[Oncological Disease and Pregnancy Denial: Psychological Support and Interdisciplinary Collaboration]. / Onkologische Erkrankung und Verleugnung einer Schwangerschaft: Psychologische Begleitung und interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit.

In the following casuistry, a denied advanced pregnancy was discovered during the diagnosis of an oncological disease. Faced with a life-threatening condition, the patient urged late termination of the pregnancy and was introduced to psychological counselling in order to find a viable and ethically justifiable solution. Strategies for crisis intervention and supportive approaches in the patient's care as well as interdisciplinary collaboration are presented and discussed.

[Patient concerns and palliative psychology interventions within an inpatient palliative care service]. / Patientenseitige Anliegen und palliativpsychologische Interventionen im Rahmen eines stationären Palliativdienstes.

BACKGROUND: Multi-professional inpatient palliative care services are increasingly complementing palliative care in hospitals alongside palliative care units. The present study aims to investigate the nature and frequency of patient concerns and palliative psychological interventions in the context of palliative psychological work, as well as the perceived quality of outcomes in an inpatient palliative service. METHODS: Palliative psychological interventions for terminally ill patients at the inpatient palliative care service at Leipzig University Hospital were investigated in a prospective follow-up evaluation study. Psychological distress (distress thermometer) as well as the perceived quality of the results of the palliative psychological support (from the therapist`s perspective) were recorded. Patient concerns and psychological conversation topics and interventions were recorded. Descriptive and regression analytic procedures were used. RESULTS: Over a year, 355 patients in the inpatient palliative care service received psychological support, 304 participated in the study (mean age 63.8 years, 55% male, 89% oncological disease). An average of 3 palliative psychological interviews were conducted; 64% of patients reported high psychological distress (M=6.5). The most common patient concerns and topics within the interviews were dealing with emotions (87%), resources (83%), conflicting care and autonomy issues (77%) and hope (76%); significantly less common were spiritual concerns (2%) or the patient's legacy (9%). The most frequently used palliative psychological interventions included: support in illness processing and acceptance (74%) or in emotional-relieving interventions (98%) as in normalisation (75%), active listening (97%) or emotional containment (95%). Regression analysis showed that an oncological (vs. non-oncological) disease, a high number of palliative psychological interviews and interventions, comprehensive information regarding the palliative dimension of the diagnosis as well as undisturbed contact in the initial interview had a positive effect on the perceived outcome quality. CONCLUSION: The study results show that palliative psychologists play an important role in inpatient palliative care teams and should be involved as early as possible in the course of the disease. There is a need for improvement, especially in the palliative psychological care of non-oncological patients.

[Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy in Psycho-Oncological Care]. / Sinnzentrierte Psychotherapie in der psychoonkologischen Versorgung.

Being diagnosed with cancer is commonly associated with psychological distress. Especially patients with advanced disease report a range of distinct symptoms that are referred to as existential distress. The conceptualization of existential distress is mainly characterized by the loss of a sense of meaning and purpose in life resulting from the confrontation with a life-threatening disease. Existential distress has a significant impact on health care outcomes and quality of life. It has been found to be associated with suicidal ideation, even in the absence of mental disorders such as depression. Meaning-centered psychotherapy offers effective interventions with regard to reducing existential distress in cancer patients.

Efficacy of the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) individual psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: A single-blind randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) therapy is superior to a non-manualized supportive psycho-oncological counselling intervention (SPI). METHODS: Adult patients with advanced cancer and ≥9 points on the PHQ-9 and/or ≥5 points on the DT were randomized to CALM or SPI. We hypothesized that CALM patients would report significantly less depression (primary outcome) on the BDI-II and the PHQ-9 6 months after baseline compared to SPI patients. RESULTS: From 329 eligible patients, 206 participated (61.2% female; age: M = 57.9 [SD = 11.7]; 84.5% UICC IV stage). Of them, 99 were assigned to CALM and 107 to SPI. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significantly less depressive symptoms at 6 months than at baseline (P < .001 for BDI-II and PHQ-9), but participants in the CALM and SPI group did not differ in depression severity (BDI-II: P = .62, PHQ-9: P = .998). Group differences on secondary outcomes were statistically not significant either. CONCLUSIONS: CALM therapy was associated with reduction in depressive symptoms over time but this improvement was not statistically significant different than that obtained within SPI group.

