Lack of beneficial effects of low-dose radiation therapy on hand osteoarthritis symptoms and inflammation: a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) is widely used as treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) in some countries, while relatively unknown in others. Systematic literature review displayed a lack of high-level evidence for beneficial effects in clinical practice. The aim was to assess the efficacy of LDRT on symptoms and inflammation in hand OA patients in a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial, using validated outcome measures. DESIGN: Hand OA patients, ≥50 years, with pain ≥5 (scale 0-10) and non-responding to conservative therapy were included and randomised 1:1 to receive LDRT (6 × 1 Gy in 2 weeks) or sham (6 × 0 Gy in 2 weeks). Primary outcome was the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders, 3 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes were pain and functioning (Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index; AUSCAN), quality of life (Short Form Health Survey; SF36) and inflammatory outcomes: erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein serum levels, effusion, synovial thickening and power Doppler signal on ultrasound (range 0-3). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included. After 3 months, no significant difference in responders was observed between groups (LDRT: 8 (29%); sham: 10 (36%); difference -7% (95%CI -31-17%)). Also, differences in clinical and inflammatory outcomes between groups were small and not significant. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to demonstrate a substantial beneficial effect of LDRT on symptoms and inflammation in patients with hand OA, compared to sham treatment. Although a small effect can not be excluded, a treatment effect exceeding 20% is very unlikely, given the confidence interval. Therefore, in the absence of other high-level evidence, we advise against the use LDRT as treatment for patients with hand OA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4574 (Dutch Trial Register).

The efficacy and safety of low-dose radiotherapy on pain and functioning in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Low-dose radiotherapy (LD-RT) has been widely used for treatment of non-malignant disorders since its introduction and animal studies show anti-inflammatory effects in osteoarthritis (OA). However, the evidence for its effect in clinical practice remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to systematically summarise the literature on effectiveness of LD-RT on pain and functioning in patients with OA and its safety. Broad search terms were used to search PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Primary inclusion criteria were osteoarthritis as indication, radiotherapy as intervention, written in English, German or Dutch and published since 1980. Study quality was assessed using the EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (scale: strong, moderate, weak). Seven studies were suitable for inclusion, all with retrospective uncontrolled observational design. Methodological quality of all studies was judged as weak. Most studies used 2-3 RT sessions per week for 2 weeks, some with booster session after 6 weeks. Generally, non-validated single-item measurement instruments were used to evaluate the effect of LD-RT on pain and function. Across the studies, in 25-90 and 29-71 % of the patients pain and functioning improved, respectively. Side effects were described in one study, none were reported. Our results show that there is insufficient evidence for efficacy or to confirm the safety of LD-RT in treatment of OA, due to absence of high-quality studies. Therefore, a well-designed, sham-controlled and blinded randomised trial, using validated outcome measures is warranted to demonstrate the value of LD-RT for OA in clinical practice.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: The discussion on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated according to current guidelines is still ongoing. A multicentre, randomized phase III trial, PROCTOR-SCRIPT, was conducted to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with observation for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision (TME). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial recruited patients from 52 hospitals. Patients with histologically proven stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to observation or adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and TME. Radiotherapy consisted of 5 × 5 Gy. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 25 × 1.8-2 Gy combined with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/LV (PROCTOR) or eight courses capecitabine (SCRIPT). Randomization was based on permuted blocks of six, stratified according to centre, residual tumour, time between last irradiation and surgery, and preoperative treatment. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Of 470 enrolled patients, 437 were eligible. The trial closed prematurely because of slow patient accrual. Patients were randomly assigned to observation (n = 221) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 216). After a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 5-year overall survival was 79.2% in the observation group and 80.4% in the chemotherapy group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.39; P = 0.73]. The HR for disease-free survival was 0.80 (95% CI 0.60-1.07; P = 0.13). Five-year cumulative incidence for locoregional recurrences was 7.8% in both groups. Five-year cumulative incidence for distant recurrences was 38.5% and 34.7%, respectively (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: The PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial could not demonstrate a significant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and TME on overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence rate. However, this trial did not complete planned accrual. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Colorectal Cancer group, CKTO 2003-16, ISRCTN36266738.

