Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg ; 276(6): 975-980, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081564

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of combined pulsed-dye laser (PDL) and NAFL for treatment of surgical scars. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: PDL and NAFL have not been compared to healing by time alone. METHODS: Randomized controlled, single-blinded clinical trial at an urban, university hospital. Healthy adults' status post skin surgery with primary closure were randomized to either 3 sessions of combination PDL and NAFL every 2 to 8 weeks, or control of no treatment. At baseline and 36-week follow-up, Patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating were completed by participants and blinded physicians. The primary outcome was scar improvement, as measured by the score difference over time. RESULTS: Of 76 participants, 52 completed the study (July 2017 to June 2019). No severe adverse events were reported. Patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale assessments demonstrated improvement in total score in the laser group compared to controls, as reported by patients [mean difference (standard deviation), laser: 12.86 (6.91) vs control: 7.25 (6.34); P = 0.004] and blinded physicians [18.32 (8.69) vs 13.08 (9.63); P = 0.044]. Patients observed a greater improvement in scar thickness [3.68 (2.04) vs 1.88 (1.85); P = 0.002] and stiffness [3.57 (2.78) vs 1.50 (2.11); P = 0.004] with lasers, and physicians reported greater improvement in vascularity [3.71 (1.98) vs 1.71 (1.52); P = 0.0002]. The live Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating subscore for erythema improved significantly with lasers [1.04 (0.79) vs 0.42 (0.50); P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Combined PDL and NAFL resulted in scar improvement. Scar thickness, stiffness, and erythema were improved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03057964).


Assuntos
Cicatriz , Lasers de Corante , Adulto , Humanos , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Cicatriz/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Cicatrização , Eritema/etiologia
3.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 314(4): 349-356, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34014340

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Nonscarring alopecia, including androgenetic alopecia and alopecia areata, are common and can negatively impact quality of life. Recent clinical studies have investigated autologous, adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) as a potentially beneficial treatment option. OBJECTIVE: To assess the available evidence on the utility and safety of SVF for nonscarring alopecia. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to November 2020. Included articles were prospective, observational or interventional studies of SVF for nonscarring alopecia in humans. FINDINGS: Six studies of 188 patients were identified, including three randomized controlled trials. There were no reported severe adverse events. All studies found improved hair density with SVF compared to control or pre-treatment baseline. One study reported that improvement in hair density varied based on time for follow-up, severity of hair loss, and concentration of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) within the SVF. Two studies reported an increase in hair diameter from baseline, and two studies reported an improvement in hair pull test outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: SVF may be safe and effective for nonscarring alopecia in the appropriate patients. Hair loss severity, method of SVF preparation and frequency of treatment, and adjunctive therapies may be important considerations for treatment success. Additional studies evaluating appropriate patient selection and treatment methods are needed.


Assuntos
Alopecia em Áreas , Fração Vascular Estromal , Tecido Adiposo , Alopecia/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA