Retro-tubercular Biplanar Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Results in Superior Patellofemoral Alignment Versus Supra-tubercular Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the changes in patellofemoral (PF) joint alignment, focusing on multiple planes, between two different types of biplanar medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). METHODS: Patients who underwent biplanar OWHTO between July 2017 and May 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. They were allocated to either the supra-tubercular (ST)- or retro-tubercular (RT)-OWHTO group. The following radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups: 1) weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), 2) patellar height, 3) posterior tibial slope (PTS), 4) tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, 5) TT-TG angle, and 6) femoral shaft-patellar tendon (FS-PT) angle. Clinical outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 104 knees that underwent ST-OWHTO and 105 knees that underwent RT-OWHTO were evaluated. The patellar height significantly decreased only after ST-OWHTO (P < .001). The TT-TG distance and FS-PT angle significantly increased, more after ST-OWHTO than RT-OWHTO (mean change value: 5.72 mm vs 1.91 mm; P < .001 for TT-TG distance; and 4.72° vs 1.80°; P < .001 for FS-PT angle). The TT-TG angle increased significantly after ST-OWHTO (mean change value: 7.62°; P < .001) but decreased after RT-OWHTO mean change value: -4.30°; P < .001). The PTS more increased after RT-OWHTO than after ST-OWHTO (mean change value: 0.91° vs 1.69°; P = .003). Clinical outcomes in both groups improved postoperatively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: RT-OWHTO resulted in lesser changes in multiplane PF joint alignment than ST-OWHTO. However, no difference was observed in clinical outcomes between both groups, and PTS increased after RT-OWHTO. Therefore, these aspects of RT-OWHTO should also be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Meniscectomy for Adult Discoid Lateral Meniscus Results in Progression to Valgus Alignment and Lateral Compartment Degeneration Compared With Nonoperative Treatment and Nondiscoid Lateral Meniscus.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of the arthroscopic meniscal procedure in adult discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) according to the age and meniscal-preserving by making comparisons with the nondiscoid lateral meniscus (N-DLM). METHODS: From March 2014 to October 2020, a comparative analysis was performed in adults with DLM who underwent arthroscopic meniscal procedures (operative DLM: 134 knees), nonoperative treatment (nonoperative DLM: 56 knees), and adult N-DLM who underwent arthroscopic meniscal procedures (operative N-DLM: 64 knees). These patients were between 20 and 65 years old and completed a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients with DLM who underwent arthroscopic procedure were divided into subgroups according to age and extent of the meniscal-preserving. The following parameters were assessed and compared between the groups: (1) coronal limb alignment, (2) osteoarthritis grade, and (3) clinical outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: The coronal limb alignment was significantly changed to valgus in the order of operative DLM, N-DLM, and nonoperative DLM (Δ mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle: 3.23 ± 1.85 vs 1.35 ± 1.03° vs -0.57 ± 1.88°; P < .05). Operative DLM showed most prominent osteoarthritic change in the lateral compartment, followed by the N-DLM and nonoperative DLM groups (40.3% vs 17.2% vs 5.3%; P < .05). These changes in operative DLM were more prominent in older adults who underwent meniscal-sacrificing procedures and resulted in less-satisfactory clinical outcomes (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic surgery for adult DLM resulted in progression to valgus alignment and lateral compartment degeneration compared with nonoperative treatment and arthroscopic surgery of the adult N-DLM. Old ager and having a meniscal-sacrificing procedure showed more rapid radiographic changes and lower clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparison study.

Age and medial compartmental OA were important predictors of the lateral compartmental OA in the discoid lateral meniscus: Analysis using machine learning approach.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop a machine learning model that would predict lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in the discoid lateral meniscus (DLM), from which to then identify factors contributing to lateral compartment OA, with a key focus on the patient's age. METHODS: Data were collected from 611 patients with symptomatic DLM diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging between April 2003 and May 2022. Twenty features, including demographic, clinical and radiological data and six algorithms were used to develop the predictive machine learning models. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) analysis was performed on the best model, in addition to subgroup analyses according to age. RESULTS: Extreme gradient boosting classifier was identified as the best prediction model, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.968, the highest among all the models, regardless of age (AUROC of 0.977 in young age and AUROC of 0.937 in old age). In the SHAP analysis, the most predictive feature was age, followed by the presence of medial compartment OA. In the subgroup analysis, the most predictive feature was age in young age, whereas the most predictive feature was the presence of medial compartment OA in old age. CONCLUSION: The machine learning model developed in this study showed a high predictive performance with regard to predicting lateral compartment OA of the DLM. Age was identified as the most important factor, followed by medial compartment OA. In subgroup analysis, medial compartmental OA was found to be the most important factor in the older age group, whereas age remained the most important factor in the younger age group. These findings provide insights that may prove useful for the establishment of strategies for the treatment of patients with symptomatic DLM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Maintenance of the joint line and posterior condylar offset are the most notable variables for successful outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy regarding which variables should be prioritized for better outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) exists. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variables affecting RTKA outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 87 RTKAs in 82 patients who were performed between March 2014 and February 2020. Range of motion (ROM), including flexion contracture (FC) and further flexion (FF), was analyzed according to the covariates. The covariates included mode of failure, joint line position, anteroposterior (AP) position, rotational alignment of the femoral component, and patellofemoral alignment. The differences between the final follow-up values of each RTKA variable and those of the native knee were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the joint line positions of the RTKA and native knees. The patellar and AP positions of the femoral component were restored to pre-TKA values. The femoral component had an external rotation of 2.78° compared with the native knee. In multivariable stepwise regression analysis, restoration of the adductor tubercle joint line and posterior condylar offset (PCO) were significant variables affecting ROM. Septic RTKA (33 knees) resulted in poor FF outcomes (p = 0.030) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (WOMAC S) scores (p < 0.001), compared with aseptic RTKA (54 knees). CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of the joint line position and PCO are crucial factors for improved ROM in RTKA. Joint line elevation in RTKA resulted in worse ROM than joint line lowering. In addition, RTKA due to septic failure had inferior ROM and WOMAC S scores compared with RTKA due to aseptic failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.

Association of the joint line orientation angle of the contralateral limb with the alignment change of the unilateral and bilateral opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare unilateral and bilateral open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using mid-term serial assessment of clinical and radiological outcomes, especially focussing on coronal lower extremity alignment. METHODS: Serial radiological assessments were performed in 40 patients (80 knees) with bilateral OWHTO and 49 patients (49 knees) with unilateral OWHTO. Both groups were further divided into four subgroups to compare each limb (unilateral involved and non-involved limbs and bilateral primarily and secondarily treated limbs). Radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared among the four groups. For the alignment change assessment, the pelvic tilt angle (PTA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), distal tibia articular angle (DTAA), and talar inclination (TI) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Student's t-test, one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, and correlation analysis were used to compare the groups. RESULTS: Patients in the unilateral and bilateral OWHTO groups had similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Each unilaterally involved limb and primarily treated bilaterally involved limb were negatively affected by the contralateral limb with respect to increased JLOA during the postoperative period (unilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.350, p = 0.023; bilateral OWHTO group: r = -0.520, p = 0.005). The correction change of the ankle parameters in the secondarily treated limb showed greater varus alignment than the primarily treated limb after bilateral OWHTO (DTAA (0.1 ± 3.0 vs. -0.5 ± 3.8°, p = 0.014) and TI (0.9 ± 3.2° vs. -0.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.001)). CONCLUSION: Unilateral and bilateral OWHTOs shared similar postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes. Alignment changes of the unilateral OWHTO and the primarily treated limb of the bilateral OWHTO were associated with the JLOA of the contralateral limb. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study; Level III.

Development of a machine learning model to predict lateral hinge fractures by analyzing patient factors before open wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Several methods have been developed to prevent lateral hinge fractures (LHFs), using only classic statistical models. Machine learning is under the spotlight because of its ability to analyze various weights and model nonlinear relationships. The purpose of this study was to create a machine learning model that predicts LHF with high predictive performance. METHODS: Data were collected from a total of 439 knees with medial osteoarthritis (OA) treated with Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) from March 2014 to February 2020. The patient data included age, sex, height, and weight. Preoperative, determined, and modifiable factors were categorized using X-ray and CT data to create ensemble models with better predictive performance. Among the 57 ensemble models, which is the total number of possible combinations with six models, the model with the highest area under curve (AUC) or F1-score was selected as the final ensemble model. Gain feature importance analysis and the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) feature explanation were performed on the best models. RESULTS: The ensemble model with the highest AUC was a combination of a light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) (AUC = 0.992). The ensemble model with the highest F1-score was the model that combined logistic regression (LR) and MLP (F1-score = 0.765). Distance X was the most predictive feature in the results of both model interpretation analyses. CONCLUSION: Two types of ensemble models, LGBM with MLP and LR with MLP, were developed as machine learning models to predict LHF with high predictive performance. Using these models, surgeons can identify important features to prevent LHF and establish strategies by adjusting modifiable factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative education on realistic expectations improves the satisfaction of patients with central sensitization after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an additional module on realistic expectations following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would lead to a higher proportion of satisfied patients compared to existing preoperative education. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized-controlled trial. A total of 172 patients who were scheduled for TKA between September 2020 and October 2021 were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either only standard preoperative education, or an additional module on realistic expectations following TKA. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were Short Form-36, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, crepitus score, and range of motion. Subgroup analysis was performed based on central sensitization inventory (CSI) score stratification. Assessment was performed at the 3-month, 6-month, and > 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: At more than 1 year, 65/78 (83.3%) patients in the intervention group and 52/80 (65.0%) patients in the control group were satisfied (P = 0.03). The mean satisfaction score was measured as 4.2 ± 0.9 in the intervention and 3.9 ± 0.9 in the control at > 1 year (P = 0.01). There were significant differences in Short Form-36 physical and mental component summary scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores at 6 months (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, P = 0.04, P = 0.04). The frequency of satisfaction and mean satisfaction score in the top 25 percentile CSI group were 15/16 (93.8%) and 4.6 ± 0.6 in those who received intervention and 12/19 (63.2%) and 3.8 ± 0.8 in those who did not (P = 0.01, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Thorough preoperative education on realistic expectations following TKA showed effects on WOMAC pain and satisfaction at > 1 year after surgery. It was more prominent in the group with a higher CSI score at > 1-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Constitutional alignment predicts medial ligament balancing in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty for varus knees.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify if constitutional alignment and preoperative radiologic parameters determined whether medial gap balancing was required in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Two hundred and sixty three patients with 394 consecutive knees who underwent primary TKAs were retrospectively analysed in this study. Selective sequential multiple needle puncturing (MNP) was performed for medial ligament balancing when required. Constitutional alignment, which was determined using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification, as well as preoperative and postoperative radiologic parameters was evaluated to identify factors which predicted the need for MNP. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty eight (40.1%) knees required medial ligament balancing with MNP. Patients who required MNP during surgery had significantly more constitutional varus, more varus preoperative mechanical Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (mHKA), smaller preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and a larger change in mHKA and MPTA after surgery than those who did not. Patients with constitutional varus also had a higher incidence of having had MNP to both anterior and posterior superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) fibres. There was no significant difference in preoperative lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and varus-valgus difference (VVD) between groups. CONCLUSION: Ligament balancing using MNP was determined by constitutional alignment rather than medial soft tissue contracture. Patients with constitutional varus who had a larger medio-lateral gap difference in extension also had a higher incidence of having had MNP to both anterior and posterior sMCL fibres. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, level IV.

Constitutional and postoperative joint line obliquity can predict serial alignment change after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: analysis using coronal plane alignment of the knee classification.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to clarify the distribution of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotype in patients who underwent medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and (2) to identify the predictive factors for postoperative serial alignment changes after OWHTO by analyzing constitutional phenotypes. METHODS: Patients who underwent OWHTO between March 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Those who completed a minimum follow-up of 3 years were divided into three groups based on the direction of alignment changes from postoperative 3 months to the final follow-up: Group 1 (varus direction) when the weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR) change was less than - 4%, Group 2 (maintained) when the WBLR change was between - 4% and 4%, and Group 3 (valgus direction) when the WBLR change was greater than 4%. The following parameters were assessed serially and compared between the groups: (1) radiologic parameters of coronal limb alignment such as joint line obliquity (JLO), (2) CPAK phenotypes, and (3) clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 163 knees were included, and the average duration of follow-up was 4.8 ± 1.6 years. More apex distal JLO was observed in the order of Group 1, 2, and 3 at all times (all p < 0.05). The most common CPAK type was type (I + II) (constitutional: apex distal JLO) + type (V + VI) (postoperative 3 months: neutral JLO) in Group 1 (29.4%; p = 0.000); otherwise, the most common CPAK type was type (IV + V) (constitutional: neutral JLO) + type (VIII + IX) (postoperative 3 months: apex proximal JLO) in Group 3 (11.7%; p = 0.000). Clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Constitutional and postoperative JLO were predictive factors of postoperative alignment changes after OWHTO. Constitutional apex distal and postoperative neutral JLO had a tendency for varus alignment progression, whereas constitutional neutral and postoperative apex proximal JLO had a tendency for valgus alignment progression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study; Level III.