Quality of life after prostate cancer treatments in patients comparable at baseline.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the effects of different prostate cancer treatments on quality of life, were confounded because patients were not comparable. This study examined treatment effects in more comparable groups. METHODS: From 2008-2011, 240 patients with localised prostate cancer were selected to be eligible for both radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Brachytherapy (BT) was a third option for some. Health-related quality of life was measured by expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) up to 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: In the sexual domain, RP led to worse summary scores (P<0.001) and more often to a clinically relevant deterioration from baseline than BT and EBRT (79%, 33%, 34%, respectively). In the urinary domain, RP also led to worse summary scores (P=0.014), and more deterioration from baseline (41%, 12%, 19%, respectively). Only on the irritative/obstructive urinary scale, more BT patients (40%) showed a relevant deterioration than RP (17%) and EBRT patients (11%). In the bowel domain, the treatment effects did not differ. CONCLUSION: This study provides a more unbiased comparison of treatment effects, as men were more comparable at baseline. Our results suggest that, for quality of life, radiotherapy is as least as good an option as RP for treating localised prostate cancer.

Maximal exercise performance in patients with postcancer fatigue.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to examine whether physical fitness of severely fatigued and non-fatigued cancer survivors, as measured by maximal exercise performance, is different between both groups and, if so, whether this difference can be explained by differences in physical activity, self-efficacy regarding the exercise test, and/or social support. METHODS: Severely fatigued (n = 20) and sex- and age-matched non-fatigued (n = 20) disease-free cancer survivors, who completed treatment for a malignant, solid tumor at least 1 year earlier, participated in this case-control study. Maximal oxygen consumption was measured during an incremental cycling exercise test. Physical activity was assessed via actigraphy. Self-efficacy regarding the test and social support were assessed via questionnaires to study its relationship with physical fitness. RESULTS: Maximal oxygen consumption was significantly lower in fatigued compared to non-fatigued participants. Actual physical activity, self-efficacy regarding the test, and negative interactions of social support were significantly different between both groups. However, after inclusion of these three variables in linear regression analyses, the difference in physical fitness between fatigued and non-fatigued cancer survivors persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal oxygen consumption, a measure for physical fitness, was reduced in severely fatigued compared to non-fatigued cancer survivors. The inferior maximal exercise performance cannot fully be explained by differences in physical activity, self-efficacy, or social support between both groups. Other currently still unknown factors, such as a disturbance in the cardiopulmonary circuit, may play a role.

The role of physical activity and physical fitness in postcancer fatigue: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Patients suffering from postcancer fatigue have both an inferior physical activity and physical fitness compared to non-fatigued cancer survivors. The aims of this study were (1) to examine the effect of cognitive behavior therapy, an effective treatment for postcancer fatigue, on physical activity and physical fitness and (2) to examine whether the effect of cognitive behavior therapy on postcancer fatigue is mediated by physical activity and/or physical fitness. METHODS: Severely fatigued cancer survivors were randomly assigned to either the intervention (cognitive behavior therapy) or the waiting list condition. After assigning 23 patients in the intervention condition and 14 patients in the waiting list condition, they were assessed both at baseline and 6 months later. Physical activity was assessed via actigraphy and physical fitness was assessed by a maximal exercise test. A nonparametric bootstrap approach was used to test the statistical significance of the mediation effects. RESULTS: A significant increase in physical activity was observed in the intervention group from baseline to follow-up, whereas physical activity did not change from baseline to follow-up in the waiting list group. Physical fitness did not significantly change after cognitive behavior therapy or after 6 months of waiting for therapy. Fatigue decreased more significantly in the intervention group than in the waiting list group. The mediation hypotheses were rejected. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavior therapy effectively reduced postcancer fatigue and increased physical activity but did not change physical fitness. The effect of cognitive behavior therapy on postcancer fatigue is not mediated by a change in physical activity or physical fitness.

