The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.

Although they are critical to models of coordinated care, the relationship and communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialists throughout the cancer continuum are poorly understood. By using predefined search terms, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature in 3 databases to examine the relationship and communication between PCPs and cancer specialists. Among 301 articles identified, 35 met all inclusion criteria and were reviewed in-depth. Findings from qualitative, quantitative, and disaggregated mixed-methods studies were integrated using meta-synthesis. Six themes were identified and incorporated into a preliminary conceptual model of the PCP-cancer specialist relationship: 1) poor and delayed communication between PCPs and cancer specialists, 2) cancer specialists' endorsement of a specialist-based model of care, 3) PCPs' belief that they play an important role in the cancer continuum, 4) PCPs' willingness to participate in the cancer continuum, 5) cancer specialists' and PCPs' uncertainty regarding the PCP's oncology knowledge/experience, and 6) discrepancies between PCPs and cancer specialists regarding roles. These data indicate a pervasive need for improved communication, delineation, and coordination of responsibilities between PCPs and cancer specialists. Future interventions aimed at these deficiencies may improve patient and physician satisfaction and cancer care coordination. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:156-169. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Tolerance and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Geriatric Breast Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an established treatment option for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (Her2+) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the toxicities associated with NAC may lead to reduced tolerance in geriatric patients due to medical comorbidities. Our objective is to evaluate the tolerance and outcomes of NAC in geriatric patients with TNBC and Her2+ breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board approved, retrospective study of 43 geriatric (≥70 y) and 103 non-geriatric (<70 y) patients with TNBC and Her2+ breast cancer was conducted. Demographic, comorbidity, treatment, and toxicity variables were collected. Log-rank tests and Cox regression visualized survival outcomes evaluated associations with clinical and demographic variables. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Following NAC, 30% geriatric patients had a pathologic complete response in the primary tumor, 54% had a partial response, and 16% had no response. Of the non-geriatric patients, 24% had a pathologic complete response, 64% had a partial response, and 12% showed no response. NAC-associated toxicities occurred in 81% of geriatric patients and 73% non-geriatric patients, with neutropenia occurring most frequently in both groups. Dose reduction and early discontinuation of NAC each occurred more frequently in the geriatric group (14%; 23%) than the non-geriatric group (7%; 6%). Higher post-treatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores were associated with worse overall survival and worse recurrence-free survival in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: NAC was associated with reduced tumor and nodal stage in most geriatric patients; however, NAC-associated toxicities were common and led some patients to reduce or stop their NAC regimen prematurely.

Surgical Management of Axilla of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the Z1071 Era: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who present with clinical N1 (cN1) disease and undergo complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) remains unclear. We aimed to study the outcomes of SLNB versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cN1 TNBC who showed cCR to NAST were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), and propensity score matched 1:1 between SLNB and ALND in all-comers, ypN0, and ypN1 subgroups. Overall survival (OS) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: Of the 2953 patients selected. 1062 (36.0%) underwent SLNB and 1891 (64.0%) underwent ALND. There was a chronological increase in national SLNB utilization (from 20% in 2012 to 46% in 2017). One thousand three patients were propensity matched between SLNB and ALND, and no OS difference was noted (81.73 ± 1.04 vs. 80.07 ± 0.70 months; p = 0.127). In the ypN0 subgroup, 884 pairs were matched and no significant OS difference was found (85.29 ± 0.84 vs. 82.60 ± 0.68 months; p = 0.638). In ypN+ patients, 129 pairs were matched and demonstrated a trend toward decreased OS with SLNB (64.37 ± 3.12 vs. 72.45 ± 72.45; p = 0.085). Cox regression identified age, inner tumors, advanced T stage, partial/no in-breast response, and nodal status as unfavorable predictors of OS. Definitive axillary surgical procedure was not a predictor in the final model. CONCLUSION: SLNB and ALND appear to yield comparable OS in cN1 TNBC patients who demonstrate cCR to NAST. Caution should be exercised in ypN1 patients as worse OS could be associated with SLNB.

Effect of surgical complications on outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Operative complications affect recurrence in non-breast malignancies. Rising rates of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and their increased post-operative complications fuel concerns for poorer outcome in breast cancer (BC). We sought to determine the effect of complications on recurrence in BC patients. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of incident BC treated with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Overall survival and recurrence were compared between patients with complications to those without. RESULTS: Of 201 patients (350 mastectomies, 86 nipple-sparing), 62 (30.8%) had a surgical complication. Patients with complications were older, but groups were similar for type of reconstruction, tobacco use, hormone receptor status, HER2, lymphovascular invasion, and pathologic stage (all p > 0.05). Twenty-two complications (10.9%) were infection, 5 (2.5%) dehiscence, 14 flap necrosis (7%), 21 hematomas (10.4%), and 8 nipple necroses (9%). Recurrence occurred in 18 (8.9%) patients: 4 local, 2 regional, and 12 distant. After 8.9 years of median follow-up, patients with complications trended towards higher recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, log-rank p = 0.08, Cox regression p = 0.05), particularly with nipple necrosis (HR 3.28, log-rank p = 0.09, regression p = 0.06). Patients with other complications had similar recurrence-free survival to those without (all p > 0.05). Higher stage (HR 13.66, log-rank p = 0.03) and adjuvant radiation (HR 2.78, log-rank p = 0.04) cases were more likely to recur. Patients with complications had similar overall survival to those without (log-rank p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: BC patients with surgical complications do not have lower overall survival. This finding may be due to the improved prognosis compared to non-breast malignancies.

Is it Wise to Omit Sentinel Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer?

BACKGROUND: The Society of Surgical Oncology's Choosing Wisely® guidelines recommend against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0), hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years. We examined the effect of SLNB on treatment and outcomes in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive cN0 women ≥ 70 years of age who received SLNB was performed. We collected clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment data. Patients were compared according to SLN status with subset analysis of HR-positive patients. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable analysis, and were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 345 (69%) were SLN-negative. Median age was 74 years (range 70-96). Most tumors were T1 (72%), N0 (69%), invasive ductal (77%), without lymphovascular invasion (88%), estrogen receptor-positive (88%) and progesterone receptor-positive (75%), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (88%) treated with lumpectomy (71%). Median number of SLNs obtained was 2 (range 0-12) and median number of positive SLNs was 0 (range 0-8). Characteristics of the HR-positive subset were similar. In both the overall cohort and the HR-positive subset, SLN status significantly affected the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, although no significant effect on recurrence was observed. SLN-negative patients had better overall survival and less distant recurrence (both p < 0.0001). Adjuvant hormone therapy significantly improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB can be safely omitted in elderly patients with T1, HR-positive, invasive ductal carcinoma tumors, but may still provide important information affecting treatment. Patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should still be considered for SLNB.

Impact of Axillary Dissection Among Patients With Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial supports omission of completion axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) after breast-conservation surgery with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). We hypothesized that CLND also does not impact outcomes in women with clinically node-negative (cN0), pathologically node-positive breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of patients with SLN-positive breast cancer treated from July 1999 through May 2018. Clinicopathologic and outcome data were collected. Patients with SLNBs were compared with those receiving SLNB and CLND. The Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were used to assess for differences between continuous and categorical variables. The log-rank test was used for time-to-event analyses, and Cox proportional hazards models were fit for locoregional and distant recurrence and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 329 patients with SLN-positive breast cancer undergoing mastectomy, 60% had CLND (n=201). Median age at diagnosis was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46-62 years). The median number of SLNs sampled was 3 (IQR, 2-4), and the median number of positive SLNs was 1 (IQR, 1-2). Patients receiving CLND had higher tumor grades (P=.02) and a higher proportion of hormone receptor negativity (estrogen receptor, 19%; progesterone receptor, 27%; both P=.007). A total of 44 patients (22%) had increased N stage after CLND. Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR, 29-83 months). No association was found between CLND and change in OS and locoregional or distant recurrence. Completion of postmastectomy radiotherapy was associated with improved OS (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: CLND is not significantly correlated with reduced recurrence or improved OS among patients who have cN0, SLN-positive breast cancer treated with mastectomy. CLND was significantly correlated with receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy. Completion of postmastectomy radiotherapy was associated with improved OS.

Characteristics of Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Versus Noninvasive and Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The present literature is conflicting regarding the management of microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (miDCIS) as to following recommendations for DCIS (margin status, surgical axillary staging, and possible observation) versus invasive breast cancer. We hypothesize that miDCIS represents more aggressive disease than pure DCIS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of female miDCIS patients compared with age-matched cohorts of DCIS and T1b/c patients with invasive breast cancer. We collected demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome information. Analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 375 patients (125 in each group) with median age 59 y (range 33-91 y). miDCIS tumors were more likely to be hormone receptor negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive compared with DCIS or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC; all P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by miDCIS focality demonstrated no significant differences. The number of involved lymph nodes was not significantly different from DCIS patients but was significantly fewer than invasive cancer patients. Of 115 miDCIS patients (88%) staged with sentinel lymph node biopsy, eight (7%) had nodal metastases. Six miDCIS patients (5%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Over a median follow-up of 23.3 mo, there were no significant differences in local or distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, miDCIS has more aggressive pathologic features compared with DCIS and warrants surgical treatment and nodal staging similar to the management of IDC. In addition, similar to IDC, nodal and receptor status may influence medical management.

Development of Malignancy-Risk Gene Signature Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) risk assessment models are statistical estimates based on patient characteristics. We developed a gene expression assay to assess BC risk using benign breast biopsy tissue. METHODS: A NanoString-based malignancy risk (MR) gene signature was validated for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. It was applied to FFPE benign and BC specimens obtained from women who underwent breast biopsy, some of whom developed BC during follow-up to evaluate diagnostic capability of the MR signature. BC risk was calculated with MR score, Gail risk score, and both tests combined. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate these 3 models. RESULTS: NanoString MR demonstrated concordance between fresh frozen and FFPE malignant samples (r = 0.99). Within the validation set, 563 women with benign breast biopsies from 2007 to 2011 were identified and followed for at least 5 y; 50 women developed BC (affected) within 5 y from biopsy. Three groups were compared: benign tissue from unaffected and affected patients and malignant tissue from affected patients. Kruskal-Wallis test suggested difference between the groups (P = 0.09) with trend in higher predicted MR score for benign tissue from affected patients before development of BC. Neither the MR signature nor Gail risk score were statistically different between affected and unaffected patients; combining both tests demonstrated best predictive value (AUC = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: FFPE gene expression assays can be used to develop a predictive test for BC. Further investigation of the combined MR signature and Gail Model is required. Our assay was limited by scant cellularity of archived breast tissue.

A randomized controlled intervention to promote readiness to genetic counseling for breast cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) survivors with a genetic mutation are at higher risk for subsequent cancer; knowing genetic risk status could help survivors make decisions about follow-up screening. Uptake of genetic counseling and testing (GC/GT) to determine BRCA status is low among high risk BC survivors. This study assessed feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a newly developed psychoeducational intervention (PEI) for GC/GT. METHODS: High risk BC survivors (N = 119) completed a baseline questionnaire and were randomized to the intervention (PEI video/booklet) or control (factsheet) group. Follow-up questionnaires were completed 2 weeks after baseline (T2), and 4 months after T2 (T3). We analyzed recruitment, retention (feasibility), whether the participant viewed study materials (acceptability), intent to get GC/GT (efficacy), and psychosocial outcomes (eg, perceived risk, Impact of Events Scale [IES]). t tests or chi-square tests identified differences between intervention groups at baseline. Mixed models examined main effects of group, time, and group-by-time interactions. RESULTS: Groups were similar on demographic characteristics (P ≥ .05). Of participants who completed the baseline questionnaire, 91% followed through to study completion and 92% viewed study materials. A higher percentage of participants in the intervention group moved toward GC/GT (28% vs 8%; P = .027). Mixed models demonstrated significant group-by-time interactions for perceived risk (P = .029), IES (P = .027), and IES avoidance subscale (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: The PEI was feasible, acceptable, and efficacious. Women in the intervention group reported greater intentions to pursue GC, greater perceived risk, and decreased avoidance. Future studies should seek to first identify system-level barriers and facilitators before aiming to address individual-level barriers.

Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

We used the Health Belief Model (HBM) to explore factors associated with readiness for genetic counseling among breast cancer survivors. Breast cancer survivors meeting NCCN genetic counseling referral criteria completed questionnaires capturing demographic and clinical information and factors guided by the HBM, including health beliefs, psychosocial variables, and cues to action. Using logistic regression, we examined whether the above variables differed based on readiness group (pre-contemplators, who did not plan to make a genetic counseling appointment, and contemplators, who planned to make a genetic counseling appointment in the next 1-6 months). Of 111 participants, 57% were pre-contemplators and 43% were contemplators. Higher cancer worry was associated with increased odds of being a contemplator (OR = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.37-6.54) and higher perceived barriers to genetic counseling were associated with decreased odds of being a contemplator (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.11-0.85). Those who reported a family member encouraged them to get tested were more likely to be contemplators (OR = 3.57; 95% CI = 1.19-10.70). Our results suggest key factors for predicting genetic counseling readiness include cancer worry, perceived barriers, and family influence. There is need for increased genetic counseling awareness. Better understanding of factors related to survivors' decisions about counseling can inform tailored interventions to improve uptake and ultimately reduce cancer recurrence risk.

Specialist Physicians' Attitudes and Practice Patterns Regarding Disclosure of Pre-referral Medical Errors.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine specialist physicians' attitudes and practices regarding disclosure of pre-referral errors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Physicians are encouraged to disclose their own errors to patients. However, no clear professional norms exist regarding disclosure when physicians discover errors in diagnosis or treatment that occurred at other institutions before referral. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews of cancer specialists from 2 National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. We purposively sampled specialists by discipline, sex, and experience-level who self-described a >50% reliance on external referrals (n = 30). Thematic analysis of verbatim interview transcripts was performed to determine physician attitudes regarding disclosure of pre-referral medical errors; whether and how physicians disclose these errors; and barriers to providing full disclosure. RESULTS: Participants described their experiences identifying different types of pre-referral errors including errors of diagnosis, staging and treatment resulting in adverse events ranging from decreased quality of life to premature death. The majority of specialists expressed the belief that disclosure provided no benefit to patients, and might unnecessarily add to their anxiety about their diagnoses or prognoses. Specialists had varying practices of disclosure including none, non-verbal, partial, event-dependent, and full disclosure. They identified a number of barriers to disclosure, including medicolegal implications and damage to referral relationships, the profession's reputation, and to patient-physician relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist physicians identify pre-referral errors but struggle with whether and how to provide disclosure, even when clinical circumstances force disclosure. Education- or communication-based interventions that overcome barriers to disclosing pre-referral errors warrant development.

The Challenges of Providing Feedback to Referring Physicians After Discovering Their Medical Errors.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are encouraged through formalized systems to discuss their own errors with peers for the purposes of quality improvement. However, no clear professional norms exist regarding peer review when physicians discover errors that occurred at other institutions before referral. Our objective was to determine specialist physicians' attitudes and practices regarding providing feedback to referring physicians when prereferral errors are discovered. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews of specialists from two National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. Thematic analysis of transcripts was performed to determine physicians' attitudes toward the delivery of negative feedback regarding prereferral errors, whether and how they communicate these errors to referring physicians, and perceived barriers to doing so. RESULTS: We purposively sampled specialists by discipline, gender, and experience level, who described greater than 50% reliance on external referrals (n = 30). Specialists believed regular, explicit feedback was ideal, but the majority of participants reported practices that did not meet this standard. While there were some structural barriers to providing feedback (lack of time or contact information), the majority of barriers were internal psychological concerns (general discomfort with providing negative feedback, fear of conflict, or defensive reactions) or fears about implications for future referrals or medicolegal risk. CONCLUSIONS: Policies and interventions that structure the approach to this sometimes difficult, yet critically important, opportunity for reducing medical errors warrant investigation as potential mechanisms by which to improve consistency and quality of care while maintaining positive professional relationships.

Disparities in Use and Access to Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Among African American Women: A Targeted Review of the Literature.

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction is a therapy that has been shown to have positive psychological effects on its recipients. There is evidence that racial disparities in its use exist, particularly among African American (AA) women. The purpose of this targeted review of the literature was to examine the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among AA women and to explore factors that contribute to such disparities. Published literature that evaluated rates of breast reconstruction in AA women, as well as barriers to reconstruction in this population, was reviewed. All of the reviewed data consisted of retrospective studies. There are conflicting data in the literature regarding disparities in the rates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among AA women. However, a majority of studies found that AA women were less likely (odds ratios: 0.36-0.71) to receive postmastectomy breast reconstruction compared to white women. System-associated factors, physician-associated factors, and patient-associated factors interact in a complex manner that contributes to the reported disparities. Although there are trends suggesting racial disparities in the rates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction exist, the published data are retrospective and are inherently limited. The pursuit of breast reconstruction is highly individual and involves multiple factors that interact in a complex manner. To this end, prospective studies encompassing sociodemographic factors, clinical factors, and patient preferences are necessary to determine what interventions by physicians can have the greatest impact in ensuring equal access to this therapy when it is desired.

Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer.

As more young women survive breast cancer, fertility preservation (FP) is an important component of care. This review highlights the importance of early pretreatment referral, reviews the risks of infertility associated with breast cancer treatment, and defines existing and emerging techniques for FP. The techniques reviewed include ovarian suppression, embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation. The barriers women face, such as not being appropriately referred and the costs of treatment, also are addressed. Multidisciplinary, patient-centered care is essential to discussing FP with patients with breast cancer and ensuring appropriate care that includes quality of life in survivorship.

Genomic Assays in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Implications for Management Decisions.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The management of breast cancer depends on clinical and pathologic prognostic factors that help guide patient treatment. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive form of breast cancer with an unpredictable risk of either progression to invasive disease or recurrence. To evaluate the utilization of the DCIS score in a large single-institution population and understand reasons for avoidance in eligible patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of eligible patients with pure DCIS treated by lumpectomy (January 2011-May 2015) was performed. Patients were considered eligible for the assay if they met the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E5194 pathology criteria. All of the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and were estrogen receptor positive. RESULTS: Of 182 estrogen receptor-positive patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery, 31 (17%) had a DCIS assay performed; however, most of the patients did not have a DCIS score assay performed, yet 47.9% of this cohort would have met the pathologic eligibility criteria. Conversely, 82.5% of the patients having the DCIS score evaluated actually met these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size, grade, ER status, and calcifications were drivers of patient selection for 12-gene assay use. E5194 eligibility criteria selected for low risk population. Although a large proportion of patients met eligibility criteria, DCIS Score was infrequently considered for recurrence risk estimation. When performed, assay scores supported omission of radiation for over 75% of cases.

Early Postoperative Complications after Oncoplastic Reduction.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy (BCT) has been established as safe oncologically. Oncoplastic breast surgery uses both oncologic and plastic surgery techniques for breast conservation to improve cosmetic outcomes. We evaluated the risk factors associated with complications after oncoplastic breast reduction. METHODS: A single-institution, institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of electronic medical records of female patients with breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic breast reduction from 2008 to 2014. A review of electronic medical records collected relevant medical history, clinical and pathological information, and data on postoperative complications within 6 months stratified into major or minor complications. Categorical variables analyzed with the χ2 exact method; continuous variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test exact method. RESULTS: We identified 59 patients; 4 required re-excision for positive margins, and 1 moved on to completion mastectomy. The overall complication rate was 33.9% (n = 20): 12 major (20.3%) and 8 minor (13.6%). Of the continuous variables (age, body mass index, and tissue removed), increased age was associated with minor complications (P = 0.02). Among the categorical variables (stratified body mass index, prior breast surgery, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, vascular disease, pulmonary disease, and stratified weight of tissue removed), none were associated with overall or major complications. Pulmonary disease was associated with minor complications (P = 0.03). Bilateral versus unilateral oncoplastic breast reduction showed no statistically significant increase in complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate after oncoplastic breast reduction was markedly higher than that in nationally published data for breast-conserving surgery. The complication rate resembled more closely the complication rate after bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. No risk factors were associated with major or overall complications. Age and pulmonary disease were associated with minor complications. Patients should be selected and counseled appropriately when considering oncoplastic breast reduction.

Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Practice guidelines incorporate genomic tumor profiling, using results such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), to refine recurrence risk estimates for the large proportion of breast cancer patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive disease. We sought to understand the impact of receiving genomic recurrence risk estimates on breast cancer patients' well-being and the impact of these patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants were 193 women (mean age 57) newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Women were interviewed before and 2-3 weeks after receiving the RS result between 2011 and 2015. We assessed subsequent receipt of chemotherapy from chart review. After receiving their RS, perceived pros (t = 4.27, P < .001) and cons (t = 8.54, P < .001) of chemotherapy increased from pre-test to post-test, while perceived risk of breast cancer recurrence decreased (t = 2.90, P = .004). Women with high RS tumors were more likely to receive chemotherapy than women with low RS tumors (88 vs. 5 %, OR 0.01, 0.00-0.02, P < .001). Higher distress (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.05-4.57, P < .05) and lower perceived cons of chemotherapy (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.26-0.97, P < .05) also predicted receipt of chemotherapy. Distressed patients who saw few downsides of chemotherapy received this treatment. Clinicians should consider these factors when discussing chemotherapy with breast cancer patients.

Clinical Considerations of Risk, Incidence, and Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Sexual Minorities.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Limited research exists on the impact of sexual orientation on overall risk of and mortality from breast cancer. We sought to summarize the medical literature on breast cancer in sexual minority women and identify possible disparities in this population. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for English-language studies in peer-reviewed medical journals that referenced breast cancer and sexual minority, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender individuals. Articles published between January 2000 and November 2015 were included. They were reviewed for relevance to breast cancer risk stratification, breast cancer mortality, breast reconstruction, and transgender issues. RESULTS: Behavioral risks, reproductive risks, and risks associated with decreased access to health care may all affect outcomes for sexual minorities with breast cancer. Limited studies have mixed results regarding mortality associated with breast cancer in sexual minorities due to an inconsistent reporting of sexual orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the research examining breast cancer in sexual minority women remains limited. This finding is likely due to limitations in the reporting of sexual orientation within large databases, thus making broader-scale research difficult.

Early experience with ultrasound features after intrabeam intraoperative radiation for early stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an emerging option for partial breast radiotherapy in select women with early stage breast cancer. We assessed short-term clinical and sonographic findings after breast conservation (BCT) and IORT. METHODS: An IRB-approved, single institution retrospective chart review was conducted of patients (pts) treated with BCT/IORT from 1/2011 to 6/2012. Follow-up clinical breast exams and ultrasounds (US) obtained 6 and 12 months after BCT/IORT were retrospectively reviewed by a single breast radiologist (JD) for sonographic findings. P values were calculated using McNemar's test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, and Chi-square. RESULTS: Seventy-one pts underwent BCT/IORT and 38 pts had an US. All 38 pts had a seroma, 10/38 (26%) pts were symptomatic. Eighteen pts had deep tissue closure (DTC) of the lumpectomy cavity with 5/18 (28%) DTC pts being symptomatic at follow-up versus 5/33 (15%) without DTC (P = 0.296). At 6 months, DTC resulted in smaller seroma cavity volumes compared to those without DTC (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Presence of a seroma is commonplace post BCT/IORT; symptomatic seromas are uncommon. DTC generated smaller seromas. Longer follow-up with serial US performed in all BCT/IORT pts could be considered to document natural progression/regression of symptoms and seromas.