Medially and distally inserted tuberosity screw fixation of the osteotomized tubercle is safe and effective in retro-tubercular bi-planar opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a safe and effective method of inserting one tuberosity screw and to determine whether retro-tubercular (RT)-Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) with tuberosity screw fixation can be conducted to overcome the problem of osteotomized tubercle and produce favorable outcomes compared to RT-OWHTO without tuberosity screw fixation. METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, patients who underwent bi-planar RT-OWHTO were allocated as two groups (RT-OWHTO without tuberosity screw fixation as group I and with screw fixation as group II). Computed tomography (CT) was used to analyze osteotomy configurations such as RT gap and tip distance, and union of the main and second plane osteotomy sites. The RT gap distance was measured as the length of the osteotomy gap. The RT tip distance was measured as the length of the gap at the tip of the tibial tubercle. Post-operative complications were analyzed also. To evaluate the neurovascular (NV) approximity of screw fixation group, the pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were referenced on the post-operative CT for the assessment of the safe zone. RESULTS: In total, 44 knees in group I and 46 knees in group II were enrolled. The RT gap distance (2.58 ± 0.69 mm vs. 0.57 ± 0.57 mm; p < .001) and RT tip distance (4.31 ± 1.60 mm vs. 1.48 ± 1.42 mm; p < .001) were significantly larger in group I than in group II. The sum of union grade in the second plane osteotomy site (17.93 ± 2.18 points vs. 22.24 ± 2.57 points; p < .001) was statistically different between two groups at three months post operatively. Post-operative tuberosity prominence occurred in five knees only in group I (p = 0.025), although tibial tuberosity fracture developed in seven cases in group II compared with two cases in group I with no statistical significance. NV was safe when the screw was inserted medially. CONCLUSION: RT-OWTHO with one-screw fixation for the tuberosity was effective in terms of tuberosity prominence and the union of the second plane osteotomy site. However, it also produced another problem, such as tuberosity fracture. In addition, a tuberosity screw was safe when it was inserted in the medial-distal direction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study; level III.

Graft impingement increases anterior cruciate ligament graft signal more than acute graft bending angle: magnetic resonance imaging-based study in outside-in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: In this study, the relationship between patient-specific geometric factors and tunnel placement in graft impingement was identified by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts. METHODS: Ninety-two patients, who were treated between 2014 and 2020, were included retrospectively. These patients underwent primary remnant-preserving outside-in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and were followed up with postoperative MRI at least one year after surgery. Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) were used to analyze tibial and femoral tunnel positions. Postoperative MRI was performed, at 32.8 ± 17.5 months after surgery, to evaluate the graft signal intensity, the ACL/posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) ratio (APR), ACL/muscle ratio (AMR), tunnel positions, and graft impingement. Clinical and stability outcomes were analyzed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, Lysholm scores, and side-to-side differences (SS-D). RESULTS: The mean APR and AMR of the proximal third of the grafts were significantly lower than those of the middle third of the grafts (p = 0.017 and p = 0.045, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed that there was a negative association between the mean APR and AMR of entire intra-articular ACL graft and the distance from the anterior end of the intercondylar roof to the center of the tibial tunnel in the sagittal plane (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and the notch width index (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). No significant correlations were found between tunneling and geometric factors, and clinical scores or SS-D. CONCLUSIONS: Graft impingement on the anterior tibial tunnel relative to the end of the intercondylar roof and narrow notch was a more significant contributing factor on increased signal intensities of the ACL graft, compared with the acute femoral bending angle in remnant-preserving outside-in ACLR. Therefore, surgeons should focus on intercondylar notch anatomy during tibial tunnel placement to avoid roof impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Analysis of the determinant factor of the medial joint space width after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: The decrease in the medial joint space width (MJSW) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) is proportional to the degree of arthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the affecting factors of the MJSW by serial radiologic assessment after medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2014 and March 2019, 162 MOW-HTO knees that underwent serial radiologic assessment and follow-up MRI were enrolled. Changes in the MJSW were analyzed by dividing into three groups: group I, low quartile (< 25%); II, middle quartile (25-75%); and III, high quartile (> 75%), according to the magnitude of the MJSW. The correlation between the MJSW and weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), hip knee ankle angle (HKA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (m-LDFA), joint line orientation angle (JLOA), and MRI cartilage status was analyzed. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze factors affecting the amount of change in the MJSW. The clinical outcome was also correlated with the MJSW. RESULTS: The amount of change in the JLCA, which has the largest beta value (weight-bearing standing anteroposterior (AP) view and 45° flexion posteroanterior view (Rosenberg view) ß = - 0.699 and ß = -5.221, both p < 0.001, respectively), had the greatest contribution to the change in the MJSW. The WBLR was also related (standing AP and Rosenberg ß = 0.177 and ß = 0.264, p = 0.015 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no statistical difference between the amount of change in the MJSW and the change in cartilage. The clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The JLCA was the most important contributing factor for the MJSW, followed by WBLR. This contribution was more pronounced in Rosenberg view than standing AP view. Changes in cartilage status were not related to the MJSW and JLCA. The clinical outcome was not related to the MJSW, either. Level of evidence Cohort study; level III.

