Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer ; 124(3): 537-545, 2018 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29044496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of immune checkpoint and targeted therapy, many patients with melanoma ultimately require further treatment. The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB) has demonstrated promising activity in a single-arm study. In the current study, the authors performed a randomized phase 2 study to confirm efficacy and to determine whether adding everolimus would increase the activity of the combination. METHODS: Through the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, a total of 149 patients with unresectable AJCC 6th edition stage IV melanoma were randomized from May 2010 to May 2014 to either CPB or CPB with everolimus (CPBE). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), response rate, and tolerability. RESULTS: The CPB and CPBE treatment arms were balanced with regard to age (median age: 59 years vs 58 years) and high lactate dehydrogenase (48% vs 51%), but were unbalanced with regard to sex (male sex: 72% vs 55%; P = .03). Overall, there was no difference noted with regard to PFS, with a median PFS of 5.6 months for CPB versus 5.1 months for CPBE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81-1.62 [P = .44]), or for OS, with a median OS of 14.5 months for CPB versus 10.8 months for CPBE (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.84). The confirmed response rate was 13% for CPB and 23% for CPBE (P = .13). Toxicity was higher for CPBE compared with CPB (83% for grade 3 + and 14% for grade 4 + vs 63% for grade 3 + and 11% for grade 4+, respectively) (toxicities were graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Common grade 3 + toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, and fatigue, which occurred in both treatment arms with comparable frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Both experimental arms demonstrated activity, with a PFS of >5 months. However, the addition of everolimus to CPB failed to improve outcomes, with increased toxicity noted. These findings replicate the moderate antitumor activity of CPB, with future development possibly in combination with targeted or immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:537-45. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Everolimo/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidade , Melanoma/secundário , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 25(3): 308-12, 2002 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12040295

RESUMO

KW-2189, a semisynthetic duocarmycine antibiotic has been shown to exert antiproliferative effects against human tumor cell lines in vitro and animal tumor models in vivo. Phase I studies identified myelosuppression as the most noteworthy adverse effect. Presented are two concurrent phase II studies assessing the antitumor and toxicity profile of KW-2189 in metastatic melanoma patients. One of the studies accrued patients with a history of prior melanoma therapy and the other accrued patients without a history of prior melanoma therapy. KW-2189 was administered at 0.4 mg/m2 to previously treated patients and 0.5 mg/m2 to the previously untreated. Treatment was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 6-week cycle. Thirty previously untreated and 15 previously treated patients were accrued. The toxicity profiles of the both groups of patients were similar. Of the 15 previously treated patients, 8 completed once cycle of treatment, 2 completed 2 cycles, and 5 completed 3 cycles. Dose modification for neutropenia/ thrombocytopenia was necessary in six patients. Among the previously untreated cohort (30 patients), 16 completed 1 cycle, 5 completed 2 cycles, 4 completed 3 cycles, 3 completed 4 cycles, and 2 completed 6 cycles. Doses were modified (neutropenia or thrombocytopenia) in 11 patients. None of the 15 previously treated patients responded to therapy. Four patients remained stable during two cycles. Five of the previously untreated patients achieved a partial remission/regression. Response duration ranged from 2.8 to 16.6 months. Overall objective response rate was 17%. Regarding survival, one previously treated patient is still alive 2.9 years after study entry, and three previously untreated patients are still alive 1.6, 2.3, and 2.9 years after study entry. The 1-year survival rate for previously treated patients is 27% and for the untreated patients is 23%. In summary, the lack of significant antitumor activity of KW-2189 and its associated toxicity suggest that further testing of this regimen in patients with stage IV melanoma is not warranted.


Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapêutico , Duocarmicinas , Humanos , Melanoma/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA