecting citizens, government, and medical personnel through the NVI, as well as ensuring a safe and regular supply of vaccine.

A Historiographical Review of the History of Western Medicine, 2011-2020 The Diversification of Subject Matter and the Search for a New Methodology.

This article examines major issues in the historiography of Western medical history between 2011 and 2020 through an analysis of scholarly articles published in journals based in the United States, Britain, and South Korea. The subject matter and methodology of the history of medicine in the West have greatly transformed since the start of the second millennium, from biographical history to historicism to social history to intellectual and cultural history. Through this process, the definition of "medicine" has been continuously denaturalized and expanded, and so have the topics its scholars deal with. Having a variety of perspectives and keeping their disciplinary boundaries porous, historians of Western medical history have examined issues of health, disease, and medicine. They have also vigilantly pursued advancements in methodology for historical analysis, experimented with different writing styles, and expanded historical resources, including visual and audio records. In recent decades, the history of medicine has seen additional experimentation with the changing understanding of the relationship between medicine and society, especially with the emergence of a knowledge- and information-based society and globalization. Furthermore, historians have attempted to establish the value of the history of medicine in response to changing perceptions of medicine and history in the twenty-first century. Their efforts have vitalized the field of medical history by treating it as a useful lens for observing medicine's past as well as formulating critical questions about its present.

Rethinking the History of Smallpox in the Early Twentieth Century: The SS Korea and Uncertainty Surrounding the Diagnosis of Smallpox.

This research explores the case of the 1903 smallpox outbreak on the SS Korea , a transpacific carrier making runs between Southeast Asia, East Asia, Hawaii, and the United States. These regions were connected to a degree that no one had ever imagined through the SS Korea . Honolulu, Hawaii, was one of the most important territories in US maritime history and served as a waypoint between Asia and San Francisco on the mainland. As increasing numbers of people traveled by sea, various microbes were communicated across the Pacific Ocean. International tourists traveling across the ocean to Hawaii and the United States were alerted to infectious diseases, smallpox being one of the most significant of such diseases. The story of the SS Korea serves as an important lens through which to explore the early twentieth century transpacific world connected through Honolulu. Focusing on the spread of smallpox via international travelers, this research studies aspects of the public health system that were developed to contain smallpox infection on international ships and the application of smallpox vaccination as a method for infectious disease control. More importantly, in bringing attention to the uncertainty surrounding the diagnosis of smallpox, this research argues for the necessity of historians to build a more comprehensive medical historical context for disease control systems that includes the limits of medical science in making diagnoses of infectious diseases, the uncertainties arising from a lack of this component, and the implementation of health policies and preventative medical technologies.