Is there any benefit in the combined ligament reconstruction with osteotomy compared to ligament reconstruction or osteotomy alone?: Comparative outcome analysis according to the degree of medial compartment osteoarthritis with anterior or posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of middle-aged patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) insufficiency by assessing different groups: high tibial osteotomy (HTO), HTO with combined ligament reconstruction, and isolated ligament reconstruction according to the alignment change and medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2019, middle-aged (40-65 years) patients with knee instability were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were categorized into three groups: group I, HTO; group II, HTO with combined ACL or PCL reconstruction; and group III, isolated ligament reconstruction. Radiological outcomes, including Kellgren-Lawrence grade, mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, and posterior tibial slope were compared. Knee stability and clinical outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients completed the final assessment. Group I was older than other two groups (p = 0.006). Groups I and II had a higher body mass index (p = 0.043) and more preoperative varus alignment than group III (p < 0.001). OA severity was ranked in the order of group I, II, and III (p < 0.001). Group I showed more valgus alignment than group II after HTO (p = 0.024 for mFTA and 0.044 for WBL ratio, respectively). Compared to their preoperative status, all three groups showed significant improvement in knee stability (p < 0.001); however, group I showed inferior knee stability regardless of ACL or PCL reconstruction (p < 0.001 and 0.043, respectively). All clinical scores significantly improved in the three groups (p < 0.001), and they showed comparable clinical outcomes in the final assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our strategy in managing middle-aged patients with knee instability according to the varus alignment and medial degeneration showed favorable stability and clinical outcomes. Middle-aged patients with knee instability should be managed with different strategies depending on their status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study; Level-III.

Clinical relevance of roll-back replacement of ultra congruent total knee arthroplasty: comparison of mid-term outcomes with posterior stabilizing design.

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain controversial, and we do not know which factors are important for successful outcomes. This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes of different conceptual designs by evaluating the radiological and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 478 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were enrolled and allocated into groups I [posterior stabilizing (PS) with anterior referencing (AR)], II [PS with posterior referencing (PR), and III [ultra-congruent (UC) TKA)]. Preoperative findings, last follow-up clinical outcomes, and final follow-up radiological and indirect assessments of the femoral rollback were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 72.6 ± 12.9 months. The tourniquet was used samely applied to every group. Flexion contracture was significantly larger in group III than in groups I and II (3.3 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), and further flexion was significantly smaller in group III (130.0° ± 2.7°, p < 0.001). Among the radiological parameters, posterior osteophyte formation was the most common in group III (67.8%). The rollback distance was significantly smaller in group III than in groups I and II (p < 0.001). The active deep flexion angle was affected by the posterior condylar offset (PCO) ratio, and the contact point changed the distance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PS TKAs showed better ROMs than UC TKAs; however, no differences were noted in the clinical outcome scales. The flexion angle was affected by the PCOR and rollback at both PS and UC TKAs. However, rollback negatively affected the flexion angle during UC TKAs. An inappropriate femoral rollback was identified, and femoral osteophyte formation was determined to be the most prominent in UC TKAs. Level of evidence Level III comparative study.