[Supportive Care and Information Needs of Cancer Survivors: A Comparison of Two Cohorts of Longterm Cancers Survivors 5 and 10 Years after Primary Cancer Diagnosis]. / Bedürfnisse nach Information und Unterstützung bei Krebspatienten: ein Kohortenvergleich von Langzeitüberlebenden fünf und zehn Jahre nach einer Krebsdiagnose.

OBJECTIVES: Addressing information and supportive care needs could enhance cancer survivors' ability to cope with the long-term and/or late effects of their disease. The study examines how long-term cancer survivors evaluate information received during the course of cancer and aims to identify supportive care needs. METHODS: The data were collected in a cross-sectional cancer registry cohort study including 1002 patients (participation rate 53%, five years post diagnosis n=660 (65.9%), 10 years post diagnosis n=342 (34.1%), mean age 66.7 years, male 52.9%, prostate cancer 25.5%). The survey instruments used included the SCNS-SF34-G, the PHQ-9, GAD-7, the Distress-Thermometer (DT) and a questionnaire measuring comorbidities. Descriptive and inference statistics were applied. RESULTS: Cancer Survivors perceived information on treatment decision-making as most helpful, whereas information about support offers was perceived as least helpful. One in 5 patients (19.6%) expressed a desire for further information. The majority of patients (81.3%) indicated at least one specific unmet supportive care need, on average 11 (SD=7.14) unmet supportive care needs. Most frequent supportive care needs are related to fear of cancer progression or recurrence, physical comorbidities and the wish for one member of the professional health care team with whom they can talk to continuously about medical issues across the treatment period. Higher physical comorbidity and distress are associated with an increased likelihood of further supportive care needs (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a need for survivorship care models that take into account medical aspects and psychosocial needs through a multidisciplinary approach.

[Psychoonkologie]. / Psychoonkologie.

Cancer is one of the most common diseases in adults. Despite an increasing incidence worldwide, many people survive the disease today. The multimodal therapies that prolong life affect patients' quality of life. For many patients, survival therefore also means a life with physical and psychosocial problems. Psycho-oncology offers evidence-based care for patients and their relatives.

[Outpatient Psychosocial Cancer Care at a University Medical Center - Study Results Concerning Patient Characteristics and Care Needs]. / Psychosoziale Versorgung von Krebspatienten in einer Krebsberatungsstelle an einem Universitätsklinikum.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial care for cancer patients has gained importance in recent years and psycho-oncological counselling centers (POCC's) offer a wide range of services in this area. We investigated the scope and content of a POCC at a university medical center. METHODS: The presented data were collected at the POCC at University Medical Center Leipzig in 2014. In total, 469 cancer patients participated (mean age 60 years, 67% female, 36% breast cancer). Psychosocial distress and psychopathology were assessed with the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and the NCCN Distress Thermometer. Descriptive statistics were analyzed. RESULTS: 1 in 4 patients (24%) reported at least moderate levels of depressive symptoms. Patients with hematological malignancies and head and neck tumors showed stronger depressive symptoms. 15% of patients suffered from elevated levels of anxiety. The average number of reported problems on the Distress Thermometer and Problem List was 14 out of 39. Physical and psychosocial problems were most prevalent (e. g. fatigue, problems getting around, anxiety). Supportive care needs were less common than reported problems. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a close network of POCS, oncological inpatient and outpatient care can help direct patients toward psychosocial care at an early stage. Psychosocial screening enables psycho-oncologists to identify problem areas and offer tailored counselling services.