In primary breast cancer the mitotic activity yields similar prognostic information as the histological grade: a study with long-term follow-up.

We evaluated with long-term follow-up, the prognostic value of the mitotic activity index (MAI) and the volume corrected mitotic index (M/V-index) compared with that of the histological grade in breast cancer patients not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy. Of 739 consecutive patients living in the city of Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 477 patients with primary unilateral breast cancer were not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and eligible for the study. In multivariate survival analyses the MAI and M/V-index showed similar hazard ratios (HRs) compared to HRs of histological grade for overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.45, 1.48, and grade II versus grade I (GII/GI) 1.34, grade III versus grade I (GIII/GI) 1.53, respectively) and for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) (HR: 1.27, 1.57, and (GII/GI) 1.57 (GIII/GI) 2.32, respectively). Other independent prognostic variables for OS and BCSS were age at diagnosis, tumour size, and number of positive lymph nodes. In the present study with long term follow-up, we compared the prognostic value of mitotic activity with that of histological grade and found no advantage for the mitotic activity in predicting either BCSS or OS and concluded that histological grade and the mitotic activity were equally informative in predicting patient outcome. As histological grade is a well established and widely used prognosticator we do not have arguments to replace the histological grade by the mitotic indices MAI or M/V-index.

Mesoscale oceanographic processes beneath the ice of fram strait.

A major component of the Fram Strait Marginal Ice Zone Experiment was the investigation of air-sea-ice interactions, processes, and circulation patterns found behind the local ice edge and on scales greater than 10 kilometers (mesoscale and large scale). Neutrally buoyant floats, ice-tethered cyclesondes, and helicopter-based measurements were used to obtain uniquely integrated and consistent views of the mesoscale ocean features beneath the ice cover of Fram Strait. Within the vicinity of the Yermak Plateau, three distinct regions of mesoscale motion were observed that coincided with the shallow topography of the plateau, the northward flowing Atlantic water over the western flank of the plateau, and the strong current-shear zone of the East Greenland Polar Front. A subice meander of the front was also observed, which was probably occluded subsequently.

Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study.

PURPOSE: Preoperative short-term radiotherapy improves local control in patients treated with total mesorectal excision (TME). This study was performed to assess the presence and magnitude of long-term side effects of preoperative 5 x 5 Gy radiotherapy and TME. Also, hospital treatment was recorded for diseases possibly related to late side effects of rectal cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Long-term morbidity was assessed in patients from the prospective randomized TME trial, which investigated the efficacy of 5 x 5 Gy before TME surgery for mobile rectal cancer. Dutch patients without recurrent disease were sent a questionnaire. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 597 patients, with a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Stoma function, urinary function, and hospital treatment rates did not differ significantly between the treatment arms. However, irradiated patients, compared with nonirradiated patients, reported increased rates of fecal incontinence (62% v 38%, respectively; P < .001), pad wearing as a result of incontinence (56% v 33%, respectively; P < .001), anal blood loss (11% v 3%, respectively; P = .004), and mucus loss (27% v 15%, respectively; P = .005). Satisfaction with bowel function was significantly lower and the impact of bowel dysfunction on daily activities was greater in irradiated patients compared with patients who underwent TME alone. CONCLUSION: Although preoperative short-term radiotherapy for rectal cancer results in increased local control, there is more long-term bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients than in patients who undergo TME alone. Rectal cancer patients should be informed on late morbidity of both radiotherapy and TME. Future strategies should be aimed at selecting patients for radiotherapy who are at high risk for local failure.