Postoperative rehabilitation using a digital healthcare system in patients with total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Digital healthcare systems based on augmented reality (AR) show promise for postoperative rehabilitation. We compared the effectiveness of AR-based rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly allocated 56 participants to digital healthcare rehabilitation group (DR group) and conventional rehabilitation group (CR group). Participants in the CR group performed brochure-based home exercises for 12 weeks, whereas those in the DR group performed AR-based home exercises that showed each motion on a monitor and provided real-time feedback. The primary outcome was change in 4-m gait speed. The secondary outcomes were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, health-related quality of life [assessed by the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ5D5L) questionnaire], pain [measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS)], Berg Balance Scale (BBS), range of motion (ROM), and muscle strength. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T0) and 3 (T1), 12 (T2), and 24 (T3) weeks after randomization. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics of participants between two groups, except age and body mass index. No group difference was observed in 4-m gait speed (0.37 ± 0.19 and 0.42 ± 0.28 for the DR and CR groups, respectively; p = 0.438). The generalized estimating equation model revealed no significant group by time interaction regarding for 4-m gait speed, WOMAC, EQ5D5L, NRS, BBS, ROM, and muscle strength score. All outcomes were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of a digital healthcare system based on AR improved the functional outcomes, pain, and quality of life of patients after TKA. AR-based rehabilitation may be useful treatment as an alternative to conventional rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04513353). Registered on August 9, 2020. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04513353 .

Editorial Commentary: Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Knee High Tibial Osteotomy Addresses the Bony but Not the Soft-Tissue Aspect of Deformity Correction.

Both bony and soft-tissue components should be considered during preoperative planning and intraoperative performance of knee high tibial osteotomy to achieve accurate correction. 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation may aid in addressing the bony component. Even with appropriate preoperative planning for bony and soft-tissue correction, appropriate adjustments must be made intraoperatively to achieve successful outcomes, and accurate correction is impossible unless the soft-tissue component is considered.