[Stigmatizing Attitudes towards Cancer Patients--Results of a Representative Population Survey]. / Stigmatisierende Einstellungen gegenüber Krebspatienten--Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsbefragung.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate stigmatizing attitudes towards cancer patients in the general population and to examine their association with socio-structural characteristics and perceived causes of disease. METHODS: We recruited a representative sample from the German general population (n=2420; mean age: 52 years; 54% women). Stigmatizing attitudes were assessed with a 9-item scale. Predictors of stigmatizing attitudes were identified using a regression analysis. RESULTS: Agreement with stigmatization items ranged from 3.6% (item: work together with a cancer patient) to 18.9% (item: use the same dishes as a cancer patient). Perceived causes of disease with a high levels of personal responsibility showed only weak correlations with stigmatizing attitudes (all r<0.31) and were partially statistical significant (e. g. food intake) or not significant (e. g. alcohol). The strongest predictors of stigmatizing attitudes were lack of cancer-related experiences (Beta=-0,26), age <60 years (Beta=0,1) and the assumption that one cannot protect oneself from cancer (Beta=0,11) (all p<0.001). Further predictors were male gender and living in rural area (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate a need for further research and the development of valid methodological instruments to assess stigmatization towards cancer patients.

The Relationship between Supportive Care Needs and Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Patients.

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and supportive care needs (SCNs) in cancer patients. It is difficult to relate SCNs to detriments in QoL since SCNs and QoL assessment tools generally comprise different dimensions that cannot be directly related to each other. Therefore, we developed a short questionnaire with eight dimensions for uniformly measuring SCNs, QoL, and the subjective importance of these dimensions. A total of 1108 cancer patients with mixed diagnoses assessed eight dimensions of health-related QoL concerning SCNs, satisfaction, and importance. Among the eight dimensions of QoL, physical functioning received the highest SCN assessments (M = 3.4), while autonomy (M = 20.7) and social relationships (M = 1.88) were the dimensions with the lowest SCN mean scores on the 1-5 scale. For each of the eight dimensions, high levels of SCNs were reported by those patients who had low levels of satisfaction with that dimension (r between -0.32 and -0.66). The subjective importance of the dimensions was not consistently correlated with SCNs (r between -0.19 and 0.20). Females reported higher SCNs than males in six of the eight specific dimensions. Patients with prostate and male genital cancers reported the lowest SCNs. These results suggest gender-specific SCN patterns that warrant further exploration. This study highlights the value of a unified assessment instrument for SCNs and QoL, providing a robust basis for future cancer care strategies.

Supportive care needs and health-related quality of life in cancer patients receiving palliative care.

Objective: Cancer patients receiving palliative care experience a variety of impairments in their quality of life (QoL), and have corresponding supportive care needs (SCNs). The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between SCNs, satisfaction with QoL dimensions, and the perceived importance of these dimensions. Method: A sample of 152 cancer patients receiving palliative care were included in this cross-sectional study. Eight dimensions of QoL were defined and assessed concerning SCNs, satisfaction, and subjective importance using a new assessment instrument with five-point scales (range 1-5) for each dimension. Results: Among the eight specific domains examined, the greatest SCNs were observed for absence of pain (M = 3.18; SD = 1.29). The patients were least satisfied with their physical functioning (M = 2.60; SD = 0.84), and the dimension social relationships (M = 4.14; SD = 0.72) received the highest perceived importance ratings. The eight dimensions' SCNs scores were significantly correlated with each other (r between 0.29 and 0.79); the lowest correlations were found for social relationships. The correlations between the satisfaction scores and the SCNs differed from dimension to dimension, with coefficients between -0.32 (absence of pain) and - 0.57 (sleep quality). Conclusion: The results show that detriments in QoL do not automatically indicate high levels of SCNs in those dimensions. Health care providers should consider both factors, QoL (as measured with QoL questionnaires) and subjectively expressed SCNs, to optimize their patients' care regimens.