No downstaging after short-term preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: In retrospective studies, total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery has been demonstrated to result in a reduction in the number of local recurrences of rectal cancer. Reports on improved local control after preoperative, hypofractionated radiotherapy have led to the introduction of a randomized multicenter trial to evaluate the effect of TME surgery with and without preoperative radiotherapy. Treatment with preoperative radiotherapy might have an effect on the pathologic characteristics that determine staging of rectal cancer. We investigated the occurrence of downstaging in rectal cancer patients treated with and without preoperative radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the differences in tumor size, number of examined lymph nodes, tumor-node-metastasis stage, and histopathologic features in 1,321 patients entered onto a randomized trial. The trial compared preoperative radiotherapy (5 x 5 Gy) followed by TME surgery with TME surgery alone. Patients who had an interval of more than 10 days between the start of radiotherapy and surgery were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Differences were observed in tumor size (P <.001) and total number of examined lymph nodes (P <.001). No difference in tumor or node classification was detected. The irradiated group demonstrated more poorly differentiated tumors as well as more mucinous tumors. CONCLUSION: In rectal cancer patients, short-term, preoperative radiotherapy with 5 x 5 Gy does not lead to downstaging if the interval between the start of radiotherapy and surgery does not exceed 10 days.

Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer has been shown to result in a reduction in the number of local recurrences in retrospective studies. Reports on improved local control after preoperative, hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) have led to the introduction of a prospective randomized multicenter trial, in which the effect of TME surgery with or without preoperative RT were evaluated. Any benefit in regard to a reduced local recurrence rate and possible improved survival must be weighed against potential adverse effects in both the short-term and the long-term. The present study was undertaken to assess the acute side effects of short-term, preoperative RT in rectal cancer patients and to study the influence of five doses of 5 Gy on surgical parameters, postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients randomized in the Dutch TME trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1,530 Dutch patients entered onto a prospective randomized trial, comparing preoperative RT with five doses of 5 Gy followed by TME surgery with TME surgery alone, of which 1,414 patients were assessable. Toxicity from RT, surgery characteristics, and postoperative complications and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Toxicity during RT hardly occurred. Irradiated patients had 100 mL more blood loss during the operation (P <.001) and showed more perineal complications (P =.008) in cases of abdominoperineal resection. The total number of complications was slightly increased in the irradiated group (P =.008). No difference was observed in postoperative mortality (4.0% v 3.3%) or in the number of reinterventions. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hypofractionated RT is a safe procedure in patients treated with TME surgery, despite a slight increase in complications when compared with TME surgery only.

Decreased coronary heart disease in hypertensive smokers. Mortality results from the MAPHY study.

The present primary prevention study aimed at investigating whether metoprolol given as initial antihypertensive treatment would lower cardiovascular complications of high blood pressure to a greater extent than thiazide diuretics. Patients were randomized to metoprolol (n = 1,609, 8,110 patient-years) or a thiazide diuretic (n = 1,625, 8,070 patient-years). At randomization, 535 patients in the metoprolol group and 524 patients in the diuretic group were classified as smokers. Blood pressure control during follow-up was equally effective regardless of smoking habits at randomization. Cardiovascular and coronary heart disease mortality was three to four times higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, underlining the importance of smoking as a risk factor. Total and cardiovascular mortality were significantly lower for the metoprolol group than for the thiazide diuretic group in the whole study population (p = 0.028 and p = 0.012), as well as in smokers (p = 0.013 and p = 0.016). Coronary heart disease mortality was significantly lower for patients on metoprolol than for patients on diuretics in the whole study population (p = 0.048) as well as in smokers (p = 0.021). The results suggest that initial antihypertensive therapy with metoprolol is associated with a lesser incidence of total, cardiovascular, and coronary heart disease mortality as compared with initial diuretic treatment, both in the whole study population and in smokers. The favorable effect of metoprolol must be mediated via mechanisms other than the blood pressure-lowering effect of metoprolol because equal blood pressure control was achieved with both types of medication, irrespective of smoking habits at randomization.

Metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics in hypertension. Morbidity results from the MAPHY Study.

