[Treatment, clinical course, and cross-sectoral information transmission in patients with acute-on-chronic kidney injury]. / Behandlung, klinischer Verlauf und sektorenübergreifende Informationsübermittlung bei Patienten mit akut-auf-chronischer Nierenschädigung.

BACKGROUND: Delayed diagnosis and undertherapy of acute-on-chronic kidney injury (AKI-on-CKD) may trigger multiple organ injury and worsen clinical outcome. OBJECTIVES: This study focused on description of in-hospital care and cross-sectoral information transmission of patients with AKI-on-CKD including subgroup analyses (under surgical vs. non-surgical and nephrology vs. non-nephrology care). MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a university clinic, we analysed clinical measures and documentation in patients with AKI-on-CKD. Cox regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital-mortality and 180-day mortality. RESULTS: In 38 (25.3%) of 150 patients, progressing AKI-on-CKD was found. Nineteen patients (12.7%) received acute dialysis. Thirty patients (20.0%) died in hospital. Systemic hypotension (n = 76, 50.7%) and nephrotoxins (n = 26, 17.3%), both considered as causes for AKI-on-CKD, were treated in 36.8 and 19.2%, respectively, of affected patients. Fluid balance was documented in one third of patients. Nephrology referral was requested in 38 (25.3%) of patients (median 24.0 h after AKI-on-CKD start). Acute renal complications (n = 74, 49.3%) were an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (ExpB 6.5, p = 0.022) or 180-day mortality (ExpB 3.3, p = 0.034). Rarely, outpatient physicians were informed about AKI-on-CKD (n = 42, 28.0%) or renal function follow-up was recommended (n = 14, 11.7% of surviving patients). CONCLUSIONS: Care gaps in therapy and cross-sectoral information transmission in patients with AKI-on-CKD were identified.

Basic resuscitation skills of medical students - a monocenter randomized simulation trial.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate resuscitation skills, defined as recognition of resuscitation situations and performance of Basic Life Support (BLS) in students at the Brandenburg Model Medical School (BMM). Methods: Participating students (n=102) were randomized to different simulation scenarios: unconscious person with physiological breathing (15/min), gasping (<10/min) and apnea (resuscitation dummy AmbuMan® Wireless with electronic recording). Primary endpoint was the proportion of students with correct decision for or against resuscitation. Secondary endpoint was resuscitation quality, self-assessment, and prior resuscitation experience. The latter two were assessed by questionnaire prior to the simulated situation. Results: Overall, there was a high risk for incorrectly omitted or incorrectly performed resuscitation (OR 3.4 [95% CI 1.4-8.1] p=0.005. The highest probability of error occurred in the unconsciousness and gasping groups. 22.3% of all performed resuscitations where at the same time indicated and reached the European Resuscitation Council recommendations for compression frequency, pressure depth and where as well = 90% relieved. A particularly large discrepancy emerged between participants' self-assessment of being prepared for a resuscitation situation by medical school and their actual documented resuscitation competence. Conclusion: The present data indicate significant uncertainty among students in recognizing a resuscitation situation. Even in curricula with a high proportion of practice and a high degree of students with completed vocational training in health care, resuscitation competence is poor.