The German version of the body image scale: Validation and item response analysis in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To translate the cancer-specific Body Image Scale (BIS) into German and assess its psychometric properties. METHODS: The BIS was translated in accordance with current guidelines. In a prospective, cross-sectional two center study (psychosocial counselling center for cancer patients Leipzig, oncological inpatient ward Berlin), we assessed composite reliability and factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis. Additional item response theory (IRT) modelling was performed. Convergent validity was assessed via correlation with the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS) as well as psychological symptom burden (PHQ-9, GAD-2 and Distress Thermometer). Discriminant validity was assessed via demographic and clinical group comparisons. RESULTS: 677 patients participated (response rate 78%). Composite reliability was 0.95 and the one-factor structure was confirmed (standardized root mean square residual = 0.051, average variance extracted ≥50%, no indications of local dependence). In IRT models, all items had a discriminating power above the established threshold of b = 0.5 and relatively high "difficulty" parameters (b = 0.89-2.06). The BIS was negatively correlated with the BAS (rho = -0.62, p < 0.001) and positively with psychological symptom burden (e.g. PHQ-9: rho = 0.49, p < 0.001). Patients who were younger, female, had undergone chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery and those who were distressed by fatigue, their appearance or sexual problems had significantly higher BIS scores. CONCLUSION: The German version of the BIS is a valid tool to assess BID in patients with cancer that is now available for clinical or research contexts.

Attitudes toward a COVID-19 vaccine and vaccination status in cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE: We aim to assess attitudes toward a COVID-19 vaccine and vaccination status in cancer patients and to explore additional factors such as the level of information and comprehensibility and accessibility of this information, anxiety symptoms in general and toward COVID-19, and general health literacy. METHODS: We included 425 outpatients (mean age 61.4, age range 30-88 years, 60.5% women) of the Psychosocial Counseling Center for Cancer patients of the Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig. We recorded attitudes toward a COVID-19 vaccine and vaccination status via self-report. The impact of psychosocial factors, including anxiety (GAD-7), COVID-19-specific anxiety (OCS; FCV-19S) and health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16) were analyzed with point-biserial correlations using Pearson's r. RESULTS: We found that the vast majority (95.5%) reported being vaccinated against COVID-19 and that overall trust in safety and protective effects of a COVID-19 vaccine was high (90.9%). The vaccination readiness among nonvaccinated cancer survivors was low to very low with "fear of side effects" the most mentioned (72.2%) reason against a COVID-19 vaccine. There was no significant correlation between vaccination status and fear or anxiety symptomatology, and health literacy. Obsessive thoughts about COVID-19 was significantly higher in nonvaccinated cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of respondents are positive about COVID-19 vaccine, accompanied by a very high rate of COVID-19 immunization in our sample. Further studies with a larger sample of nonvaccinated cancer patients should further investigate the relationship on fear and vaccination hesitancy and align communication strategies accordingly.

The relationship of quality of life and distress in prostate cancer patients compared to the general population.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is two-fold. The first part compares quality of life (QoL) data of prostate cancer patients with those of a representative and age-specific sample of the general population and analyzes the influence of cancer related as well as socio-demographic parameters on QoL. Secondly, differences in QoL depending on the experienced psychological distress will be shown both in prostate cancer patients and in the general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 265 prostate cancer patients completed both the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) during their stay in the hospital. A total HADS cut off score of 15 was used to indicate psychological distress and significant emotional concerns in patients and men of the general population. The results of the patients were compared with those of the general population (N=444). RESULTS: Prostate cancer patients reported significantly worse levels of social and emotional functioning as well as more symptoms like insomnia, constipation and diarrhea compared to the general population. Patients and men of the general population with a total HADS score >/=15 reported lower QoL in all sub-scales except for diarrhea in comparison to people without distress. DISCUSSION: Psychological distress is accompanied by lower QoL and therefore should be taken into consideration when QoL is assessed. Furthermore, clinicians should be trained by professionals to detect distress in their patients and to pay more attention to their emotional concerns, which are strongly associated with the patients' well-being and QoL during their stay in hospital.