The present study in hypertensive men (40-64 years old) with untreated diastolic blood pressure above 100 mm Hg was aimed at investigating whether metoprolol (n = 1,609) given as initial treatment would lower the risk for coronary events (sudden death and myocardial infarction) more effectively than thiazide diuretics (n = 1,625). A substantial part of this study was the metoprolol arm of the Heart Attack Primary Prevention in Hypertension (HAPPHY) study. The HAPPHY study was a pooling of the effect of different beta-blockers, mainly metoprolol and atenolol, in which no favorable effect in relative risk was observed for atenolol as compared with diuretics. In the present study, 255 patients suffered definite coronary events during follow-up; 25% of these events were fatal, 39% were acute myocardial infarctions, and 36% were silent myocardial infarctions. The risk for coronary events was significantly lower in patients on metoprolol than in patients on diuretics (111 versus 144 cases, p = 0.001, corresponding to 14.3 versus 18.8 cases/1,000 patient years and a relative risk of 0.76 at the end of the trial; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.98). This difference in risk has potentially important implications for clinical practice because of the large number of hypertensive patients who are at increased risk for coronary events. Because a placebo group, for ethical reasons, could not be included, relative risk can only be expressed in relation to diuretics. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in baseline characteristics, blood pressure during follow-up, or stroke rates. Thus, the difference in risk for coronary events is probably mediated via mechanisms other than blood pressure control. However, present data might suggest that different beta-blockers may have different efficacy in preventing coronary events. The reasons for this possibility are as yet unknown.

Surveillance versus adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I non-seminomatous testicular cancer: a decision analysis.

In stage I non-seminomatous testicular cancer, the decision between surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy rests heavily upon the valuation of quality of life. Decision analysis was used to assess at what relapse rate adjuvant chemotherapy is preferred when patients' and clinicians' evaluations are considered. Probabilities were obtained from the literature and from experts. Evaluations of the disease states were obtained from patients (n = 68) and clinicians (n = 50). Results from the model were compared with a treatment preference question, asking for the relapse rate directly. Adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred at relapse rates above 50% when patient evaluations were used. The evaluations of the disease states had a strong impact on the decision. Using clinician evaluations, adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred at relapse rates above 73%. The relapse rates from the treatment preference question were lower: 46% for patients and 35% for clinicians. The results indicate that when patient preferences are accounted for, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered more often.

Training in radiotherapy in The Netherlands.

The training in radiotherapy in The Netherlands is an example of a master apprentice system. In this overview we will discuss the organization and describe the official bodies involved in the Dutch training programs. Also the contents and the system of accreditation are presented.

Education in radiation oncology in Europe.

The outcome of an inventory among 22 European countries with respect to the radiotherapy facilities and the training of new radiation oncologists in each country is described. The radiotherapeutic profession, which mostly prescribes also cytostatics or hormones, has become well-regulated in the last 20 years. Most radiation oncologists are also involved in the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of the cancer patient. The numbers of radiotherapists and other staff, treatment capacities, and patients are given. The training for radiation oncologists is mostly taken at the university centers, but the curricula are rather diverse.

Isolated late local recurrences with high mitotic count and early local recurrences following breast-conserving therapy are associated with increased risk on distant metastasis.

PURPOSE: Local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is associated with an increased risk for the development of distant metastasis. We studied risk factors for distant metastasis risk (DMR) and poor prognosis within a group of patients with LR as first event. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a cohort of 1481 breast carcinomas treated with BCT in the period 1980-1994, a total of 68 pT1-3 N0-1 patients developed LR as first event. We have studied risk factors for the development of distant metastasis within this group of patients with LR. In addition to clinical factors (age at BCT and LR, mode of detection, location of LR, and treatment of LR), the histology slides of the primary and the recurrent tumor were reviewed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for the following proteins: bcl-2, cyclin D1, E-cadherin, EGF receptor, ER, PR, Ki-67, c-erbB-2/neu, and p53. Statistical analyses were performed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: At a median follow-up after LR of 5.6 years, the 5-year DMR was 53%. In univariate analysis, none of the factors of the primary tumor was found to be associated with DMR after LR. Of the recurrent tumor the following factors were found to be risk factors for high DMR after LR: interval between treatment of the primary tumor and LR at 2 years or less (relative risk, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.76; p = 0.008) and high mitotic count (relative risk, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-6.15; p = 0.04). All patients with noninvasive recurrent tumor were alive at the time of analysis. Patients with an interval of greater than 2 years and a recurrent tumor with high mitotic count were found to have an equally poor prognosis compared to patients with LRs detected after a short interval. CONCLUSION: LR after BCT is associated with higher DMR and poor prognosis. Patients with LR within 2 years after BCT are especially at high risk. Late recurrences with high mitotic count have the same poor prognosis as early recurrences. For these patients, systemic treatment at time of the detection of LR should be considered.