Excessively Increased Joint-Line Obliquity After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Is Associated With Inferior Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes: What Is Permissible Joint-Line Obliquity.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the permissible joint-line obliquity (JLO) based on radiologic and clinical outcomes with midterm follow-up after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). METHODS: Patients who had undergone MOWHTO from March 2014 to May 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. They were divided into 4 groups based on JLO as represented by postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Radiologic parameters including MPTA, joint-line orientation angle (JLOA), joint-line convergence angle (JLCA), posterior tibial slope, weightbearing line ratio (WBLR), and coronal translation were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Index, and short-form 36 health survey (SF-36). The changes between preoperation and final follow-up in JLOA and MPTA were defined as ΔJLOA and ΔMPTA. RESULTS: A total of 135 knees were finally included (MPTA ≤90.32° as group I; 90.33° to 92.62° as group II; 92.74° to 95.22° as group III; and ≥95.23° as group IV). The last follow-up MPTA, JLOA, and JLCA values were different between the groups (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .015, respectively). WBLR and JLOA positively correlated with MPTA; however, WBLR showed an abrupt increase at MPTA >96.5°, and the JLOA distribution tended to be greater than the regression line at MPTA >96°. Moreover, ΔJLOA was not as large as ΔMPTA. The percentage of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference was significantly lower in the AKSS-functional score and SF-36 physical component summary in group IV (P = .008 and 0.021, respectively). CONCLUSION: The JLOA did not change as much as the MPTA, but an MPTA >95.2° abruptly increased the JLOA and valgus overcorrection after MOWHTO. Poor clinical outcomes were more evident in excessive MPTA (>95.2°) than in mildly undercorrected or properly corrected MPTA (<95.2°). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Additional tying on the adjustable-loop device improves the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify the efficacy of a novel technique for additional tying on the adjustable-loop device to prevent stress concentration on the graft loop end and gradual loop lengthening. METHODS: A total of 124 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts from 2014 to 2017 were included in this retrospective study. After 1:1 propensity score matching, two groups were formed (group I: 50 patients without tying vs. group II: 50 patients with tying). Anterior laxity was evaluated using side-to-side differences. Tunnel length, loop length, and graft-tunnel gap were measured using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. The signal-to-noise ratio was calculated at the loop end, loop inner side, tunnel entrance, and graft mid-substance. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, pivot shift test, and Lachman test. RESULTS: The average follow-up period was 63.2 ± 4.8 and 53.8 ± 11.9 months in groups I and II, respectively. Anterior laxity showed that side-to-side differences improved significantly 6 months postoperatively in both the groups. Although the anterior laxity improved in group II (2.9 ± 1.0 to 1.6 ± 0.8, p < 0.001), it deteriorated in group I (2.5 ± 1.5 to 3.3 ± 1.3 mm, p < 0.001) at the final follow-up. The graft-tunnel gap was significantly larger in group I (p < 0.001). The signal-to-noise ratios of the loop end and loop inner side were significantly higher in group I (p < 0.001 and p = 0.020, respectively). The clinical outcomes at the final follow-up were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: The additional tying on the adjustable-loop device was not superior to the control group in clinical stability examination or outcome. However, it was effective in anterior laxity measured by stress radiographs, preventing stress on the adjustable-loop device, and gradual graft loop lengthening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A web-based machine-learning algorithm predicting postoperative acute kidney injury after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a deleterious complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purposes of this study were to identify preoperative risk factors and develop a web-based prediction model for postoperative AKI, and assess how AKI affected the progression to ESRD. METHOD: The study included 5757 patients treated in three tertiary teaching hospitals. The model was developed using data on 5302 patients from two hospitals and externally validated in 455 patients from the third hospital. Eighteen preoperative variables were collected and feature selection was performed. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) was used to predict AKI. A tenfold-stratified area under the curve (AUC) served as the metric for internal validation. Calibration was performed via isotonic regression and evaluated using a calibration plot. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) was followed up for an average of 41.7 months. RESULTS: AKI develops in up to 10% of patients undergoing TKA, increasing the risk of progression to ESRD. The ESRD odds ratio of AKI patients (compared to non-AKI patients) was 9.8 (95% confidence interval 4.3-22.4). Six key predictors of postoperative AKI were selected: higher preoperative levels of creatinine in serum, the use of general anesthesia, male sex, a higher ASA class (> 3), use of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, and no use of tranexamic acid (all p < 0.001). The predictive performance of our model was good (area under the curve 0.78 [95% CI 0.74-0.81] in the developmental cohort and improved in the external validation cohort (0.89). Our model can be accessed at https://safetka.net . CONCLUSIONS: A web-based predictive model for AKI after TKA was developed using a machine-learning algorithm featuring six preoperative variables. The model is simple and has been validated to improve both short- and long-term prognoses of TKA patients. Postoperative AKI may lead to ESRD, which surgeons should strive to avoid. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level II.

Editorial Commentary: Tibial Slope Should Be Naturally Maintained by Proper Posterior Cortical Osteotomy and Gap Distraction in Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

The tibial slope usually increases after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) because of several factors. The anteromedial cortex of the proximal tibia is angulated 45° relative to the posterior cortex, whereas the lateral cortex is nearly perpendicular. Therefore, an OWHTO with equal anterior and posterior gaps will increase the tibial slope. In addition, an anteromedial approach to the proximal tibia because of concern about neurovascular injury results in the failure to perform a proper osteotomy of the posterolateral cortex. Slope-optimization methods include a sagittally oriented hinge, posterior bone grafting, posterior plating, and forcefully extending the knee to compress the anterior gap sagittally oriented hinge, posterior positioning of the wedged plate, and knee extension during fixation. However, if the tibial slope is easily controlled using knee extension, this may indicate fracture of the lateral hinge, whereas a preserved lateral hinge is a prerequisite for a successful OWHTO. Most of all, a proper posterior cortical osteotomy is the key step to preventing increased tibial slope in OWHTO. Again, if an incomplete osteotomy is performed posterolaterally, the opening gap is increased anteriorly, leading to an unnecessary increase in posterior tibial slope; for biplanar osteotomy, retrotubercular osteotomy should be performed close to the patellar tendon and not be advanced to the posterolateral side of the hinge.