Local irradiation alone for peripheral stage I lung cancer: could we omit the elective regional nodal irradiation?

PURPOSE: The results of local irradiation only for patients with Stage I lung cancer were analyzed to see whether the treatment of regional lymph nodes could be omitted. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and eight medically inoperable patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (T1 and peripheral T2) were treated with 60 Gy split course or 65 Gy continuous treatment. The target volume included the primary tumor only, without regional lymph nodes. Response, survival, and patterns of failure were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 85% with 50 (46%) complete responses (CRs). Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 31 and 15%, and cancer-specific survival was 42 and 31% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. The actuarial 5 years local relapse free survival in patients with a CR was 52%. Tumor size (< or = 4 cm) was strongly correlated with the chance of complete remission and better survival. Of patients in complete remission, only two had a regional recurrence as the only site of relapse; an additional two patients had a locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSION: High-dose local radiotherapy on the primary tumor only is justified for medically inoperable patients with peripherally located nonsmall lung cancer. The low regional relapse rate does not support the need for the use of large fields encompassing regional lymph nodes. Using small target volumes, higher doses can be given and better local control rates can be expected.

Electron beam therapy is not inferior to superficial x-ray therapy in the treatment of skin carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare recurrence rates and cosmetic results after electron beam therapy vs. superficial x-ray therapy for nonmelanoma skin carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 389 histologically confirmed basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, treated with either superficial x-rays or electron beam therapy, with regard to local control rates and cosmetics, as scored with an arbitrary three-point scale. RESULTS: The overall local recurrence rate was 4.9% (19 out of 389). For small tumors (irradiated surfaces < or = 10 cm2) a local recurrence rate of 2.2% was observed, both after electron beam therapy and after superficial x-ray therapy. Tumor size and previous treatment proved to be important prognostic factors with regard to control rate. The well-fractionated electron beam therapy yielded better cosmetic results than the large fraction superficial x-ray therapy. CONCLUSION: Electron beam treatment is not inferior to superficial x-ray treatment and even better for larger tumors. The inferior results of electron beam therapy reported in literature might be due to technical factors, which are discussed.

Local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer: high incidence in young patients and association with poor survival.

PURPOSE: To study risk factors for local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for invasive breast cancer and, for patients with an LR, the mode of detection, location, treatment, influence of radiation therapy, and impact on survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 1360 patients (median age 52 years; range 24-88) with a total of 1393 pT1-2 N0-1 tumors treated with BCT between 1980-1994 were studied (median follow-up 52 months). The adequacy of radiation treatment of the patients developing LR was studied in a quality control study. The impact of LR on overall survival and distant metastasis was studied in a Cox regression model with LR as a time-dependent covariate. RESULTS: A total of 88 LR occurred with a 5- and 10-year LR risk of 8 and 12%. Age was the only significant risk factor. Compared to patients > 65 years old, patients < 45 years old and patients 45-65 years old had a relative risk (RR) of 4.09 and 2.41, respectively, of developing LR. Risk on LR was found to increase gradually with younger age. Radiation therapy was considered adequate and did not play a role in influencing the LR rate. Almost 65% of the LR were true or marginal recurrences. Of all LR, 80% appeared during the first 5 years and were detected with equal frequency by the patient herself, the physician, and annual mammography. LR was a major predictor for distant metastasis (RR: 4.90; 3.15-7.62) and death (RR: 4.29; 2.93-6.28). CONCLUSION: Young age is a major risk factor for LR and there is a significant gradual increase in LR with decreasing age. LR is associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis and death. Whether LR is the cause of or a marker for distant metastasis remains unresolved.